Criticising  the non-entity Horrorist Mohan Bhagwat’s suggestion on a review of the reservation
policy, BSP chief Mayawati on Tuesday warned of a nationwide protest if
the government made any attempt to “tamper” with the quota system.

“If the Murderer
of democratic institutions (Modi) tries to toe non-entity supporting the
manusmriti  Horrorist Bhagwat’s line, if it tries to
tamper with the provision of reservation as enshrined in the
Constitution, then the BSP will launch a nationwide agitation which will
prove costly for the government,” she said.

Suspecting
that the “government can definitely do something in one way or the
other to tamper with the arrangement of reservation”, Mayawati said her
party would “keep a vigil on the issue”. 

Claiming
that Horrorist Bhagwat’s remarks had led to a lot of anguish among
SC/STs, Mayawati said that “so far neither the Modi nor the Bahuth Jiyadha Paapis have come out openly to reject the demand of the RSS.”

1% intolerant, militant, violent, shooting, lynching cannibals of stealth hindutva cult  Rowdy Swayam Sevak  chitpawan brahmin out of hatred
want to push SC/STs and the downtrodden back into the “dark ages of
exploitation by burying them without knowing that they are seeds that sprouts as Bodhi Trees.

http://www.liveind24.com/hi/america-enlisted-rss-in-one-of-the-biggest-terrorist-organisation-in-the-world/

Increasing
threats to the democratic-secular polity from the hindutva
organizations - a concise document on the anti-national game-plan of the
RSS

RSS
chief Horrorist Mohan Bhagwat is saying ‘the cultural identity is
hindutva’ which has got nothing to do with spirituality. It is just a
political cult.

The 20th century descriptions of this 1% non-entity EVIL PSYCHOPATH MINDS WITH INTOLERANCE, HATRED, ANGER,
JEALOUSY, DELUSION, VIOLENCE, MILITANCY OF SHOOTING, LYNCHING CANNIBALS  chitpawan brahmin  Rowdy Swayam Sevaks Goonslist
inordinate frugality, untrustworthiness, conspiratorialism, phlegmatism
not only murder democracy but also the real spirituality of this
nation. 

The
true cultural identity of this country is Jambudvipan that is Prabuddha
Bharath since all belong to the same race with Buddha Nature practicing
equality, fraternity and liberty as enshrined in the Constitution based
on Dhamma. 

Haughty
behavior by the upstart chitpvan brahmins caused conflicts with other
communities which manifested itself as late as in 1948 in the form of
anti-Brahminism after the killing of M.K. Gandhi by nathuram godse, a
chitpavan brahmin just as  Bal Gangadhar Tilak , Gopalkrishna Gokale.

After
the fall of the Maratha Empire in 1818, the chitpavan brahmins lost
their political dominance to the British.The British would not subsidize
the chitpavan brahmins on the same scale that their caste-fellow, the
Peshwas had done in the past. Pay and power was now significantly
reduced. Poorer chitpavan brahmin students adapted and started learning
English because of better opportunities in the British administration.
Some of the strongest resistance to change also came from the very same
community. Jealously guarding their brahmin stature, the orthodox among
the chitpavan brahmins were not eager to see the shastras challenged,
nor the conduct of the brahmins becoming indistinguishable from that of
the sudras. The vanguard and the old guard clashed many times. The
chitpavan brahmin community includes two major politicians in the
Gandhian tradition: Gopal Krishna Gokhale whom he acknowledged as a
preceptor, & Vinoba Bhave, one of his outstanding disciples. Gandhi
describes Bhave as the Jewel of his disciples, and recognized Gokhale as
his political guru.However,strong opposition to Gandhi also came from
within the chitpavan brahmin  community.V D Savarkar,the founder of the
Hindu nationalist political ideology hindutva  is castiest and communal,
militant, violent, intolerant,  stealth political cult greed of power
hating all the non-chitpavan brahimins which is anger that is madness
requiring treatment in mental asylums, was a chitpavan brahmin.

