2125 Wed 1 Feb 2017 LESSONS Wishing May all be Happy, Well and Secure!! May all live long!!! May all have calm, quiet, alert, attentive and an Equanimity Mind with a Clear Understanding that everything is Changing!!!!
a very Happy Birthday to Navaneetham Chandrasekharan and all born on
1st February an auspicious month for the success of Techno, Politico,
Socio Transformation and Economic Emancipation Movement of DR BR
Ambedkar, Manyawar Kanshiram and Ms Mayawati of BSP!
Awakened One with Awareness came from a warrior caste and was naturally
brought into association with kings, princes and ministers. Despite His
origin and association, He never resorted to the influence of political
power to introduce His teaching, nor allowed His Teaching to be misused
for gaining political power. But today, many politicians try to drag
the Awakened One with Awareness’s name into politics by introducing Him
as a communist, capitalist, or even an imperialist. They have forgotten
that the new political philosophy as we know it really developed in the
West long after the Buddha’s time. Those who try to make use of the good
name of the Buddha for their own personal advantage must remember that
the Buddha was the Supremely Awakened One who had gone beyond all
worldly concerns.
is an inherent problem of trying to intermingle religion with politics.
The basis of religion is morality, purity and faith, while that for
politics is power. In the course of history, religion has often been
used to give legitimacy to those in power and their exercise of that
power. Religion was used to justify wars and conquests, persecutions,
atrocities, rebellions, destruction of works of art and culture.
religion is used to pander to political whims, it has to forego its
high moral ideals and become debased by worldly political demands.
thrust of the Awakened One with Awareness Dhamma is not directed to the
creation of new political institutions and establishing political
arrangements. Basically, it seeks to approach the problems of society by
reforming the individuals constituting that society and by suggesting
some general principles through which the society can be guided towards
greater humanism, improved welfare of its members, and more equitable
sharing of resources.
is a limit to the extent to which a political system can safeguard the
happiness and prosperity of its people. No political system, no matter
how ideal it may appear to be, can bring about peace and happiness as
long as the people in the system are dominated by greed, hatred and
delusion. In addition, no matter what political system is adopted, there
are certain universal factors which the members of that society will
have to experience: the effects of good and bad Cause and Effect , the
lack of real satisfaction or everlasting happiness in the world
characterized by dukkha (unsatisfactoriness), anicca (impermanence), and
anatta (egolessness). To the Awakened One with Awareness, nowhere in
Samsara is there real freedom, not even in the heavens or the world of
Brahama.
a good and just political system which guarantees basic human rights
and contains checks and balances to the use of power is an important
condition for a happy in society, people should not fritter away their
time by endlessly searching for the ultimate political system where men
can be completely free, because complete freedom cannot be found in any
system but only in minds which are free. To be free, people will have to
look within their own minds and work towards freeing themselves from
the chains of ignorance and craving. Freedom in the truest sense is only
possible when a person uses Dhamma to develop his character through
good speech and action and to train his mind so as to expand his mental
potential and achieve his ultimate aim of awakenment.
recognizing the usefulness of separating religion from politics and the
limitations of political systems in bringing about peace and happiness,
there are several aspects of the Awakened One with Awareness’s teaching
which have close correspondence to the political arrangements of the
present day. Firstly, the Awakened One with Awareness spoke about the
equality of all human beings long before Abraham Lincoln, and that
classes and castes are artificial barriers erected by society. The only
classification of human beings, according to the Buddha, is based on the
quality of their moral conduct. Secondly, the Awakened One with
Awareness encouraged the spirit of social -co-operation and active
participation in society. This spirit is actively promoted in the
political process of modern societies. Thirdly, since no one was
appointed as the Buddha’s successor, the members of the Order were to be
guided by the Dhamma and Vinaya, or in short, the Rule of Law. Until
today very member of the Sangha is to abide by the Rule of Law which
governs and guides their conduct.
the Awakened One with Awareness encouraged the spirit of consultation
and the democratic process. This is shown within the community of the
Order in which all members have the right to decide on matters of
general concern. When a serious question arose demanding attention, the
issues were put before the monks and discussed in a manner similar to
the democratic parliamentary system used today. This self-governing
procedure may come as a surprise to many to learn that in the assemblies
of Awakened One with Awareness 2,500 years and more ago are to be found
the rudiments of the parliamentary practice of the present day. A
special officer similar to ‘Mr. Speaker’ was appointed to preserve the
dignity of the Parliamentary Chief Whip, was also appointed to see if
the quorum was secured. Matters were put forward in the form of a motion
which was open to discussion. In some cases it was done once, in others
three times, thus anticipating the practice of Parliament in requiring
that a bill be read a third time before it becomes law. If the
discussion showed a difference of opinion, it was to be settled by the
vote of the majority through balloting.
Awakened One with Awareness approach to political power is the
moralization and the responsible use of public power. The Awakened One
with Awareness preached non-violence and peace as a universal message.
He did not approve of violence or the destruction of life, and declared
that there is no such thing as a ‘just’ war. He taught: ‘The victor
breeds hatred, the defeated lives in misery. He who renounces both
victory and defeat is happy and peaceful.’ Not only did the Awakened One
with Awareness teach non-violence and peace, He was perhaps the first
and only religious teacher who went to the battlefield personally to
prevent the outbreak of a war. He diffused tension between the Sakyas
and the Koliyas who were about to wage war over the waters of Rohini. He
also dissuaded King Ajatasattu from attacking the Kingdom of the
Vajjis.
Awakened One with Awareness discussed the importance and the
prerequisites of a good government. He showed how the country could
become corrupt, degenerate and unhappy when the head of the government
becomes corrupt and unjust. He spoke against corruption and how a
government should act based on humanitarian principles.
Awakened One with Awareness once said, ‘When the ruler of a country is
just and good, the ministers become just and good; when the ministers
are just and good, the higher officials become just and good; when the
higher officials are just and good, the rank and file become just and
good; when the rank and file become just and good, the people become
just and good.’(Anguttara Nikaya)
the Cakkavatti Sihananda Sutta, the Awakened One with Awareness said
that immorality and crime, such as theft, falsehood, violence, hatred,
cruelty, could arise from poverty. Kings and governments may try to
suppress crime through punishment, but it is futile to eradicate crimes
through force.
the Kutadanta Sutta, the Awakened One with Awareness suggested economic
development instead of force to reduce crime. The government should use
the country’s resources to improve the economic conditions of the
country. It could embark on agricultural and rural development, provide
financial support to entrepreneurs and business, provide adequate wages
for workers to maintain a decent life with human dignity.
the Jataka, the Awakened One with Awareness had given to rules for Good
Government, known as ‘Dasa Raja Dharma’. These ten rules can be applied
even today by any government which wishes to rule the country
peacefully. The rules are as follows:
A good ruler should act impartially and should not be biased and
discriminate between one particular group of subjects against another.
A good ruler must possess a clear understanding of the law to be
enforced. It should not be enforced just because the ruler has the
authority to enforce the law. It must be done in a reasonable manner and
with common sense. — (Cakkavatti Sihananda Sutta)
the Milinda Panha,it is stated: ‘If a man, who is unfit, incompetent,
immoral, improper, unable and unworthy of kingship, has enthroned
himself a king or a ruler with great authority, he is subject to be
tortured‚ to be subject to a variety of punishment by the people,
because, being unfit and unworthy, he has placed himself unrighteously
in the seat of sovereignty. The ruler, like others who violate and
transgress moral codes and basic rules of all social laws of mankind, is
equally subject to punishment; and moreover, to be censured is the
ruler who conducts himself as a robber of the public.’ In a Jataka
story, it is mentioned that a ruler who punishes innocent people and
does not punish the culprit is not suitable to rule a country.
king always improves himself and carefully examines his own conduct in
deeds, words and thoughts, trying to discover and listen to public
opinion as to whether or not he had been guilty of any faults and
mistakes in ruling the kingdom. If it is found that he rules
unrighteously, the public will complain that they are ruined by the
wicked ruler with unjust treatment, punishment, taxation, or other
oppressions including corruption of any kind, and they will react
against him in one way or another. On the contrary, if he rules
righteously they will bless him: ‘Long live His Majesty.’ (Majjhima
Nikaya)
Awakened One with Awareness’s emphasis on the moral duty of a ruler to
use public power to improve the welfare of the people had inspired
Emperor Asoka in the Third Century B.C. to do likewise. Emperor Asoka, a
sparkling example of this principle, resolved to live according to and
preach the Dhamma and to serve his subjects and all humanity. He
declared his non-aggressive intentions to his neighbors, assuring them
of his goodwill and sending envoys to distant kings bearing his message
of peace and non-aggression. He promoted the energetic practice of the
socio-moral virtues of honesty, truthfulness, compassion, benevolence,
non-violence, considerate behavior towards all, non-extravagance,
non-acquisitiveness, and non-injury to animals. He encouraged religious
freedom and mutual respect for each other’s creed. He went on periodic
tours preaching the Dhamma to the rural people. He undertook works of
public utility, such as founding of hospitals for men and animals,
supplying of medicine, planting of roadside trees and groves, digging of
wells, and construction of watering sheds and rest houses. He expressly
forbade cruelty to animals.
the Awakened One with Awareness is said to be a social reformer. Among
other things, He condemned the caste system, recognized the equality of
people, spoke on the need to improve socio-economic conditions,
recognized the importance of a more equitable distribution of wealth
among the rich and the poor, raised the status of women, recommended the
incorporation of humanism in government and administration, and taught
that a society should not be run by greed but with consideration and
compassion for the people. Despite all these, His contribution to
mankind is much greater because He took off at a point which no other
social reformer before or ever since had done, that is, by going to the
deepest roots of human ill which are found in the human mind. It is only
in the human mind that true reform can be effected. Reforms imposed by
force upon the external world have a very short life because they have
no roots. But those reforms which spring as a result of the
transformation of man’s inner consciousness remain rooted. While their
branches spread outwards, they draw their nourishment from an unfailing
source — the subconscious imperatives of the life-stream itself. So
reforms come about when men’s minds have prepared the way for them, and
they live as long as men revitalize them out of their own love of truth,
justice and their fellow men.
doctrine preached by the Awakened One with Awareness is not one based
on ‘Political Philosophy’. Nor is it a doctrine that encourages men to
worldly pleasures. It sets out a way to attain Eternal Bliss as Final
Goal. In other words, its ultimate aim is to put an end to craving
(Tanha) that keeps them in bondage to this world. A stanza from the
Dhammapada best summarizes this statement: ‘The path that leads to
worldly gain is one, and the path that leads to Eternal Bliss as Final
Goal(by leading a religious life)is another.’
this does not mean that Awakened One with Awareness cannot or should
not get involved in the political process, which is a social reality.
The lives of the members of a society are shaped by laws and
regulations, economic arrangements allowed within a country,
institutional arrangements, which are influenced by the political
arrangements of that society. Nevertheless, if a Buddhist wishes to be
involved in politics, he should not misuse religion to gain political
powers, nor is it advisable for those who have renounced the worldly
life to lead a pure, religious life to be actively involved in politics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6PcVOe0Uqk
BSP MISSION 2017 - Behenji Mayawati Song
2124 Tue 31 Jan 2017 LESSONS
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/56871903.cms
Kumari Mayawati School-teacher-turned politician, Mayawati has many
‘firsts’ under her name. She was the first chief minister of Uttar
Pradesh to complete a full term of five years in office.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/55844050.cms?
DEMONetisation won’t hit BSP campaign, says Mayawati
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/56202024.cms
BJP targeting me because I am a SC and opposed DEMONetisation: Mayawati.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/56563462.cms
Only BSP can stop BJP from coming to power: Mayawati
As the EVMs were tampered gobble the Master Key by Congress, BJP, SP
and all their allies which are vultures of a father flock together to
feed on the bodies of Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies except Ms
Mayawati’s BSP Real-Time IoT Poll Tracking Display will never be
introduced.
RSSised Modi is Trumpised and Trump is RSSised.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/56871903.cms
Kumari Mayawati School-teacher-turned politician, Mayawati has many
‘firsts’ under her name. She was the first chief minister of Uttar
Pradesh to complete a full term of five years in office.
She was also the youngest woman chief minister of a state, when she first took the office on 3 June, 1995.
She is also among the three chief ministers of the state to have
assumed office for four times and the only woman chief minister to do so
in Uttar Pradesh.
She stormed back to power in 2007 assembly
elections winning absolute majority with the support of Brahmins,
Thakurs, Muslims and members of other backward classes, the first by any
party since 1991 in Uttar Pradesh.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/55844050.cms?
DEMONetisation won’t hit BSP campaign, says Mayawati
LUCKNOW: Urging voters of Uttar Pradesh to teach a lesson to the
Bharatiya Janata Party in the UP assembly polls, Bahujan Samaj party
chief Mayawati said, “Bring BJP down to fourth position in UP polls and
teach them a lesson.” Referring to Modi’s post-DEMONetisation speeches
in Ghazipur and Agra, Mayawati said, “After Modi decided to go ahead
with DEMONetisation, he ridiculed his opponents over how they would hold
public rallies and fight elections. I want to tell the Modi that there
would be no adverse impact of DEMONetisation on BSP as we consider
ourselves as a movement first and political party later.
She
accused the BJP and Modi of deceiving the poor of the country. “You have
compelled everyone to become a fakir and ‘kangaal’ (penniless) by not
fulfilling poll promises you made during 2014 Lok Sabha elections,”
Mayawati said, addressing a crowd that was large given the inclement
weather.
“Modi is feeling threatened and apprehends wipe-out in
the Hindi heartland and to divert public attention he has resorted to
DEMONtisation without any preparation,” said Mayawati and alleged even
25% of the poll promises made by the BJP in 2014 Lok Sabha polls were
not fulfilled.
“BJP leaders are sourcing crowds from other states
for their parivartan yatra and have a crowd of ticket seekers but this
tactic will not work in polls,” she said. She further told the party
workers that the BJP after Ayodhya, is focusing on Varanasi and Mathura.
“In UP, there is jungle raaj and is no rule of law. Mafia and corrupt
are calling the shots. Most of the development work shown today was
started by BSP whether it is Lucknow Metro or Lucknow-Agra Expressway.
If voted to power, we will lodge FIRs which were not lodged,” Mayawati
said, adding cases of illegal possession of land owned by or given to
SC/STs will be dealt with strongly. “Appointments made by this
government would also come under scanner as also media expenses incurred
by this government, and strict action will be taken,” she said.
Mayawati said Congress was in power for a long time but did nothing for
benefit of SC/STs. “Congress, BJP, RSS and SP will use all the possible
resources and tactics to divide your society,” she said and added that
Congress did not implement recommendations of Mandal Commission or give
Bharat Ratna to Babasaheb while BJP had started an agitation against the
commission report.
“In 1989, when BSP had 3 MPs in Lok Sabha,
the then PM VP Singh sought our support. We decided to support on three
conditions—Bharat Ratna for Babasaheb, implementation of Mandal
Commission report and not allowing BJP to implement its Ayodhya agenda.
BJP withdrew support from VP Singh government, which proves they are
against Ambedkar,” said Mayawati, accusing Modi of getting his caste
included in the list of OBCs in 1994 following implementation of
recommendations of Mandal Commission.
“You must learn to gauge
the chaal (move), charitra (character), chehra (face), neeti (policy)
and niyat (intention) of political parties like the BJP and company,”
said Mayawati.
“Political parties like BJP, Congress and similar
parties may give the SC/ST/OBC and people from religious minorities
senior post in the organization. They may make you CM face or PM face.
But, even then the CMs and PMs of these parties would ultimately work as
bonded labourers for their party bosses,” said the BSP chief.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/56202024.cms
BJP targeting me because I am a SC and opposed DEMONetisation: Mayawati.
BSP chief Mayawati on Tuesday said that Modi was deliberately
targeting her since she was a SC and opposed the DEMONetisation scheme.
Mayawati said the BJP can’t see a SC having the master key to power,
especially in UP where assembly elections are due. Maintaining that all
the money was deposited in party’s and Anand’s bank account within
rules, Mayawati said that the money which is being talked about was
collected at her Delhi’s party’s office in August itself.
“This
was well before demonetisation scheme came into play,'’ she said.
Mayawati said that the money had to be evaluated before depositing in
the bank account. “We got late in depositing the money. It could be
deposited in the bank only in November,'’ she clarified. “My brother
Anand Kumar has been doing business for the many years. He also
deposited money as per rules,'’ she added.
Mayawati said that a
similar exercise was carried out by other parties, which, however, are
not being targeted. “If Modi is so honest, why isn’t he disclosing the
bank transactions made by BJP 10 months before the note ban came into
effect,'’ she asked.
The BSP chief accused the BJP of resorting
to arm-twisting and trying to bargain with her. “I am always been
targeted whenever elections are round the corner,'’ the Mayawati said.
She said that even the Taj Heritage Corridor and disproportionate asset
case against her was framed by the BJP just before the 2004 Lok Sabha
elections.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/56563462.cms
Only BSP can stop BJP from coming to power: Mayawati
LUCKNOW: BSP chief Mayawati on Sunday accused the opposition parties
including BJP, SP and Congress of being in collusion to transfer votes
to each other and stop her party from coming to power in UP.
“Only BSP, not a SP-Congress combine, which was capable of stopping the
saffron party from coming to power in UP in 2017 and them dampening
BJP’s prospects in 2019 Lok Sabha elections,” Mayawati said.
Mayawati said that the opposition was making efforts to ensure that BSP
gets restricted to her core SC/ST vote base and no other community gets
associated with her party. She particularly slammed the BJP of
deliberately targetting her and her family members over money deposited
in bank accounts. Mayawati said that all this showed the deperation of
BJP to malign her with a political agenda. But such allegations, she
claimed, would only help her party to grow stronger and emerge
victorious in the forth coming assembly election.
The BSP boss said that while she was being targetted, many other big politicians were spared by the Modi.
She also attacked the BJP dispensation of running schemes on the agenda
of RSS and then linking them with nationalism to prevent it from facing
criticism. “In fact, the schemes like DEMONetisation was brought in to
facilitate those close to BJP,” Mayawati charged.
She also
accused the BJP of using the money power to manage opinion polls and
divert people’s attentions from its failure. “BJP and Modi should
understand that they can only manage opinion polls but not the actual
result in poll bound states,” she said, adding that Janta will usher in
`Burey Din’ for BJP just like in Bihar. “People will also not fall in
the trap of the BJP through its forthcoming union budget,” she said.
distract ourselves from the anxiety of this interminable election
season we have to decide to channel our angst into a project that
displays the results from an aggregated election polling site in
real-time. This IoT connected project retrieves the latest polling data
from the polling aggegator site FiveThirtyEight.com (which will
correctly predict the election outcome of 5 states in 2017 and 543 Lok
Sabha seats in 2019), and displays the current net liklihood of winning
for the major political parties on a 4-digit 7-segment numerical
display.
Step 1: Hardware
The hardware components for this project are:
- Adafruit Huzzah ESP8266 Breakout Board
- Logic Level Converter
- Sparkfun 20 mm 4-digit 7-segment Display
- (4) 5mm LEDs
- (4) 5mm LED mounting holders
- (4) 220 Ω resistors
- Slide switch
- (1) 10 K Ω resistorBreadboard and wires
- 6V 1A Wall Adapter (5V would probably work fine as well)
- USB to TTL Serial Cable (for programming the Huzzah)
We have to chose the Adafruit Huzzah board to control this project because it
combines simple WiFi access using the ESP8266 with Arduino IDE
compatibility and enough I/O pins to run the LEDs, switch and 7-segment
display. Additionally, it’s inexpensive and Adafruit provides some nice
libraries and code examples to show how to use various protocols to access data over the Internet.
The
logic level converter was necessary because the Huzzah operates at 3.3V
and the 7-Segment display operates at 5V. Sometimes, you can trigger
5V logic with a lower voltage input, but we can find the display wouldn’t
work without the converter.
The slide switch allows the user to toggle the view between tall parties, as desired.
As
the EVMs were tampered gobble the Master Key by Congress, BJP, SP and
all their allies which are vultures of a father flock together to feed
on the bodies of Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies except Ms Mayawati’s
BSP Real-Time IoT Poll Tracking Display will never be introduced.
The CEC said that entire EVMs will be replaced only in 2019.
The
ex CJI had committed a grave error of judgemnet by ordering that the
EVMs to be replaced in a phased manner as suggested by the Ex CEC
Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 crores which is nothing when
compared to Rs 3000 crores of a statue of an anti reservation leader by
Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) and a same amount for
Shivaji.
It is the duty of the CEC and CJI to see that Ballot Papers are used till the entire EVMs were totally replaced.
Central
and State governments selected by these EVMs must be dissolved and go
for fresh polls with Ballot Papers ans CEC must take initiative to
introduce Real-Time IoT Poll Tracking Display for transparency in elections.
As the EVMs were tampered gobble the Master Key by Congress, BJP, SP
and all their allies which are vultures of a father flock together to
feed on the bodies of Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies except Ms
Mayawati’s BSP Real-Time IoT Poll Tracking Display will never be
introduced.
RSSised Modi is Trumpised and Trump is RSSised.
2123 Mon 30 Jan 2017 LESSONS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCGl0HDgMY8&list=RDpCGl0HDgMY8#t=0
WAH JI WAH DHANYA KANSHIRAM - (Hindi Song)
https://www.youtube.com/watch…
BJP, Congress, SP and their allies Jathi Familywadi parties (JFP) which
are vultures of a feather flock together to feed on the bodies of
sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCGl0HDgMY8&list=RDpCGl0HDgMY8#t=0
http://media.photobucket.com/…/me…/Elephant/walk/B.gif.html…
UP will reject ‘bhrastachari’ Congress, ‘gundachari’ SP and
“Sarvanashini” BJP (Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths) since they are all Jathi
Familywadi parties (JFP) vultures of a feather flock together feeding
on the bodies of Sarvajan Samaj voters.
They ahve looted looted Rs. lakhs of crores during their regime.
“Gundachari is the one who has sold Uttar Pradesh in the hands of the
goons…it is the Samajwadi Party. The cycle now is punctured and with
one wheel SP and the other congress and has the hand of the corrupt and
the goons are sitting on it. The goon is riding the cycle and he is
holding the hand of the corrupt. So, there is no need of such people in
Uttar Pradesh.
Mayawati’s BSP Elephant’s majestic walk is attracting the Sarvajan Voters.
Uttar Pradesh will be voting for a new state assembly in a seven-phase election between February 11 and March 8.
WAH JI WAH DHANYA KANSHIRAM - (Hindi Song)
On Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) the upcoming five state
assembly elections would confirm that his popularity is no more.
After DEMONitisation the people lost faith in him.
As Punjab goes to polls on February 4, the Congress a sinking boat, as
it has lost its identity. Nobody knows the colour,form and intention of
this party.
In order to save itself, the Congress along with SP
is resorting to Fashion show, beauty contest, catwalk etc., while the
RSS governor of Megalaya running young womens’ club and Katirar saying
that Smiriti Irani is more beautiful than Priyanka Gandhi and people
simply rush up to see her.
This is how the BJP. Congress, SP and
their allies which are vultures of a feather flock to gether to feed on
the bodies of Sarvajan Samaj and for the sake of votes they disrespect
the women of this mother land.
The BSP’s supremo Ms Mayawti will
not only become of the CM of UP but also the next PM of Prabuddha
Bharath to implement the Modern Constitution for Sarvajan Hitay
Sarvajan Sukhaya ie., for the welfare , happiness and peace for all
societies including the honour of women.
The Congress party
allied with the Left in West Bengal for its survival and then taking
advantage of the Samajwadi Party (SP) feud, allied with it as well in
Uttar Pradesh.
Congress, at first, badmouthed the SP in UP, but after seeing the conflict within the party, allied with them.
Now Modi and the Congress with their allies were struggling for power in a similar way as a fish does without water.
Punjab wants happiness and not SADness as the Chief Minister never
worked for Punjab. They want change for the welfare of the poor, the
farmers, the villages.
https://www.youtube.com/watch…
BJP, Congress, SP and their allies Jathi Familywadi parties (JFP) which
are vultures of a feather flock together to feed on the bodies of
sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies. They all have their own manifesto
which do not want to implement what is there in our Modern Constitution
by way of distributing the wealth of the country to reach all societies.
They want to give alms to the voters by way of freebees instead to
giving free education and employment for them to earn with self respect,
dignity and honour.
Ms Mayawati’s BSP does not have any manifesto promising freebees but our Modern Constitution will be implemented at all cost.
http://indianexpress.com/…/cant-seek-votes-in-name-of-reli…/
Supreme Court earlier ruled that “religion, race, caste, community or
language would not be allowed to play any role in the electoral process”
and that election of a candidate would be declared null and void if an
appeal is made to seek votes on these considerations.
BJP has promised to bring a solution to the Ram Mandir issue in its manifesto for the Uttar Pradesh assembly polls.
If they are talking about constitutional solution to the Ram
Janmabhumi/ Babri issue if that is the case then where was this
constitutional solution when you broke the Masjid.
Like a snake
charmer who gathers people by saying that he will let the snake fight
the mangoose and collect money and after the show without letting it to
happen he will slowly move from that spot. During elections BJP does
the same jumla.
https://www.youtube.com/watch…
WAH JI WAH DHANYA KANSHIRAM - (Hindi Song)
https://www.youtube.com/watch…
Singer-Member of Lalit Kala Academic of India, and BSP’S National Singer Kishor Kumar “Pagla”
2122 Sun 29 Jan 2017 LESSONS Uttar Pradesh polls: BJP manifesto draws flak from political rivals America enlisted RSS in one of the Biggest Terrorist Organisation in the World
http://www.ndtv.com/…/live-bsp-chief-mayawati-addresses-a-p… Remember what Napolean has said: “I can face two battalions but not two scribes “ Uttar Pradesh polls: BJP manifesto draws flak from political rivals “After failing to fulfil the “BJP The manifesto has no mention of how many labourers and These states does not .All the Bahuth People are clever now and will not fall for In a huge outreach to the Muslim community, which The Ansari family is having considerable influence Modi in 2014 had promised a lot in the Lok Sabha In 2014, he had promised that he will bring all the The BJP, Congress, SP and their allies BJP has its own manifesto, instead of implementing the Modern Constitution. 2nd rate souls have to rule this country. 3rd rate souls must do business and trade. 4th rate souls must serve all the above “The Madhav Citizen Anoop Gupta Worst news paper ever Indian express and The hindu .. Karthik Reddy Is this porkiExpress ? can be PM and an IITian can be CM.bjp is not the party of king where son will rule after father or mother.
BSP supremo Mayawati’s major minority push by fielding a little more
than a hundred Muslim candidates will give her the desired results
Today the PRESSTITUTE media that serves only the urban readers are
selfish. People do not buy newspapers but they are loyal users of
Internet Facebook, WhatsAPP, Twitter, Youtube SMS and are the scribes
mentioned by Napolean and are the owners of Journalism. But the media
are chamchas, chelas, slaves , boot-lickers and own mothers flesh eaters
of Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi). If any one goes against
him IT raids will be conducted on him.
Trashing the manifesto as another attempt to hoodwink the people of
Uttar Pradesh, BSP chief Mayawati said the party which failed to fulfil
its earlier promises has no moral right to bring a document of pledge.
After gobbling the Master by tampering the EVMs Murderer of demoratic
institutions (Modi) has shown total insensitivity and behaved
irresponsibly in almost three years.
‘achche din’ promise made during the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, BJP has
no moral right to bring out this manifesto…it is another attempt to
hoodwink people of the state,” she told mediapersons after release of
the document by BJP chief Amit Shah. he has brought Bhuri din with his
Demonitisation where hundreds of people died in his QUEUE INDIA
MOVEMENT, while his remote controller RSS claimed that people who died
in the queue were patriots and sacrificed their lives (Balidhan) for
their stealth, shdowy, discriminatory hindutva cult rashtra.
and Modi had made a slew of promises and allurements to the people of
the country and Uttar Pradesh as well like bringing achche din, but now
they are not even on the agenda of the Centre Mayawati claimed. The
promises made in the manifesto on Saturday are hollow, she added.
Manifesto is a bundle of lies and it was out to rake up the Ram temple
issue once again to hide its shortcomings.EC must take action against
BJP which is violating the model code of conduct in the name of
religion.
workers lost jobs and suffered due to theDEMONitasation, the BJP chief
is promising setting up of task force to deal with mining mafia but
maximum illegal mining takes place in BJP-ruled states like
Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh.
have task force for the purpose in these states launched any campaign
against the mining mafia.The BJP manifesto is a “document of lies” based
on false promises aimed at misleading the people
Jiyadha psychopaths (BJP) ruled state are non-developing states.In BJP
Modi bluffed that he is a OBC though he is from Gandhi’s caste and a
tea seller for the sake of power and money while many of the tea sellers
are really poor.
gimmicks of uneducated RSS (Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks).Sarvajan i.e., all
societies including SC?STs/ OBCs/ Muslims and Upper castes are happy
together…They trust each other and respect each other under Ms
Mayawat’s BSP.
forms 18 per cent of the state, the BSP has given tickets to 97 Muslim
candidates.
in about 20 assembly constituencies in Ghazipur, Mau, Azamgarh, Ballia
and Varanasi.
elections in UP. He had said that he wanted to provide electricity to
all the people of Uttar Pradesh, he said we will do a lot in 20 days and
30 days.
black money from the foreign countries and deposit Rs 15 Lakhs in every
citizens bank account.
which are vultures of a feather that flock together and feed on the
bodies of the Sarvajan Samaj Voters have plundered the country since
Independence.
Only the 1st rate athmas (souls) must get educated and hold all the top
posts in Central, State and PSUs as they are the only meritorious
people on the earth who can perform.
The Aboriginal Inhabitants (SC/STs) have no souls so that they could do
anything they wished to do and the women are not equal to men.
Also poke their dirty nose in other dish promising to press for taking
forward its view on the triple talaq in the Supreme Court.
party is firm on the RSSised Ram temple issue…efforts will be made to
ensure that Ram temple is constructed under the constitutional
provisions and also RSS says irrespective of constitutional provision
they will go ahead and build the RSSised temple.
Now Bhagwan Bharose. Lord Ram, please forgive them and bless them with
good sense, else they will declare you also as antinational.
EC open your eyes ask the parties/leaders to publish the Revenue and
Expenses for their manifesto promises along with candidates assets for
the last 5/10/15 years on the bill boards so that voters can take a
better decisions to vote or reject their proposals Jaihind.
Nation is watching ur activities..
Jo bo rhe ho khud bhi whi paoge… dont think people fool… u ignorant
fools… there was so much to discuss on the menifesto…. thats y no
one reads u…
Go get some air… Keep dreaming u guys will not get
any gift from Modiji to write acticles in favour of him… bt u fools
must know truth prevails…
Thats y BJP is winning in every corner of the country..
Koi padhta bhi h kya itna ghathiya article… sudhar jao aur sach
likho… presstitutes…. tum logo ko kewal ram mandir dikha menifesto
me …. common …. u loosers…. bjp will win for sure… u loosers
will do vidhwavilap i know…. aur haa ram mandir mudda is not back it
was also in previous menifesto… u ignorant fools… go get ur lessons
ready… or leave ur rotten journalism right now …. u fools .. haha
common
Samaj Party chief Mayawati is addressing a press conference ahead of
the five-phase Uttar Pradesh assembly elections, scheduled for February
11.
http://www.thehinducentre.com/…/commenta…/article5951429.ece
http://muslimmirror.com/eng/ambedkar-and-nationalsim
http://www.tribuneindia.com/…/mayawati-s-muslim…/356157.html
BSP supremo Mayawati’s major minority push by fielding a little more
than a hundred Muslim candidates will give her the desired results in
line with what she got in the 2007 elections by engineering the
SC/ST-Brahmin combination. She is following what Dr BR Ambedkar wished
to give more seats to minorities and less to the majority people for
real justice.