Several
members of the chitpavan community were among the first to embrace d
hindutva ideology, which they thought was a logical extension of the
legacy of the Peshwas and caste-fellow Tilak. These chitpavans felt out
of place with the Jambudvipan social reform movement of Mahatama Phule
and the mass politics of Mr.M.K. Gandhi. Large numbers of the community
looked to Savarkar, the hindu mahasabha and finally the RSS. Gandhi’s
assassins narayan apte and nathuram godse, drew their inspiration from
fringe groups in this reactionary trend.

Therefore, the RSS chief Horrorist Mohan Bhagwat is saying ‘the cultural identity  is hindutva’ covering the above facts.

On
kobras (the konkanastha chitpavan brahmin Community) of West of the
Country. The chitpavan or chitpawan, are brahmins native to the Konkan
with a sizeable Christian Protestant who after the British left grabbed
all churches, hospitals, schools, colleges to become their owners and
started their practice of untouchability against all the non-chitpawan
brahmins.

Until
the 18th century,the chitpavan brahmins were not esteemed in social
ranking and were indeed considered by other brahmin tribes as being an
inferior caste of brahmins.It remains concentrated in Maharashtra but
also has populations all over the Country and rest of the world, (USA
& UK.) According to Bene Israeli legend, the Chitpavan and Bene
Israel are descendants from a group of 14 people shipwrecked off the
Konkan coast. several immigrant groups including the Parsis, the Bene
Israelis,the kudaldeshkar gaud brahmins, and the Konkani saraswat
brahmins, and the chitpavan brahmins were the last of these immigrant
arrivals.The satavahanas were  sanskritisers. It is possibly at their
time that the new group of chitpavan brahmins were formed.Also, a
reference to the  chitpavan surname ghaisas, written in Prakrut Marathi
can be seen on a tamra-pat (bronze plaque) of the Year 1060
A.D.belonging to the King Mamruni of Shilahara Kingdom, found at
Diveagar in Konkan. With the accession of balaji bhat and his family to
the supreme authority of the Maratha Confederacy, chitpavan immigrants
began arriving en masse from the Konkan to Pune where the Peshwa offered
all important offices his fellow-castemen. The chitpavan kin were
rewarded with tax relief & grants of land. Historians cite nepotism
& corruption as causes of the fall of the Maratha Empire in 1818.
Richard Maxwell Eaton states that this rise of the chitpavans is a
classic example of social rank rising with political fortune.
Traditionally, the chitpavan brahmins were a community of astrologers
and priests who offer religious services to other communities. The 20th
century descriptions of the chitpavans list inordinate frugality,
untrustworthiness, conspiratorialism, phlegmatism. Agriculture was the
second major occupation in the community, practiced by the those who
possess arable land. Later, chitpavans became prominent in various
whitecollar jobs and business. Most of the chitpavan brahmins in
Maharashtra have adopted Marathi as their language. Till the 1940s, most
of the chitpavans in Konkan spoke a dialect called chitpavani Konkani
in their homes. Even at that time, reports recorded chitpavani as a fast
disappearing language. But in Dakshina Kannada District and Udupi
Districts of Karnataka, this language is being spoken in places like
Durgaand Maala of Karkala taluk and also in places like Shishila and
Mundaje of Belthangady Taluk.There are no inherently nasalized vowels in
standard Marathi whereas the chitpavani dialect of Marathi does have
nasalized vowels. Earlier, d deshastha brahmins believed that they were
the highest of all brahmins, & looked down upon the chitpavans as
parvenus (a relative newcomer to a socioeconomic class),barely equal to
the noblest of dvijas. Even the Peshwa was denied the rights to use the
ghats reserved for Deshasth priests @ Nashik on the Godavari.Dis
usurping of power by chitpavans from the deshastha Brahmins resulted in
intense rivalry between the two brahmin communities which continued in
late Colonial British India times. The 19th century records also mention
Gramanyas or village-level debates between the Chitpavans, & two
other communities, namely the Daivajnas, and the Chandraseniya Kayastha
Prabhus. This lasted for about ten years.

RSS WANTS MANUSMRITI TO REPLACE DEMOCRATIC-SECULAR CONSTITUTION OF THIS COUNTRY

Half

a century ago, Dr.Ambedkar surveyed the existing data on the physical
anthropology of the different castes in his book The Untouchables.He
found that the received wisdom of a racial basis of caste was not
supported by the data,e.g.:The table for Bengal shows that the chandal
who stands sixth in the scheme of social precedence and whose touch
pollutes, is not much differentiated from the brahmin. In Bombay the
deshastha brahmin bears a closer affinity to the Son-Koli, a fisherman
caste, than to his own compeer, the chitpavan brahmin.  The Mahar, the
Untouchable of the Maratha region, comes next together with the Kunbi,
the peasant.  They follow in order the shenvi brahmin, the nagar brahmin
and the high-caste Maratha. These results  mean that there is no
correspondence between social gradation and physical differentiation in
Bombay. A remarkable case of differentiation in skull and nose indexes,
noted by Dr. Ambedkar, was found to exist between the brahmin and the
(untouchable) Chamar of Uttar Pradesh. But this does not prove that
brahmins are foreigners, because the data for the U.P. brahmin were
found to be very close to those for the Khattri and the untouchable
Chuhra of Punjab. If the U.P. brahmin is indeed foreign to U.P., he is
by no means foreign to India, at least not more than the Punjab
untouchables. This confirms the scenario which we can derive from the
Vedic and ItihAsa-PurANa literature:the Vedic tradition was brought east
from d Vedic heartland by brahmins who were physically
indistinguishable from the lower castes there, when the heartland in
Punjab-Haryana at its apogee exported its culture to the whole Aryavarta
(comparable to the planned importation of brahmins into Bengal and the
South around the turn of the Christian era).  These were just two of the
numerous intra-Indian migrations of caste groups.Recent research has
not refuted Ambedkar,s views. A press report on a recent anthropological
survey led by Kumar Suresh Singh explains:English anthropologists
contended that the upper castes of India belonged to the Caucasian race
and the rest drew their origin from Australoid types.The survey has
revealed this to be a myth.Biologically &linguistically, we are very
mixed, says Suresh Singh.The report says that the people of India have
more genes in common, and also share a large number of morphological
traits.  

There
is much greater homogenization in terms of morphological and genetic
traits at the regional level, says the report. For example, the brahmins
of Tamil Nadu (esp.Iyengars) share more traits with non-brahmins in d
state than with fellow brahmins in western or northern parts of the
country.

The
sons-of-the-soil theory also stands demolished. The Anthropological
Survey of India has found no community in India that cant remember
having migrated from some other part of the country.Internal migration
accounts for much of India’s complex ethnic landscape, while there is no
evidence of a separate or foreign origin for the upper castes.Among
other scientists who reject the identification of caste (varNa) with
race on physical-anthropological grounds, we may cite Kailash C.
Malhotra:Detailed anthropometric surveys carried out among the people of
Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Bengal and Tamil Nadu revealed
significant regional differences within a caste and a closer resemblance
between castes of different varnas within a region than between
sub-populations of the caste from different regions. On the basis of
analysis of stature, cephalic and nasal index, H.K. Rakshit (1966)
concludes that the Brahmins of India are heterogeneous & suggest
incorporation of more than one physical type involving more than one
migration of people.A more detailed study among 8 Brahmin castes in
Maharashtra on whom 18 metric,16 scopic and 8 genetic markers were
studied, revealed not only a great heterogeneity in both morphological
and genetic characteristics but also showed that 3 Brahmin castes were
closer to non-Brahmin castes than [to the] other Brahmin castes.  