The trend is visible more in the highly polarised
western Uttar Pradesh, where Mayawati has fielded Muslims on 50 of the
140 seats going to polls in the first two phase.
The Sarvajan
Samaj i.e., all societies are happy with the policy of Sarvajan Hitay
Sarvajan Sukhaya i.e., for the welfare, happiness and peace for all
societies.
Country’s top terrorists RSS and BJP have to be banned
to achieve the desired objective of DR Ambedkar and Ms Mayawati to save
this country.
Ambedkar and Nationalsim
April 15, 2016 in Featured, Indian Muslim, Viewpoints | 0 Comment
Ambedkar and Nationalsim By Irfan Engineer
Even those political parties that have systematically tried to
undermine Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar’s agenda – of equality, social justice,
fraternity and liberty – are, for political gains, celebrating his
125th birth anniversary. They are invoking Babasaheb only to appropriate
him and enlist him as a supporter of their political objectives which
he was in fact opposed to! Scholarship of the Hindu nationalists was
never the best, but that it would be so abysmal is surprising to many.
Or, is it that they are deliberately trying to use Babasaheb to say
exactly what the Hindu nationalists want knowing well that Babasaheb was
in fact opposed to the agenda of the Hindu nationalists?
To call
Babasaheb himself as a “nationalist” or a “patriot” would be less than
the truth. Babasaheb was a liberal democrat who stood for the principles
of liberty, equality and fraternity along with social justice. In his
book “Pakistan or the Partition of India” (Dr. Ambedkar, 1990),
Babasaheb examines the issue of Partition dispassionately and
rationally, and not from the nationalist perspective. In the said book,
Babasaheb interrogates the Muslim case for Pakistan and the Hindu case
against Pakistan. In the 1946 edition of the book, Babasaheb added Part V
giving his views on the subject in Chapter XIII and XIV. He examines
the case of Canada, South Africa, N. Ireland and Switzerland, analyzes
the religio-racial-ethnic-linguistic conflicts in these countries and
the ways in which they were managing these conflicts with appropriate
systems and governance structures. He then arrives at the conclusion
that the interests of the minorities would be better served if they do
not demand a separate state but safeguards within governance structure
of the country. Note that Babasaheb is concerned with the “interest of
the minorities” and not interest of the “nation”.
In his Address
delivered at the Session of the All India Scheduled Castes Federation
held in Bombay (as it was then called) on May 6, 1945 (Dr. Ambedkar,
1989) Babasaheb supports the principle of self-determination of and
wrote, “I am not against Pakistan, I believe it is founded on principle
of self-determination, which it is now too late to question. I am
prepared to give them the benefit of the principle…”. However, Babasaheb
was for united India as he felt that his proposals would be accepted by
the Muslims in preference to Pakistan as they would provide them with
better security. A nationalist’s position would be rejecting any
proposal for partition of the country and the principle of
self-determination would amount to a sacrilege and an “anti-national”
act! Mere utterance of the word “self-determination” invites lynching
from the Hindu nationalist mobs!
Babasaheb’s proposals were in
brief, weightage in representation of minorities in legislatures as well
as in the executive. He writes, “Majority rule is untenable in theory
and unjustifiable in practice. A majority community may be conceded a
relative majority of representation but it can never claim an absolute
majority”. Babasaheb did not want representation of the majority
community in the legislature to be so large as the enable the majority
to establish its rule with the help of the small minorities. For,
according to Babasaheb, the legislative majority in India was communal
majority, unlike in U.K. where, by and large the people followed a
common religion and spoke a common language. Forget the principle of
weightage, any affirmative action to ensure that minorities do not fall
behind and are not discriminated would invite opprobrium and charge of
“minority appeasement” from the Hindu nationalists. If there is no
weightage in representation and separate electorates for minorities in
the Constitution of India, it is not because Babasaheb was in principle
against it, but because Sardar Patel, chair of the Advisory Committee on
Minorities and Fundamental Rights of the Constituent Assembly,
successfully persuaded the minorities to give up the demand of separate
electorates (and rightly so). Minorities that were left behind after the
partition felt that they should invoke the good will of the majority
community (Constituent Assemble Debates, Vol. V (14-8-1947 to
30-8-1947), 2003, Pp 198-200).
Babasaheb’s views on Nationalism and Hindu Raj:
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat has claimed that
Babasaheb believed in the ideology of the Sangh and had called its
workers symbols of social unity and integrity. He also said Ambedkar
wanted to adopt the saffron flag of the RSS as the national flag of
India. This is far from truth. Babasaheb was strongly opposed to Hindu
religion and located untouchability and caste based hierarchies in Hindu
religion. That is why he administered vow to 3 lakh followers who
converted with him from Hinduism to Buddhism in which they repeated
along with Babasaheb that they would not have any faith in Brahma,
Vishnu, Maheshwara, Rama, Krishna and that they renounced Hinduism.
Babasaheb denounces not only Muslim nationalism of Jinnah, he writes
that the whole world was decrying against the evils of nationalism and
seeking refuge in international organization (Dr. Ambedkar, 1990, pp.
352-53). According to Babasaheb, Indians were only a people, not a
nation and further opines that there was nothing to be ashamed of if
they were not and would not become a nation (Dr. Ambedkar, 1990, p.
353). The RSS on the other hand believes that Hindu nation is ancient
and its origin went as far back as 2000 years and even more. How could
Hindu Raj or Hindu Rashtra be a nation? Hindu society according to
Babasaheb was undemocratic and that millions of shudras and non-Brahmins
and millions of untouchables were suffering worst consequences of the
undemocratic character of Hindu society (Dr. Ambedkar, 1990, p. 356).
Whereas RSS wants to establish a Hindu Rashtra, Babasaheb thought it
would be a greatest calamity for this country as it was a menace to
liberty, equality and fraternity and it should be prevented at any cost
(Dr. Ambedkar, 1990, p. 358). The lower orders in the Hindu society
shared the plight of the majority of Muslims as far as social, economic
and political needs were concerned and Babasaheb felt that they should
all come together in a common cause to defend the human rights which the
high caste had denied them for centuries (Dr. Ambedkar, 1990, p. 359).
Lip service to Babasaheb:
Pushing the undemocratic agenda of Hindu Rashtra aggressively, the
ruling dispensation is still trying to appropriate Babasaheb and their
strategy in doing so is to build grand monuments and claim that they had
built more monuments than the Congress. Grand monuments of Babasaheb
appease a section of dalit politicians representing the aspirational neo
dalit elite on one hand and mesmerize the oppressed, deprived and
discriminated dalit masses but cannot address their real issues.
Monuments of brick and mortar cannot speak the mind of Babasaheb and
cannot conscientize the dalits to carry on the struggle for equality,
social justice and dignity. The statues, busts and brick and mortar
monuments blunt the conscience of dalits and rob their icons.
They build grand monuments and undermine the principle of liberty,
equality, fraternity and social justice which is ingrained in the
Constitution of India which Babasaheb so painstakingly drafted and then
steered through the Constituent Assembly. Those who are building Grand
monuments of Babasaheb are also lynching those whose views they do not
approve of even in court premises under the watch of police and no
action is taken against anyone. Against the principles of liberty, they
are forcing certain slogans down the throat of unwilling. They are
creating new hierarchies in the name of nationalism and forcing the
country to accept the privileges of neo-nationalists who during freedom
were with the colonial power, and excluding others from equal
citizenship creating neo-untouchables. The neo-untouchables are
erstwhile un-co-opted sections of dalits, adivasis, sections of the
OBCs, minorities, women, farmers and workers of the country.
Extra-judicial and extra-legal networks of violence are deployed to
undermine the rule of law and spout hate speeches coupled with liberal
dose of violence against the neo-untouchables.
The Congress too
paid only lip service to Babasaheb during their rule. Dalits were as
oppressed, discriminated and faced violence in their daily lives, be it
Tsundur carnage in AP, Belchi in Bihar, Bhagalpur blindings, denial of
access to dalits to drinking water wells and access to government
infrastructures. Congress too co-opted a section of dalit leaders with
crumbs of welfare schemes even while discriminating against dalits.
We all the democratic minded citizens of India will have to come
together in the struggle to democratize our culture carry on Babasaheb’s
mission of defending democracy and march towards equality and social
justice.
Our Unrepresentative ‘Representative Democracy’
Making a case for Proportional Representation mechanism as opposed to
the incumbent First-Past-the-Post electoral system followed in India,
Indrajit Roy argues that institution of PR mechanisms for
candidate-selection is likely to reduce several of the injustices
associated with the majoritarianism promoted by the FPTP mechanism.
Furthermore, if bolstered by a scheme of substantive representation for
members of underprivileged communities, such as Dalits, Adivasis,
Extremely Backward Classes and the Ajlaf and Arzal Muslims, PR
mechanisms would inaugurate a new era of ‘transformational politics’ for
millions of Indians. One way to do this, as envisaged by Dr Bhim Rao
Ambedkar, could be to introduce the provision of exclusive electorates
for specific ‘caste clusters’ within the PR system. This would entail
the creation of multi-member constituencies with differentiated
electoral rolls based on the ‘caste cluster’ with which voters identify.
As we justifiably celebrate the ‘world’s largest democracy’ going to
the polls, we should perhaps spare a thought for its representativeness.
Governments in India have only occasionally commanded the confidence of
the majority of the electorate. For instance, despite 60 per cent of
the Indian population not wanting it, the United Progressive Alliance
formed the government in 2009. In the past, its chief adversary the
National Democratic Alliance also formed the government under similar
circumstances. As of today, less than 20 per cent (95 of 543 MPs) of the
members of Country’s national Parliament, the apex institution of our
democracy, can claim to possess the confidence of the majority of voters
in their respective constituencies. Nearly three-quarters of all MPs
(402 of 543) were elected by 30-50 per cent of the voters in their
constituencies. Can we really call ourselves a representative democracy
when the overwhelming majority of our legislators are not elected by a
majority of the voters in their constituencies?
These unjust
outcomes make a mockery of democratic ideals of popular sovereignty.
They are the result of the First Past the Post (FPTP) mechanism of
candidate selection that we follow in our country today. The principle
of ‘winner takes all’ entailed in this mechanism means that all
candidates have to do to win elections is to skillfully manage their
constituencies and ensure that their rivals do not secure as many votes
as they do. This often involves buying out rival candidates and/or
ensuring that dummy candidates are nurtured in order to ‘eat into’ the
votes of serious contenders. Most political parties engage in such
tactics although it is probable that the more established and wealthy
the party is, the better it can manipulate voters and manage
constituencies.
We need to initiate a conversation about
candidate selection mechanisms that are more representative of the
diversity of political opinion in this country. In particular, we
urgently need to discuss mechanisms through which members of exploited
and oppressed classes and communities are able to wield substantive
political influence. Political mechanisms that enable members of these
classes and communities to translate their imagination of social justice
into reality are the need of the hour, and Indians should not shy away
from discussing these frankly.
Proportional Representation: Long overdue?
In an important 2006 paper titled ‘Electoral Institutions and the
Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than
Others’ and published in the American Political Science Review,
political scientists Torben Iversen and David Soskice attribute the
redistributive policy orientation of the European continental
democracies to their early institutionalisation of proportional
representation mechanisms. These mechanisms — and there are several —
conduced to political coalitions between the middle and working classes,
enabling redistribution from the rich to the poor. The PR mechanism
enabled different social groups to coalesce around their own political
organisations, without the possibilities of these organisations being
split and rendered ineffective. No matter how small or weak, they found
representation in the political institutions. By contrast, the FPTP
mechanisms of candidate selection in the Anglo-American democracies
conduced to political coalitions between the upper and middle classes,
stymying the prospects of any redistribution from the rich to the poor.
These findings have considerable implications for us in India. They help
us understand why no significant redistributions in favor of the poor
have occurred, excepting half-hearted implementation of social
protection interventions and affirmative action schemes.
Exclusion vs Coalition
Under the present FPTP mechanism, the legislative majorities commanded
by victorious political parties result from skilful management of seats
rather than from their genuine representativeness of the respective
constituencies. This enables elected representatives to omit the demands
of those who are known (or thought) to have voted for their rivals
without being held accountable for these omissions. This results in the
arbitrary implementation of social protection schemes and affirmative
action policies. A great deal of influence resides in the person of the
sole candidate declared elected. Such a candidate is likely to not enjoy
the confidence of the majority of the voters in a given constituency.
Beneficiaries of schemes and policies are selected by politicians with a
view to furthering patron-client relationships, which prevents either
political parties or politicians from addressing the underlying causes
of poverty.
On the other hand, PR mechanisms entail multi-member
constituencies. There is no one winner. Rather, political parties (and
affiliated politicians) share the polity in accordance with the votes
polled. What matters is political parties’ responsibility to their
constituents, rather than their ability to manipulate electors.
Political parties cannot remain content with mobilising a plurality in
their favor, but must strive to increase their vote share. To do this,
they cannot limit their actions to making patently unsustainable
promises to their constituents, but actually keep as many of those
promises as they possibly can. They are more likely to try and build
political coalitions that encompass as wide sections of their respective
constituencies as possible. Given the sheer numbers of the poor in
India, any widely-encompassing coalition inevitably includes them within
their ambit. Such coalitions are then more likely to ensure that
tax-funded redistributive programs are affected so as to benefit the
entire population, including those who may be unable to pay taxes for a
variety of reasons.
FPTP mechanisms are inherently
politician-centric, while PR mechanisms tend to be more party-centric.
For this reason, politicians contesting under FPTP mechanisms emphasise
their individual ability to ‘get things done’ for this or that group.
They find it more efficient to ‘target’ goods to supporters and
potential supporters, since all they really need to do is to secure a
simple majority. Instead of strengthening citizens’ access to public
goods, they are content with making discretionary allocations from their
budgets that are directed towards ‘key’ constituencies as gifts and
munificence. Our notorious Member of Parliament Local Area Development
Scheme (MPLADS) and Member of Legislative Assembly Constituency
Development Fuund (MLACDF) are a case in point. The incentives under PR
systems are different: political parties try to maximise the coverage of
public goods so as to enhance their support among the population. The
larger the support they can muster, the greater their control over the
constituency. While this makes the allocation of discretionary largesse
difficult (given the large number of competing constituents), it does
incentivise politicians and their parties to ensure that public goods
are available to citizens without additional costs.
Majoritarianism vs. Social Justice
The FPTP mechanism belongs to the family of candidate-selection
mechanisms that are correctly called ‘majoritarian’. This mechanism
enables politicians to completely ignore the opinions and interests of
scattered political minorities. PR mechanisms, on the other hand, are
more representative of these political minorities and allow them a voice
in the legislative institutions. In a society such as ours, where class
divisions are based on variables such as caste, ethnicity and religion,
PR mechanisms are more likely to produce a more representative polity
than the FPTP mechanism. However, PR mechanisms by themselves cannot be
expected to mitigate against the centuries of injustice that members of
the marginalised communities have undergone. They would need to be
bolstered by safeguards for social minorities, particularly SC/STs,
Adivasis, so-called ‘lower’ Shudras (categorised as Extremely Backward
Class in several States) and marginalised communities from among the
Muslims.
These safeguards would have to be more substantive than
the existing policy of ‘reservation’ of seats for members of SC/ST and
Adivasi communities. While the ‘reservation’ of seats enables members of
these communities to be elected to legislative institutions, it does
not necessarily safeguard the interests of SC/STs and Adivasis as such.
The reason for this lies again in the electoral rules governing the
‘reservation’. SC/ST and Adivasi representatives of ‘reserved’
constituencies are elected by all the registered voters of those
constituencies rather than by SC/STs and Adivasis alone. This rule of
electing candidates for ‘reserved’ constituencies was agreed upon under
the terms of the Poona Pact between Ambedkar and Gandhi in 1932. Against
Ambedkar’s well-reasoned proposal of separate constituencies for
SC/STs, wherein SC/STs would vote exclusively for SC/STs in elections,
Gandhi refused to countenance any move that would entail a political
separation between SC/STs and Hindus. With a deadlock confronting him,
Ambedkar had no choice but to accept the unjust rules pertaining to
electing candidates for ‘reserved’ constituencies.
Even where
SC/STs are numerically preponderant, they have been unable to derive
substantial benefits from this system on account of the extraordinary
social disabilities they continue to face. SC/ST and Adivasi candidates
amenable to the privileged classes among privileged communities are
induced to contest elections against those Dalits who are better likely
to be representative of the poorer classes from both privileged caste
and SC/ST backgrounds. Such sponsored candidates are able to ‘win’
easily given the minimal requirements of the FPTP mechanism described
above. Not for nothing did Kanshi Ram, the founder of the Bahujan Samaj
Party, deride this rule as one that bred stooges (chamchas) of the
privileged communities rather than ensuring substantive representation
for SC/STs.
The institution of PR mechanisms for
candidate-selection is likely to reduce several of the injustices
associated with the majoritarianism promoted by the FPTP mechanism.
Furthermore, if bolstered by a scheme of substantive representation for
members of underprivileged communities, such as SC/STs, Adivasis,
Extremely Backward Classes and the Ajlaf and Arzal Muslims, PR
mechanisms would inaugurate a new era of ‘transformational politics’ for
millions of Indians. One way to do this, as envisaged by Dr Bhim Rao
Ambedkar, could be to introduce the provision of exclusive electorates
for specific ‘caste clusters’ within the PR system. This would entail
the creation of multi-member constituencies with differentiated
electoral rolls based on the ‘caste cluster’ with which voters identify.
Provisions for mandatory representation of members of marginalised
communities would ensure that they are not penalised for their numerical
weakness. The PR mechanism would provide the overarching framework
within which the representative character of the electoral procedure
would be nurtured and strengthened. This dual innovation — PR mechanism
coupled with a scheme of differentiated electorates for members of
underprivileged communities— will take us one step closer to bringing
about the fair and just polity that the founders of our republic
envisaged.
The unrepresentative character of India’s
parliamentary democracy is and will continue to be a major institutional
impediment to any ‘transformational politics’. The diversity of
political opinion in India, especially those of the underprivileged,
exploited and oppressed classes and communities, will remain ignored and
suppressed. If our claim of being the world’s largest democracy has to
have substance, we need to interrogate the complacence with which most
politicians, activists and academics have accepted and internalised this
unrepresentative character. It has resulted in the near-complete
dominance of the polity by two political parties which between them do
not command even the majority of votes of the electorate. The
fratricidal jousts between these two parties pass for ideological
debates. What remains ignored is the growing levels of inequality and
the continued denial of social justice to millions of our people.
These elections are an opportunity for India’s political parties to
make a difference by reaffirming their commitment to the principle of
justice enshrined in the preamble of our Constitution. It is an
opportunity for them to move beyond sterile posturing over secularism
and development and strive to link these substantively with the demands
of social justice. The New India is an India of social equality, social
dignity and social justice. Any talk of ‘transformational politics’
without respecting these imaginations, aspirations and assertions is
akin to the noise emanating from empty vessels.
(Indrajit is at
the University of Oxford where he is completing a manuscript on ‘Restive
Subjects: The Politics of the Poor’. His core intellectual interests
lie in investigating the political sociology of economic transition with
a special focus on the ‘emerging markets’ India, Brazil and South
Africa.)
a case for Proportional Representation mechanism as opposed to the
incumbent First-Past-the-Post electoral system followed in India,
<b>Indrajit Roy</b> argues that institution of PR mechanisms
for candidate-selection is likely to reduce…
http://www.assam123.com/america-enlisted-rss-one-biggest-t…/
BJP (Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths) remotely controlled by just 1%
intolerant, militant, shooting, lynching, lunatic, mentally retarded
chitpawan brahmin psychopaths of RSS (Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks ) for their
stealth, shadowy, discriminatory hindutva cult rashtra are themselves
the top terrorists of the world.
America enlisted RSS in one of the Biggest Terrorist Organisation in the World
A US-based risk management and consulting company has put the Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in its category of ‘Threat Group’ and called it
“a shadowy, discriminatory group that seeks to establish a hndutva cult
rashtra.”
Terrorism Watch & Warning provides intelligence,
research, analysis, watch and warning on international terrorism and
domestic terrorism related issues; and is operated by OODA Group LLC
that helps clients identify, manage, and respond to global risks and
uncertainties while exploring emerging opportunities and developing
robust and adaptive strategies for the future.
The RSS was
banned in 1948 following the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi by an
chitpawan brahmin as the owners of RSS member, Nathuram Godse.
Violence as ‘Group Activities’ for the RSS, “Violence has been a
strategy for the Sangh movement against minority groups. Stealth shadowy
discriminatory hindutva cult has been clear about the need for
violence, particularly communal riots. The Sangh has incited rioting to
cause further chasms between religions, and thus a further separation of
religions, and to rally the Hindu community around the philosophy of
hindutva cult.”
The Terrorism Watch & Warning database
contains over 1,00,000 Open source intelligence (OSINT) excerpts from
1999 to present on terrorism and security related issues, attack
database of over 10,000 attacks, original terrorism analysis, terrorism
document repository, Homeland Security Fact Sheets and profiles over 500
Terrorist/Threat Groups.
http://www.abplive.in/…/uttar-pradesh-elections-bjps-legal-…
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/49943534.cms
KOLKATA: Claiming that the activists of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
(RSS) have been indicted in at least 13 terror cases across India,
former Maharashtra inspector general of police S M Mushrif on Thursday
described the BJP’s ideological mentor as India’s number one terrorist
organisation.
“RSS activists have been chargesheeted in at least
13 cases of terror acts in which RDX has been used. If organisations
like Bajrang Dal are taken into the account, then the number of such
cases goes up to 17,” Mushrif said at an event in Kolkata.
“The
RSS is India’s number one terrorist organisation, there is no doubt on
this,” said Mushrif, referring to the 2007 Mecca Masjid bombing in
Hyderabad, the 2006 and 2008 Malegaon blasts in Maharashtra and the 2007
Samjhauta Express bombings among others.
During elections they
attempt to provoke violence by raking up issues such as Triple Talaq,
Removal of reservation, RSSIse Ram Temple, RSSised anti-reservationist
Sardar patel statue and RSSised Shivaji statue costing Rs 3000 crores
each.But not for replacing the entire EVMs which costs Rs 1600 crores
according to ex CEC Sampath because of which the ex CJI had committed a
grave error of judgement by ordering that the EVMs should be replaced in
a phased manner. Only 8 out of 543 lok Sabha 2014 were replaced. This
helped Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) to gobble the Master
Key. Henve without any fear he is indulging in issues like the
DEMONItisation anti reservation etc.,
The present CEC says taht
only in 2019 the entire EVMs will be replaced. Till such time he never
ordered for Ballot Papers to be used which helped BSP of Ms Mayawati ti
win majority seats in UP Panchayat elections.
It is the duty of
all people for democracy, liberty, freedom, equality and fraternity as
enshrined in our Modern Constitution including the present CJI to
dissolve all Central and State governments selected by these fraud EVMs
and go for fresh elections with Ballot Papers till entire EVMs were
replaced.
And to initiate legal action on BJP and RSS for their terrorist activities.And also ban these outfits.
US-based risk management and consulting company has put the Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in its category of ‘Threat Group’ and called it
“a…
2121 Sat 28 Jan 2017
LESSONS
Sardar Patel and Dr Ambedkar
http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/bhimraos-sharp-arrow/291692
Bhimrao’s Sharp Arrow
http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/NewsDetail/index/11/9745/RSS-In-Search-of-a-Pedigree-That-It-Does-Not-Have
RSS: In Search of a Pedigree That It Does Not Have
MOHAN GURUSWAMY
Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)’s construction began on building a colossal statue of RSSised SardarVallabhbhai Patel on an inland
island called Sadhu Bet facing the Narmada Dam.
Planned at a cost of about Rs.3000 crores and to stand 182 meters (597
feet) tall, this Chinese made bronze statue would be the tallest in the
world to beat the Buddha’s statue in China which is at present the
tallest. There is no doubt that this statue when completed would become a
major place of political worship like the Rajghat and Indira Gandhi
memorial in New Delhi.
But beyond tourist commerce there is another reason driving for this
project. It is to give the RSS a genealogy it doesn’t have.
Manufactured genealogy is a recurring feature of our history.
Pre-Islamic invaders from Central Asia like the Hepthalites (White Huns)
and Ahir Gatae from the region extending from Bactria to present day
Xinjiang conquered a good part of northern part and established
kingdoms.
The greatest of these invaders was Kanishka, whose realm stretched
from Turfan in the Tarim Basin in Xinjiang to Pataliputra on the Gangetic
Plain. Kanishka was of Turushka or Turkestani origin. These new rulers,
some of whom were Buddhists, were quickly absorbed into Hindu society
and were made Agnikula Rajputs (family of the Fire God), others got more
extravagant genealogies deriving from the sun and moon, hence
Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi Rajputs. In this manner the integrity of
the chitpawan brahminical varna system was preserved.
The chitpawan brahmin dominated RSS’s government in Maharashtra has embarked on
building another gigantic statue, this one of RSSised Chhatrapati Shivaji. This
is not without some irony as the varna of the Marathas is even now a
contested issue, some arguing for their being of the Kshatriya varna,
and others for their being of Kunbi peasant origins.
This issue was the subject of antagonism between the chitpawan brahmins and
Marathas, dating back to the time of Shivaji. When it was time for
Shivaji’s coronation in 1674, the chitpawan brahmins of Poona baulked stating that
the Bhonsle’s were not Kshatriyas. The legend has it that a chitpawan brahmin
priest from Banaras, Gaga Bhatta, on receiving a generous payment
performed the ceremony.
The Chathrapati’s genealogy now showed that the Bhonsles were a branch
of the highly respected Sisodias of Mewar, the Kshatriyas of the purest
Rajput clan. Whatever might have been his caste antecedents, Shivaji
undoubtedly was one of Country’s greatest kings. His achievements didn’t
need a manufactured genealogy.
The ultra nationalist RSS is still in search of a genealogy that will
connect it to the nationalist movement that won the country its freedom.
The truth is that the contemporary writings and speeches of RSS leaders
have a very different story to tell. These leaders showed little
enthusiasm for the anti-British struggle. Though the founder of the RSS,
Dr. BR Hedgewar had an early association with the Congress and other
nationalist movements like Bhagat Singh and Chandrashekhar Azad’s
Hindustan Republican Association, he left it all behind to found the
RSS.
He also stopped his followers from the nationalist path. In fact a later
Sarsanghchalak, BR Deoras, wrote approvingly of how“Dr.Hedgewar saved
him and others from the path of Bhagat Singh and his comrades.” With the
death of Dr.Hedgewar in 1940, the RSS lost all interest in freedom. Its
new leader MS Golwalkar drew inspiration from Adolf Hitler’s ideology
of race purity. Paradoxically Golwalkar also admired Jews for
“maintaining their religion, culture and language.”
Golwalkar’s focus was on religion, racial purity and exclusion. Freedom
was to be left to lesser mortals like Gandhiji and his Congress. He
wanted the RSS to be involved only in “routine work.”
In the words of Golwalkar: “There is another reason for the need of
always remaining involved in routine work. There is some unrest in the
mind due to the situation developing in the country from time to time.
There was such unrest in 1942. Before that there was the movement in
1930-31. At that time many other people had gone to Doctorji (Hedgewar).
This ‘delegation’ requested Doctorji that this movement (Congress) will
give independence and Sangh should not lag behind. At that time, when a
gentleman told Doctorji that he was ready to go to jail, Doctorji said:
‘Definitely go. But who will take care of your family then?’ That
gentlemen told- ‘he has sufficiently arranged resources not only to run
the family expenses for two years but also to pay fines according to the
requirements.’ Then Doctorji said to him-’if you have fully arranged
for the resources then come out to work for the Sangh for two years.’
Golwalkar’s point was crystal clear. Dharam came before Dharma.
The BJP leadership is very keen to project the RSS as a component of the
freedom struggle. The BJP finds it embarrassing that the RSS - to which
the top leadership as well as the overwhelming majority of the cadre of
the BJP belong -was not a part of the freedom movement. The RSS lacks
the courage to categorically state that it did not participate in the
freedom struggle because its ideology prevented it from doing so.
There is the well-known concocted story of how the RSS tried to lionize
Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s role in the 1942 movement. This ended up in a
huge fiasco when it was discovered that Vajpayee actually made a
confessional statement disassociating himself from the event at his
hometown Bateshwar. In this confessional he wrote: “Ten or twelve
persons were in the Forest Office. I was at a distance of 100 yards. I
did not render any assistance in demolishing the government building.
Thereafter, we went to our respective homes.” Clearly this was leading
nowhere.
Hence the RSS is trying to attach themselves the legacy of RSSised Vallabhbhai
Patel, to get a leg into the nationalist movement. They forget that it
was Sardar Patel who had banned the RSS after learning that its workers
were distributing sweets to celebrate Gandhiji’s assassination.
In the run up to the 2014 elections Modi displayed his lack of
knowledge of history or willingness to distort it by saying that the
Congress Party wanted Patel to be the first PM. The fact is that
Jawaharlal Nehru became the President of the Congress in 1946, after
Maulana Azad was dissuaded from offering himself on the basis of the
system of rotation that the Congress informally followed. Patel was
never in the run. Given Nehru’s overwhelming popularity, even if Patel
contested Nehru would have defeated him.
Both, LK Advani and Narendra have tried to create a fissure between
Nehru and Patel. They seem to be confused between dissent and
dissidence. Dissent is a genuine difference of opinion, and there were
many between Nehru and Patel, as should be between two independent
minded individuals. Dissidence is a result of competing ambitions.
On this Patel was clear. He wrote: “It was, therefore, in the fitness of
things that in the twilight preceding the dawn of independence he
(Nehru) should have been our leading light, and that when country was
faced with crises after crises, following the achievement of our
freedom, he should have been the upholder of our faith and the leader of
our legions.” Patel tellingly added: “Contrary to the impression
created by some interested persons and eagerly accepted in credulous
circles, we have worked together as lifelong friends and colleagues,
adjusting ourselves each other’s advice as only those who have
confidence in each other can.”
Now the RSS is trying to make Sardar Patel its own. In this modern
version of the RSS’s history it tries to give itself an indirect lineage
deriving from RSSised Sardar Patel. The colossal statue is supposed to rewrite
its history. But it will only end up as a parvenu wanting in patriotism
when it mattered most
But Modi won’t know all this. History is not his forte, or else
he would not think that Alexander died on the west bank of the Ganges!
(Mohan Guruswamy, a scholar from Harvard, is a well known political commentator)
http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/bhimraos-sharp-arrow/291692
National
Ambedkar’s view
Bhimrao’s Sharp Arrow
Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar always feared that the Hindus,
specifically the caste Hindus, whom he often addressed with the cold
appellation—Touchables—would gang up communally, pose as a political
majority, and run away with what he called the ‘title deeds’ of
democracy. The usage of this heaped category that lumps close to 65 per
cent of the subcontinent’s population (52 per cent obcs plus the rest
of the privileged dwija/twice-born communities), problematic though it
is, indicates a shift from an earlier, more nuanced position Ambedkar
held in 1931. That was when he saw the various jatis belonging to the
four varnas—Shudra, Vaishya, Kshatriya, brahmin—as “a gradation of
castes forming an ascending scale of reverence and a descending scale
of contempt”, a system he believed “gives no scope for the growth of
that sentiment of equality and fraternity so essential for a democratic
form of government”.
A lot had
changed from 1931 to 1945, but Ambedkar was still smarting
from the defeat inflicted on him by the blackmail fast his principal
adversary, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, undertook in Poona in 1932. Till
the success at the Round Table Conference in 1931, Ambedkar was coasting
along. With the Mahad Satyagraha (1927) and stellar performances in the
Bombay Legislative Council behind him, he had come to be seen as the
distinctive voice of the Untouchables. He consistently argued that the
Untouchables should not be clubbed with Touchable Hindus. This
position—echoed previously by Panditar Iyothee Thass (1845-1914), the
radical Tamil Buddhist thinker—was first articulated by Ambedkar during
his submission to the South borough Franchise Commission in 1919,
where
he submitted that the Untouchables formed “a separate element in
Country’s social life”, and hence were a social minority. “That was
Ambedkar’s first political statement.”
After eight years, when Ambedkar led 3,000 SC/STs to drink water from
a tank in Mahad maintained with public funds, and thus establish “the
norm of equality”, the obduracy of the caste Hindus and Gandhi’s
conspicuous silence on the thirst of the Untouchables for equality made
him arrive at a conclusion historians of the Left, Right, Congress and
Subaltern Studies have refused to acknowledge: “The satyagraha movement
started by Gandhi was backed by the people as it was against foreign
domination. Our struggle is against the mass of caste Hindus and
naturally we have little support from outside.” All his life, Ambedkar
identified the Hindus (which translated into the brahmin-baniya
Congress) as the principal adversaries of SC/STs in the social and
political field.
Despite all efforts to keep him out of the Constituent Assembly, Jogendranath Mandal got him elected.
Yet, Ambedkar convinced the British to accept the fact
that Untouchables deserved separate electorates and the double vote.
This was granted by the Communal Award of August 16, 1932. What did this
entail? The Scheduled Castes were to have their own electorates and
exclusively choose their representatives. Additionally, they would
have a second vote—to choose who among the Touchables would be the
least inimical to them. Untouchables, regarded habitually by Touchables
as lesser humans unfit for association, needed such protection if they
were to be treated as equal. Democracy, premised on ‘one person one
vote’, needed to be modified to suit the subcontinental context composed
of multiple minorities. Ambedkar was making an immense moral demand of
the Hindus: for the crime of practising untouchability over centuries,
Hindus will not be allowed to vote for Untouchables for 10 years. But
the Scheduled Castes will have a say in choosing who among the Hindus
could possibly be their friend. This was a modest price he was seeking
of Touchables who owed an unrepayable debt for generations of slavery
and dehumanisation of 15 per cent of the population whose very shadow
they were afraid of.
After Gandhi stymied this scheme, Ambedkar faced one electoral
humiliation after another. He found it impossible to get
self-respecting, independent SC/STs into legislatures. Several times,
his own defeat was inevitable. In fact, his election to the Constituent
Assembly required a miracle.
Padma-award-friendly court historians and Films Division-style propaganda by the likes of Shyam Benegal (his Samvidhan
series for Doordarshan) would have us believe that it was at Gandhi’s
benevolent and large-hearted suggestion that Ambedkar was made chairman
of the drafting committee of the Constitution. The truth is every effort
was made to ensure that Ambedkar did not even enter the Constituent
Assembly. In the 1946 elections to the provincial assemblies, Ambedkar’s
Scheduled Caste Federation suffered crushing defeats. The
first-past-the-post (FPTP) system led to only pliable SC/STs—‘Harijans’—being elected from reserved constituencies. In the
July 1946 elections to the Constituent Assembly, then Bombay prime
minister B.G. Kherat engineered Ambedkar’s defeat at Vallabhbhai
Patel’s behest. Jogendranath Mandal, SCF leader from Bengal, stepped in
to get Ambedkar elected to the Constituent Assembly from Bengal where
Mandal had forged an alliance with the Muslim League.
Lasting legacy Dalits in Mumbai on his 51st death anniversary
It was at this juncture that, unsure of his place and role in the
Constituent Assembly, Ambedkar prepared a memorandum in March 1947: States and Minorities: What are Their Rights and How to Secure them in the Constitution of Free India.
This ‘Constitution of the United States of India’ offered a unique
solution so that a communal majority did not wear the garb of political
majority. The minorities—Muslims, SC/STs or Sikhs—if they were not to be
“crushed and overwhelmed by the communal majority”—ought to have
greater representation in a legislative body than their actual share in
the population.
States and Minorities echoed Ambedkar’s
presidential address to the SCF in 1945, where he said: “In our country, the
majority is not a political majority. In this country, the majority is born; it
is not made. That is the difference between a communal majority and a
political majority.” He offered a prescient formula to thwart the
communal majority from claiming a political majority. In the Central
Assembly, the Hindus, who form 54.68 per cent of the population, should
get 40 per cent representation; Muslims with 28.5 per cent should get 32
per cent; Scheduled Castes with their 14.3 per cent should get 20 per
cent; 1.16 per cent Christians 3 per cent; 1.49 per cent Sikhs 4
per cent; and 0.05 per cent Anglo-Indians 1 per cent. In Bombay, the
Hindus, who are 76.42 per cent of the population, should get 40 per cent
representation in the legislature; Muslims, 9.98 per cent of the
population, 28 per cent; 9.64 per cent Scheduled Castes, 28 per cent,
and so on. The minorities must get representation positively
disproportionate to their ratio in population while for the majority
community it is capped at 40 per cent. That is, less should have more,
and more should have less. Where Hindus were outnumbered, like in
pre-partition Punjab, Muslims comprising 57.06 per cent would get 40 per
cent representation; Hindus at 22.17 per cent, 28 per cent, and so
forth. This formula could well have even prevented Partition.
This is because Ambedkar believed “majority rule is untenable in
theory and unjustifiable in practice. A majority community may be
conceded a relative majority of representation but it can never claim an
absolute majority”. In Thoughts on Linguistic States (1955),
he says, “It would be enough to have plural member constituencies (of
two or three) with cumulative voting in place of the system of
single-member constituency embodied in the present Constitution.”
Had the FPTP system been modified according to Ambedkar’s formula,
we would not have had the gross statistical aberration in the 2014
general election: with just 31 per cent of the total voteshare (not the
share of the total population), the BJP won 282 Lok Sabha seats. No
party ever has won so many seats with so less a voteshare. The Hindus
have ganged up communally. In the 2007 Gujarat election, Muslims at 9
per cent of the population could elect only five MLAs (2.7 per cent) to
the 182-member assembly. In 2012, only two got elected. For 25 years
now, Gandhi’s Gujarat has not elected a single Muslim to the Lok Sabha.
The ‘Gujarat model’ Ambedkar feared is now being experimented with in
Uttar Pradesh. Caste has found a perfect fit with parliamentary
democracy.
Had Ambedkar had his way, someone like Narendra Modi would have found
it difficult to get elected even to a panchayat. And we would not have
had Amit Shah’s mug staring at us from every hoarding in the capital.
(Anand is publisher, Navayana.)
https://www.thequint.com/opinion/2015/10/31/sardar-patel-and-dr-ambedkar-allies-or-foes
Sardar Patel and Dr Ambedkar
Dr
BR Ambedkar and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the BJP and the
government’s latest totems. A few days ago, Murderer of democratic
institutions (Modi) commissioned Patel’s statue at Kevadia in Gujarat,
which is billed
as being the tallest in the world.But not for Ambedkar.
Meanwhile, Hardik Patel, who has rapidly become somewhat of a rather
painful pinprick for the BJP, continues to agitate for scrapping the
system of reservations altogether, or to accede to his demand for the
Patel quota. While the celebrations and commemoration is on today, he,
presently behind bars for arson and vandalism, and his supporters are
raring to play a disruptive role.
Thus, in this perplexing crucible, it would be worthwhile to
delve into the tomes of history and see whether both the icons –
Ambedkar and Patel – saw eye-to-eye on caste and reservations.
Did You Know?
felt quotas “quotas are anti-national”.
The Constituent Assembly Debates,
which took place from 9 December 1946 to 24 January 1950, provide the
richest source of material for pursuing this inquiry. This is because
reservations, which are now enshrined in the Constitution as a part of
the fundamental right to equality and non-discrimination, were one of
the most hotly debated issues.
On 24 January 1947, the Advisory Committee on Rights of
Citizens, Minorities, and Tribal and Excluded Area was set up, with
Patel as the head, and Ambedkar a member of one of the sub-committees,
the one on Fundamental Rights. On one hand, the Committee was clear that
the scourge of the caste-system and all the oppression it brought in
its wake has to be eradicated, and there must be constitutional and
legal safeguards to ensure that discrimination and practice of
untouchability in any form was disposed of in the trashcans of history.
Ambedkar was the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the
Constituent Assembly, but he also had a very determined agenda – to
safeguard the rights of SC/STs and ensure that their continued
subjugation was brought to an end, even if it required a persistent and
‘combative’ approach. He was in no doubt that it would not be possible
without securing political and economic rights – that is, through quotas
in public education and employment. Therefore, he proposed that the
government must set aside, by prescription, a certain percentage of
posts for the backward and depressed classes.
Patel, on the other hand, and many members of the Congress,
predominantly upper-castes, especially KM Munshi and Pandit Thakur Das
Bharghava, were vehemently opposed to this. Munshi and Bharghava
insisted that the SC/STs were part of Hinduism, and they should eschew
their demands for quotas and separate electorates, because that would
make them stand out as separate, thereby causing a schism in the Hindu
community and polity.
Ambedkar, who had demanded separate electorates for guaranteeing equal
opportunities in political representation resolutely pressed ahead. He
did so in spite of being forced on the backfoot by Gandhi to accede to
the Poona Pact of 1932 (which considerably diluted the stakes of the Scheduled Castes).
At this moment, one could perhaps pause and wonder who all Patel had in
mind while insisting that the reality of centuries of slurs, torture,
and abject deprivation be ‘forgotten’? Just because Ambedkar and a few
other SC/STs, whose tales of overcoming seemingly insurmountable
barriers are legion, had made their way to the Constituent Assembly ?
Also, doesn’t his stance resonate exactly with what Hardik and his
cohorts are demanding – that economic status should be the sole
criterion for deciding upon reservations?
Enforced Civility towards Determination and “Merit”?
Today,
in any discussion or debate on reservations, “merit” is bound to
feature. Demands that it should be the only criterion for opening doors
to opportunities in both education and employment are rampant. By merit,
those who oppose reservations, mean ‘performance’ – in terms of
examination scores and professional accomplishments. They fervently
believe that any other factor – social discrimination and exclusion –
which have a significant bearing on an individual or a group’s
performance in certain spheres, must be left at the wayside.
In this context, historian Christophe Jaffrelot’s seminal treatise
on Ambedkar’s battle against untouchability provides illuminating
insights into how he could even make it to the Constituent Assembly in
the first place. It assumes all the more significance because of late,
there have been consistent efforts to “whitewash” Ambedkar – scrub him clean of his SC/ST identity
and present him as a shining constitutional scholar and statesman
(which he undoubtedly was) only. Efforts are also underfoot to present
him as someone who is given more respect than he deserves, and someone who hugely benefited from Gandhi and Patel’s magnanimity. These have come mostly from the BJP, whose Arun Shourie heaped scorn on Ambedkar.
Here, one needs to read Jaffrelot, who shows how the Indian National Congress scuttled his election
to the Constituent Assembly, and Patel, who always maintained a cordial
demeanour, did have a hand in it. Ultimately it was Jogendra Nath
Mandal, a SC leader from Bengal, who later went on to become
Pakistan’s first Law Minister, who helped him get elected.
Thus,
as the BJP and its allies surge ahead, Hardik rages on, and the Congress
clambers on to the criticism bandwagon, a travel into the past rakes up
some revelatory truths.
http://www.asianage.com/…/cm-drops-letter-banning-religious…
Maharashtra CM drops letter banning religious photos in govt offices
State government employees’ union has strongly protested actions being taken against the officer.
Mumbai: Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis has ordered the withdrawal of a
letter by the state rural development department banning religious
pictures in government offices after meeting Shiv Sena ministers. But
the said letter is based on a government circular issued in June 2002.
The Asian Age has copies of the 2002 circular as well as the recent
letter issued by the department reiterating the former’s contents. But
overlooking the 2002 circular, the government has sought explanation
from the concerned desk officer who issued the guidelines afresh earlier
this month. The state government employees’ union has strongly
protested actions being taken against the officer, against whom a show
cause notice was served today. The desk officer, A.V. Warkade, was asked
to give his explanation in writing by his superiors. When contacted by
The Asian Age, Mr Warkade however refused to talk. “I am not authorised
to speak to media,” he said.
On Friday morning, Mr Fadnavis
ordered an inquiry into the said letter sent sent by Mr Warakade on
January 4 of this year. “Any pictures of Gods, as well as religious
festivals, writing slogans in government offices is not permitted under
government rule and according to the Constitution,” stated the letter.
The ruling Shiv Sena party strongly objected the letter reaching its
peak on Thursday when Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray raised the issue
in his political rally as well.
However, the issue of the letter
was not a manifestation of a single man’s whim. In a government circular
of rural development ministry from 2002, a copy of which is in
possession of The Asian Age, clearly instructed their employees not to
post any religious pictures in offices.
However, Mr Warakade
issued the letter in his capacity as a desk officer, after receiving it
from the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO). Maharashtra Cast Tribe
Government Employees Welfare Union as well as Secular Movement
Organisation had sent the letters to CMO demanding issuance of
instructions on religious pictures in government offices.
When
asked if blaming the officer was justified, Shiv Sena leader and
Industry Minister Subhash Desai said, “There is no issue of
generalisation. Be it circular from 2002 or 1947. This rule was not in
actual implication, then why pushing it now? It is an emotional issue
for us and till we are in the government we will never allow officers to
disrespect emotions of Hindus.”
The State Government Employees
Union has also showed their discontent for taking actions against the
officer. The union’s general secretary G.D. Kuthe said, “The officer
shall not be punished as the letter was sent with good intentions. Union
will see that there won’t be an injustice.”
Once The EC had passed orders to drape all the BSP symbols Elephant in the last assembly elections for ‘level playing ground’. But noe the same order is not passed to drape the cycles the symbol of SP or its ally Congress’s Hand. The BJP’s lotus symbol must also be draped and in Maharashtra gods pictures must not be displayed because most of the gods or either sitting or standing on Lotus which is the symbol of BJP and also the national flower Lotus must be frozen for level playing ground.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Abki Baar BSP Ki Sarkar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
BSP का विदेश में भी बजा डंका, ऑस्ट्रेलिया के अप्रवासी भारतीयों ने की मायावती को जीताने की अपील
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
सच्चे भीम सिपाही का क्या है फर्ज । Bheem Mission Song by Haryanvi Bhim
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
सपना को दिया मुँह तोड़ जवाब । Manjeet Mehra Song for Sapna Nalayak | Bheem Jagran Jhajjar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
कैलाश खेर का बहुजन समाज पार्टी के लिए गाना । BSP UP
2120 Fri 27 Jan 2017
LESSONS
The
urban oriented PRESSTITTUE media attempt to isolate BSP will fail. It
will be a rude shock to the Jathi Familywadi Party and the media as the
Social media is more powerful catering to the entire sarvajan Samaj
whose only leader is Mayawati waiting in the wings to return to power on
the time-tested Sarvajan Samaj including SC.STs/OBCs/Minorities/Upper
Castes combination.
With the Jathi Familywadi Party (JFP)the SP
on poor law and order and focusing on the its failure during the 2013
Muzaffarnagar riots which left more than 60 persons dead and thousands
homeless, the BSP is a serious challenger to the BJP (Bahuth Jiyadha
Psychopaths ) and the SP (JFP) as SP-Congress tie-up will only help the
BJP by dividing votes and that Mayawati’s BSP remained their best bet.
“The coming together of the SP-Congress is nothing but an attempt by
both sides to piggyback each other in the face of certain electoral
defeat,” Naseemuddin Siddiqui, the tallest Muslim leader of the BSP,
said. Siddiqui scoffed at the “winnability prospects” of the alliance.
“The Congress leadership has surrendered before the SP in a bid to
garner a few seats but it has failed the aspirations of the Muslim
voters,” Mayawati thundered.
Murderer
of democratic institutions (Modi) Of The Nation (MOTN) polls forecast
in his favour is conducted by PRESSTITUTE Media thus called by the BJP
(Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths) but for the sake of money. They cater to
only the urban voters.
Napolean had said that “I can face two battalions but not two scribes”.
Now
such loyal scribes are found in the Social Media including WhatsApp,
Facebook, twitter, Youtube etc. who have become the owners of Journalism
and the nation.
Their political opinion poll which clearly shows that Modi’s days are numbered.
So who will win 2019?
The
results of the assembly polls in five states, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab,
Uttarakhand, Goa and Manipur will, of course, provide some indication.
Mayawati’s
inclusive politics having paid off at the hustings, the BSP now has the
Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies including SC/STs, Muslims and upper
castes—cutting across communities—as its audience…. The people of UP
tasted the fruits of identity politics. What they had was real
development electricity infrastructure and safety from criminal
elements. …task for Mayawati the as monarch in 2007 she had acted with
the overwhelming mandate.
This was not tolerated by Congress,
BJP, SP and their allies which are Jathi Familywadi Parties (JFP) all
serving for their own families welfare and happiness ignoring their
communities who selected them.
Mayawati who became eligible for next PM of Prabuddha Bharath was defeated by the JFP by tampering the EVMs in their favour.
”We have reached a stage where people are demanding hundred per cent
deployment of paper audit trail machine. Our plan is that by 2019, the
whole country will be covered by paper audit trail machines. The budget
for this has been committed now,” Zaidi said
It has been proved
any doubt that the EVMs could be tampered as EVMs are continued to be
attacked by activists in various media and
judicial fora on account of lack of transparency.
But he has not ordered for Ballot Papers to be used till the entire EVMs were replaced
Now for the UP Assembly elections only in 20 constituencies the EVMs are being replaced.
In the 2014 Lok Sabha elections Ms Mayawati’s BSP lost all the seats in
UP because of these EVMs. But after some months BSP won with thumping
majority with paper ballot system.
http://www.advocatekhoj.com/li
the Ex CJI sathasivam had committed a grave error of judgement by
ordering that the EVMs will be replaced in a phased manner as suggested
by the ex CEC Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 crores involved in
the entire replacement of the EVMs. Only in 8 out of 543 seats were
replaced in 2014 Lok Sabha elections which helped the Murderer of
democratic institutions (Modi) to gobble the Master Key.
After that all state elections are using the very same EVMs that helped the BJP or Congress and their allies getting selected.
The CJI and CEC must order for paper ballot system till entire EVMs
were replaced. And also order for dissolving the Central and state
governments selected by these EVMs and go for fresh elections with paper
ballot system.
The next general elections are due in 2019.
Were an election held today, the BSP would
get a
comfortable majority in the Lok Sabha and making it less dependent on
allies.
Modi’s popularity ratings have also shown a
remarkable down slide: who polled just 1 per cent of the votes.
The
whole Nation believe that DEMONetisation did not curb black money and
helped the economy. Rs 15 Lakhs as promised by Modi was not not
deposited in the bank accounts of all the citizens of the nation. That
is a solid 100 per cent who did not endorse Modi’s DEMONetisation move without proper planning. DEMONetisation
had caused more pain than gain that killed many innocent people in
Modi’s QUEUE INDIA MOVEMENT. And as an insult to the injured The
Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) of just 1% intolerant, militant, violent,
shooting, lynching, lunatic, mentally retarded cannibal chitpawan
brahmins psychopaths claimed that people who died in queue were patriots
who sacrificed (Balidhan) for their stealth, shadowy discriminatory
hindutva cult rashtra.
Such is the downfall that Modi has
been rated as the worst the country has had so far with a slaogan
Jab
Nehru, Lal Bahadur Sashtri, Indira, Rajiv Gandhi, Gulzari Lal Nanda,
Moraji Desai, VP Singh, IK Gujral, Deve Gowda, Man Mohan Singh ko aane
dhiya ab Bhenji ko aane do.
Modi’s
DEMONetisation exercise and his other initiatives made him super-fool.
100 per cent thought that his performance has been worst.
almost a
wash-out of the Winter Session in the Parliament due to DEMONisation,
100 per cent still believe that it was NDA and UPA’s fault for the
Parliament
stalemate as they were vultures of a feather that flock together feeding
on the bodies of the Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies voters.
Modi, as leader of NDA, is the most unpopular in the country, with 29 state chief ministers, the
three most unpopular-Nitish Kumar in Bihar, Mamata Banerjee in Bengal and RSS Arvind Kejriwal who initially opposed EVMs then favoured when it was tampered in his favour in Delhi-are all from UPA parties.
Rahul
Gandhi redux: His popularity have
waned because of his anthar palti.(summersault). He said nathuram godse
the murderer of Gandhi belonged to RSS and later he backed out. He said
he had evidence of the corruption of Modi and then became silent. He
asked if it was a sin to have a brahmin Shila Dixit as CM of UP when
they could be as PMs. Now is just a 2nd partner of Jathi Familywadi
Party.
Who are the Others? It’s obviously
advantage BSP, with an increase of hundred percentage points the BSP’s fortunes continue to plummet.
99 per cent of the voters still think that former Chief Minister Ms Mayawati will be the best person to lead Prabuddha Bharath.
Now the CEC and CJI must order for dissolution of Central and State
governments selected by these EVMs and go for fresh polls with paper
ballots till the entire EVMs are replaced as we have reached a stage
where people are demanding hundred per cent deployment of paper audit
trail machine. And asthe plan is that by 2019, the whole country will be
covered by paper audit trail machines. The budget for this has been
committed now as said by Zaidi.
2119 Thu 26 Jan 2017
LESSONS
68th Happy Republic Day 2017
https://drambedkarbooks.com/…/
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar on Republic Day (26th January)
SP, Congress, BJP and their allies are all now Jathi Familywadi Parties
(JFP) Vultures of a feather that flop together on feeding on the bodies
of Sarvajan Voters.
2019 general elections to have paper-trail EVMs
Instead of waiting till 2019 the CEC must conduct elections with paper ballots system.
It has been proved any doubt that the EVMs could be tampered.
https://drambedkarbooks.com/…/
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar on Republic Day (26th January)
“On 26th January 1950, we are going to enter into a life of
contradictions. In politics, we will have equality and in social and
economic structure, continue to deny the principle of one man one value.
How long shall we continue to live this life of contradictions? How
long shall we continue to deny equality in our social and economic life?
If we continue to deny it for long, we
will do so only by putting our political democracy in peril. We must
remove this contradiction at the earliest possible moment else those who
suffer from inequality will blow up the structure of democracy which
this Constituent Assembly has so laboriously built up.”
“I feel that the constitution is workable, it is flexible and it is
strong enough to hold the country together both in peacetime and in
wartime. Indeed, if I may say so, if things go wrong under the new
Constitution, the reason will not be that we had a bad Constitution.
What we will have to say is that Man was vile.”
“There is no
nation of Indians in the real sense of the world, it is yet to be
created. In believing we are a nation, we are cherishing a great
delusion. How can people divided into thousand of castes be a nation?
The sooner we realise that we are not yet a nation, in a social and
psychological sense of the world, the better for us.”
“The third
thing we must do is not be content with mere political democracy. We
must note that our political democracy can not last unless there lies at
the base of it social democracy. What does social democracy mean? It
means a way of life which recognizes liberty, equality and fraternity as
the principles of life.”
“Independence is no doubt a matter of
joy. But let us not forget that this independence has thrown on us
greater responsibilities. By independence, we have lost the excuse of
blaming the British for anything going wrong. If hereafter things go
wrong, we will have nobody to blame except ourselves. There is a greater
danger of things going wrong. Times are fast changing.”
“Our object in framing the Constitution is rally two-fold:
(1) To lay down the form of political democracy, and
(2) To lay down that our ideal is economic democracy and also to
prescribe that every Government whatever is in power shall strive to
bring about economic democracy. The directive principles have a great
value, for they lay down that our ideal is economic democracy.”
26th January 1950, we are going to enter into a life of contradictions.
In politics, we will have equality and in social and economic
structure, continue to deny the principle of one man …
http://www.igovernment.in/…/
2019 general elections to have paper-trail EVMs
Instead of waiting till 2019 the CEC must conduct elections with paper ballots system.
It has been proved any doubt that the EVMs could be tampered.
Mayawati, Ignored By Media, Is Way Ahead In Campaigning
http://indianexpress.com/…/
“We have reached a stage where people are demanding hundred per cent
deployment of paper audit trail machine. Our plan is that by 2019, the
whole country will be covered by paper audit trail machines. The budget
for this has been committed now,” Zaidi said while addressing an
international seminar today.
“The Commission, with certain
additional resources, can undertake the exercise of (holding)
simultaneous elections in future. But there are two pre-conditions.
“One, there should be an amendment in the Constitution through a process
of political consensus and we will need some additional resources in
terms of EVMs (electronic voting machines), etc,” Zaidi said.
Instead of waiting till 2019 the CEC must conduct elections with paper ballots system.
It has been proved any doubt that the EVMs could be tampered.
http://www.igovernment.in/…/
2019 general elections to have paper-trail EVMs
Instead of waiting till 2019 the CEC must conduct elections with paper ballots system.
It has been proved any doubt that the EVMs could be tampered.
http://indianexpress.com/…/up-
In the 2014 Lok Sabha elections Ms Mayawati’s BSP lost all the seats in
UP because of these EVMs. But after some months BSP won with thumping
majority with paper ballot system.
http://www.advocatekhoj.com/
the Ex CJI sathasivam had committed a grave error of judgement by
ordering that the EVMs will be replaced in a phased manner as suggested
by the ex CEC Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 crores involved in
the entire replacement of the EVMs. Only in 8 out of 543 seats were
replaced in 2014 Lok Sabha elections which helped the Murderer of
democratic institutions (Modi) to gobble the Master Key.
After that all state elections are using the very same EVMs that helped the BJP or Congress and their allies getting selected.
In UP elections only in 20 constituencies the EVMs are being replaced.
The CJI and CEC must order for paper ballot system till entire EVMs
were replaced. And also order for dissolving the Central and state
governments selected by these EVMs and go for fresh elections with paper
ballot system.
The next general elections are due in 2019.
The paper audit trail machine or Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail
(VVPAT) was first introduced by the Commission in 2013 in order to
enhance transparency in the polls process and increase electorate’s
confidence that their vote goes without error to their desired
candidate.
Once the vote is polled, the VVPAT linked EVM
immediately takes a printout and it is preserved for later use to tally
in case there is a dispute in the final result.
Zaidi, who was
speaking on the topic ‘Leveraging Technology for Transparent and
Credible Elections’, stressed that secrecy of voters will be zealously
preserved.
For e-postal ballot, Zaidi said a “safe technology” has been developed and it is being “validated and tested currently….”
Zaidi said the EC has always marched along with technology despite
challenges coming its way like “controversies and opposition raised by
political parties and activists” while introducing EVMs as replacement
of the paper ballot system.
He said despite these results, the
EVMs “continued to be attacked by activists in various media and
judicial fora on account of alleged lack of transparency”.
“According to these activists, a voter does not get any physical
evidence whether his voting has gone to the intended candidate. This in
turn has led to introduction of paper audit trail machines after an
order of Supreme Court in 2013,” he said.
The CEC said VVPAT machines hence acted to resolve the queries and clarifications sought by people in this regard.
He added that “not a single” dispute has been reported from the country
vis-a-vis VVPAT usage in polls and the EC has deployed more than 20,000
such paper audit trail machines till now.
While moving forward in this direction, the CEC said the most important thing to be kept in mind was the security of the data.
When the BJP was in opposition even the RSS favoured Paper Ballots but
after it came to power they prefer EVMs and gave tickets to RSS cadres
in support of its hindutva rashtra.
Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths
continue to harass the voters because they are not bothered about their
votes as long as the EVMs are there to select them.
And also the
Congress, SP, BJP and all their allies are vultures of a feather that
flock together feeding on the bodies of Sarvajan Samaj voters.
BJP is using Religion for votes without any action being taken. RSS a
non political party says reservation should be removed which is against
our Modern Constitution. Again no action is being taken. EVMs were
tampered in favour of Murdererof democratic institutions (Modi)
Now the CEC and CJI must order for dissolution of Central and State
governments selected by these EVMs and go for fresh polls with paper
ballots till the entire EVMs are replaced as we have reached a stage
where people are demanding hundred per cent deployment of paper audit
trail machine. And asthe plan is that by 2019, the whole country will
be covered by paper audit trail machines. The budget for this has been
committed now as said by Zaidi.
Samaj Party (BSP)- she feels that the media in favour of
“the high-flying glamour boys” (Akhilesh Yadav and Rahul Gandhi).
It is correct that the structuring and last-minute reworking of the
tie-up between Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav and Congress No 2 Rahul
Gandhi grabbed them an inordinate amount of media space. “Dilli ki media
koh sirf cream polish samajh mein aati hai” (Delhi media only
understands cream and polish or elitist fate) said a senior BSP leader,
in a rather delightful dismissal. Others like him say that while the
media has obsessed over the alliance which hopes to be the BJP’s giant
killer, the facts on the ground are being ignored.
Though
the Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths referred the RSSISED media as
PRESSTITUTES they are not ashamed. They are enjoying the freedom of
press and expression as enshrined in our modern constitution whose chief
architect is Dr BR Ambedkar. They must be booked for practicing
untouchability for practicing social boycott.
Nepolian had said that ” I can face two battalions but not two scribes
“. Such scribes are the ones in social media who are really powerful
journalists. The urbanite media scribes are corrupt. IT raid follows if
it goes against congress SP BJP and their allies which are vulchers of a
feather that flock together along with the media feeding on the bodies
of Sarvajan Samaj voters who are calm, quiet, alert, attentive and
having equanimity minded with a clear understanding that everything is
changing including the central and state governments selected by the
fraud EVMs with the support of urban media.
1. There are 73
assembly constituencies where Muslims form more than 30 percent of the
electorate, while in another 70 assembly constituencies, Muslims are
between 20 and 30 percent of the voters. The BSP says that it has
started work in all these constituencies much before the other parties.
Mayawati has extensively campaigned in these constituencies and was
first off the block announcing a record number of Muslim candidates - 97
for a total of 403 seats (She is putting up 86 SC/ST candidates).
Mayawati stops her public meetings if the azaan rings out, calling
worshippers to pray.
2. Her party’s leaders say that Mayawati spurned an alliance
with the Congress as the party has not been in power in UP for more than
27 years. The Congress’s performance in the Lok Sabha elections
underscored its relegation to a bit player. Mayawati told two senior
Congress emissaries that while her loyal Jatav (Scheduled castes ) vote
is transferable and could help back Congress candidates, the 10 percent
vote that the Congress still manages will not support her candidates, so
she simply does not see any advantage to the alliance. “Behen-ji does
not need fancy foreign or local strategists. We know our people and they
crave the most basic thing: law and order, which will allow economic
opportunity for all,” said senior BSP leader Satish Mishra in a jibe at
Congress strategist Prashant Kishor and Steve Jarding, a public policy
professor at Harvard who advises Akhilesh Yadav on his campaign.