P.P.
Majumdar and K.C. Malhotra (1974) observed a great deal of
heterogeneity with respect to OAB blood group system among 50 Brahmin
samples spread over 11 Indian states. The evidence thus suggests that
varna is a sociological and not a homogeneous biological entity.

http://www.countercurrents.org/islam130815.htm

This document underlines the following cardinal principles of the RSS world view:
(1)  RSS IDOLIZES FASCISM & NAZISM.
(2)  RSS WANTS MANUSMRITI TO REPLACE DEMOCRATIC-SECULAR CONSTITUTION .
(3)  RSS HAS ETERNAL BELIEF IN CASTEISM.
(4)  RSS DENIGRATES THE NATIONAL FLAG.
(5)  RSS AGAINST DEMOCRACY AND FOR TOTALITARIANISM.
(6)  RSS AGAINST FEDERALISM.
(7)  RSS’ HATRED FOR SC/STs MUSLIMS & CHRISTIANS.
(8)  RSS AGAINST COMPOSITE INDIAN NATIONALISM.

(1) RSS IDOLIZES FASCISM& NAZISM

Doubtlessly Hitler is a great hero for RSS. The RSS as great champions of
hindutva want to deprive minorities of their all civil and human rights
shamelessly and openly adhering to the totalitarian models of Hitler.
This fascist outlook towards minorities specially Muslims and Christians
was clearly elaborated by the senior ideologue of the RSS, MS
Golwalkar, in his book, We or Our Nationhood Defined. This book
published in the year 1939, gives an insight into the thinking of the
RSS leadership. We find Golwalkar in this book idealizing the Nazi
cultural nationalism of Hitler in the following words:
“German Race
pride has now become the topic of the day. To keep up the purity of the
Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the
country of the Semitic Races—the Jews. Race pride at its highest has
been manifested here. Germany has also shown howwell-nigh impossible it
is for Races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be
assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindusthan to
learn and profit by.”
[MS Golwalkar, We Or Our Nationhood Defined, Bharat Publications, Nagpur, 1939, p. 35.]
Golwalkar
unhesitatingly wanted to model his hindu rashtra or Nation on Hitler’s
totalitarian and fascist pattern as is clear from the following words of
his in the same book:
“It
is worth bearing well in mind how these old Nations solve their
minorities [sic] problem. They do not undertake to recognize any
separate element in their polity. Emigrants have to get themselves
naturally assimilated in the principal mass of the population, the
National Race,by adopting its culture and language and sharing in its
aspirations, by losing all consciousness of their separate existence,
forgetting their foreign origin. If they do not do so, they live merely
as outsiders,bound by all the codes and conventions of the Nation, at
the sufferance of the Nation and deserving no special protection, far
less any privilege or rights. There are only two courses open to the
foreign elements, either to merge themselves in the national race and
adopt its culture, or to live at its mercy so long as the national race
may allow them to do so and to quit the country at the sweet will of the
national race. That is the only sound view on the minorities [sic]
problem. That is the only logical and correct solution. That alone keeps
the national life healthy and undisturbed. That alone keeps the nation
safe from the danger of a cancer developing into its body politic of the
creation of a state within a state.”
[MS Golwalkar, We Or Our Nationhood Defined, Bharat Publications, Nagpur, 1939, p. 47.]

(2) RSS WANTS MANUSMRITI TO REPLACE DEMOCRATIC-SECULAR CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

RSS
and its fraternal organization, hindu mahasabha were very angry when
Constituent Assembly adopted a democratic-Secular Constitution under the
supervision of Dr. BR Ambedkar. VD Savarkar as a manufacturer of
Hindutva believed:

“Manusmriti
is that scripture which is most worship-able after Vedas for our hindu
Nation and which from ancient times has become the basis of our
culture-customs, thought and practice. This book for centuries has
codified the spiritual and divine march of our nation. Even today the
rules which are followed by hindus in their lives and practice are based
on Manusmriti. Today Manusmriti is hindu Law”.

[VD
Savarkar, ‘Women in Manusmriti’ in Savarkar Samagar (collection of
Savarkar’s writings in Hindi), vol. 4, Prabhat, Delhi, p. 416.]