3. Mayawati feels that the media, which these days she’s
extra-careful not to call manuwadi (elitist) as she did in the past,
does not give her enough play and air time. However, she believes the UP
voter is listening carefully to her speeches and dismissal of the Yadav
family fight and soap opera as a Noora Kushti (a rigged fight).
Mayawati feels that the family feud, which was political centerstage for
weeks, was masterminded by her canniest and most persistent opponent,
Mulayam Singh, to combat anti-incumbency against his son.
4. The BSP feels that its vote share will increase because the
section of SC/STs who voted for the BJP in 2014 is now disillusioned.
Apart from the Jatavs, the BJP won swathes of the SC/ST vote during the
Modi wave, resulting in its huge yield of 73 of 80 parliamentary seats.
But with the Modi wave showing some ebbing, as shown in the Delhi and
Bihar elections, and the restrictive beef laws brought in to the
BJP-ruled states of Haryana and Maharashtra, the UP SC/STs are
reportedly upset with the BJP (SC/STs are beef-eaters and are heavily
employed in tanneries).
5. The BSP has calculated that the UP SC/ST is politically
hyper-aware after the assault on SC/STs in Una last year and the suicide
of Rohith Vemula at his Hyderabad university. Amit Shah, BJP President,
has given tickets to SC/STs but they are inconspicuous in campaign
material which is heavily tilted towards the BJP’s traditional upper
caste base. This has delighted Mayawati who loses no opportunity to mock
“Modi’s use and throw approach” at her hugely attended rallies. “Modi
ke toh achhe din aa gaye, UP koh kya mila? (Good times for Modi, but how
has UP benefited)?” You made him PM, he took away your money” she
thunders to huge applause, referencing the PM’s demonetisation drive.
6. Mayawati makes no qualms about her ambitions to eventually be
Prime Minister and directly attacks Modi at her meetings. She also rubs
in the fact that if she wins, she will be present as Chief Minister in
Lucknow to ensure that the dabang (daring lawless) are kept in check.
“Will Modi stay in Lucknow? He does not even stay in Delhi,” she tells
crowds to mock Modi’s frequent foreign trips.
7. Mayawati has also cut back on her much-discussed aloof and
arrogant demeanour after several high-value defections from the BSP to
the BJP. She makes time to meet every block leader and is in constant
touch with far-flung karyakartas (workers). Gone is the earlier hauteur,
replaced with an oft-repeated public vow of not building any more
monuments to herself. When Mayawati said this in public for the first
time last year, it shocked BSP leaders who now point to it as her
ability to adapt and read the voters’ mind. Says a BSP leader, “Is the
media so colour blind? You keep projecting Kejriwal, Nitish Kumar, now
even Yadav Junior as challengers to Modi but not a woman who has been UP
Chief Minister four times? Mayawati is truly a symbol of empowerment
and the majority of the voters see her like that. Our voters are silent,
they are diffident but they know how to press the button. The path to
Delhi is only through UP and only through Dalits and Muslims and Behenji
has time on her side.”
The two common threads that can be discerned in the different campaigns
for Uttar Pradesh is that all parties have gone back to basics of
vote-bank politics with a topping of Vikaas (development) in order to
garner the young voter who is the majority. So to appeal to the floating
youth vote, jobs and freebies such as pressure cookers and smart phones
are tumbling around. The second is that it’s the entire opposition
versus Narendra Modi and his demonetisation narrative.
So “Apni behen, bahar ka PM” (our sister versus an outsider PM) is the
BSP chant, while Akhilesh Yadav and Rahul Gandhi are being offered as
“Baahri versus apne ladkey” (our boys versus the outsider). It does seem
at this point that Shah has made a tactical error in not declaring a
presumptive Chief Minister and putting the entire onus on Modi. If the
BJP loses, the entire blame from currently irate and smarting BJP
leaders who have been ignored will fall on Shah and Modi.
BSP leaders say that the lack of a Chief Ministerial candidate from the
BJP and the consolidation of the Dalits and Muslims in favour of
Mayawati make her position impregnable. Ask if the alliance between SP
and Congress will net them Muslim votes and BSP leaders say that’s a
media-bred fallacy as the Muslims have made up their minds for Behen-ji.
Then the litany of complaints of blackouts and inadequate coverage is
trotted out.
There is a certain amount of truth to the BSP’s complaint. Mayawati,
unlike Akhilesh Yadav who is affable and ever-smiling, does get
negligible press. Senior BSP leaders say Sonia Gandhi keeps the press at
arm’s length, yet gets great coverage. BSP leaders feel a double
standard is applied to Mayawati and their party.
(Swati Chaturvedi is an author and a journalist who has worked with The
Indian Express, The Statesman and The Hindustan Times.)
SP, Congress, BJP and their allies are all now Jathi Familywadi Parties
(JFP) Vultures of a feather that flop together on feeding on the bodies
of Sarvajan Voters.
Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths, Congress and their allies are indulging in
Fashion shows, Beauty Contest and Cat walk for their Vote Bank. such as
“Priyanka Gandhi, whom the Congress is projecting as their star
campaigner for UP Assembly election, is not as pretty as people claim”.
“The BJP has prettier faces than Priyanka,”
“We have Smriti Irani, who more beautiful than Priyanka. There is a
crowd wherever she goes. Irani is also a far better speaker than
Priyanka,” said Katiyar.
Instead of showing respect to our Modern
Constitution by maintaining status quo the Psychopaths demolished a
place of worship of other religion and claim
“irrespective of the apex court’s decision, temple will be built in Ayodhya no matter what it takes”
Severe action must be taken against who practice hatred, anger,
jealousy, violence, delusion which is defilement of the mind that is
madness requiring treatment in a mental asylum with Vipassana Meditation
until they get cured of their mental illness.
But Sharad Yadav,
stirred a controversy of electoral vote. “Ballot paper ke bare mein
samjhane ki zarurat hai…i.e., there must be an awakening on the use of
Ballot paper instead of EVMs until they are entire replaced.
http://indianexpress.com/…/
“We have reached a stage where people are demanding hundred per cent
deployment of paper audit trail machine. Our plan is that by 2019, the
whole country will be covered by paper audit trail machines. The budget
for this has been committed now,” Zaidi said while addressing an
international seminar today.
“The Commission, with certain
additional resources, can undertake the exercise of (holding)
simultaneous elections in future. But there are two pre-conditions.
“One, there should be an amendment in the Constitution through a process
of political consensus and we will need some additional resources in
terms of EVMs (electronic voting machines), etc,” Zaidi said.
Instead of waiting till 2019 the CEC must conduct elections with paper ballots system.
It has been proved any doubt that the EVMs could be tampered.
http://www.igovernment.in/…/
2019 general elections to have paper-trail EVMs
Instead of waiting till 2019 the CEC must conduct elections with paper ballots system.
It has been proved any doubt that the EVMs could be tampered.
http://indianexpress.com/…/up-
In the 2014 Lok Sabha elections Ms Mayawati’s BSP lost all the seats in
UP because of these EVMs. But after some months BSP won with thumping
majority with paper ballot system.
http://www.advocatekhoj.com/
the Ex CJI sathasivam had committed a grave error of judgement by
ordering that the EVMs will be replaced in a phased manner as suggested
by the ex CEC Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 crores involved in
the entire replacement of the EVMs. Only in 8 out of 543 seats were
replaced in 2014 Lok Sabha elections which helped the Murderer of
democratic institutions (Modi) to gobble the Master Key.
After that all state elections are using the very same EVMs that helped the BJP or Congress and their allies getting selected.
In UP elections only in 20 constituencies the EVMs are being replaced.
The CJI and CEC must order for paper ballot system till entire EVMs
were replaced. And also order for dissolving the Central and state
governments selected by these EVMs and go for fresh elections with paper
ballot system.
The next general elections are due in 2019.
The paper audit trail machine or Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail
(VVPAT) was first introduced by the Commission in 2013 in order to
enhance transparency in the polls process and increase electorate’s
confidence that their vote goes without error to their desired
candidate.
Once the vote is polled, the VVPAT linked EVM
immediately takes a printout and it is preserved for later use to tally
in case there is a dispute in the final result.
Zaidi, who was
speaking on the topic ‘Leveraging Technology for Transparent and
Credible Elections’, stressed that secrecy of voters will be zealously
preserved.
For e-postal ballot, Zaidi said a “safe technology” has been developed and it is being “validated and tested currently….”
Zaidi said the EC has always marched along with technology despite
challenges coming its way like “controversies and opposition raised by
political parties and activists” while introducing EVMs as replacement
of the paper ballot system.
He said despite these results, the
EVMs “continued to be attacked by activists in various media and
judicial fora on account of alleged lack of transparency”.
“According to these activists, a voter does not get any physical
evidence whether his voting has gone to the intended candidate. This in
turn has led to introduction of paper audit trail machines after an
order of Supreme Court in 2013,” he said.
The CEC said VVPAT machines hence acted to resolve the queries and clarifications sought by people in this regard.
He added that “not a single” dispute has been reported from the country
vis-a-vis VVPAT usage in polls and the EC has deployed more than 20,000
such paper audit trail machines till now.
While moving forward in this direction, the CEC said the most important thing to be kept in mind was the security of the data.
When the BJP was in opposition even the RSS favoured Paper Ballots but
after it came to power they prefer EVMs and gave tickets to RSS cadres
in support of its hindutva rashtra.
Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths
continue to harass the voters because they are not bothered about their
votes as long as the EVMs are there to select them.
And also the
Congress, SP, BJP and all their allies are vultures of a feather that
flock together feeding on the bodies of Sarvajan Samaj voters.
BJP is using Religion for votes without any action being taken. RSS a
non political party says reservation should be removed which is against
our Modern Constitution. Again no action is being taken. EVMs were
tampered in favour of Murdererof democratic institutions (Modi)
Now the CEC and CJI must order for dissolution of Central and State
governments selected by these EVMs and go for fresh polls with paper
ballots till the entire EVMs are replaced as we have reached a stage
where people are demanding hundred per cent deployment of paper audit
trail machine. And asthe plan is that by 2019, the whole country will be
covered by paper audit trail machines. The budget for this has been
committed now as said by Zaidi.
2118 Wed 25 Jan 2017
LESSONS
http://www.igovernment.in/…/2019-general-elections-have-pap…
Wishing all a Happy Lunar Year of the Rooster! May we awaken to the crow
of the Rooster!
http://media.photobucket.com/…
Wishing all a Happy Lunar Year of the Rooster! May we awaken to the crow of the Rooster!
How do we know we have awakened as an arhat?
We can only answer meaningfully through our understanding.
Arhathood arises from the full understanding and experience of the 4
noble truths. Once we become streamwinners, or even as aspirants to
streamwinning, we are able to see the true, as well as subtle, nature of
suffering. The world may be appearances, but it is what lies below
these appearances that bait and bully us into acting in a way that
perpetuates our suffering.
As long as we neither understand nor
accept that craving is at the root of suffering, we will look for all
the wrong explanations and rationalizations for suffering. Science and
medicine may be able to describe the nature of suffering, even cure
certain aspects and delay others, but the suffering of the mindrooted
in greed, hate and delusion will always haunt us as long as we are
unawakened.
With our worldly knowledge, we may study the nature of
suffering, or even analyze what we see as the causes of suffering. We
may gaze deep into the nature of suffering, but we only see suffering
staring back at us. We cannot exorcise all the demons of suffering, or
even tame any of them, as long as we are rooted in spiritual ignorance.
Meaning of life
The first two noble truths suffering and its arising (through craving)
– clearly describe the true meaning of life. We can take “meaning” here
as referring to the value of life. When we understand that life is
nothing but “suffering” (dukkha) because it is impermanent,
unsatisfactory and beyond our control (it has no abiding essence), we
see the value of such an understanding.
The full meaning of life
is formulated in the teaching on dependent arising, which is rooted in
ignorance, and through ignorance we create our own virtual reality that
invariably ends in suffering. Dependent arising comprises these two
noble truths, describing by means of conditionality (causes and effects)
the meaning of life.
Then, when we reflect deeper, we will see
that because life is impermanent, it is precious to us: we value life.
This is, in fact, the basis for moral virtue: it is founded on the value
and respect for life because it is so fragile. Yet, it is precious
because it is our only means of getting out of suffering, of awakening
to true reality.
The purpose of life
The third noble truth
here (following the practice model) is the path leading to the end of
suffering, that is, the noble eightfold path, constituting the 3
trainings of moral virtue, mental concentration and wisdom. Having
clearly understood the nature and arising of suffering, we are ready to
work towards its ending, or rather, to take the path to the ending of
suffering.
We must now apply our understanding into action, to
tame and refine our body and speech so that they do not distract our
mental cultivation. Then, we calm and clear our mind to direct it
towards seeing true reality, which brings us the insight wisdom to free
us from the grasp of ignorance and craving.
The total freedom
from ignorance and craving – more fully, the destruction of the 3 karmic
roots of greed, hate and delusion – is called Eternal Bliss, the fourth
and last of the noble truths (according to the practice model) [see
previous paragraph].
Eternal Bliss is neither a place nor a
state. It is just a word we use to refer to when all suffering ends with
the destruction of greed, hate and delusion. It is like the
extinguishing of fire, or the quenching of thirst. That fire or the
thirst does not go anywhere; neither of them arise any more (as long as
we are quenched). Eternal Bliass, however, is the final quenching; it
needs to be done only once.
The last two noble truths deal with
the path to the ending of suffering, and the total ending of suffering
itself, that is, Eternal Bliss. While the first two truths deal with the
meaning of life, these last two deal with the purpose of life. Based on
our understanding of the meaning of life through dependent arising, we
can now reverse the cycle, or break any of the vital links in the
chain, and bring on the dependent ending of suffering with the
uprooting of ignorance and craving.
Attaining arhathood
This is the arhat’s review knowledge, that is, a retrospective
knowledge. This is the “recollected mental image obtained in
concentration, or to any inner experience just passed, as for
instance, an absorption or a supramundane path, or fruition of the
path, etc.
We remind ourself to keep to our practice, instead
of anticipating or measuring its progress. If we need to ask whether we
have progressed or not, the likely answer is that we have not! True
practitioners only diligently and joyfully practice. As we live our
lives diligently, over an extended period, we are able to joyfully
notice that we have invariably not faltered in the smallest challenge to
our moral virtue, or mental concentration, or wisdom. We live confident
in the fact that we have always, without exception, lived in the spirit
and the letter. This is sufficient for us to rejoice in that we have
attained the supreme goal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSK80pQZn9Y
Ideal Bahujan Song 4
Singer- Kishor Kumar “Pagla” Member of Lalit Sangeet Kala Natya Academy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXRhzqaQ3N4
Ideal Bahujan Song Listen Must
Singer-Member of Lalit Kala Academic of India, and BSP’S National Singer Kishor Kumar “Pagla”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Imzv3z23A
MAYAWATI SONG : बहन हमारी भारत कि शान है
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9HYI7Ll1o0
Bhanji ko aane do
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbUWZfzjsO8
Bhen ji ko aane do
http://zeenews.india.com/…/senior-samajwadi-party-leader-am…
Senior Samajwadi party leader Ambika Chowdhary joins
Lucknow: Senior Samajwadi Party (SP) leader and former minister in the
state government Ambika Chowdhary on Saturday switched allegiance to the
Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP).
Samajwadi Party (SP) leader and former minister in the state government
Ambika Chowdhary on Saturday switched allegiance to the Bahujan Samaj
Party (BSP).
Delhi: BSP supremo Ms Mayawati today attacked RSS chief Mohan
Bhagwat’s statement on review of quota regime and threatened a
nationwide protest against the Narendra Modi government if it “toed” the
line of the Sangh leader.
the Narendra Modi government tries to toe the line of Bhagwat, if it
tries to tamper with the humanitarian provision of reservation as
enshrined in the Constitution, then BSP will launch a nation-wide mass
agitation which will prove costly to the government,” she said at a
press conference in New Delhi.
former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister said the RSS wants to push the
Dalits and the downtrodden back into the “dark ages of exploitation”
against which B R Ambedkar had to struggle and framed a Constitution
based on humanitarian considerations.
claimed Mr Bhagwat’s remarks have created a lot of anguish among the
Dalits and the backwards. “But so far neither the Narendra Modi
government nor the BJP have come out openly to reject the demand of the
RSS for which the BSP criticises them in strongest possible words.”
did the same during the rule of Atal Bihari Vajpayee government when it
tried to end reservation in the garb of Constitution review. The then
government was forced to withdraw its agenda,” she said.
said BSP is concerned on the issue of review of the reservation policy
as the reins of the PM Modi government are in the hands of the RSS.
government can any time definitely do something in one way or the other
to tamper with the arrangement of reservation. Therefore, we will keep a
vigil on the issue,” she said.
BJP and Congress as “extremely casteist”, Ms Mayawati said the two have
done little to improve the condition of the Dalits and the backwards in
the last several years.
is he to poke his dirty nose in others dish. He is a dropout and not a
constitutional expert and has no business to talk of reservation
enshrined in the Modern Constitution of the Chief Architect Dr BR
Ambedkar who made reservations as a compromise for separate electorate.
27th January in SC/ST History – Dr Ambedkar before Southborough Commission: Fight for separate electorate
27 January 1919: Dr. Ambedkar
submitted a memorandum and gave evidence before the Southborough
Commission. The memorandum was attached as a supplementary in the
commissions report.
In the examination of Dr. Ambedkar‘s
views the commission found that he had un-mistakenly presented the
division of Hindu society into touchables and untouchables. If a
particular community had a majority of votes in a constituency, there
was no need for that community to have separate communal representation.
If the untouchables had a majority of votes in a particular
constituency, he would not ask for communal representation. It was
because they were in a minority and would always remain so on a uniform
franchise that he asked for separate representation. He was opposed to
any system under which the representatives of the depressed classes were
drawn from other classes. His justification for asking for a low
qualification for franchise was that as a result of being untouchable,
the untouchables had no property; they could not trade because they
could not find customers. He remembered a case in which a Mahar
caste woman was taken to the police court for selling watermelons. In
the mills in the Bombay Presidency the untouchables were not yet allowed
to work in the weaving department: in one case an untouchable did work
in the weaving department of a mill saying that he was a Mohammedan, and
when found out, he was severely beaten. The definition of an
“untouchable” as a person, who would cause pollution by his touch, was a
satisfactory one for electoral purposes. It was not the case that some
castes were considered to be untouchable in some districts and touchable
in others.
In the whole Bombay Presidency there was
one B.A. and 6 or 7 matriculates among the depressed classes. The
proportion of those who were literate in English was very small, but not
much smaller than in the case of the backward classes. The depressed
classes especially the Mahars and the Chamars, were fit to exercise the
vote. He would also give them the votes by way of education. He could
find at least 25 or more men amongst them who had passed the 6th or the
7th Standards of a High School, and, although the number was not large,
the 9 seats which he suggested for the depressed classes could be filled
from amongst them. Such a candidate in practical matters would be as
good as a graduate although the latter might be able to express himself
better.
He suggested large constituencies for the
depressed classes’; if such large constituencies had been accepted for
the Mohammedans he did not see why they were not practicable in the case
of the depressed classes.
In order to obtain the required number of
seats for the depressed classes he would reduce the number of seats
suggested by Government for the Mohammedans, from 38 to 10. This
reduction was justifiable, as on the population basis the Mohammedans
were only entitled to 20 per cent of the seats. He did not consider the
Congress League Pact as binding on all.
In the evidence he piointed out that
Untouchables were persons to whom certain rights of citizenship had been
denied. For instance, it was the right of every citizen to walk down
the street, and if a man were prevented from doing so, even temporarily,
it was an infringement of his right. Whether a man was prevented from
exercising his rights by law or social custom, made very little
difference to him. Government had recognised custom and persons
belonging to the untouchable classes were not employed in Government
service.
His view was that British rule in India
was meant to provide equal opportunities for all, and that in
transferring a large share of the power to popular assemblies,
arrangements should be made whereby the hardships and disabilities
entailed by the social system should not be reproduced and perpetuated
in political institutions. As regards the exact position at present, he
admitted that, for instance, at the Parel school which was meant for the
depressed classes, there were many higher-caste pupils, who came there
because it was a good school. Similarly as a professor he, being a
member of a depressed class, had pupils of all classes and found no
difficulty in dealing with his higher caste pupils. If the untouchable
classes were recognized by Government by the grant of seats, their
status would be raised and their powers would be stimulated. He was not
very particular about the number of their seats; all he wanted was
something adequate.
British parliament had first passed the Government of India Act, 1919 on the recommendation of Southborough Commission to which Dr. Ambedkar submitted
the memorandum (glimpses above) and raised the issue of right to vote
and adequate representation. After this the British Government
constituted “Simon Commission” in the year 1928 and send to India to
review the provisions. Simon Commission promised to consider the demands
of the rights of this class sympathetically. M K Gandhi immediately
sensed that untouchables shall have their share in independent India,
which can destabilise the supremacy of Arya Brahmins. Gandhi and his
congress immediately gave a call of “Simon go Back” and Lathi Charge was
carried out under the leadership of Lala Lajpat Rai.
EVIDENCE BEFORE
THE SOUTHBOROUGH COMMITTEE ON FRANCHISE
______________________________
Examined
on: 27th January 1919
From
the Report of the Reforms Committee (Franchise) Vol. II, 1919
The
Committee was constituted as under: The Rt. Hon. Lord Southborough, G.c.b., g.c.v.o., g.c.m.c.
(Chairman).
Sir
Frank G. Sly, k.c.s.l, I.C.S. Sahibzada Aftab Ahmed Khan. The Hon’ble Babu Surendranath Banerjea. The Hon’ble Mr. M. N. Hogg. W. M. Hailey, Esq., c.s.I, c.i.e., I.C.S. The
Hon’ble Mr. Srinivasa Sastri (Not present on 25-1-1919
and
27-1-1919). And the following added members : L. C. Crump, Esq., l.c.s. K. Natarajan, Esq. P. C. Tallents, Esq., l.c.s. (Secretary).
EVIDENCE
BEFORE THE SOUTHBOROUGH COMMITTEE
WRITTEN
STATEMENT
“
The most difficult and the most momentous question of Government (is) how to transmit the
force of individual opinion and preference into public action. This is the crux of popular
institutions.” So says Professor A. B. Hart. But this is only half the definition of popular
Government. It is therefore necessary to emphasize the other
half which is equal if not more in importance. As the
Government is the most important field for the exercise of individual capacities, it is in
the interest of the people that no person as such should be denied the opportunity of
actively participating in the process of Government. That is to say popular Government is
not only Government for the people but by the people. To express the same in a different way, representation of opinions by itself is not
sufficient to constitute popular Government. To cover its true meaning it requires personal representation as well. It is
because the former is often found without the latter that the Franchise Committee has to
see in devising the franchises and constituencies for a popular Government in India, it
provides for both, i.e., representation of opinions and representation of persons. Any
scheme of franchise and constituency that fails to bring this about fails to create a
popular Government.
2.
Success in this task will ultimately depend upon the accuracy of the de facto conception of the society which is to be given the
popular form of Government. De facto India was well portrayed by Lord Dufferin when he described it as a. .
.
“
Population … composed of a large number of distinct
nationalities, professing various religions, practising diverse rites, speaking different languages, while many of them… still further separated from one another by discordant prejudices, by conflicting sources of usages, and
even antagonistic material interests. But perhaps the most patent characteristic of our
Indian cosmos is its division into two mighty political communities as distant from each other as the poles apart—On the one hand the
Hindus—with their elaborate caste distinctions—on the other hand, the Mohammedans—with their social equality. To
these must be added a host of minor nationalities most of them numbering
millions—almost as widely differentiated from one
another by ethnological or political distinctions as are the
Hindus from the Mohammedans, such as Sikhs, with their warlike habits and traditions and their enthusiastic religious beliefs, the Rohillas, the Pathans, the Assamese, the Baluchis and other
wild and martial tribes on our frontiers, the hill men dwelling in the folds of the
Himalayas, our subjects in Burma, Mongol in race and Buddhist
in religion, the Gonds, Mhars,
Bheels and other non-Aryan people in the centre and south of
India, and the enterprising Parsees, with their rapidly developing manufactures and commercial interests. Again, amongst these
numerous communities may be found, at one and the same moment, all the various stages of civilization through which mankind has passed from the pre-historic ages to the present
days.”
3.
Englishmen have all along insisted that India is unfit for representative Government
because of the division of her population into castes and creeds. This does not carry
conviction with the advanced wing of Indian politicians. When they say that there are also
social divisions in Europe as there are in India they are amply supported by facts. The
social divisions of India are equalled, if not outdone, in a country like the United
States of America. Corresponding to those in the former, we
have in the latter men bonded together in a criminal conspiracy and trust or combinations
that prey upon the public. Not only are there political sub-divisions but also industrial,
scientific, and religious associations, differing in their aims and their attitudes towards each other.
Apart from political parties
with diverse ends, social sets, cliques and gangs we find in the United States of America
more permanent divisions of the population such as the Poles, Dutch, Swedes, Germans,
Russians, etc., each with its own language, religious and moral codes and traditions. If
social divisions unfit a country for representative
Government, it should unfit the United States of America as much as India. But if with all
the social divisions, the United States of America is fit for representative Government, why not India ? Ask the
Indian politicians, so entrenched, it is difficult to
dislodge them, and show that the social divisions of India are of a different kind or
grant them their contention. Without these two there is no third alternative possible.
4.
In my opinion their contention cannot be granted for the social divisions of India do matter in politics. How they matter can be best
shown by understanding when they don’t matter. Men live in a community by virtue of the
things they have in common. What they must have in common in order to form a community are
aims, beliefs, aspirations, knowledge, a common understanding;
or to use the language of the Sociologists, they must be
like-minded. But how do they come to have these things in common or how do they become
like-minded? Certainly, rot by sharing with another, as one would do in the case of a piece of cake. To cultivate
an attitude similar to others or to be like-minded with others is to be in communication
with them or to participate in their activity. Persons do not become like-minded by merely
living in physical proximity, any more than they cease to be like-minded by being distant
from each other. Participation in a group is the only way of being like-minded with the
group. Each group tends to create its own distinctive type of like-mindedness,
but where there are more groups than one to be brought into political union, there would
be conflict among the differently like-minded. And so long
as the groups remain isolated the conflict is bound to continue and prevent the harmony of
action. It is the isolation of the groups that is the chief evil. Where the groups allow
of endosmosis they cease to be evil. For endosmosis among the groups makes
possible a resocialization of once socialized attitudes. In place of the old, it creates a
new like-mindedness, which is
representative of the interests, aims, and aspirations of all the various groups
concerned. Like-mindedness is essential for a harmonious life, social or political and, as
has just been shown, it depends upon the extent of communication, participation or
endosmosis. Applying this test to the divisions in India, we must pronounce upon them as
constituting an obstacle in the path of realizing a harmonious political life.
5.
The groups or divisions each with its set like-mindedness
that are sure to be in conflict may be given as follows :
(1)
Hindus ;
(2)
Mohammedans;
(3)
Christians;
(4)
Parsees,
(5)
Jews, etc.
Except
the Hindus the rest of the divisions are marked by such complete freedom of communication
from within that we may expect their members to be perfectly like-minded with respect to
one another. Regarding the Hindus, however, the analysis must be carried on a little
farther. The significant fact about the Hindus is that before they are Hindus they are
members of some caste. The castes are so exclusive and isolated that the consciousness of
being a Hindu would be the chief guide of a Hindu’s activity towards
non-Hindu. But as against a Hindu of a different caste his caste-consciousness would be
the chief guide of activity. From this, it is plain that as between
two Hindus, caste-like-mindedness is more powerful than the like-mindedness due to their both being Hindus. Thus
from within the Hindus, as from without, there is likely to be a conflict of like-minded
persons. There are some who argue that this conflict runs through
the whole gamut of the caste system.
But this is protesting too much. From the point of view of communication the Hindus, in spite of castes, divide themselves into two significant
groups—the touchables and the untouchables. The touchables have enough communication between them to enable us
to say that the conflict of like-mindedness
so far as they are concerned is not much to be dreaded. But there is a real difference and
consequent conflict between the like-mindedness of the
touchables and the untouchables. Untouchability is the
strongest ban on the endosmosis between them. Their complete isolation
accounts for the acuteness of the difference of like-mindedness.
The
real social divisions of India then are :
(1)
Touchable Hindus.
(2)
Untouchable Hindus.
(3)
Mohammedans.
(4)
Christians.
(5)
Parsees.
(6)
Jews.
6.
It will not do good to ignore these real divisions in devising a system of policy, if the
policy is to take the form of popular Government. But if the success of popular Government
depends upon how well the constituencies and franchises transmit the social forces and how well they secure personal
representation; we must first study the form which the
conflict between these groups will assume in an election.
7.
In a territorial constituency, which will group together voters
belonging to the above groups, a majority of votes will
declare a candidate to be a representative for the constituency in question. Now the
question arises : is such a candidate, a true representative
of the groups, covered by the territorial
constituency ? Is he a true mirror of the mind of the
constituency ? Is he a representative of all the interests
in the constituency ? To be concrete,
will a Hindu candidate represent Mohammedan interests ? At
this stage it must be recalled that the various divisions described above are held
together by a community of interests which are non-secular
or purely religious. We cannot say that each division is held together by a community of
interests which are secular or material. If so, then for secular purposes the groups will
be broken up. From the point of view of material interests, there are no such people as
Mohammedans, Parsees, Hindus, etc. There will be in each of these groups landlords,
labourers, capitalists, free traders, protectionists, etc., each of the groups having
community of interests which are material will be composed of Hindus, Mohammedans, Parsees, etc. Consequently, a Hindu
candidate can very well represent the material interests of the Mohammedans and vice versa. There is thus no conflict of material
interest in the main among the communities as such. If we suppose that religious interests
in future will occupy a subordinate place in the affairs of men, the secular interests of
a group can be well represented by a candidate from another group.
8.
From this point of view a territorial constituency will be sufficient for a popular Government. A little more
consideration will show that it will be sufficient for only one-half the definition of
popular Government. How true it is, will be shown presently.
In an electoral fight between the various groups in a territorial constituency the voters
will discriminate in favour of a candidate with whom they are in sympathy. But with whom
they will be in sympathy is determined for them in advance. Given two candidates belonging
to different groups but purporting to represent the same interest, the voters will mart their votes on the person belonging to the same community.
Any group yielding a large number of electors will have its own candidate elected. This
discrimination on the part of the voters, though it may not leave unrepresented the
interests of the members of the minor groups, leaves them without any chance of personal
representation.
9.
To those who are busy in devising schemes for the proper and
adequate representation of interests and opinions dilating
on the importance of personal representation is likely to seem idle. But personal
representation is not therefore unimportant. In recent times “
Government for the people ” has claimed more attention
than “ Government by the people “. In fact there are instances to show that “ Government for the people “
can exist in the best sense of the phrase without there being a “Government by the people.”.
Yet all political theorists will unanimously condemn such a form of Government. And the
why of it is important to know. It will be granted that each kind of association, as it is an educative environment, exercises a formative
influence on the active dispositions of its members. Consequently, what one is as a person
is what one is as associated with others. A Government for the people, but not by the
people, is sure to educate some into masters and others into subjects; because it is by the reflex effects of association that one
can feel and measure the growth of personality. The growth of personality
is the highest aim of society. Social arrangement must
secure free initiative and opportunity to every individual
to assume any role he is capable of assuming provided it is socially desirable. A new rule
is a renewal and growth of personality. But when an association—and a Government is after all an association—is such that in it
every role cannot be assumed by all, it tends to develop the personality of the few at the
cost of the many—a result scrupulously to be avoided in
the interest of Democracy. To be specific, it is not enough to be electors only. It is
necessary to be lawmakers; otherwise who can be lawmakers
will be masters of those who can only be electors.
10.
Territorial constituencies are therefore objected to, and rightly,
on the ground that they do nothing to prevent this absurd
outcome. They erroneously suppose that electors will vote on
the programmes of the candidates without any regard for their persona. As a matter of
fact, the electors before they are electors are primarily members of a group. The persona
of the candidates does matter with them. Naturally,
therefore, as members of a group they prefer the candidate who belongs to their group to
another candidate who does not belong to their group though both of them claim to
represent the same interest. As a result of this preference the electors of a large group are destined to rise to a higher position of becoming
eventual lawmakers, while the electors of a smaller group for no fault of theirs are
doomed to a lower position of remaining electors. One crux of popular Government is the
representation of interests and opinions. The other crux is
personal representation. Territorial constituencies fail to create popular Government
because they fail to secure personal representation to members of minor groups.
11. If this is a correct analysis
as to how the social divisions operate to the prejudice of the political life of some
communities, never was a more improper remedy advocated to meet the situation than
proportional representation. Proportional representation is
intended to give proportionate representation to views. It presupposes that voters vote
for a candidate because of his views and not because of his persona. Proportional
representation is ill suited for the purpose in hand.
12.
We have therefore two possible methods of meeting the situation:
either to reserve seats in plural constituencies for those
minorities that cannot otherwise secure personal representation or grant communal
electorates. Both have their usefulness. So far as the representation of the Mohammedans
is concerned, it is highly desirable that they should participate in a general election
with seats reserved for them in plural constituencies. The angularity of the division that separates the Hindus and Mohammedans is already sharp and
communal representation, it may be urged, sharpens it the
more. Communal election, however, seems to be a settled fact, so far as the Mohammedans
are concerned and nothing is likely to alter it, even though alteration is likely to be
beneficial.
13.
But this argument is mainly intended to concern itself with the representation of the
Hindus in general, and of the untouchable Hindus in particular. The discussion of the
representation of the Hindus may be best introduced by a quotation which expresses the newer consciousness that has arisen in the
various Hindu groups. It is said :
“A
community may claim representation only on the ground of separate interests which require
protection. In India, such interests are of three kinds only :
either they arise out of religious antipathies which are pretty strong in India, or out of
the backward state of a community in educational matters, or out of the socio-religious disabilities to which a community may be
subject. Confining ourselves to the Hindu communities there are certain communities who,
besides being very backward,
are suffering under a great social tyranny. The untouchable
classes must have their own men in the Council
Hall to fight for the redress of their grievances. The non-Brahmins
as a class are subjected to the social and intellectual domination
of the Brahmin priesthood and may therefore rightly advocate separate
representation.”
14.
From this it will be seen that the-
new consciousness among the Hindus while acknowledging the separate interests of the
untouchables does not accept the position that the touchable
Hindus form a group by themselves. The new consciousness insists on dividing the touchable
group into Brahmins and non-Brahmins each with its own
separate interests. Separate electorates or reserved seats
in mixed electorates are demanded for the three groups in which the Hindus are divided.
Before dealing with the problems of the representation of the untouchables something will be said on the question of the Brahmins
and non-Brahmins.
15.
That the non-Brahmins are “ backward in educational
matters “ cannot be said in any way to be their special
interest. It is the general interest of all even of those
Brahmins who are educationally backward. “The intellectual and social domination of
the Brahmins “ is not a matter that affects the non-Brahmins alone. It affects all and it is therefore the interest of all. What remains then
as a special interest for the non-Brahmins to require their protection ?
The
case for separate representation for non-Brahmins fails because they cannot prove to have
a common non-Brahmin interest.
16.
But do they fail to secure personal representation ? This
can be best shown by reference to figures—
|
Group |
|
|
Group |
|
|
Caste |
No. |
Total |
No. |
Total |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Brahmins |
4,600 |
85,739 |
4,477 |
89,786 |
|
12,730 |
933,123 |
|||
|
1,074 |
255,526 |
3,667 |
446,077 |
|
|
22 |
196,751 |
33 |
138,738 |
|
|
Mohammedans |
661 |
295,838 |
1,169 |
106,273 |
|
Others |
4,241 |
1,065,821 |
2,837 |
1,016,930 |
|
|
23,328 |
2,832,798 |
12,183 |
1,797,804 |
Reducing
the above figures to the basis of a thousand we have the following interesting result:
|
Group |
Group |
|||||
|
Names |
Proportion |
Proportion |
Proportion |
Proportion |
Proportion |
Proportion |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Brahmins |
30.2 |
53.7 |
197-2 |
50-8 |
49-8 |
367-4 |
|
329.4 |
13-6 |
545-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
90.2 |
4-2 |
46-0 |
248-8 |
8-2 |
300-9 |
|
|
69.5 |
0-1 |
0-9 |
74-5 |
0-2 |
2-7 |
|
|
Mohammedans |
104.4 |
2-2 |
28-3 |
59-2 |
10-9 |
95-9 |
|
Others |
376.2 |
3-9 |
181-3 |
562-2 |
2.,8 |
232-8 |
So
arranged, the conclusions to be drawn from these figures are highly important.
(1)
The Brahmins, given a uniform franchise for all, though a small minority so far as numbers are concerned becomes a majority so far as the total of
voters is concerned as is the case in Group II.
(2)
Though with an uniform franchise the non-Brahmin communities
like the Lingayats and Marathas do not fail to figure on the voters’ list, the proportion
of their voters to their population is insignificant as compared with the proportion which
the Brahmin voters bear to the Brahmin population.
17.
The proportion of the Brahmins to their voters is really extravagant. It is justified
neither by faith in them nor by their own numbers. The Lingayats though they can
legitimately complain that the proportion of their voters is small will succeed in securing personal representation. The Marathas though larger in
numbers than the Brahmins, besides the very small proportion of their voters suffer on the
voters’ list and very likely will fail to secure personal representation for themselves.
So
argued, the case for special provision of the Marathas can be sustained and should
be admitted.
18.
The question is in what form the provision should take. In my opinion such provision instead of taking the form of separate electorates of
reserved seats should take the form of a low-pitched franchise. The franchise for the non-Brahmin should be lower than that for the Brahmin. By this
arrangement the Marathas would
improve their position on the voters’ list and the altogether favoured position of the
Brahmin would be equalized. It is in the interest of all that the Brahmin should not play
such a preponderant part in politics as he has been doing hitherto. He has exerted a
pernicious influence on the social life of the country and it is in the interest of all
that his pernicious influence should be kept at a minimum in politics. As he is the most
exclusive he is most anti-social.
19.
Even the authors of the report on constitutional reforms are not in favour of a limited or
uniform franchise. They say, “ We consider that the
limitations of the franchise, which it is obviously desirable to make as broad as
possible, should be determined rather with reference to practical difficulties than to any
prior considerations as to the degree of education or amount
of income which may be held to constitute a qualification. It is possible that owing to
unequal distribution of population and wealth it may be necessary to differentiate the
qualifications for a vote not merely between provinces, but between different parts of the
same province “ (P. 147)
To this I should like to add that we should differentiate the qualifications for a vote
not merely between provinces or parts thereof but between communities of the same
province. Without this differentiation some communities with a small but wealthy or
educated population will secure more votes than a large community consisting of poor and
uneducated members. Uniformity in franchise should be dispensed with. An important result
will be that communal representation or reservation of seats for some non-Brahmin
communities who are now clamouring for it would be avoided.
20.
The untouchables are usually regarded as objects of pity but they are ignored in any
political scheme on the score that they have no interests lo protect. And yet their
interests are the greatest. Not that they have large property to protect from
confiscation. But they have their very persona
confiscated. The socio religious disabilities have
dehumanised the untouchables and their interests at stake are therefore the interests of
humanity. The interests of property are nothing before such primary interests.
21.
If one agrees with the definition of slave as given by Plato, who defines him as one who
accepts from another the purposes which control his conduct,
the untouchables are really slaves. The untouchables are so socialized as never to
complain of their low estate. Still less do they ever dream of trying to improve their
lot, by forcing the other classes to treat them with that common respect which one man
owes to another. The idea that they have been born to their lot is so ingrained in their
mind that it never occurs to them to think that their fate is anything but irrevocable.
Nothing will ever persuade them that men are all made of the same clay, or that they have
the right to insist on better treatment than that meted out to them.
22.
The exact description of the treatment cannot be attempted. The word untouchable is an
epitome of their ills and sufferings. Not only has untouchability
arrested the growth of their personality but also it comes in the way of their material
well being. It has also deprived them of certain civil rights. For instance, in Konkan the untouchables are prohibited from using the public
road. If some high caste man happens to cross him, he has to be out of the way and stand
at such a distance that his shadow will not fall on the high caste man. The untouchable is
not even a citizen. Citizenship is a bundle of rights such as (1) personal liberty, (2)
personal security, (3) rights to hold private property, (4) equality before law, (5) liberty of conscience, (6) freedom of opinion and
speech, (7) right of assembly, (8) right of representation in a country’s Government and (9) right to hold office under the State. The
British Government by gradual growth may be said to have conceded these rights at least in
theory to its Indian subjects. The right of representation and the right to hold office
under the State are the two most important rights that make up citizenship. But the untouchability of
the untouchables puts these rights far beyond their reach. In a few places they do not
even possess such insignificant rights as personal liberty
and personal security, and equality before law is not always assured to them. These are
the interests of the untouchables. And as can be easily seen they can be represented by
the untouchables alone. They are distinctively their own interests and none else can truly
voice them. A free trade interest can be voiced by a Brahmin, a Mohammedan or a Maratha equally well. But none of
these can speak for the interests of the untouchables because they are not untouchables.
Untouchability constitutes a definite set of interests which the untouchables alone can
speak for. Hence it is evident that we must find the untouchables to represent their
grievances which are their interests and, secondly, we must find them in such numbers as
will constitute a force sufficient to claim redress.
23.
Now, will a general territorial electorate provided for the
adequate return of the untouchables to the law-making body ?
Referring back to the figures we find that the untouchables (represented in the table by the Mahars), though they formed
69.4 in every thousand of the population, did not claim even a voter from their class.
Under such circumstances it is impossible for them to elect their
own man in a general
electorate. On the other hand they must despair of any votes being cast by the touchable Hindus for
an untouchable candidate. The gradation of castes produces a
certain theological basis which cuts the untouchables both ways : in
the minds of the lower orders it creates a preference for the higher orders while it creates a contempt for the lower orders in the minds of the higher
orders. Thus the ascending scale of preference and the descending scale of hatred and
contempt beggars the untouchables both ways. Without giving a single vole to the
untouchables the touchables are sure to make a large draft
on the already meagre voting strength of the untouchables.
24.
So situated, the untouchables with the largest interests at stake will be the greatest
sufferers in a general territorial electorate. To give them an opening, special provision
shall have to be made for their adequate representation. But before a scheme can be outlined it is necessary to see how much is the untouchable population in the Bombay Presidency. The Census Report for the Bombay
Presidency for the year 1911 gives the following figures for
castes which “ cause pollution “:
|
Bhungis |
93,691 |
|
Chamars, |
306,478 |
|
Sochis, |
1,470,992 |
|
Mangs, |
274,037 |
|
Total |
2,145,193 |
|
To |
13,506 |
|
TOTAL |
2,158,699 |
The following figures give the distribution of the
untouchables by districts:
|
District |
Total |
Total |
Total |
Percentage of untouchables to the total population |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
19.628,477 |
14,920,267 |
1,627,980 |
8 |
10.9 |
|
|
1. |
979,445 |
664,042 |
89,052 |
9 |
11.6 |
|
3,685,383 |
3,117,263 |
245,050 |
6.6 |
7.8 |
|
|
827,809 |
693,155 |
78,869 |
10 |
11.4 |
|
|
3. |
306,717 |
192,935 |
22,390 |
7 |
11.6 |
|
4. |
691,744 |
598,164 |
41,497 |
5.9 |
6.9 |
|
332,695 |
274,339 |
14,410 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
6. |
654,109 |
571,745 |
36,509 |
5.6 |
6 |
|
7. |
882,309 |
786,925 |
50,010 |
5.6 |
6 |
|
Central |
6,387,064 |
5,998.828 |
7,73,184 |
12 |
13 |
|
8. |
945,305 |
855,676 |
116,929 |
12 |
13.6 |
|
1,034,886 |
902,131 |
112,391 |
10.8 |
.12 |
|
|
580,723 |
474,200 |
36,809 |
6 |
7.7 |
|
|
11. |
905,030 |
843,705 |
97,740 |
10.7 |
11 |
|
12. |
991,725 |
113,118 |
12.4 |
13.3 |
|
|
13. |
1,081,278 |
1,028,176 |
13 |
14 |
|
|
768,330 |
703,215 |
125,063 |
16.7 |
18 |
|
|
Southern |
5,061,150 |
4,502,708 |
385,470 |
7.6 |
8.5 |
|
15. |
943,320 |
817,797 |
83,199 |
8.8 |
10.1 |
|
16. |
862,973 |
757,542 |
80,501, |
9 |
10.6 |
|
17. |
1,026,005 |
872,885 |
52.540 |
5 |
6 |
|
18. |
430,548 |
383,624 |
10,767 |
2.4 |
2.9 |
|
19. |
594,156 |
560,266 |
51,108 |
8.5 |
91 |
|
20. |
1,203,638 |
1,110,594 |
107,354 |
8.9 |
9.7 |
|
Sind (British |
3,513,435 |
837,426 |
135,224 |
3.8 |
16 |
25. The total population of the Bombay
Presidency by the Census of 1911 (British districts only) is
19,626,477. Of this the untouchable population is 1,627,980 or 8 per
cent of the total. Assuming for the present the Bombay Legislative Council to consist of
100 elected members, the untouchables should have 8
representatives to represent them in the Council. If we
distribute one representative to every 200,000 of the people
(which is just the ratio of 100 representatives to the 20 millions of the population), then the untouchables can by right claim 8 representatives to
themselves. But the untouchables
of the Bombay Presidency may be allowed to elect 9 members in all. The election of one
additional member will be justified later on.
26.
Allowing them to elect 9 members, the constituencies which
are to elect them should be as follows:
The
various districts of the Presidency except the City of
Bombay and the Province of Sind
should be grouped together on a linguistic basis as follows:
|
I. Gujarathi-speaking districts II. Marathi-speaking |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
1. Ahmedabad |
78,969 1. Thana |
50,010 1. Dharwar 52.540 |
|
||||||
|
2. Broach |
22,390 2. Kolaba |
51,108 2. Bijapur 80,503 |
|
||||||
|
3. Kaira |
41,497 3. Ratnagiri |
107,354 3. |
|
||||||
|
14,410 4. Ahmednagar |
116,929 4. |
|
|||||||
|
5. Surat |
36,509 5. KhandeshWest |
36,809 |
|
||||||
|
|
6. Khandesh East. |
112,391 |
|
||||||
|
|
7. Satara |
144,738 |
|
||||||
|
|
8. Poona |
148,118 |
|
||||||
|
|
9. Nasik |
96,740 |
|
||||||
|
|
10. Sholapur |
129,063 |
|
||||||
|
should elect: |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Language District |
Population in |
Number of representatives to be elected by the constituency |
|||||||
|
1 2 |
3 |
4 5 |
6 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Bombay City |
89,052 |
89,052 1 |
1 |
||||||
|
1. Ahmedabad |
78,869 |
|
|
||||||
|
22,390 41,497 |
193,675 11 |
1 |
|||||||
|
14,410 |
|
|
|||||||
|
5. Surat |
36,509.1 |
|
|
||||||
|
1. Thana |
50,010 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2. Kolaba |
51,108 |
|
208,472 III |
1 |
|||||
|
|
3. Ratnagiri |
107,354 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
4. Ahmednagar |
116,929 |
|
|
|
||||
|
11. Marathi |
5. Khandesh East 6. Khandesh West |
112,391 36,809 |
|
363,869 IV |
2 |
||||
|
|
7. Nasik |
97,740 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
8. Satara |
144,688 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
9. Poona |
133,118 |
|
406,869 V |
2 |
||||
|
|
129,063 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
1. Belgaum |
83,199 |
|
|
|||||
|
III. Kanarese |
80,501 52,540 |
227,007 VI |
|
||||||
|
|
4. Kanara |
10,767 |
|
|
|||||
|
135,224 |
135,224 VII |
1 |
|||||||
|
Total number |
of the Presidency. |
|
|||||||
These
9 elected members should form a constituency to elect one member from among themselves to represent the untouchables of this
Presidency in the Imperial Legislative Council.
28.
It may be objected that though 8 representatives are not in excess to the untouchable
population it may be in excess to the voting strength of untouchables. That the
untouchables are a poor community and that under the same franchise they yield per
thousand a smaller proportion of voters than other communities is a fact. But if the grave
position of the untouchables is admitted instead of
restricting their number of representatives, the aim should be to increase the number of
their voters, i.e., we must aim at lowering the franchise so
far as the untouchables are concerned.
29.
What the franchise should be is a very important question. There is a line of argument which urges that franchise should be given to those only who can be expected to make an intelligent use
of it. As against this view it can be said in the words of Prof.
L. T. Hobhouse that it is true that “
the success of democracy depends on the response of voters to the opportunities given
them. But conversely the opportunities must be given in order to call forth the response.
The exercise of popular Government is itself all education.
enfranchisement itself may precisely be the stimulus needed
to awaken interest The ballot alone
effectively liberates the quiet citizen from the tyranny of the shouter
and the wire-puller. An impression of existing inertness alone is not a sufficient reason
for with-holding responsible
Government or restricting the area of suffrage.” Taking into consideration that
suffrage is an education and that there are groups with unequal distribution of wealth and
education among them and that these groups are not sympathetically
like-minded, the authors of the reports rightly argue that the case for uniformity of
franchise cannot be sustained.
30.
But in the case of the untouchables there are as few reasons
for curtailing the number of their representatives, as the reasons for widening their
electorate are many. If under a given franchise the untouchables do not muster strong as
electors, it is not their fault. The very untouchability attached
to their person is a bar to their moral and material progress. The principal modes of
acquiring wealth are trade, industry or service. The untouchables can engage in none of
these because of their untouchability. From an untouchable trader no Hindu will buy. An
untouchable cannot be engaged in lucrative service. Military service had been the monopoly
of the untouchables since the days of the East India
Company. They had joined the Army in such large numbers that the Marquis Tweedledale in his note which he submitted to the Indian Army
Commission of 1859 wrote. “ It should never be forgotten that India was conquered
with the help of the low-caste men.”. But after the
mutiny when the British were able to secure soldiers from the ranks of
the Marathas, the position of the low-caste men who had been
the prop of the Bombay Army became precarious, not because the Marathas
were better soldiers but because their theological bias prevented them from serving under
low-caste officers. The prejudice was so strong that even the non-caste British had to
stop recruitment from the untouchable classes. In like manner, the untouchables are
refused service in the Police Force. In a great many of the
Government offices it is impossible for an untouchable to get a place. Even in the mills a
distinction is observed. The untouchables are not admitted in Weaving Departments of the
Cotton Mills though many of them are professional weavers. An instance at hand may be
cited from the school system of the Bombay Municipality. This most cosmopolitan city ruled
by a Corporation with a greater freedom than any other Corporation in India has two
different sets of schools . one for the children of touchables
and the other for those of the untouchables., This in itself is a point worthy of note. But there is something yet more
noteworthy. Following the division of schools it has divided its teaching staff into untouchables and touchables. As the untouchable teachers
are short of the demand, some of the untouchable schools are manned by teachers from the touchable class. The heart-killing fun of it is that if there
is a higher grade open in untouchable school service, as there is bound to be because of a
few untouchable trained teachers, a touchable teacher can be thrust into the grade. But if
a higher grade is open in the touchable school service, no untouchable teacher can be
thrust into that grade. He must wait till a vacancy occurs
in the untouchable service !!! Such is the ethics of the
Hindu social life. Under it if the untouchables are poor,
the committee, it may be hoped, will not deny them representation because of their small
electoral roll but will see its way to grant them adequate representation to enable the
untouchables to remove the evil conditions that bring about their poverty. At present when
all the avenues of acquiring wealth are closed, it is unwise to require from the
untouchables a high property qualification. To deny them the opportunities of acquiring
wealth and then to ask from them a property qualification is to add insult to injury. Just
what sort of franchise and just what pitch are required to produce sufficient voting
strength from the untouchables ? In absence of data, I leave
it to the Committee to decide. It would be better to pitch the franchise so low as to
educate into political life as many untouchables as possible. They are too degraded to be
conscious of themselves. I only wish to emphasize that in deciding upon the representation of the untouchables the
Committee looking to their interests at stake will not let the extent of the electorate
govern the number of representatives, but will rather let the number
of representatives govern the extension of the electorate.
31.
In this connection it would not be improper to remind the Committee of Lord Morley who is reported to have said that “ the object of Government
was that the Legislative Councils should represent truly and effectively with reasonable
approach to the balance of real social forces, the wishes and needs of the communities
concerned. This could not be done by Algebra, Arithmetic,
Geometry or Logic, but by a wide outlook. He saw no harm as
to a compromise that while numbers should be the main factor
in determining the extent of representation modifying causes might influence the number of
representatives” It is therefore proposed that the untouchables
of the Bombay Presidency should be allowed to elect 9 members through the constituencies made up as above.
These 9 members will further form a constituency to elect one member from among themselves
to represent the untouchables in the Imperial Legislative Council leaving 8 members to
represent the untouchables in the Bombay Legislative
Council.
32.
Besides communal electorates there are other schemes in the field for the representation of the
untouchables. It would not be proper to close this statement without a word of comment on
those Schemes.
33.
The Congress has denied communal representation except in
the case of Mohammedans and it also denies the extensive use
of nomination ‘, the only way then left open to the
untouchables is to fight in a general electorate. Now this is as it should be if all were
equally free to fight. To educate the untouchables by Shahtras into pro-touchables and
the touchables into anti-untouchables and then to propose
that the two should fight out at an open poll is to betray signs of mental aberration or a
mentality fed on cunning. But it must never be forgotten
that the Congress is largely composed of men who are by
design political Radicals and social Tories. Their chant is that the social
and the political are two distinct things having no bearing on each other. To them the
social and the political are two suits and can be worn one
at a time as the season demands. Such a psychology has to be laughed at because it is too
interested to be seriously taken into consideration either for acceptance or for
rejection. As it pays to believe in it, it will die a hard
death. Starting from this unnatural premise the Congress activities have been quite
natural. Those who attend the Congress do not care to attend the National Social
Conference held in the same pandal. In fact those who attend
the Congress had once started a campaign to refuse the use of the pandal to the Conference
which was once refused the pandal in the city of Poona, the roosting place of the intelligentsia of our
Presidency, As the Congress is a non-national or antinational body, its views on communal
electorates are worthy of no serious consideration.
34.
The moderates in their separate meeting have been more kindly than just. They proposed the reservation of seats for
backward communities in plural constituencies. They have not specified the number of seats
for the untouchables. But the general sense of many enlightened moderates and others
kindly inclined is that one or two representatives of the untouchables in the Legislative Council would suffice. It is impossible
to agree with these gentlemen though they are entitled to gratitude for this much
sympathy. One or two representatives of the untouchables are as good as having none.
A
Legislative Council is not an old curiosity shop. It will be
a Council with powers to make or mar the fortunes of society. How can one or two
untouchables carry a legislative measure to improve their
condition or prevent a legislative measure worsening their
state ? To be frank, the untouchables cannot expect much
good from the political power to be given over to the high
caste Hindus. Though the power may not be used against the untouchables and one cannot be altogether sure of this, it may not be used for their
betterment. A Legislative Council may be sovereign to do anything it likes, but what it
will like to do depends upon its own character. The English Parliament, we may be certain,
though it is sovereign to do anything, will not make the
preservation of blue-eyed babies illegal. The Sultan will
not, though he can, change the religion of Mohammed just as the Pope will not, though he
can, overthrow the religion of Christ. In the same way legislature, mainly composed of
high caste men, will not pass a law removing untouchability,
sanctioning inter-marriages,
removing the ban on the use of public streets, public temples, public schools; in short, cleansing the person of the untouchables. This is
not because they cannot, but chiefly because they will not. A legislature is the product
of a certain social condition and its power is determined by
whatever determines society. This is too obvious to be denied. What may happen in future
can be guessed from what has happened in the past. The high caste men in the Council do
not like any social question being brought before the legislature, as may be seen from the fact of the Resolution introduced by the
Honourable Mr. Dadabhoy in 1916 in the Imperial Legislative
Council. That it was adversely criticized by many who claimed to evince some interest in
the untouchables is too well known to need repetition. But what is not well known is that
though the resolution was lost the mover was not pardoned; for
the very moving of such a nasty resolution was regarded as a sin. At a subsequent election
the mover had to make room for the Honourable Mr. Khaparde,
who once wrote in an article : “Those who work for the
elevation of the untouchables are themselves degraded.”.
Isn’t
this sympathy of the higher castes for the untouchables, sympathy with a vengeance ?
35.
Those who tell that one or two members would suffice for the untouchables fail to grasp
the true import of political right. The chief import of a political
right though technically summed up in the power to vote does
lie either in voting upon for laws or for those who make
laws; neither does it consist in the right to speak for or
against a certain measure nor in being able to say “
yea or nay “ upon roll-call;
to be able to put into a ballot-box a piece of paper with a number
of names written thereon is an act which, like those mentioned above, of itself possesses no value which stamps it as inherently superior to many of the most ordinary
transactions of daily life. They
are educative but as much as any transaction is. The chief significance of suffrage or a political
right consists in a chance for active and direct participation in the regulation of the
terms upon which associated life shall be sustained. Now the terms upon which the
associated life between the touchables
and untouchables is carried on today are the most ignominious to the former and highly detrimental
to the latter. To make effective the capacities of a people there must be the power to fix the social conditions
of their exercise. If the conditions are too obdurate. it is in the interest of the untouchables as well as of the touchables that the conditions should
be revised. The untouchables must be in a position to influence the revision. Looking to
the gravity of their interests, they should get their representation as proposed in
proportion to their population. One or two is only kind but neither just nor sufficient.
As Lord Morley says in an earlier quotation, needs not
numbers should govern the extent of representations.’.
36.
Recently there is brought into the forefront a rival scheme for the representation of the
untouchables by the Depressed Class Mission. The scheme is known as co-option. The scheme
proposes that the representatives of the untouchables should be nominated by the co-option
of the elected members of the Council. Whether one should laugh or cry at the solicitude
of the Mission for the untouchables it is rather difficult to decide. To cry is to believe
that such a silly scheme would ever be adopted. The best way is to laugh it out. From the
scheme can be easily seen that what is sometimes called benevolent interest in others may
be an unwilling mask for an attempt to dictate to them what their good shall be, instead
of an endeavour to agree with them so that they may seek and find the good of their own
choice. The Mission, it must be said, was started with the intention of improving the
condition of the Depressed Classes by emancipating them from the social tyranny of their high caste masters. But the Mission has fallen on such
bad times that it is forced to advocate a scheme by which its wards or their representatives will be bounden slaves of their
past masters. The masters and the mission have thus met and evolved
a scheme which will keep the Depressed classes eternally depressed without any hope of
deliverance. Such tactics do not deceive the untouchables
ignorant as they are; much less will they deceive the
Franchise Committee. From another point of view the scheme
of the Mission is unacceptable. It is aggravating to see the Mission proposing a scheme
for the representation of the untouchables while persistently refusing to admit an
untouchable in its governing council. Interested and
officious as it is. its scheme must be rejected.
37.
Nomination even though by Government in itself to be preferred to the former kind of
nomination, is to be objected to from the standpoint of the untouchables. Apart from
restricting the freedom of the representatives it fails to give political education which
is the urgent need of all communities, much more of the
untouchables.
38.
At this stage we must consider the argument against communal representation. The first
argument raised by the authors of the report is to the
effect “ that the history of self-government among the
nations who have developed it is decisively against “
communal representation. But on an earlier page the authors say that the difference of
caste and creeds must be taken “ into account as
presenting a feature of Indian Society which is out of harmony with the ideas on which
elsewhere in the world representative institutions rest” (page 97). In writing the
former the later analysis of the situation must have vanished from their minds, else we
must say that the authors could hold two opposing views at the same time. Presented in
juxtaposition, the authors must be expected to agree to communal representation on the score of an exceptional remedy required to meet an
exceptional situation.
39.
Another and chief argument against communal representation is that it will perpetuate social divisions. The fun of it is that those who uphold the social divisions are the loudest in their
expression of this adverse argument. The committee will
please note that those who are the opponents of communal representation on this score are
also the staunchest opponents of Mr. Patel’s Inter-Caste Marriage Bill
as a caste-breaking bill. The sincerity of those who bring forward this argument is
seriously to be doubted. But as even the authors of the report have put it as a second
count against communal representation, this particular argument must be met if possible.
Does
communal representation perpetuate social divisions ? If you
look upon communal representation as making electoral Colleges
of social divisions, the criticism may be said to be valid.
This is true only if it is presupposed that the divisions are no real divisions and that they don’t matter. This is as false a pre-supposition
as that of inviting India which is made when it is said that Englishmen are unsocial.
Communal Representation is a device to ward off the evil effects of the divisions. To those who, while agreeing to this
particular benefit of communal representation, object to it on the score that it perpetuates the
divisions it can be shown that there is another perspective from which it can be said that communal representation instead of perpetuating the social divisions is one of
the ways of dissolving them.
40.
While communal electorates will be co-terminus
with social divisions their chief effect will be to bring together men from diverse castes
who would not otherwise mix together into the Legislative Council. The Legislative Council will thus become a new cycle of participation in which the
representatives of various castes who were erstwhile isolated and therefore anti-social will be thrown into an associated life. An active participation
in an associated life, in its turn, will not leave unaffected the dispositions and
attitudes of those who participate. A caste or a religious group to day is a certain
attitude. So long as each caste or a group remains isolated its attitude remains
fossilized. But the moment the several castes and groups begin to have contact and co-operation with one another the resocialization
of the fossilized attitude is bound to be the result. If the Hindus become resocialized with regard to their attitude towards Mohammedans, Christians, etc., and the Mohammedans,
Christians, etc., become resocialized with regard to their attitudes towards the Hindus,
or the touchable Hindus with regard to the untouchables,
caste and divisions will vanish. If caste is an attitude and it is nothing else, it must
be said to be dissolved when that particular attitude symbolizing the caste is dissolved.
But the existing set attitude representing the diverse
castes and groups will be dissolved only if the diverse groups meet together and take part in a common activity. Such changes of disposition and
attitudes will not be ephemeral but will, in their turn influence
associated life outside the Council Hall. The more opportunities are created for such conjoint
activities the better. The resocialization will
then be on a larger scale and bring about a speedier end of caste and groups. Thus those
who condemn communal representation on the score of perpetuating the existing divisions
will welcome it, on reflection, as a potent solvent for
dissolving them.