The
democratic-secular Indian Constitution was adopted by the Constituent
Assembly on November 26, 1949, RSSEnglish organ, Organizer in an
editorial on November 30, 1949, complained:

“But
in our constitution there is no mention of the unique
constitutionaldevelopment in ancient Bharat. Manu’s Laws were written
longbefore Lycurgus of Sparta or Solon of Persia. To this day his laws
as enunciated in the Manusmriti excite the admiration of the world
andelicit spontaneous obedience and conformity. But to our
constitutional pundits that means nothing”.

How loyal the RSS is to the Constitution of India can be known by the following statement of Golwalkar:

“Our
Constitution too is just a cumbersome and heterogeneous piecing
together of various articles from various Constitutions of the Western
countries. It has absolutely nothing which can be called our own. Is
there a single word of reference in its guiding principles as to what
our national mission is and what our keynote in life is? No!”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 238.]

(3) RSS HAS ETERNAL BELIEF IN CASTEISM

Golwalkar,
the most prominent ideologue of the RSS like Savarkar, believed that
Casteism was a natural integral part of Hinduism. In fact, Golwalkar
went to the extent of declaring that Casteism was synonymous with the
Hindu nation. According to him, the Hindu people are none else but,
“the
Virat Purusha, the Almighty manifesting himself… [according to purusha
sukta] sun and moon are his eyes, the stars and the skies are created
from his nabhi [navel] and Brahmin is the head, Kshatriya the hands,
Vaishya the thighs and Shudra the feet. This means that the people who
have this fourfold arrangement, i.e., the Hindu People, is [sic] our
God. This supreme vision of Godhead is the very core of our concept of
‘nation’ and has permeated our thinking and given rise to various unique
concepts of our cultural heritage.[Italics as in the original][MS
Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, pp.
36-37.]

(4) RSS DENIGRATESTHE NATIONAL FLAG

The
English organ of the RSS,Organizer (dated August 14, 1947) carried
afeature titled ‘mystery behind the bhagwa dhawaj’ (saffronflag) which
while demanding hoisting of saffron flag at theramparts of Red Fort in
Delhi, openly denigrated the choiceof the Tri-colour as the National
Flag in the following words:
“The people who have come to power by
the kick of fate maygive in our hands the Tricolour but it never be
respected andowned by Hindus. The word three is in itself an evil, and
aflag having three colours will certainly produce a very
badpsychological effect and is injurious to a country.”

Thus the National Flag was declared to be inauspicious and injurious forthis country!

(5) RSS AGAINST DEMOCRAY AND FOR TOTALITARIANISM

The
RSS since its inception loves absolute power. Golwalkar while
addressing the 1350 top level cadres of the RSS at its headquarters at
Nagpur in 1940 declared:
“The RSS inspired by one flag, one leader
and one ideologyis lighting the flame of Hindutva in each and every
corner ofthis great land.”
[MS Golwalkar, Shri Guruji Samagar Darshan
(collected works of Golwalkar in Hindi), Bhartiya Vichar Sadhna,
Nagpur, nd, vol. I, p. 11.]
This slogan of one flag, one leader and
one ideology was directly borrowed from the programmes of the Nazi and
Fascist Parties of Europe.

(6) RSS AGAINST FEDERALISM

On federalism Golwalkar sent the following message to the first session of the National Integration Council in 1961. It read:
“Today’s
federal form of government not only gives birth butalso nourishes the
feelings of separatism, in a way refuses torecognize the fact of one
nation and destroys it. It must becompletely uprooted, constitution
purified and unitary formof government be established.”