41.
The importance and necessity of communal and adequate representation of untouchables is beyond question. The depth of emotion with which the untouchables speak on this topic must have been easily gauged when the untouchables of
the Madras Presidency told Mr. Montague that there would be
bloodshed if Home Rule for India was not accompanied by
communal representation to the untouchables. The authors of the Report however are actuated
by a faith in the intelligentsia
to effect all reforms for the elevation of the untouchables from permanent degradation and ostracism. They say “ they find the educated Indian organizing effort not for
political ends alone but for various forms of public and social service.” As the authors have connived at the demands of the untouchables on this score it is but proper to investigate
whether their faith is well grounded. On education and its social value the words of Joseph Addison are not too stale to be
recalled. He said, “ There can be no greater injury to
human society than that good Talents among men should be held Honourable to those who are
endowed with them without any regard how they are applied. The Gifts of Nature and the
Accomplishments of Art are valuable
but as they are exerted in the interest of virtue or governed by the Rules of Honour, we
ought to abstract our minds from the observation of an excellence in those we converse
with, till we have taken some notice or received some good information of the Disposition
of their Minds, otherwise they make us fond of those whom our reason and judgment will tell us we ought to abhor.”
42.
Statistics will show that the intelligentsia and the Brahmin caste are exchangeable terms.
The disposition of the intelligentsia is a Brahmin disposition. Its outlook is a Brahmin
outlook. Though he has learned to speak in the name of all,
the Brahmin leader is in no sense a leader of the people. He is a leader of his caste at
best, for he feels them as he does for no other people. It is not intended to say that
there are no Brahmins who feel for the untouchables. To be
just, there are a few more moderate and rational Brahmins who admit the frightful nature
of the institution of untouchability in the abstract and
perceive the dangers to society with which it is fraught. But the great majority of the
Brahmins are those who doggedly deny the horrors of the
system in the teeth of such a mass of evidence as never was brought to bear on any other
subject and to which the experience of every day contributes its immense amount; who, when they speak of freedom, mean the freedom to oppress
their kind and to be savage, merciless and cruel, and whose inalienable rights can only
have their growth in the wrongs of the untouchables Their delicate gentility will neither
bear the Englishmen as superior nor will it brook the untouchables as equal. “ I will not tolerate a man above me, and of those below
none must approach too near “ sums up the true spirit
of their social as well as political creed. Those who speak against the anti-social spirit
of the Brahmin leaders are often cautioned that in their denunciation they do not pay
sufficient regard to the existence of the first class of Brahmin leaders. This is no doubt
the case. Noble but very rare instances of personal and pecuniary sacrifice may be found
among them just as may be found to be tender in the exercise of their unnatural power.
Still it is to be feared that this injustice is inseparable from the state of things with
which humanity and truth are invoked to deal. The miserable state of the untouchables is
not a bit more tolerable because some tender hearts are bound to show sympathy, nor can
the indignant tide of honest wrath stand still because in its course it overwhelms a few who are comparatively innocent among a host of guilty.
43.
The trend of nationalism in India does not warrant us to believe that the few who are
sympathetic will grow in volume. On the other hand it is the host of guilty that time is
sure to multiply. With the growth of political agitation, the agitation for social reform
has subsided and has even vanished The Prarthana Samaj, the Brahmo Samaj with their elevating influence have become things of the
past. The future has few things like these in store. The
growth of education if it is confined to one class, will not necessarily lead to
liberalism. It may lead to the justification and conservation of class interest; and instead of creating the liberators of the down-trodden,
it may create champions of the past and the supporters of the status quo. Isn’t
this the effect of education so far? That it will take a new course in future ceteris paribus, there is no ground to believe. Therefore, instead
of leaving the untouchables to the mercy of the higher castes, the wiser policy would be to give power to the untouchables themselves who are anxious,
not like others, to usurp power but only to assert their natural place in society.
44.
This gigantic world war however motivated, has yielded what
is known us the principle of self-determination which is to govern international relations
of the future. It is happy to note that the pronouncement of the 20th August 1917 declared
the application of the principle to India—a principle which enunciates the rule that every people must be free to
determine the conditions under which it is to live. It would be a sign of imperfect
realization of the significance of this principle if its application were restricted to
international relations, because discord does not exist between nations alone, but there is also discord between classes from within a nation.
Wittingly our Indian politicians in their political speeches and harangues hold to the de jure conception of
the Indian people. By the de jure conception
they conceive of the Indian people as by nature one and emphasize the qualities such as
praiseworthy community of purpose and welfare, loyalty to public ends and mutuality of sympathy which accompany this unity. How the de jure and de facto conceptions conflict, it is hoped, the
committee will not fail to realize. As an instance the
following may be noted. The moral evil to the Indian people of their conquest and
subjugation by the British is a theme which is very attractive to the Brahmin politicians,
who never fail to make capital out of it. The moral evils were once portrayed by John
Shore in his “Notes on Indian Affairs” written in
1832. The late Honourable Mr. Gokhale once voiced the same
feeling when speaking about the “ excessive costliness
of the foreign agency “. He said :
“There
is a moral evil which, if anything, is even greater. A kind of
dwarfing or stunting of the Indian race is going on under the present system. We must live
all the days of our life in an atmosphere of inferiority and the tallest of us must bend, in order that the exigencies of the existing system may be satisfied. The upward impulse, if
I may use such an expression, which every schoolboy at Eton and Harrow may feel, that he
may one day be a Gladstone or Napoleon or a Wellington, and which may draw forth the best
efforts of which he is capable is denied to us. The full height to which our manhood is capable of rising can never be reached by us
under the present system. The moral elevation which every self-governing people feel cannot be felt by us. Our administrative and
military talents must gradually disappear, owing to sheer disuse till at last our lot as
hewers of wood and drawers of water in our own country. is stereotyped.”.
45.
I beg to invite the attention of the Committee whether these sentiments which have been
voiced by a Brahmin (a noble Brahmin to be sure) to the disgrace of the British
bureaucracy cannot be more fittingly voiced by the untouchables to the disgrace of the
Brahmin oligarchy ? May it be said to the credit of the
bureaucracy, that it has disproved the charge of being wooden and shown itself susceptible
to feeling by proposing changes in the system of the Government which has dwarfed the
personality of those for whom it was devised. But can the
oligarchy claim anything half as noble? Their belief is that the Hindu social system has
been perfected for all time by their ancestors who had the superhuman vision of all eternity
and supernatural power for making infinite provision for
future ages. This deep ingrained ethnocentrism has prevented
a reconstruction of Hindu Society and stood in the way of a
revision of vested rights for the common good. A farce of a
conference for the removal of untouchability
was enacted in March 1918 in Bombay. Doctor Kurtakoti, the Shankaracharya of Karvir fame,
though promised to attend, left for Northern India just a
day or two before the conference met, on some urgent business. Mr. Tilak is credited with a short speech at the
conference which has for the good luck
of Mr. Tilak remained unreported. But this was only lip sympathy shown to hoodwink the untouchables for when the draft of the proclamation
removing untouchability was presented to Mr. Tilak. It is
known on creditable evidence that he
refused to honour it with his signature.
46.
Here is disclosed a patent disharmony within a nation and therefore
a proper field for the application of the principle of
self-determination, if the advanced classes are clamouring for its application to India and if the powers
that be have sanctioned it, however partially, to ward off
the future stunting and dwarfing of the Indian people, may not the untouchables with justice claim its benefit in their
own interest? Admitting the necessity or self-determination for the
untouchables communal representation cannot be withheld from them, for communal representation and self-determination are but two different, phrases
which express the same notion.
Supplementary Written Statement of Mr. Bhimrao R. Ambedkar.
1.
The
object of this supplement is primarily, to show how the scheme of representation which I have recommended for the untouchables “of the Bombay Presidency in my previous statement can be fitted into the scheme of representation proposed by
the Government of Bombay for the
composition of the Legislative Council.
- First
I wish to propose certain changes in number of seats assigned by the Government to the various main constituencies. The several changes proposed
are indicated in the following table :
|
Distribution |
By |
By |
|
(1) |
1 |
1 |
|
(2) |
1 |
1 |
|
(3) |
1 |
1 |
|
(4) |
2 |
2 |
|
(5) |
4 |
4 |
|
(6) |
3 |
4 |
|
(7) |
18 |
10 |
|
(8) |
18 |
17 |
|
(9) |
52 |
60 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
2.
As regards the method of election proposed for I, II,
III, IV & V of the above constituencies, I agree with
the Government.
- The
Government has reserved 3 seats for the Sindh Hindus. I have
proposed 4 for them, one of
which should be earmarked for the untouchables of Sind to be
filled by a communal electorate. - For
the 6 cities I have reserved 17 seats. Of this I propose
that Bombay should be given 10. Of the 10 seats the untouchables of the
city should be given I seat, also to be filled by a communal
electorate. - So
far it is shown how the Sind untouchables and their fellows
in Bombay can be provided for. In addition to these two seats the untouchables of the
Presidency proper, excluding the city of Bombay, should be given 7 seats. The
constituencies among which these 7 seats are to be distributed, I have indicated on page 7 of my previous statement. It is in this
fashion that the 9 seats for the untouchables
of the Presidency should be carved out. The Government of Bombay finds difficulty in
defining the Depressed Classes.
The
difficulty is not a real difficulty, for, for all practical purposes the untouchables
and the Depressed classes are
the same. Knowing full well the degradation
of the untouchables, the callousness of the Bombay Government is appalling. By refusing to make
provision for the representation of the Depressed classes the Government have deliberately thrown
the gravest of interests into the greatest of perils—a calamity which I am sure the Committee will avert.
6. Having taken out 7 seats from the 60, I propose to distribute the remaining 53 among
the touchable population of the 26 districts as follows:
I
allow, though cannot quite agree with the Government, that
the 7 districts of Sind should elect 14 members on
the basis of 2 per district. But in the case of the 19 districts which are outside Sind
£ feel that a two-member constituency
will not suffice, principally because the touchable Hindu
population is not homogeneous. In. order to satisfy the aspirations of the.
subdivisions of the touchable Hindus
we must at least in some cases give up the principle of a
two-member constituency. [91 (2)] To distribute the 39 seats
among the 19 districts in
question I should first group
the districts on linguistic basis as follows :
Districts
|
|
|
|
(1) |
614,286 |
|
(2) |
170,545 |
|
(3) |
556,667 |
|
259,929 |
|
|
(5) |
535,236 |
|
Total |
21,36,663 |
II
marathi
|
|
Touchable |
|
(1) |
736,915 |
|
(2) |
509,158 |
|
(3) |
1,003,240 |
|
(4) |
738,747 |
|
(5) |
789,740 |
|
(6) |
437,391 |
|
(7) |
745,965 |
|
(8) |
883,488 |
|
(9) |
858,607 |
|
(10) |
574,152 |
|
Total |
72,77,403 |
III
kanarese
|
|
Touchable |
|
(1) |
734,598 |
|
(2) |
677,041 |
|
(3) |
820,345 |
|
(4) |
372,857 |
|
Total |
26,04,841 |
Grand
total of touchable Hindus in the 19 Districts concerned 12,018,907.
Of
the 39 seats to be distributed I should give 8 seats to the Gujarati
23 to the Marathi and 8 to
the Kanarese districts.
The
actual constituencies may be as under:
|
Language |
Population in each constituency
|
Number |
Number |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
I |
|||
|
614,286 |
I |
2 |
|
727,212 |
II |
3 |
|
|||
|
614,286 |
III |
3 |
|
|||
|
II |
|||
|
1. |
1,246,073 |
IV |
4 |
|
2. |
|||
|
3. |
1,003,240 |
V |
2 |
|
4. |
1,484,712 |
VI |
3 |
|
5. |
|||
|
6. |
1,227,131 |
VII |
3 |
|
7. |
|||
|
8. |
883,488 |
VIII |
* |
|
9. |
858,607 |
IX |
3 |
|
10.Sholapur |
574,152 |
X |
3 |
|
III |
|||
|
1. |
1,411,639 |
XI |
4 |
|
2. |
|||
|
3. |
1,193,202 |
XII |
4 |
|
4. |
|||
* No Figure is shown against the Satara district in
the original.
Total
number of representatives for the 19 districts 39.
The Principal advantage of such a grouping is that the demand of the Marathas and the Lingayats
can be satisfied without resorting to communal representation. There is no sacredness
about a district that can plead against transcending its
boundaries for political purposes when such a transcending enables us to minimise the
field for communal representation.
8.
I have differed from the Government of Bombay on the number
of representatives to be given to the Mohamedans. Of the
two bases, population and the Congress Scheme, the Government of Bombay have preferred the
latter without even making a show of reasoning. In doing so they
have contravened the most considered opinion of the authors of the Reforms Scheme who say
that there is no basis other than that of negotiation for
the proportion of Mohammedan representation fixed in the
Congress League Scheme. It must be urged that looking to
its composition the Congress is a body whose vicarious
promises can never be binding on the vast population who have played no part in its
deliberations.
9.
The Mohammedans of
this presidency form 20 per cent of the total population. On the basis of population
therefore, they are entitled only to 20 seats out of the 100 elective seats. But tempering
population by need I think 24 seats ought to satisfy them. Any excess over this cannot be
tolerated, as it will be at the cost of the other
communities. Of these 24, the 7 districts of Sind on the basis of 2 per
district will return 14 Mohammedans. The other 10 seats may be distributed as follows:
|
|
|
Population |
|
No. |
|
(1) |
|
179,246 |
|
2 |
|
(2) |
|
342,696 |
|
2 |
|
(3) |
|
367,509 |
|
3 |
|
(4) |
|
457,997 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
10 |
I
should prefer linguistic grouping to divisional grouping
even in the case of the Mohammedans. I fail to see how a
Mohammedan from Thana can have any
affiliation with a Mohammedan of Surat
though both the districts come under the same division. To group together for political
purposes people who are ethnically different is absurd
Mr. Bhimrao R. Ambedkar called and examined
Sir
Frank Sly: He was a professor in the Sydenham College of Commerce.
He graduated from the Elphinstone College, Bombay and was an M.A. of the Columbia University, New York. He was a Mahar
by caste and his statement dealt largely with the depressed classes.
So
far as the Hindu community was concerned, he divided them into two
classes, touchables and
untouchables; a distinction which was unmistakable in
practice and more convenient than a division by castes. He recognised also a distinction
between Brahmins and non-Brahmins, but this was of less
importance. The distinction between Brahmin and non-Brahmin
would not make much difference as regards the attitude of
voter to a candidate, but the distinction between touchable
and untouchable would make a very great difference.
He
did not think there was any necessity for communal electorates for non-Brahmins as, if three-member constituencies were granted
according to his supplementary statement, non-Brahmins
would get some seats. From the figures in Para 16 of his
written statement he intended to
show that on a uniform property qualification, a community
which might be in a minority with regard to population might be in
a majority in respect of voting strength;
some of the communities that he had mentioned might be minorities in the whole province, but
majorities in particular districts. They should try to
reduce the fever for communal representation as much as possible, and he therefore recommended three-member constituencies.
He
wanted a variation of the franchise for the untouchables; but, if constituencies with more than two members were adopted, the lowering of the franchise became a matter of
less importance. In the case of a small constituency, for instance, the Marathas,
it might be desirable to group
them.
If
a particular community had a majority of votes in a constituency,
there was no need for that
community to have separate communal representation. If the untouchables had a majority of votes in
a particular constituency, he would not ask for communal representation. It was because they were in a minority and would always remain so on a
uniform franchise that he asked for separate representation. His justification for asking
for a low franchise was that as a result of being untouchable, the untouchables had no
property; they could not trade because they could not find
customers. He remembered a case in which a Mahar woman was taken to the police court for
selling watermelons. He was not aware of the conditions outside the Bombay Presidency. In
the mills in the Bombay Presidency the untouchables were
not yet allowed to work in the weaving department: in one
case an untouchable did work in the weaving department of a mill saying that he was a Mohammedan, and when found out, he was severely
beaten. The definition of an “
untouchable “ as a
person, who would cause pollution by his touch, was a
satisfactory one for electoral purposes. It was not the case that some castes were considered to be untouchable in some districts
and touchable in others.
According
to his classification the untouchables amounted to about 8 per
cent of the population, but he had proposed 9 seats which would make about 9 per cent. These seats should be filled by separate communal election.
He
was aware that the untouchable in his present state of development was in no way qualified to give a
responsible vote. In the whole Bombay Presidency there were one B.A.
and 6 or 7 matriculates among the
depressed classes. The proportion of those who were literate in English was very small,
but not much smaller than in the case of the backward classes. The depressed classes especially the Mahars and the Chamars, were fit to exercise
the vote. He would also give them the votes by way of education. He could find at least 25 or more men amongst them who had passed
the 6th or the 7th Standards
of a High School, and, although the number was not large, the 9 seats which he suggested for the
depressed classes could be filled from amongst them. Such a candidate
in practical matters would be as good as a graduate although the latter might be
able to express himself better.
He
was opposed to any system under which the representatives
of the depressed classes were drawn from other classes. Representation by missionaries, for
instance, would not be representation in any real sense of the word.
He
suggested large constituencies for the depressed classes’; if such large constituencies had been accepted for the Mohammedans he did not see why
they were not practicable in
the case of the depressed classes.
In
order to obtain the required number of seats for the
depressed classes he would reduce the number of seats
suggested by Government for
the Mohammedans, from 38 to
10. This reduction was justifiable,
as on the population basis the Mohammedans were only entitled to 20 per cent of the seats. He did not consider the Congress League
Pact as binding on all.
Mr.
Hailey: Untouchables were persons to whom certain
rights of citizenship had been denied.
For instance, it was the right of every citizen to walk
down the street, and if a man were prevented from doing so, even temporarily, it was an infringement of his right. Whether a man was prevented from exercising his
rights by law or social custom, made very little difference
to him. Government had recognised custom and persons belonging io the untouchable classes
were not employed in Government service.
He
suggested the lowering of the franchise qualification in. She case of the depressed
classes, as it should be the object of the Government to
improve the lot of the community.
From
an examination of the Census Report he would say that the
problem of touchable and non-touchable
existed in Sind, as although the greater proportion of the
population there were Mohammedans, there were also Hindus. If special provision was going
to be made for the Hindus in Sind, he did not see why special
provision should not be made for the depressed classes also.
Mr.
Banerjee: The depressed classes would be able to find 9 men
who were able to speak English and who could represent their cause in the Council. The 6th standard was the class below the
matriculation, and a man who
had passed the 6th standard would be able to follow the debates in the Council. They had
about 25 persons who had passed that standard.
For
political purposes there would be no difficulty in defining the
depressed classes, who were the same as the untouchables. No one who was not a member of a
depressed class would think of trying to make himself out to be such, though such a thing
might occur in the case of the backward classes.
He
would accept 8 representatives as the minimum for the depressed classes, and they should
be elected. Nominated representative would not be in a position adequately to represent
their interests.
Mr.
Crump: He had no experience of the problem and conditions
of the untouchable classes in Sind, and could not say anything with regard to the
statement that there was only one such class, viz., the Bhangis, there- His information
was that the total Hindu population in Sind was 837,426, and the total of the untouchable
classes was 135,224.
Mr.
Natarajan: His view was that
British rule in India was meant to provide equal opportunities
for all, and that in transferring a large share of the
power to popular assemblies, arrangements should be made
whereby the hardships and disabilities entailed by the social system should not be
reproduced and perpetuated in political institutions. As regards the exact position at
present, he admitted that, for instance, at the Parel school which was meant for the depressed classes, there
were many higher-caste pupils, who came there because it was a good school. Similarly as a
professor he, being a member of a depressed class, had pupils of all classes and found no
difficulty in dealing with his higher caste pupils. If the untouchable classes were recognized by Government by the grant of
seats, their status would be raised and their powers would be stimulated. He was not very
particular about the number of their seats; all he wanted
was something adequate.
The
following persons were called and examined at Bombay
between 24 January 1919 and 31 January 1919:
(1) L. C. Crump, Esq., I.C.S. representing the
Government of Bombay (24 January 1919).
(2)
The Hon’ble Major C. Fernandez,
M. D. I. M. S. (Temporary) (24 January
1919).
(3)
The Rev. Cannon D. L. Joshi, representing the Bombay Indian
Christian (Protestant) Association (24 January 1919).
(4)
Lieut. Colonel H.A.J. Gidney, I.M.S. (Retired),
representing the Anglo-Indian
Empire League (Bombay Branch) (25 January 1919).
(5)
Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy,
BART (25 January 1919).
(6)
W. A. Haig Brown, Esq.,
representing the Bombay Branch of the European Association
(25 January 1919).
(7)
Mr. D. D. Sathaye, representing the Bombay National Union
(25 January 1919).
(8)
The Hon’ble Mr. M. A. Jinnah (25 January 1919).
(9)
Mr. C. N. Wadia,
representing the Bombay Millowners’ Association (27 January
1919).
(10)
Mr. V. R. Shinde (27 January
1919).
(11)
Mr. K.R. Koregawkar, representing the Maratha
Aikyecchu Sabha (27 January
1919).
(12)
The Hon’ble Mr. M. A. Jinnah (27 January 1919).
(13)
Mirza Ali Muhamad Khan (27 January 1919).
(14)
Bhimrao R. Ambedkar Esq. (27
January 1919).
(15)
The Hon’ble Mr. V. J. Patel
(28) January 1919).
(16)
The Hon’ble Sahib Hiralal Desaibhai
Desai (28 January 1919).
(17)
The Hon’ble Mr. Chunilal V. Mehta
(28 January 1919).
(18)
A. B. Latthe, Esq. (28
January 1919).
(19)
The Hon’ble Mr. R. P. Paranjpye (28 January 1919).
(20)
Mr. V. R. Kothari, representing the Deccan Ryots’ Association (28 January 1919).
(21) Messrs. Umar Sobhani and S. G. Banker,
representing the Bombay Home Rule League (29 January 1919).
(22)
H. N. Apte Esq.,
representing the Deccan Sabhn, Poona
(23 January 1919).
(23)
N. C. Kelkar Esq. (29 January 1919).
(24)
The Hon’ble Mr. D. V. Belvi (29 January 1919).
(25)
Rao Bahadur Thakorram Kapilram (29 January
1919).
(26)
N. M. Joshi Esq., Member of the Servants of India Society (30 January 1919).
(27)
The Hon’ble Rao Bahadur Venkatesh Srinivas Naik (30 January
1919).
(28)
Pandit R. Chikodi (30 January 1919).
(29)
The Hon’ble Mr. S. J. Gillum and Sir Thomas Birkett, Kt., representing the Bombay Chamber of Commerce (30 January
1919).
(30)
Mr. Ambalal Sarabhai with
Mr. Kasturbhai Lalbhai, Dalpatbhai representing the Ahmadabad Millowners’
Association (30 January 1919).
(31)
Devidas Madhavji Thakersey, Esq., representing the Bombay
Native Piece-goods Merchants Association (30 January 1919)
(32)
The Hon’ble Mr. Ghulam Hussain
Hidayatulla (31 January 1919).
(33)
Mr. B. V. Jadhav (31 January
1919).
(34)
The Hon’ble Sir Pazulbhoy Currimbhoy, Kt., C.I.E. (31 January 1919).
(35)
H. P. Mody Esq. (31 January
1919).
(36)
Sardar V. N. Mutalik representing the Inamdars’
Central Association, Sarara (31 January 1919).
27 January 1948: Sixth session for one day of consituent assembly on 27 Jan 1948.
27 January 1967: With the
facilitation of Nanak Chand Rattu (Personal Secretary of Dr. Ambedkar)
Savita Ambedkar (wife of Dr. Ambedkar) got the help from then Home
Minister Shri Y B Chavan, Lt Governor and Deputy Commissioner and then
she was permitted to enter the Bunglow at 26 Alipore Road, New Delhi
(currently Parinirvan Bhoomi) – the residence of Dr. Ambedkar[1].
After the death of Dr. Ambedkar
on the intervening night of 5th and 6th December 1956, Savita Ambedkar
had stayed in the Bunglow at 26 Alipore road where her husband (Dr.
Ambedkar) breathed the last till 1967. One Madan Lal Jain had purchased
the bunglow in 1966 and allowed her to stay in the rooms already in her
possession. Madan Lal quietly moved an application in the court to evict
her. And on 20 January 1967 when she went to Alwar district, Madan Lal
Jain and his son-in-law entered the premises with three bailiffs and 20
muslce men and forcilbly opened the rooms and a big store room taking
bunch of keys from Mohan Singh, her servant, who was listening, at ease,
the radio programme.
On 27 January 1967 with the facilitation
of Nanak Chand Rattu she got the help from Home Minister Shri Y B
Chavan, Lt Governor and Deputy Commissioner. Consequently she was
permitted to enter the premises and have access to rooms in her
possession. The worst was that Madan Lal Jain and his the men had
removed countless precious documents and important parpers, nicely kept
in several racks of the big store room and recklessly dumped in an open
yard opposite the shed in a shameful manner, not realizing the
importance of these. In addition the store room had contained
manuscripts of Dr. Ambedkar’s several wirtings which at that time were
unpublished. But many of them were destroyed and reduced to waste paper
due to the reckless handling and rain the same night.
Subsequently the papers were taken into
the custody by the custodian of the High Court of Delhi. Then these were
transferred to the Administrative General of the Government of
Maharashtra. Later Shri J B Bansod, an Advocate from Nagpur, filed a
suit against the Government in the High Court at Nagpur making a simple
request seeking permission from court to allow him to publish the
unpublished writings of Dr. Ambedkar or to direct the Government to
publish the same. Government then formed a committee called as Dr.
Babasaheb Ambedkar Source Material Publication Committee and appointed
Vasant Moon as the Officer on Special Duty. The work of Dr. Ambedkar
then got publilshed due to the unrelenting hard work of Vasant Moon. But
alas! much of the work cannot see the light of the day as it was lost
between 20 and 27 January 1967.
27 January 2000: The then President of India K R Narayanan praised the Constitution of India.
In an address in the central hall of the
parliament to mark the golden jubilee of the Indian republic and the
constitution, asked whether “it is the constitution that has failed us
or we who have failed the constitution”. The president was responsing
criciallty to the appointment of a commission “to comprehensively review
the Constitution of India in the light of the experience of the past 50
years and to make suitable recommendations.” Unlike the presidential
speech at the opening of parliament, President Narayanan’s golden
jubilee address as not written for him by the government of the day. It
represented an autonomous presidential perspecgive. Widely reported and
much discussed in print and the electronic media, the speech deepened
and accelerated a national debate on the constitution that the NDA
government’s action had provoked. In his address, The President praised
the work of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
on the Indian constitution and cautioned against attempts to change its
basic structure, concurring with Dr. Ambedkar’s preference for
accountability and responsibility over the stability of the
government[2].
The context of the above incident is that
the then NDA government under Atal Bihari Vajapyee considering to
appoint a commission to review the Consitution of India.
—
[1] Nanak Chand Rattu, Last Few Years of Dr. Ambedkar, book
[2] Full text of the President’s golden
jubilee speech is given in Seminar, magazine issue 487, March 2000, pg
88-90. Accounts of debate surrounding the speech are given, inter alia,
in Asian Age, newspaper, 28 January 2000.
Mohan Bagwat’s RSS is not a registered Political Party either. But
puts only the 1% intolerant, volent, militant, shooting, lynching,
lunatic, mentally retarded cannibal horrororist chitpawan brahmins as
candidates in UP and all other states for his stealth,shadowy,
discriminatory hindutva cult rashtra.
For violating the
Constitution he and his avathars must be booked and treated in mental
asylum for their hatred, anger, jealousy, delusion which are defilement
of mind and madness till they are totally treated with Vipassana
Mediatation.
They are attempting to instigate SC/STs/Minorities
of the Sarvajan Samaj as they are terrorists having belief in violence
to win elections.
A US-based risk management and consulting
company has put the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in its category of
‘Threat Group’ and called it “a shadowy, discriminatory group that
seeks to establish a Hindu Rashtra, a Hindu Nation.”
Terrorism
Watch & Warning provides intelligence, research, analysis, watch and
warning on international terrorism and domestic terrorism related
issues; and is operated by OODA Group LLC that helps clients identify,
manage, and respond to global risks and uncertainties while exploring
emerging opportunities and developing robust and adaptive strategies for
the future
http://www.hindustantimes.com/…/story-EqYMsbzYbhDOtNgocROfN…
Ban RSS, India’s no 1 terror organisation: Former Maharashtra cop
2116 Mon 23 Jan 2017
LESSONS
from
INSIGHT-NET-
Online A1 (Awakened One) Tipiṭaka Research & Practice University
in Visual Format (FOA1TRPUVF)
Mayawati says alliance with Samajwadi (Familywadi) Party will not help Congress in Uttar Pradesh
Lucknow: Accusing Akhilesh Yadav government of shielding criminals and
communal forces, BSP chief Mayawati on Saturday said Congress’ attempted
tie-up with ruling Samajwadi Party showed its political bankruptcy and
will be inimical to party which is “running on oxygen support” in Uttar
Pradesh.
She alleged that Congress was kowtowing to Samajwadi
(Familywadi) Party by accepting “tainted” Akhilesh Yadav as the chief
ministerial candiate and claimed several Congress leaders have come to
BSP after talks for an alliance between the two parties for the upcoming
Assembly polls.
“I will like to tell the Congress that if they
consider themselves as secular, they should not go along with SP.
Keeping their future in mind, they should either go it alone or with
smaller secular parties in the Assembly polls,” Mayawati told
newspersons here.
Attacking (Familywadi) Samajwadi Party, she
alleged it has been shielding criminals and communal forces and has a
clear understanding with the BJP.
She also claimed that the
infighting in Mulayam Singh Yadav’s clan was a mere “drama” enacted by
the SP patriarch in which his brother Shivpal Yadav was made a scapegoat
to divert the attention of people from the “failures” of his son and
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav.
“Congress appears to
have totally bowed before the SP by accepting the tainted face of
Akhilesh Yadav as the chief ministerial candiate. It shows Congress’
political bankruptcy.
“Now people are asking whether Congress was
preparing for a fight against the BJP with such a tainted face,” she
said, adding that it is known that in Bihar, Nitish Kumar had somehow
saved the Congress.
“People are asking as to how Congress will face the secular people of Uttar Pradesh,” she said.
The BSP chief said that the “real selfish face” of Congress has been
exposed at election time and the top leadership of Congress has proved
that “this party is running on oxygen support” in UP.
“It is a
reality that Congress is in such a bad shape in UP that despite the
‘rath yatra’ and ‘khat sabhas’ by its top leadership, it is not easily
getting candidates for the Assembly elections”, she said.
Highlighting the contradictions in the alliance, she said Congressmen
who have been facing problems during the past five years and fighting
against “jungleraj” will not vote for SP candidates.
What happens to Rahul Gandhi who asked whether it was a sin to have a brahmin as CM of UP while projecting Shila Dixit.
He is not consist in his statements. He said that RSS godse killed
Gandhi and then backed out. He said he was having proof of Modi’s
corruption and he is yet to publish.
People are quite aware that
the Congress, BJP Familywadi Party and all their allies pappu, mulayam
yadhav, lallu,mamata,kalmadi,
kanimozhi of another familtwadi
party,azam khan are all vultures of the same feather flocking together
to feed on the bodies of Sarvajan Samaj voters.
Country will a glorious period of never ending scams when the above “netas” will take charge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DonVZEc0K0
Betiyaan With Chitra Tripathi: Mayawati
is an Indian politician who served four terms as Chief Minister of
Uttar Pradesh (UP) as head of the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), which
focuses on a p…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3w6y1PNo78
bahujan samaj party song mission 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0XPJWWatMA
bahujan samaj party song sing by SHAAN
u want more song just like sing by kailash khair , shaan . alka yagni
etc then pls like , share , comment and subscribe my channel THANKU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guK1pfUq9D4
bahujan samaj party song ( kailash khair )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzFBcgQ1fiU
jai bheem bsp songs mission 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyrW94fA0vc
बहनजी हमारी प्राइम मिनिस्टर । BSP Video Song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qJPOsv74DU
सवार होकर हाथी पर जायेंगे दिल्ली पर BSP Video Song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YetPIYpOy7g
BSP Behan jee ko aane do!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZWQhBOLRl4&spfreload=5
Pseries BSP nitu darmendra siyaram S4 - PRACHAR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtR-tQ0F0rc
BABULAL PATEL ABAKI BAR BSP SARKAR बाबुलाल पटेल चुनाव प्रचार गीत 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67sy8h7nJw4
jai bheem bsp song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIdARBHr06I
Bsp New Song 2017 नहीं चाही चूड़ी कंगना
सीमा आजाद फ़ैज़ाबादी , अंजनी कुमार गीतकार- राज कुमार शर्मा, विजय
तिवारी, विमलेश राज संगीत-पैशन स्टूडियो , आंबेडकर नगर विशेष सहयोगी- पवन
कुमार गौतम, विम…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBQpKgI_JTA
kailash kher song- हाथी का बटन दबाव नीला परचम लहराव
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QndkyfW-KOQ
B.S.P JAI BHIM LAGE JAB NARA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmXhELvBBhw
बहुजन समाज पार्टी बरेली सुनील सागर
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQU1Q0IcEV4
यूपी चुनाव में बहुजन समाज पार्टी सबसे आगे, ऑस्ट्रेलिया के अप्रवासी भारतीयों ने दिया मायावती का साथ
http://foodsuppb.nic.in/Branches/ATTA%20DAL%20POLICY.pdf
Jaitley Promised ‘Doubling Accidental Insurance’ to Punjab
January23, 2017 (C) Ravinder Singh progressindia2015@gmail.com
Arun Jaitley’s biggest poll promise to Punjab is Doubling of
Compensation to Accident Victims belonging to weaker sections, including
Farmer Suicides.
Just about 3000 Accident Victims Annually may
be eligible for Accident Insurance and 5 lakh extra compensation is
Rs.150 Cr only.
Promise of giving 2 kg Ghee and 5 kg Sugar to
Blue Card holders but Punjab is overflowing with Milk & Milk
Products – Wheat & Rice. Farm workers are Well Fed and sometimes
paid in kind - Wheat & Rice. In case of Ghee – any old or stinking
Ghee purchased through tenders wouldn’t attract buyers.
http://foodsuppb.nic.in/…/PUNJAB%20HOARDING%20AND%20PROFITE…
http://foodsuppb.nic.in/Branches/ATTA%20DAL%20POLICY.pdf
Atta Dal Scheme:
i) The State Govt. has kept budget obtain of Rs.300 Crore. The bills of
the scheme are raised by Punjab Civil Supplies Corporation (Punsup).
[Let me tell you that this includes procurement, packing and home
delivery etc and per capita benefit of not even Rs.150 annually.]
Kisan Amdan Ayog – Fool Voters Idea
We had in past similar Ayogs – all ECCENTRAIC FARMERS & ECONOMISTS like MS Swaminathan & GS Kalkat – both Anti Farmers.
Punjab was Number One State in 1995 – 10th Rank in Per Capita GDP 20
years later when Dullard GS Kalkat was Chairman of Punjab Planning
Commission.
MS Swaminathan recommended 50% profit margin to Farmers – THIS ACTUALLY TRANSLATES TO MARGIN.
Ø RETURN ON COST OF LAND WAS FACTORED IN PRODUCTION COST,
Ø Cost of MONEYLENDER LOANS Ignored,
Ø Cost RISK Factor Like Drought, Floods, Pest Attack, Fire, Theft etc ignored.
GS Kalkat Was Totally Lunatic
GS Kalkat Recommended ‘Lowering or Freezing Wheat & Rice MSP’ To Discourage Wheat & Rice Cultivation in Punjab.
Ravinder Singh, Inventor & Consultant, INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND PROJECTS
Y-77, Hauz Khas, ND -110016, India. Ph: 091- 9871056471, 9718280435, 9650421857
Ravinder Singh* is a WIPO awarded inventor specializing in Power, Transportation,
Smart Cities, Water, Energy Saving, Agriculture, Manufacturing, Technologies and Proje
2115 Sun 22 Jan 2017
LESSONS
2114 Sat 21 Jan 2017
LESSONS
from
INSIGHT-NET-
Online A1 (Awakened One) Tipiṭaka Research & Practice University
in Visual Format (FOA1TRPUVF) http://www.ndtv.com/india-
Mayawati said the statement re-examining reservation “is highly condemnable.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-02Glh8YOeU
Advantage
of the reservation system to do much better for themselves because of
protectionism-senior govt jobs, education & trade etc.
Even
he had it, in his mind, as a measure for the oppressed anddowntrodden
under such reservation system would have bettered their lots.
He
asked them to write on the walls that one day they will hold the Master
Key so that all doors of development could be opened for them.
Baba
Saheb Ambedkar recommended reservations for SC/STs as a compromise for
separate electorate as long as they came on par with others.
Basically
RSS want stealth, shadowy discriminatory chitpavan brahmin cult
rashtra. Non chitpavan Brahmin,very strongly believe in equality.
Are
you saying that 1% is so super duper intelligent that rest of the 99
were not?! Do you even have basic understanding of statistics.
Suresh
|What you RSS 1% chitpavan brahmins out of 100% brahmin have to say
about the fact that of our population holds 99% of the top job?
http://timesofindia.
RSS cadre graduate to the BJP.
RSS
converted hindu temples serve as repositories of weapons as well as
centers of dissemination of its racist ideology of Aryan supremacy.
RSS
militia is organised around local cells where weapons are distributed
to its hardcore members, who are drilled in a vigorous programs.
This
was done to symbolise its anti-Sudra nature. RSS is highly skewed,with
the supreme dictator at the top who can only be a brahmin.
http://sanghparivar.blogspot.
RSS : World’s largest terrorist Organization. when the Aryan invader Rama destroyed the Dravidian Empire of Lanka.
Why
godse construction of temple and his statue suddenly in the news and
being made to sound like hero while he actually was a murderer?
All
religions can coexist peacefully, but these Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks
(RSS) want to cause communal disturbances for political benefits.
And the RSS Mohan Bhagwat is nothing more than a criminal causing communal terror in the society.
anony |Why do they keep bringing up Deen Dayal Upadhyay? He was a traitor who was helping the British.
http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/
What’s decent about a RSS Mohan Bhagwat a dropout wanting extra constitutional changes?
Brahmins get the top jobs, get the best scholarship? you guys have rigged the entire system be it to a important job,promotion.
Many countries have reservation in another term called ‘affirmative action’
How only the forward castes get admissions in the top colleges ?
anon@Vilas
Basutkar: dont you know how Manu Dharma and Bhagavath Geetha deny
dignity, education to people of other castes except brahmins?
If
we want true equality, we should drop our caste & surname If we
can do that, reservation will become redundant on its own.
Now you want the solution (reservation) to be scrapped but you want the original problem (caste system) to remain.
bittu
|Not one statement about the caste system.Can’t we all be equal?
Reservation was brought in as a solution to that inequality.
Hindu@Vilas
Basutkar: dude,competition is between EQUALS.Brahminis and SC/STs are
NOT treated equally. So talking about ‘fittest’ is ABSURD
kvrmurty-
RSS has an Agenda to defeat Modi who stated that no one can take away
the Reservations. It will ensure that Modi LOOSES IN UP.
RSS
is forward looking by killing,creating riots & steamrolling
minorities,SC/STs.These lunatics need to be sent to mental asylums .
http://www.victorianweb.org/history/empire/india/caste.html …
RSS/Modi looking forward while keeping centuries old obnoxious social divisions intact ?
All
tRSS/BJP idiots do is to vomit! first swallowing “opportunities and not
reservation” and vomiting “Reservation should continue”
stealth
shadowy discriminatory hindutva cult is deeply divided on caste line
for unjustifiable reasons.definitely not good for the country.
Ex-Bhakt
True face of RSS Chaddis.behind the dishonesty of the BJP IT-cell
spreading propaganda. Chaddi gang have their own agenda..
RSS
is given a free hand Modi.i am thinking of us going back to Vedic age
aka Stone age..save this country from ‘hindutva cult’ perversion.
http://www.yourepeat.com/
Time and again, RSS proving that BJP is Brahmin Janta Party. They only care about brahmins and rich.
Anonymous@Indian:
brahimins enjoyed 100% reservations for 5000 years. they didn’t allow
education to other castes even today it follows.
Anonymous@Indian:
I challenge Modi to fist release the data on socio economic census of
2011.RSS is highly reluctant to release the data.
Anonymous@Indian:
Let RSS/Modi first release the socio-economic survey of 2011.Then we
will see unreasonably brahmins are well off. They are.
Anonymous @Indian: intolerant&violent lunatic RSS chitpavan brahmins just 1% of total brahmins hates SC/STs,Muslims, hates Christians..
Pavan @Indian:SC/STs and brahmins are NOT treated equal in present-day. When they are, reservation must go. Until then. lets live in reality.
avan
http://www.clipartguide.com/_
it will come out in one way or the other…modi and chorus are just tools..
He
asked them to write on the walls that one day they will hold the Master
Key so that all doors of development could be opened for them.
Baba
Saheb Ambedkar recommended reservations for SC/STs as a compromise for
separate electorate as long as they came on par with others.
Basically
RSS want stealth, shadowy discriminatory chitpavan brahmin cult
rashtra. Non chitpavan Brahmin,very strongly believe in equality.
Later,
RSS leaders in Jaipur back tracked,”As long as there is discrimination,
reservation as provided by the constitution should continue.
http://media.photobucket.com/
Modi is use and throw curry leaves-Sangh Parivar has an agenda of brahmin supremacy and however they try to hide,
https://mail.google.com/mail/
ET Online Editor
http://economictimes.
Jagatheesan Chandrasekharan ()
One
can see the Congress, BJP, SP and all their allies are vultures of the
same feather flocking together to feed on the flesh of the Sarvajan
Samaj Voters to deny them Sarvajan Hitay Sarvajan Sukhaya i.e., for the
happiness, welfare and peace for all societies as enshrined in our
Modern Constitutions by way of distributing the wealth equally among all
societies
Jagatheesan Chandrasekharan ()
With our Modern Constitution as Ms Mayawati’s BSP manifesto and its Slogans
‘betion ko muskurane do, behenji ko aaney do’
Nirdoshon ko na aansoon bahane do… Behenji ko aane do (To wipe the tears of innocent…let Behenji come to power)
Nahi roshni dikhane ko…. Behenji ko aane do (To show new light ….let behenji come to power)
Upeksahaaon ko jane do… Behenji ko aane do (Let ‘neglect’ be the past…let behenji come to power)
Let daughters smile
Make villages prosperous
Dignity of all communities New light for
minorities
Justice for the innocent Fulfil youth dreams Empowerment of women and
Empowerment senior citizens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=521LTq3RrYw
Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) Bahan ji ka Alha बहन जी का आल्हा video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRMjt-PdWBM
BSP Party start up for Mission 2017 in Punjab
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbpeaiHT4Sg
BSP leader Satish Chandra Misra hits out at SP over slew of issues
2113 Fri 20 Jan 2017
LESSONS
from
INSIGHT-NET-
Online A1 (Awakened One) Tipiṭaka Research & Practice University
in Visual Format (FOA1TRPUVF)
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/#inbox/159bbe2862cc55a1
ET Online Editor |
|
6:08 PM (3 hours ago)
|
|||
|
|||
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinions/56666953.cms?mailon_commented=1&usercommentid=53919129#toreply53919129
Jagatheesan Chandrasekharan ()
One
can see the Congress, BJP, SP and all their allies are vultures of the
same feather flocking together to feed on the flesh of the Sarvajan
Samaj Voters to deny them Sarvajan Hitay Sarvajan Sukhaya i.e., for the
happiness, welfare and peace for all societies as enshrined in our
Modern Constitutions by way of distributing the wealth equally among all
societies
Jagatheesan Chandrasekharan ()
With our Modern Constitution as Ms Mayawati’s BSP manifesto and its Slogans
‘betion ko muskurane do, behenji ko aaney do’
Nirdoshon ko na aansoon bahane do… Behenji ko aane do (To wipe the tears of innocent…let Behenji come to power)
Nahi roshni dikhane ko…. Behenji ko aane do (To show new light ….let behenji come to power)
Upeksahaaon ko jane do… Behenji ko aane do (Let ‘neglect’ be the past…let behenji come to power)
Let daughters smile
Make villages prosperous
minorities
Justice for the innocent Fulfil youth dreams Empowerment of women and
Empowerment senior citizens
Akhilesh Yadav’s Cycle SYMBOL has just two wheels ‘Gundaraj’ and ‘Dangaraaj’:
BSP leader Sudhindra Bhadoria said that the incumbent Samajwadi Party
and its chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav would lose Uttar Pradesh elections
comprehensively.
Delhi[India],
Jan. 18: The Bahujan Samaj Party(BSP) is confident that Mayawati will
win this year’s assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh.. Senior BSP leader
Sudhindra Bhadoria said that the incumbent Samajwadi Party and its
chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav would lose comprehensively. On the
controversy asurrounding the cycle symbol, he said “The cycle is already
punctured. “Jai Jai Shiva Shankar SP cycle Punchure” Akhilesh
represents only Gundaraj and Dangaraaj, the two wheels of his cycle.”
and many of its allies including the congress is riding on a single
punctured bicycle.
He further said, that the samajwadi party also
has a communal history like the Congress “Mulayam Singh is against
Muslims. Never has a Muslim occupied any significant police officer’s
rank. Under their rule, Muslims have been exploited and tortured. Just
one community has hogged 80 percent of the jobs.”
“Akhilesh is
now exposed, and cannot don anymore masks now”, he added On Tuesday,
senior Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad yesterday said that his party
would enter into an alliance with the Samajwadi Party for the Uttar
Pradesh Assembly polls under the leadership of Chief Minister Akhilesh
Yadav.
Samajwadi Party leader Ram Gopal Yadav also confirmed that the party will lock itself in a pre-poll alliance with the Congress.
Meanwhile, Sheila Dikshit, who was named as the chief ministerial
candidate of Congress for Uttar Pradesh polls and rahul Gandhi asked if
it was a sin to have a brahmin as the CM of UP while many brahmins were
PM of this country, withdrew her name stating that there cannot be two
chief ministerial faces in case of an alliance in a politically crucial
state like Uttar Pradesh.(ANI
One can see the Congress, BJP, SP and all their allies are vultures of the same feather flocking together to feed on the flesh of the Sarvajan Samaj Voters to deny them Sarvajan Hitay Sarvajan Sukhaya i.e., for the happiness, welfare and peace for all societies as enshrined in our Modern Constitutions by way of distributing the wealth equally among all societies
http://media.photobucket.com/…/ShoePa…/media/21808.gif.html…
Same side goals being scored by Murderer of democratic institute
(Modi)’s BJP (Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths) ahead of polls in UP,
Uttarakhand, Punjab, Goa harming it.
Future PM of Prabuddha Bharath Ms Mayawati is the only leader of sarvajan Samaj i.e., for all Societies
SP, Congress, BJP and all their allies with the money greed and
PRESSTITUTE Media as referred by BJP are vultures of the same feather
flocking together feeding on the Sarvajan voters’ flesh !
Some of them who left the Sarvajan Samaj of BSP went alone the Samaj did not follow them.
http://www.assam123.com/americ…
http://indianexpress.com/…/rss…
Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) cadres start massive campaign for BJP in Uttar Pradesh
Now they want only RSS men to be in power as the fraud EVMs are being
tampered in favour of BJP since Murderer of democratic institutions
(Modi) is a looser after his DEMONitisation and has become unpopular.
The RSS is using him as a use and throw curry leaves.
Induction
of outsiders and giving tickets to them and ignoring its own RSS cadres
which has taken over distributing tickets, is taking steps which is
adversely affecting its prospects in the forthcoming Assembly elections.
BJP is going to lose Assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand,
Goa and Punjab (in alliance with SAD) is in the realm of uncertainties.
But the party, which was certainly in the reckoning in these states,
seems to be weakening its position by scoring one self side goal after
another.
TICKET DISTRIBUTION
In both Uttar Pradesh and
Uttarakhand, BJP has distributed a sizeable number of tickets to
outsiders. This has only angered its own RSS cadres which has identified
its own contestants.
Uttar Pradesh
Of the names of 149
candidates announced by BJP for Uttar Pradesh in its first list, 25 are
those who have recently joined the party.
Resentment is growing
in the most populous state over ticket distribution. Former BSP leader
and leader of opposition in UP Assembly Swami Prasad Maurya, who joined
the BJP in 2016, is reportedly sulking for not getting his share of
tickets.
All those who left Sarvajan Samaj of BSP went alone and
the Samaj did not follow them. Hence no one attended when he arranged
for a rally.
Maurya wanted tickets to his supporters and members
of his family. However, he is feeling cut up with the BJP leadership for
ignoring his demand. Maurya may be on his way out of BJP, the sources
said, adding that he is holding negotiations with the ruling Samajwadi
Party and Congress.
BJP suffered huge embarrassment on Wednesday
over the so-called induction of senior Congress leader ND Tiwari.
Initial reports suggested that the former UP and Uttarakhand chief
minister had been inducted into BJP along with his son Rohit Shekhar.
BJP faced flak for inducting 91-year-old Tiwari who had courted
controversy after the release of a sleaze CD in public domain. However,
it was forced to swiftly backtrack after inducting Tiwari. Within hours
of BJP president Amit Shah meeting him, the party clarified that only
Rohit had joined the party. Tiwari had just extended his support to the
party, it was indicated.
Uttarakhand
Of the 64 candidates
declared in Uttarakhand, 15 are considered to be outsiders. On January
16, Uttarakhand Revenue and Irrigation Minister Yashpal Arya defected to
the BJP along with his son Sanjeev and former Yamunotri MLA Kedar Singh
Rawat. The names of all these three persons found mention in the BJP’s
list of candidates released hours later.
BJP giving assembly ticket to several leaders who lost in parliamentary polls
Further, several former Congress MLAs who had revolted against the
Harish Rawat government in March 2016 have been rewarded with tickets by
BJP at the cost of the old-timers in the party. This has led to
protests at several places against the BJP leadership.
DISSENTS
Though dissents during election season are the norm, BJP cannot afford
to allow it to fester because of the high stakes involved
post-demonetisation. The situation is currently under control. However,
it will not take much time for dissent to turn into rebellion if not
handled deftly.
Uttar Pradesh
At least four senior BJP
leaders are learnt to be upset over being ignored by the party
leadership. Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh is angry over his son
Pankaj Singh’s name not finding place in the BJP’s list of candidates
yet from Sahibabad constituency. BJP has fielded Rajasthan Governor
Kalyan Singh’s grandson Sandeep from Atrauli. His son Rajveer Singh is
an MP from Etah. Rajnath would expect his son to get ticket from the
desired constituency.
BJP’s Gandhi scion - Sultanpur MP Varun
Gandhi - feels sidelined. He had expected the party to project him as
the chief ministerial candidate. Moreover, he nurses grudge against the
leaders for not coming to his defence after an MMS scandal broke
allegedly involving him.
Though five-term Lok Sabha MP from
Gorakhpur since 1998, Yogi Adityanath, holds sway in eastern UP, he has
been ignored by the party leadership. Adityanath may have reasons to
crib because he has not been included even in the state’s election
committee. While newcomers to the party such as Rita Bahuguna Joshi
(from Congress), and Brajesh Pathak and Swami Prasad Maurya (from BSP)
find place in the 23-member committee, Adityanath has been excluded from
it.
Maurya is already feeling offended for getting just three
tickets against the 30 reportedly promised to him before he had joined
BJP.
BJP may ill-afford to antagonise so many senior leaders.
Punjab
Peeved over ticket distribution, Union Minister of State for Social
Justice and Empowerment Vijay Sampla had apparently resigned as BJP’s
Punjab unit president. He was demanding sitting MLA from Phagwara Som
Parkash to be dropped and replaced by a candidate of his choice.
However, the party leadership ignored his demand.
The sources
said that on reports emerging that Sampla had resigned, Amit Shah
summoned him to the capital on January 17 and gave him a dressing down.
Following this, Sampla denied all reports of his resignation.
Goa
BJP is already struggling in Goa due to the rebellion in August 2016 by
then state RSS chief Subhash Velingkar who has floated the Goa Suraksha
Manch (GSM) over the regional language issue.
Making matters
worse for the ruling BJP, GSM has formed a “grand alliance” along with
Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party (MGP) and NDA ally Shiv Sena for the
Assembly elections next month. The alliance will contest 35 of the 40
seats in the Assembly.
MGP, the oldest regional outfit of the
state, recently severed its ties with BJP and withdrew its two ministers
from the Laxmikant Parsekar Cabinet.
Despite these constraints,
BJP may win in UP, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Goa. But if it loses in any
of these four states, a large share of the blame would go to its failure
to handle the ticket distribution, lack of importance accorded to its
cadres and the resulting dissent within the party.
The BJP and
Congress allies will be exposed for their tampering the EVMs in their
favour to gobble the Master Key. People are now aware that the EVMs
could be tampered.
In fact RSS’s BJP leaded Ananth Kumar had told the Lok Sabha that “Modi ne kaha matadan ke samay pe EVM ka prachar hota hai”.
http://www.advocatekhoj.com/lib…/judgments/announcement.php…
http://indianexpress.com/…/up-panchayat-polls-bsp-back-to-…/
The ex CJI Sathasivam had committed a grave error of judgement by
ordering that the EVMs to be replaced in a phased manner as suggested by
ex CEC Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 crores involved in
replacement of the entire EVMs. Only 8 out of 543 seats in the 2014 Lok
sabha were replaced. Ms Mayawati’s BSP lost all its seats because of
these fraud EVMs. But it won with a thumping majority in UP Panchayat
elections with paper ballots.
BJP is upset because of such a change within few months.
Now in UP assembly elections only in 20 constituencies the EVMs are being replaced.
http://zeenews.india.com/…/2019-general-elections-to-have-p…
The present EVMs said that entire EVMs will be replaced only in 2019.
Nobody can stop Ms Mayawati becoming PM after the entire EVMs are replaced.
Hence present CJI must order for dissolving the Central and state
governments selected by these fraud EVMs and go for fresh polls with
paper ballots until the entire EVMs were replaced.
__._,_.___
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTZdGGKw6u0
Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)’s days are numbered. He got selected by tampering the fraud EVMs.
The whole world knows that the ex CJI Sathasivam had committed a grave
error of judgement by ordering that the EVMs to be replaced in a phased
manner as suggested by the ex CEC Sampath becaus of the cost of Rs 1600
crores involved in the entire replacement. Only 8 out of 543 Lok Sabha
seats in 2014 were replaced.And in all the states BJP and Congress took the advantage of these fraud EVMs and got selected.
The present CEC said that entire EVMs will be replaced in 2019.
But none of them ever said that paper ballots will be used until the entire EVMs were replaced.
Ms Mayawati’s BSP which lost in the Lok Sabha elections because of
these EVMs got thumping majority in the UP Panchayat elections just
after few months.
So Modi is committing blunders after blunders
like DEMONetisation where number of people died in his QUEUE INDIA
MOVEMENT. The RSS (Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks) said that they did balidhan
for their stealth, shadowy, discrimatoru hindutva cult rashtra which
believes in brahmins as 1st rate athmas (solus), kshatrias as 2nd ,
vysias as 3rd shudras as 4th rate souls and the Aboriginal Inhabitants
Adi shudras (SC/STs) having no soul at all so that they can do whatever
they wished to do. But the Buddha never believed in any soul. He said
all are equal. Dr Ambedkar returned back to his own home with millions
of aboriginal people and the process continues. As the chief Architect
of our Modern Constitution he made provision for anyone irresepective
of caste, religion to get education, to rule this country, and to do any
business and trade.
This is not tolerated by the 1% violent,
militant, shooting, lynching, lunatic, mentally retarded cannibal
chitpawan brahmin psychopaths. so they atarted RSSising each and
everything for the sake of greed of power and money including the EVMs.
Diwali, Ganapathi, Janmastami, Holi and many other festivals have been
RSSised only or votes.Vivekananda, Shivaji, Vallabhabai Patel have also
been RSSised. They are planning to build temple for Murderer nathuram
godse. They are erecting statues for All haters of the downtrodden and
religious minorities.
Now the educated and intellectuals of
Sarvajan Samaj have started exposing then via social media such as
facebook, WhatsApp, Youtube, etc since the media has become PRESSTITUE
as the BJP calls them though they support them for money.
Napolean had once said that “I can face two battalions but not two scribes”.
The users of internet and the social media are those scribes mentioned by Napolean.
They have started exposing the EVMs by awakening the masses.
SP, Congress, BJP and all their http://www.assam123.com/ http://indianexpress.com/…/ Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) cadres start massive campaign for BJP in Uttar Pradesh Now With our Modern Constitution as Ms Mayawati’s BSP manifesto and its Slogans ‘betion ko muskurane do, behenji ko aaney do’ Nirdoshon ko na aansoon bahane do… Behenji ko aane do (To wipe the tears of innocent…let Behenji come to power) Nahi roshni dikhane ko…. Behenji ko aane do (To show new light ….let behenji come to power) Upeksahaaon ko jane do… Behenji ko aane do (Let ‘neglect’ be the past…let behenji come to power) Let daughters smile Make villages prosperous Dignity of all communities New light for minorities Justice for the innocent Fulfil youth dreams Empowerment of women and Empowerment senior citizens and with the support of entire Sarvajan Samaj nobody can beat BSP. http://indianexpress.com/…/up- http://www.advocatekhoj.com/ http://zeenews.india.com/…/ And Ms Mayawati will become the PM of Prabuddha Bharath after the entire fraud EVMs were replaced in 2019. http://news.webindia123.com/…/ RSS favours paper ballots, EVMs subjected to public scrutinyNew Delhi | Saturday, Aug 28 2010 IST http://www.assam123.com/ http://indianexpress.com/…/ Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) cadres start massive campaign for BJP in Uttar Pradesh http://www.yourepeat.com/ In The “pain and anger” among people would reflect in the voting patterns in the five states, including Uttar Pradesh. RBI’s autonomy and statutory powers have been subjugated RBI and the Modi must answer all All people for democracy, liberty, http://zeenews.india.com/…/ http://www.advocatekhoj.com/ http://indianexpress.com/…/up- http://economictimes. http://zeenews.india.com/…/ http://indianexpress.com/…/up- http://www.ndtv.com/…/uttar- EC had issued orders to cover all the BSP poll symbol elephants were veiled with tarpaulin and cloth. http://www.ndtv.com/…/ Election Commission must also ban the cycle during the elections in the state said BSP leader SC Mishra. Now in UP Assembly elections only in 20 constituencies the EVMs are being replaced.
allies with the money greed and PRESSTITUTE Media as referred by BJP are
vultures of the same feather flocking together feeding on the Sarvajan
voters’ flesh !
they want only RSS men to be in power as the fraud EVMs are being
tampered in favour of BJP since Murderer of democratic institutions
(Modi) is a looser after his DEMONitisation and has become unpopular.
The RSS is use-ing him as a use and throw curry leaves.
With her best governance of UP as CM she became eligible for PM. This
was intolerated by the Congress, BJP, SP and their allies. So the fraud
EVMs were tampered to defeat her.
But she got all her votes in the UP Panchayat elections whcih was
conducted with paper ballots as followed in 80 democracies of the world.
the ex CJI committed a grave error of judgement by ordering that the
EVMs could be replaced in a phased manner as suggested by the ex CEC
Sampath. Only in 8 out of the 543 2014 Lok Sabha elections were replaced
to favour Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) and his BJP
(Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths)
Earlier the Congress tampered the fraud EVMs in favour of SP in the last UP elections.
The CEC said that only in 2019 the entire EVMs will be replaced
None of them ever said that paper ballots will be used till entire fraud EVMs were replaced
If elections are conducted with paper ballots until the entire fraud
EVMs are replaced only BSP will win with the support of 99% Sarvajan
Samaj ie., with the support of all societies for Sarvajan Hitay Sarvajan
Sukhaya. Rest of the parties will not get even 1% of the votes.
When the BJP was in opposition the RSS favoured paper ballots. Now since
BJP is in power the want these EVMs to keep tampering in their favour.
Now they want only RSS men to be in power as the fraud EVMs are being
tampered in favour of BJP since Murderer of democratic institutions
(Modi) is a looser after his DEMONitisation and has become unpopular.
The RSS is use-ing him as a use and throw curry leaves.
Assembly elections in five states is a virtual referendum on the
DEMONetisation decision which has led to “pain and anger” among a vast
number of ordinary people who had to suffer for long with people who
died in Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)’s QUEUE INDIA
MOVEMENT who said, even if you burn
me alive, I will not be cowed down, said Modi without explaining how
anyone could be cowed down after his cremation.
Goa in his speech Modi asked the peoples of to give him only 50
days till 30th December to curb black money, corruption, terrorism and
fake money in the country. On 8th November, Modi has banned
Rs 500 and Rs 1000 currency notes.
RBI Governor and Modi must resign taking responsibility for the
‘DEMONetisation mess’ permitting the Modi to encroach upon the
jurisdiction of the central bank and rendering it as “a mouthpiece ” of
Modi.
and compromised. Responsibility lies at the doorsteps of RBI Governor
for this erosion of credibility.
questions also wanted grant of ‘right of withdrawal of own money’ by
lifting all restrictions.
equality and fraternity as enshrined in our Modern Constitution demand
the dissolution of Central and state governments selected by by the
fraud EVMs and go for fresh polls with paper ballots until the entire
EVMs were replaced.
er Key.
The present CEC said that only in 2019 the entire EVMs will be replaced without ordering for paper ballots till such time.
The ex CJI Sathasivam had committed a grave error of judgement by
ordering that the EVMs can be replaced in a phased manner as suggested
by ec CEC Sampath. Only 8 out of 543 Lok Sabha seats in 2014 elections
were replaced enabling Modi to gobble the Master Key. From all the state
elections are conducted with these fraud EVMs.
But Ms Mayawati’s BSP won the UP Panchayat elections conducted with paper ballots as followed by 80 democracies of the world.
The present CEC said that entire EVMs will only be replaced in 2019.
But he did not say that paper ballots followed in 80 democracies of the
world will be used in all the elections till the entire EVMs were
replaced.
Ms Mayawati’s BSP won majority of UP Panchayat elections because of the
paper ballots while it last in Lok Sabha elections because of the fraud
EVMs.