[MS
Golwalkar, Shri Guruji Samagar Darshan (collected works of Golwalkar in
Hindi), Bhartiya Vichar Sadhna, Nagpur, nd, vol. III, p. 128.]
These have not been some stray ideas of the RSS ideologue on the Indian
Federalism.
The Bible of the RSS, Bunch of Thoughts, has an exclusive chapter
titled, ‘Wanted a unitary state’ in which Golwalkar presenting his
remedy to the federal set-upof India wrote:
“The most important and effective step will be to bury deep for good all
talk
of a federal structure of our country’s Constitution, to sweepaway the
existence of all ‘autonomous’ or semi-autonomous ‘states’within the one
state viz., Bharat and proclaim ‘One Country, OneState, One Legislature,
One Executive’ with no trace offragmentational[sic], regional,
sectarian, linguistic or other types of pridebeing given a scope for
playing havoc with our integrated harmony.Let the Constitution be
re-examined and re-drafted, so as to establishthis Unitary form of
Government…”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 227.]

(7) RSS’ HATRED FOR SC/STs MUSLIMS& CHRISTIANS

Organizations
like the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), Hindu Jagran Manch (HJM) and
Bajrang Dal (BD), and other affiliates of the RSS after using Gujarat as
a laboratory for religious cleansing of minorities specially Christians
and Muslims for last so many years are spreading their tentacle
throughout India. The leaflets containing highly provocative statements
like,
“‘Muslims are filth of the gutter, don’t let them enter in your
houses’,or ‘Wherever Christian priests have gone in the world, they
loot thepeople. Lies and deceit are their religion. The Christian
priests teachpeople to tell lies, to steal in the name of religion…They
curse Hindus,and decry the Hindu religion. Awaken Hindus and struggle
againstthese thieves who lie, who rob you of your rights, and bring
thesepeople to their senses and put their pride in place’, or ‘One
additionin the population of Christians or Muslims is not only the
addition ofanti-Hindu but anti-national person.’”
[Leaflets circulated by the RSS offsprings like VHP, Hindu Jagaran Manch, and Bajrang Dal]

The
‘Holy’ book for the RSS cadres Bunch of Thoughts, has a long
chaptertitled as ‘Internal Threats’ in which Muslims and Christians are
described as threatnumber one and two respectively. This chapter opens
with the following statement:
“It has been the tragic lesson of the
history of many a country in theworld that the hostile elements within
the country pose a far greatermenace to national security then
aggressors from outside.”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 177.]

While treating Muslims as hostile element number one he goes on to elaborate,
“Even
to this day there are so many who say, ‘now there is no Muslimproblem
at all. All those riotous elements who supported Pakistan have gone away
once for all. The remaining Muslims are devoted toour country. After
all, they have no other place to go and they arebound to remain
loyal’….It would be suicidal to delude ourselves intobelieving that they
have turned patriots overnight after the creation ofPakistan. On the
contrary, the Muslim menace has increased ahundredfold by the creation
of Pakistan which has become aspringboard for all their future
aggressive designs on our country.”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, pp. 177-78.]
He goes on to spit venom against common Muslims in the following words:
“…within
the country there are so many Muslim pockets, i.e., so many ‘miniature
Pakistans’… The conclusion is that, in practically every place, there
are Muslims who are in constant touch with Pakistan over the
transmitter…”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 185.]
While deliberating on the ‘Internal Threat’ number two, he says,
“such
is the role of Christian gentlemen residing in our land today, out to
demolish not only the religious and social fabric of our life but also
to establish political domination in various pockets and if possible all
over the land.”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 193.]
Golwalkar, finally, following into the footsteps of Hitler had the followingsolution of the minority problem in India:
“From
this stand point, sanctioned by the experience of shrewd oldnations,
the foreign races in Hindusthan must either adopt the Hinduculture and
language, must learn to respect and hold in reverenceHindu religion,
must entertain no idea but those of the glorification ofthe Hindu race
and culture, i.e., of the Hindu nation and must losetheir separate
existence to merge in the Hindu race, or may stay in thecountry, wholly
subordinated to the Hindu Nation, claiming nothing,deserving no
privileges, far less any preferential treatment not evencitizen’s
rights. There is, at least should be, no other course for themto adopt.
We are an old nation: let us deal, as old nations ought toand do deal,
with the foreign races who have chosen to live in our country.”
[MS Golwalkar, We Or Our Nationhood Defined, Bharat Publications, Nagpur, 1939, pp. 47-48.]
The
RSS hatred for Muslims and Christians does not mean that it accords
equality to other religious Indian minorities like Sikhs, Buddhist and
Jains. It does not accord the status of independent religions to
Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism and treats them as part of Hinduism.

(8) RSS AGAINST COMPOSITE INDIAN NATIONALISM

Importantly,
the RSS organ Organizer in its issue on the very eve of Independence,
dated 14 August, 1947, rejected the whole concept of a composite nation
(under the editorial title ‘Whither’):
”Let us no longer allow
ourselves to be influenced by false notions of nationhood. Much of the
mental confusion and the present and future troubles can be removed by
the ready recognition of the simple fact that in Hindusthan only the
Hindus form the nation and the national structure must be built on that
safe and sound foundation […] the nation itself must be built up of
Hindus, on Hindu traditions, culture, ideas and aspirations”.
Shamsul Islam is a former professor of Delhi University
Email: notoinjustice@gmail.com
LINKS FOR MORE MATERIAL ON RSS/HINDUTVA
https://www.academia.edu/676529/Know_the_RSS
https://www.academia.edu/4101765/RSS_Ko_Pehchane_Hindi_version_of_KNOW_THE_RSS_
https://www.academia.edu/4122908/RSS_Marketing_Fascism_as_Hindutva
https://www.academia.edu/4727904/Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh_and_Politics_Conspiracy_is_the_Mantra
https://www.academia.edu/4898365/RSS_Ideologue_Nana_
Deshmukh_Condoned_The_Massacre_Of_Sikhs_In_1984
https://www.academia.edu/4209015/The_Freedom_Movement_and_
the_RSS_A_Story_of_Betrayal_Hindi_version_
https://www.academia.edu/676534/RSS_Primer_Based_on_RSS_Documents._Pages_36
https://www.academia.edu/2464034/RSS_s_Tryst_with_Terrorism_Past_and_Present
https://www.academia.edu/11936340/AAB_BARI_AMBEDKAR_KEE_Now_is_the_turn_of_Ambedkar_
https://www.academia.edu/11939187/Appropriation_of_Dr._Ambedkar_by_the_Hindutva_Camp
https://www.academia.edu/14838603/Return_of_Manu
http://www.academia.edu/4181477/Open_letter_to_Hindu_Nationalist_
and_Gujarat_Chief_Minister_Narendra_Modi_in_Gujarati_
http://www.academia.edu/4091454/Hindu_Nationalist_Narendra_Modi_ke_naam_khula-patr_an_open_letter_to_Hindu_Nationalist_Modi_
https://www.academia.edu/11939263/The_Hijacking_of_Babasaheb
https://www.academia.edu/10368127/GANDHIJI_S_MARTYRDOM_ANNIVERSARY_SARDAR_PATEL_HELD_
RSS_and_HINDU_MAHASABHA_RESPONSIBLE_FOR_HIS_MURDER
https://www.academia.edu/3502488/Not_the_First_Controversy_Over_Vande_Mataram_by_Shamsul_Islam
https://www.academia.edu/1103098/Tiranga_For_Muslims_And_Saffron_For_Hindus_By_Shamsul_Islam_
http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam
http://www.academia.edu/4209231/KNOW_THE_RASHTRIYA_SWAYAMSEVAK_SANGH_Gujarati_version_
https://www.academia.edu/11939516/Madhok_Makes_Stunning_Revelations
https://www.academia.edu/7203894/DOES_VD_SAVARKAR_S_PORTRAIT_DESERVE_TO_
BE_HANGED_AND_EULOGIZED_IN_THE_PARLIAMENT
https://www.academia.edu/3836921/Text_of_Savarkars_Mercy_
Petition_to_the_British_Masters_submitted_on_14-11-1913
https://www.academia.edu/1102526/Need_to_Indianise_the_RSS_By_Shamsul_Islam_
https://www.academia.edu/2023373/THE_DALIT_AGENDA_OF_HINDUTVA–Shamsul_Islam
https://www.academia.edu/2491823/WHO_IS_HELPING_THE_ISI_
OF_PAKISTAN_IN_FOMENTING_COMMUNAL_TROUBLE_IN_INDIA
https://www.academia.edu/3312354/CROSS-BREEDING_HUMAN_TIPS_FROM_GOLWALKAR_The_most_prominent_ideologue_of_Hindutva_

Please watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL1UNEAUaMU&hd=1

for

RSS Workers Beaten Protesting Students In Mumbai

http://www.assam123.com/rss-hindu-terrorist-training-camp-video/

for

RSS hindutva Horrorist Training Camp

Tipiṭaka (Kannada)

ತಿಪಿಟಕ (ಮೂಲ)

ವಿನಯಪಿಟಕ

ಸುತ್ತಪಿಟಕ

ದೀಘನಿಕಾಯ

ಸೀಲಕ್ಖನ್ಧವಗ್ಗಪಾಳಿ

೧. ಬ್ರಹ್ಮಜಾಲಸುತ್ತಂ

೨. ಸಾಮಞ್ಞಫಲಸುತ್ತಂ

೩. ಅಮ್ಬಟ್ಠಸುತ್ತಂ

೪. ಸೋಣದಣ್ಡಸುತ್ತಂ

೫. ಕೂಟದನ್ತಸುತ್ತಂ

೬. ಮಹಾಲಿಸುತ್ತಂ

೭. ಜಾಲಿಯಸುತ್ತಂ

೮. ಮಹಾಸೀಹನಾದಸುತ್ತಂ

೯. ಪೋಟ್ಠಪಾದಸುತ್ತಂ

೧೦. ಸುಭಸುತ್ತಂ

೧೧. ಕೇವಟ್ಟಸುತ್ತಂ

೧೨. ಲೋಹಿಚ್ಚಸುತ್ತಂ

೧೩. ತೇವಿಜ್ಜಸುತ್ತಂ

ಮಹಾವಗ್ಗಪಾಳಿ

೧. ಮಹಾಪದಾನಸುತ್ತಂ

೨. ಮಹಾನಿದಾನಸುತ್ತಂ

೩. ಮಹಾಪರಿನಿಬ್ಬಾನಸುತ್ತಂ

೪. ಮಹಾಸುದಸ್ಸನಸುತ್ತಂ

೫. ಜನವಸಭಸುತ್ತಂ

೬. ಮಹಾಗೋವಿನ್ದಸುತ್ತಂ

೭. ಮಹಾಸಮಯಸುತ್ತಂ

೮. ಸಕ್ಕಪಞ್ಹಸುತ್ತಂ

೯. ಮಹಾಸತಿಪಟ್ಠಾನಸುತ್ತಂ

೧೦. ಪಾಯಾಸಿಸುತ್ತಂ

ಪಾಥಿಕವಗ್ಗಪಾಳಿ

೧. ಪಾಥಿಕಸುತ್ತಂ

೨. ಉದುಮ್ಬರಿಕಸುತ್ತಂ

೩. ಚಕ್ಕವತ್ತಿಸುತ್ತಂ

೪. ಅಗ್ಗಞ್ಞಸುತ್ತಂ

೫. ಸಮ್ಪಸಾದನೀಯಸುತ್ತಂ

೬. ಪಾಸಾದಿಕಸುತ್ತಂ

೭. ಲಕ್ಖಣಸುತ್ತಂ

೮. ಸಿಙ್ಗಾಲಸುತ್ತಂ

೯. ಆಟಾನಾಟಿಯಸುತ್ತಂ

೧೦. ಸಙ್ಗೀತಿಸುತ್ತಂ

೧೧. ದಸುತ್ತರಸುತ್ತಂ