CEC must also make arrangements to dissolve Central and all the state
governments selected by the fraud EVMs to be dissolved and go for fresh
polls with paper ballots as followed in 80 democracies of the world.
Ms mayawati’s BSP wond in the last UP panchayat elections with these
paper balots while it lost in the last Lok sabha elections because of
these fraud EVMs.
doctorate in biochemistry with several research papers to his credit,
Zaidi went on to crack the IAS in 1976 – a career he was motivated to
take up by his brother Qamar…
http://www.nyoooz.com/…/first-
First phase of Uttar Pradesh assembly polls begins from Tuesday
Summary: LUCKNOW: The formal bugle for the crucial 2017 UP
assembly polls would be blown on Tuesday with the issuance of
notification for the first phase of assembly elections. As per the
directions of the ECI, the candidates would also have to furnish the
no-demand certificate vis-a-vis electricity bill, water bill, telephone
bill and rent. The last date of withdrawal of nominations in January 27.
According to the Election Commission of India, the first phase would
witness 73 assembly constituencies in 15 districts of the state (western
part) going to polls.The districts going to polls in the first phase
are Shamli, Muzaffarnagar, Baghpat, Meerut, Ghaziabad, Gautam Buddh
Nagar, Hapur, Bulandshahr, Aligarh, Mathura, Hathras, Agra, Firozabad,
Etah and Kasganj. Vote Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) machines would
be used in Agra (Agra Cantonment and Agra South), Aligarh (Aligarh),
Ghaziabad (Ghaziabad) and Meerut (Meerut).The first phase will cover
western UP districts, including riot-scarred Muzaffarnagar and Shamli,
where BJP had fared well in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections primarily due
to polarisation.Nomination process would commence immediately after the
issuance of notification at around 11.00 am.
LUCKNOW: The formal
bugle for the crucial 2017 UP assembly polls would be blown on Tuesday
with the issuance of notification for the first phase of assembly
elections. According to the Election Commission of India, the first
phase would witness 73 assembly constituencies in 15 districts of the
state (western part) going to polls.The districts going to polls in the
first phase are Shamli, Muzaffarnagar, Baghpat, Meerut, Ghaziabad,
Gautam Buddh Nagar, Hapur, Bulandshahr, Aligarh, Mathura, Hathras, Agra,
Firozabad, Etah and Kasganj. Vote Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT)
machines would be used in Agra (Agra Cantonment and Agra South), Aligarh
(Aligarh), Ghaziabad (Ghaziabad) and Meerut (Meerut).The first phase
will cover western UP districts, including riot-scarred Muzaffarnagar
and Shamli, where BJP had fared well in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections
primarily due to polarisation.Nomination process would commence
immediately after the issuance of notification at around 11.00 am.
Nominations could be filed on all the working days from 11.00 am to
3.00 pm.As per the poll schedule, the last date to file nominations in
January 24, while scrutiny of nomination papers would be held on January
25. The last date of withdrawal of nominations in January 27. Voting
would be held on February 11, while counting of votes would be done on
March 11.During the nomination process, the candidates have to
compulsorily provide their photographs and also mention their
nationality.Elaborating further additional chief electoral officer
Pramod Kumar Pandey, said, “Vulnerability mapping of the assembly
constituencies is going on, and it would be finalized, once the
candidates’ list is finalized.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbUWZfzjsO8 …
Behenji ko aane do (Let Behenji come to power)
Pradesh maange badlaav (state needs change)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAcEBrupI-w …
Let daughters smile
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XRNsg14d-s …
Make villages prosperous
APN News at ground zero from BSP Supremo Mayawati village
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCqjjIDW79c …
Dignity of all communities FULL STORY OF BSP SUPREMO MAYAWATI/ नेशनल दस्तक पर मायावती के 61वें जन्मदिन पर खास पेशकश-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhTG37e1yJY&t=84s …
New light for minorities-BSP chief Mayawati calls Modi’s Lucknow rally a ‘flop’
-
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tsMQ9lT5Kc …
Fulfil youth dreams-WHAT ARE YOUR DREAMS IN 2017? (Black Ops 3 Sniper Gameplay)
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPkHFQWVw4o …
Empowerment of women - Empowering Women & Girls-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7tUJQeEUkk-WAR … ON SOCIAL MEDIA HAS BSP AT FRONT IN UP ELECTIONS 2017/सोशल मीडिया पर मायावती की धमाकेदार एंट्री
-
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhTG37e1yJY …
BSP chief Mayawati calls Modi’s Lucknow rally a ‘flop’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hg_Qv3sp9fU …
Kaun Banega Mukhyamantri: BJP misusing state machinery to malign BSP, says Mayawati
http://www.assam123.com/americ …
Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) cadres start massive campaign for BJP in Uttar Pradesh
Rector
JC
2111 Wed 18 Jan 2017
LESSONS
Nirdoshon ko na aansoon bahane do… Behenji ko aane do (To wipe the
tears of innocent…let Behenji come to power)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiSQ_db-Dcw
The Way of The Tears - Exclusive Nasheed - Muhammad al Muqit
Nahi roshni dikhane
ko…. Behenji ko aane do (To show new light ….let behenji come to
power)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LypjOTTH6E
0:21 / 4:21
Disturbed - The Light [Official Music Video]
Upeksahaaon ko jane do… Behenji ko aane do (Let ‘neglect’ be
the past…let behenji come to power).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFYl8TVNwg8
Letting Go Of The Past - How To Get Over The Past In Minutes
Go Of The Past - An easy, simple process for how to release past trauma
right now. The Ultimate Life Purpose Course - Create Your Dream Career:
http:…
over Demonetisation and SP’s goonda raj and ongoing fierce family feud
during public
rallies, party’s over a dozen campaign videos will form the series with
themes such as
Let daughters smile
“http://media.photobucket.com/user/fabiolaamparo/media/55108049_1486846.gif.html?filters[term]=daughters&filters[primary]=images&filters[secondary]=videos&sort=1&o=16″,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP4abiHdQpc
Baby Laughing Hysterically at Ripping Paper (Original)
Micah (a boy) laughing hysterically while at-home daddy rips up a job
rejection letter. Check out the other “Baby Laughing Hysterically”
videos o…
http://giphy.com/gifs/village-of-the-damned-DUBvYIn63ZA4M
“Make villages prosperous”, “http://giphy.com/gifs/village-of-the-damned-DUBvYIn63ZA4M”,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnIpv_zRm8M
Minecraft How to make a village
“Dignity of all communities”,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAJbvekexaU
Dignity’s Story
We are transforming communities with coconuts!
Our business was born out of a conviction to help communities overcome
cycles of poverty and slavery. Not with a handout, but with a
sustainable business that will bring lasting hope and change to
communities.
are transforming communities with coconuts! Our business was born out
of a conviction to help communities overcome cycles of poverty and
slavery. Not with…
minorities”,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adap4rzlM2I
Lights Out Short Horror Movie
“Justice for the innocent”,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqIjL5WmpCE
Innocence Project WA “We Will Keep Fighting”
“Fulfil youth dreams”,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYAghEq5Lfw
Troye Sivan - YOUTH
New album ‘Blue Neighbourhood’ feat. “YOUTH” available now: http://troye.si/vanBlueNeighbourhood
‘Blue Neighbourhood’ merch & more here: http://troye.si/vanStore
and
“Empowerment of women
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWBP9z5X59A
Women Empowerment Short Film: Inspired from true stories
Here is a video inspired by true stories around the world made by
students of Gitam University in hopes to spread a message of gender
equality.
is a video inspired by true stories around the world made by students
of Gitam University in hopes to spread a message of gender equality.
Cast Acting (…
and
Empowerment senior citizens”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VK0lbMDV_Fw
This Senior-Citizen Synchronized Swim Team Will Make Your Day | Short Film Showcase
The Harlem Honeys and Bears are a synchronized swim team for seniors 55
years and older. In this short film, Veena Rao captures the “freedom”
that comes from being in the water, a freedom that allows these
performers to “do all kinds of things that [they] cannot do on land” and
stay, as one member says, “92 years young.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPx5g_eg7z4
Synchro Japan 2000Sydney team/tech
Please watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-02Glh8YOeU
by Yash Bharti award winner Manoj Muntashir (of Bahubali and ‘Teri
Galiyan’ fame). Sung by:- Divya Kumar, Aishwarya Nigam & Vishal
Mishra
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYzfHk8uGas
Bahan ji ko aane do
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6uFgwb50bI
Uttar Pradesh Elections 2017: सोशल मीडिया में ‘काम बोलता है का जवाब ‘…बहन जी को आने
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wESDZV2mYnY
BSP has decided to start social media campaign for assembly election 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6eX56MhBjE
0:19 / 3:28
BSP MISSION 2017…… kailash khair
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M2RcHkuKiU
Mayawati song BSP ka Raaj hoga
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D40pqmmJM_I
Rajneeti: नीला झंडा आसमां में फिर है लहराना….BSP New Campaign Video Song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo2T0Vh0NGI
Kanshiram song BSP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p14HldUZN9Y
Punjabi Song on BSP and Saheb Kanshi Ram
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-02Glh8YOeU
BSP Anthem 2017
Published on Jan 14, 2017
Lyrics by Yash Bharti award winner Manoj Muntashir (of Bahubali and
‘Teri Galiyan’ fame). Sung by:- Divya Kumar, Aishwarya Nigam &
Vishal Mishra
III. Cittānupassanā
Kathaṃ ca pana, bhikkhave, bhikkhu citte cittānupassī viharati?
And furthermore, bhikkhus, how does a bhikkhu dwell observing citta in citta?
Idha, bhikkhave, bhikkhu sa·rāgaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘sa·rāgaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, vīta·rāgaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘vīta·rāgaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, sa·dosaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘sa·dosaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, vīta·dosaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘vīta·dosaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, sa·mohaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘sa·mohaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, vīta·mohaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘vīta·mohaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, saṅkhittaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘saṅkhittaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, vikkhittaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘vikkhittaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, mahaggataṃ vā cittaṃ ‘mahaggataṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, a·mahaggataṃ vā cittaṃ ‘a·mahaggataṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, sa·uttaraṃ vā cittaṃ ‘sa·uttaraṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, an·uttaraṃ vā cittaṃ ‘an·uttaraṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, samāhitaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘samāhitaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, a·samāhitaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘a·samāhitaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, vimuttaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘vimuttaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti, a·vimuttaṃ vā cittaṃ ‘a·vimuttaṃ cittaṃ’ ti pajānāti.
Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu understands citta with rāga as “citta with rāga“, or he understands citta without rāga as “citta without rāga“, or he understands citta with dosa as “citta with dosa“, or he understands citta without dosa as “citta without dosa“, or he understands citta with moha as “citta with moha“, or he understands citta without moha as “citta without moha“, or he understands a collected citta as “a collected citta“, or he understands a scattered citta as “a scattered citta“, or he understands an expanded citta as “an expanded citta“, or he understands an unexpanded citta as “an unexpanded citta“, or he understands a surpassable citta as “a surpassable citta“, or he understands an unsurpassable citta as “an unsurpassable citta“, or he understands a concentrated citta as “a concentrated citta“, or he understands an unconcentrated citta as “an unconcentrated citta“, or he understands a liberated citta as “a liberated citta“, or he understands an unliberated citta as “an unliberated citta“.
Iti ajjhattaṃ vā citte cittānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā citte cittānupassī viharati, ajjhatta-bahiddhā vā citte cittānupassī viharati; samudaya-dhamm·ānupassī vā cittasmiṃ viharati, vaya-dhamm·ānupassī vā cittasmiṃ viharati, samudaya-vaya-dhamm·ānupassī vā cittasmiṃ viharati; ‘atthi cittaṃ’ ti vā pan·assa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti, yāvadeva ñāṇa·mattāya paṭissati·mattāya, a·nissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati. Evam·pi kho, bhikkhave, bhikkhu citte cittānupassī viharati.
Thus he dwells observing citta in citta internally, or he dwells observing citta in citta externally, or he dwells observing citta in citta internally and externally; he dwells observing the samudaya of phenomena in citta, or he dwells observing the passing away of phenomena in citta, or he dwells observing the samudaya and passing away of phenomena in citta; or else, [realizing:] “this is citta!” sati is present in him, just to the extent of mere ñāṇa and mere paṭissati, he dwells detached, and does not cling to anything in the world. Thus, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu dwells observing citta in citta.
தமிழ்
III. Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலையை கூர்ந்து கவனித்தல்
மற்றும்
இப்போது எவ்வாறு பிக்குக்களுக்களே, ஒரு பிக்கு, Citta மனம் அதனுடைய
அகநிலையை in Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலையில் கூர்ந்து கவனித்து வாசம்
செய்கிரார்?
மற்றும் இப்போது எவ்வாறு பிக்குக்களுக்களே, ஒரு பிக்கு,
Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை rāga ஆர்வ வேட்கையை ” Citta மனம் அதனுடைய
அகநிலை rāga ஆர்வ வேட்கையாக” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்,அல்லது Citta மனம்
அதனுடைய அகநிலை rāga ஆர்வ வேட்கையற்றதை, “Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை rāga
ஆர்வ வேட்கையற்றது” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்,அல்லது
Citta மனம்
அதனுடைய அகநிலை “dosa வெறுப்பு ஆர்வ வேட்கையை Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை
dosa வெறுப்பு ஆர்வ வேட்கையாக” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்,”Citta மனம் அதனுடைய
அகநிலை dosa வெறுப்பு ஆர்வ வேட்கையற்றதை, Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை dosa
வெறுப்பு ஆர்வ வேட்கையற்றது” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார், அல்லது Citta மனம்
அதனுடைய அகநிலை moha மருட்சி ஆர்வ வேட்கையை “Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை
moha மருட்சி ஆர்வ வேட்கை” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்,”Citta மனம் அதனுடைய
அகநிலை moha மருட்சி ஆர்வ வேட்கையற்றதை, Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை moha
மருட்சி ஆர்வ வேட்கையற்றது” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார், அல்லது ஒரு சேர்த்த
Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை “ஒரு சேர்த்த Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை” என
புரிந்துகொள்கிரார், ஒரு சிதறலான
Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை “ஒரு
சிதறலான Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்,அல்லது ஒரு
விரிவாக்கம் செய்த Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை “ஒரு விரிவாக்கம் செய்த
Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார், ஒரு விரிவாக்கம்
செய்யாத Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை “ஒரு விரிவாக்கம் செய்யாத Citta மனம்
அதனுடைய அகநிலை” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்,அல்லது ஒரு மிக மேற்பட்ட Citta மனம்
அதனுடைய அகநிலை “ஒரு மிக மேற்பட்ட Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை” என
புரிந்துகொள்கிரார், ஒரு மிக மேற்படாத Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை “ஒரு
மிக மேற்படாத Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்,அல்லது ஒரு
திண்மையான Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை “ஒரு திண்மையான Citta மனம் அதனுடைய
அகநிலை” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார், ஒரு திண்மையற்ற Citta மனம் அதனுடைய
அகநிலை “ஒரு திண்மையற்ற Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை” என
புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்,அல்லது ஒரு விடுதலை செய்த Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை
“ஒரு விடுதலை செய்த Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்,
ஒரு விடுதலை செய்யாத Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை “ஒரு விடுதலை செய்யாத
Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலை” என புரிந்துகொள்கிரார்.
இவ்வாறு
அவர் Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலையை in Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலையில்
கூர்ந்து கவனித்து வாசம் செய்கிரார், அல்லது அதனுடைய அகநிலையை in Citta
மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலையில் வெளியே கூர்ந்த கவனித்து வாசம்
செய்கிரார்;samudaya of phenomena புலன்களால் உணரத்தக்க தோற்றம் அதனுடைய
அகநிலையில் கூர்ந்து கவனித்து வாசம் செய்கிரார், புலன்களால் உணரத்தக்க
கழிதல் அதனுடைய அகநிலையில் கூர்ந்து கவனித்து வாசம் செய்கிரார், samudaya
and passing away of phenomena புலன்களால் உணரத்தக்க தோற்றம் மற்றும்
கழிதல் அதனுடைய அகநிலையில் கூர்ந்து கவனித்து வாசம் செய்கிரார்,
இல்லாவிடில் “இது citta அகநிலை” என உணர்ந்து, sati விழிப்பு நிலை
அவருக்குள் வந்திருக்கிறது, சும்மா வெறும் ñāṇa ஓர்அளவு ஞானம் மற்றும்
ஓர்அளவு paṭissati என எண்ணி பற்றறு வாசம் செய்கிரார். மற்றும் உலகத்தில்
சிறிதளவாவது பற்றிக்கொள்ளாது,அவ்வாறாக பிக்குக்களுக்களே, ஒரு பிக்கு, Citta
மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலையை in Citta மனம் அதனுடைய அகநிலையில் கூர்ந்து
கவனித்து வாசம் செய்கிரார்.
http://media.photobucket.com/…/media/similes/tears.gif.html…
Nirdoshon ko na aansoon bahane do… Behenji ko aane do (To wipe the tears of innocent…let Behenji come to power)
http://media.photobucket.com/…/Animated/034lllisalllindsay.…
Nahi roshni dikhane ko…. Behenji ko aane do (To show new light ….let behenji come to power)
Rector
JC
2110 Tue 17 Jan 2017
LESSONS
Rector
JC
an expert who identifies experts
Religions for Kidshttps://drambedkarbooks.co
(A1wAM)
as Final Goal through Electronic Visual Communication Course on
Political Science -Techno-Politico-Socio Transformation and Economic
Emancipation Movement (TPSTEEM).
Struggle hard to see that all fraud EVMs are replaced by paper ballots by
Start
using Internet of things by creating Websites, blogs. Make the best use
of facebook, twitter etc., to propagate TPSTEEM thru FOA1TRPUVF.
Behenji ko aane do (Let Behenji come to power)
http://media.photobucket.com/user/Modiinqalabda/media/2006101101761101.jpg.html?filters[term]=mayawati&filters[primary]=images&filters[secondary]=videos&sort=1&o=11
http://media.photobucket.com/user/whatpraytell/media/Varanasi%20Uttar%20Pradesh/DSCF2594.jpg.html?filters[term]=uttar%20pradesh&filters[primary]=images&filters[secondary]=videos&sort=1&o=16
“Sapno kop ankh lagane ko …Behenji ko aane do” (To give wings to dreams..let behenji come to power)
Nirdoshon ko na aansoon bahane do… Behenji ko aane do (To wipe the
tears of innocent…let Behenji come to power)
Nahi roshni dikhane
ko…. Behenji ko aane do (To show new light ….let behenji come to
power)
Upeksahaaon ko jane do… Behenji ko aane do (Let ‘neglect’ be
the past…let behenji come to power).
‘.
All these video messages, the excerpts of which are already being shared
on facebook, Twitter, Youtube and WhatsApp by a team of social media
savvy supporters of the party, send a tell-tale sign of BSP’s changed
approach in the current state polls to woo the voters.
Rallies are still where Mayawati excels, but now her outfit has also
heavily invested its thought and energy into new media. Twitter handles
backing the party have opened a broadside against rivals – mainly BJP
– and professionally produced digital and video campaigns are
arresting people’s attention.
Apart
from the party’s officials handles, scores of BSP supporters,
mostly youth, have been running a concerted campaign in support of the
Sarvajan party through different twitter handles. These are being used
to
share information on programmes and public meetings for promoting BSP
ideology as well as countering each move of the rivals.
Behenji Mayawati’s birthday on January 15 (Sunday) has given the Bahujan Samaj
Party (BSP) the perfect opportunity to escalate its social media blitz.
Over the next
few days, the BSP will launch a string of videos and posters on Twitter,
Facebook and other online platforms with the catchphrase - ‘Behenji Ko
Aane Do (Return Mayawati to power).
Mayawati plans to address over 50 rallies in the coming weeks.
The
campaign on Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp and YouTube will be a new
add-on for the 60-year-old who has always preferred more traditional
ways of reaching out to her supporters.
The BSP, which contests under the “elephant” symbol, has active Twitter and Facebook accounts which are very popular.
While planning to target Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)
over Demonetisation and SP’s goonda raj and ongoing fierce family feud
during public
rallies, party’s over a dozen campaign videos will form the series with
themes such as
“Let daughters smile”, 
“Make
villages prosperous”, 
“Dignity of all communities”, 
“New light for
minorities”, 
“Justice for the innocent”, 
“Fulfil youth dreams”, 
and
“Empowerment of women 
and
senior citizens”.
screen-fitted campaign
vehicles will telecast these films in rural areas
BSP supremo Mayawati
has forged ahead of her political opponents as far as preparations for
the Assembly elections are concerned. The BSP will also highlight the achievements of the Mayawati-led
government from 2007-2012 through short films.
The video of the
campaign will be launched simultaneously on Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp,
YouTube and television channels.
BSP candidates have been given the permission to use the social media
for their individual campaigns as well but without deviating from the
party ideology.
Ms Mayawati will be addressing around 60 meetings in various districts
in the coming days.
“The
video campaign will be aired through screen-fitted campaign vehicles in
rural areas. Party has roped in an agency to the make these films and
videos, and draft the strategy for the party’s campaign,” said a senior
party leader.
With the notification of the first phase of UP
assembly elections on January 17, Mayawati is all set to launch her
party campaign addressing over 60 meetings in different districts across
the state.
Foreign media on UP election: Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) sees danger in ‘Sarvajan Samaj Queen’ Mayawati
According to foreign media, Modi is scared of Mayawati. Here’s why.
When Amit Shah, president of Modi’s BJP (Bahuth Jiyadha Psycchopaths)
party, meets with Modi, he is sometimes asked a question he struggles to
answer: “What is behenji thinking?”
By “behenji”, or ” sister”,
Modi means Mayawati, the enigmatic politician and former ruler of the
Country’s most populous state, Uttar Pradesh.
Modi’s keen
interest in what the 60-year-old is up to reflects concern about his
political prospects, amid an economic recovery that many poor people
have yet to feel and rising social tensions among sizeable minority
communities.
With a near-devotional following from tens of
millions of people who, like her, belong to the bottom rung of country’s
social hierarchy, Mayawati is emerging as Modi’s chief challenger in a
key state election set for early this year.
“Mayawati is the biggest threat to our victory,” Sanjeev Balyan of BJP told Reuters.
“The one who becomes the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh gets to be the
most powerful political leader after the prime minister.”
Modi’s
(BJP) gobbled the Master Key with Uttar Pradesh, home to 200 million
people, in the 2014 general election, handing him the biggest
parliamentary majority in three decades as the EVMs were tampered in
favour of him.
http://zeenews.india.com/…/2019-general-elections-to-have-p…
It would also significantly not advance his chances of retaining power
when the country chooses its next prime minister in 2019 as the present
CEC has said that the entire EVM will be replaced.
http://www.advocatekhoj.com/lib…/judgments/announcement.php…
The ex CJI had committed a grave error of judgement by orderring that
the EVMs would be replaced in a phased manner as suggested by the ex CEC
Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 crores involved in the entitre
EVMs replacement. It was proved in the Supreme court that the EVMs
could be tampered hence they have to be replaced.
http://indianexpress.com/…/up-panchayat-polls-bsp-back-to-…/
Because of these EVMs Ms Mayawati’s BSP lost in the Lok Sabha elections
while with in a short period they won with thumping majority where
paper ballots were used.
Hence Modi sees danger in Sarvajan Samaj Queen Mayawati and he is scared of her and she is the biggest threat to his victory.
http://www.assam123.com/america-enlisted-rss-one-biggest-t…/
Violent attacks on SC/STs are turning the opinion of some against the
BJP and its 1% intolerant, violent, militant, shooting, lynching,
lunatic, mentally retarded cannibal chitpawan brahmin psychopaths of
stealth, shadowy,discriminatory hindutva cult rashtra supporters,
giving Mayawati a new lease of life as she seeks a political
renaissance.
Mayawati is calling on minority groups to reject the
BJP, whose roots are in hindutva rashtra that many SC/STs and Muslims
see as a threat to their way of life.
“Communal forces are
becoming stronger,” she told 500,000 cheering supporters, as she kicked
off her election campaign at a sprawling park she built to honour
Aboriginal Inhabitants, previously known as “untouchables”, in Uttar
Pradesh’s capital Lucknow.
“I want to ask Modi where are the jobs
for SC/ST boys and girls?” she said. “He will never understand the
problems faced by us.”
Speaking on the sidelines of the rally,
Mayawati’s Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) general secretary Satish Mishra
said SC/STs and Muslims “were totally unsafe” under Modi, a view that
reflects Mayawati’s strategy to try and convince the two groups to vote
as one.
Self-styled hardline Hindu cow protectors have targeted
SC/STs and Muslims who make money skinning dead cows, accusing them of
killing animals sacred to hindutva which are considered as gomata i.e.,
their cow mother and gopitha i.e., their bull father.
In July,
footage emerged of four Scheduled Caste men tied to a car, stripped and
being flogged in Modi’s home state of Gujarat, triggering violent
protests.
Dressed in her trademark beige salwar kameez, Mayawati has sped across the country to appear at the side of victims.
“Mayawati has herself a godsend,” said Ramesh Dixit, a former professor
of political science at Lucknow University, referring to the attacks.
Amit Shah, president of Narendra Modis ruling party, meets with the
Indian prime minister, he is sometimes asked a question he struggles to
answer: -What is…
http://www.yourepeat.com/watch/?v=bgGcrVNEGIQ#!
Mayawati
Mayawatiis a Prabuddha Bharat politician who served four terms as Chief
Minister of
Uttar Pradesh as head of the Bahujan Samaj Party, which focuses on a
platform of social change to improve the welfare of the weakest strata
of the Country’s society—the Bahujans or Sarvajans including Other
Backward Classes, religious minorities and the poor Upper castes . She
was Chief Minister briefly in 1995 and again
in 1997, then from 2002 to 2003 and from 2007 to 2012.
Mayawati’s rise from humble beginnings has been called a “miracle of
democracy” by P. V. Narasimha Rao, former Prime Minister of India. In
1993 Mayawati formed a coalition with the Samajwadi Party and became the
youngest Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh at that time. She was the
first female Sarvajan Chief Minister in India. In 1997 and in 2002 she was
Chief Minister for the second
time for a full term.
Mayawati’s tenure has attracted praise. Millions of Sarvajans view her as an icon, and refer to her as Behen-ji. She has been
praised for her fundraising efforts on behalf of her party and her
birthdays have become major media events and a symbol for her
supporters.
Please watch:
http://www.assam123.com/america-enlisted-rss-one-biggest-t…/
http://indianexpress.com/…/rss-cadres-start-massive-campai…/
Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) cadres start massive campaign for BJP in Uttar Pradesh
…http://www.assam123.com/america-enlisted-rss-one-biggest-t…/
http://indianexpress.com/…/rss-cadres-start-massive-campai…/
Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) cadres start massive campaign for BJP in Uttar Pradesh
..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l7GXIhx550
Bahujan samaj Party Trends on Twitter - How a Common Man Reacts to it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bZl6WLrkbM
Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) Ad Campaign l 2017 U.P Elections
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgmSprqnEZo
अब सोशल मीडिया पर बीएसपी की धमक, मायावती ने शुरू किया वाररूम
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op3F6i1O3Fg
सुश्री बहन मायावती जी के जन्मदिन पर आप सब को समर्पित यह विडियो।
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHhPuqD7qQw
उत्तर प्रदेश में कुशल नेतृत्व लाने को ,2017 में बहन जी को आने दो।।
http://media.photobucket.com/…/m…/2006101101761101.jpg.html…
Behenji ko aane do (Let Behenji come to power)
http://media.photobucket.com/…/Varanasi%…/DSCF2594.jpg.html…
Uttar Pradesh maange badlaav (state needs change)
http://media.photobucket.com/…/RedBullAirRaceWingWalkersAni…
“Sapno kop ankh lagane ko …Behenji ko aane do” (To give wings to dreams..let behenji come to power)
http://media.photobucket.com/…/katiel…/media/Tears.png.html…
Nirdoshon ko na aansoon bahane do… Behenji ko aane do (To wipe the tears of innocent…let Behenji come to power)
http://media.photobucket.com/…/lighting_the_sky_gif_by_bayh…
Nahi roshni dikhane ko…. Behenji ko aane do (To show new light ….let behenji come to power)
http://media.photobucket.com/…/GoogleMapsStreetViewletsyout…
Upeksahaaon ko jane do… Behenji ko aane do (Let ‘neglect’ be the past…let behenji come to power).
Let daughters smile
http://media.photobucket.com/…/Victoria%…/Bushbuck.jpg.html…
“Make villages prosperous”
http://media.photobucket.com/…/me…/indian/Indian18.gif.html…
Dignity of all communities
New light for minorities
http://media.photobucket.com/…/…/media/seniorpivot.gif.html…
Fulfil youth dreams
http://media.photobucket.com/…/ker…/media/075d3889.gif.html…
Empowerment of women
http://media.photobucket.com/…/…/media/seniorpivot.gif.html…
Empowerment senior citizens
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/…/uttar-pradesh-…/1/794054.html
Foreign media on UP election: Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) sees danger in ‘Sarvajan Samaj Queen’ Mayawati
According to foreign media, Modi is scared of Mayawati. Here’s why.
…http://www.assam123.com/america-enlisted-rss-one-biggest-t…/
http://indianexpress.com/…/rss-cadres-start-massive-campai…/
Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) cadres start massive campaign for BJP in Uttar Pradesh
…http://www.thehindu.com/…/Uttar-Pradesh…/article17040428.ece
Uttar Pradesh election 2017: BSP to fight it alone, says Mayawati
The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) will fight it alone in the upcoming
Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, party Chief Mayawati said in a press
conference in Lucknow on Sunday.
http://www.newindianexpress.com/…/samajwadi-party-has-becom…
Samajwadi Party has become a drama company: Velu Bsp
NEW DELHI: Labelling the Samajwadi Party as a ‘drama company’, the
Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) on Saturday said the ruling party of Uttar
Pradesh is there only to fool people.
https://mg.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch…
ARUN JAITLEY IS IN HURRY TO ANNOUCE – EXTENTION OF ILLEGAL CONCESSIONS
& TAX DODGES TO CORPORATE & SELECT SECTORS THAN ARE ALL CORRUPT
PRACTICES.
It is Scandalous to present budget based on Rough
Estimates TWO MONTHS in advance – ‘Presumable Running Out of Tax Money
due to Demonetization’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Imzv3z23A
MAYAWATI SONG : बहन हमारी भारत कि शान है
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfbcER2N1v4
Singhasan Par Maya Behan - Vote For BSP
http://www.ambedkar.org/gifima
BSP Hathi ko Vote Do
http://media.photobucket.com/…/dig…/media/MAYAWATI.jpg.html…
Behenji Ko Aane Do
May Bahen Kumari Mayawati Ji be ever happy,well and secure !..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6uFgwb50bI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Imzv3z23A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfbcER2N1v4
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLEgcnppt10
UP Elections 2017: Muslim Voters are Confused on Choosing SP or BSP
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/uttar-pradesh-elections-dalit-modi-mayawati/1/794054.html
2109 Mon 16 Jan 2017
LESSONS
Rector
JC
an expert who identifies experts
Religions for Kidshttps://drambedkarbooks.co
(A1wAM)
as Final Goal through Electronic Visual Communication Course on
Political Science -Techno-Politico-Socio Transformation and Economic
Emancipation Movement (TPSTEEM).
Struggle hard to see that all fraud EVMs are replaced by paper ballots by
Start
using Internet of things by creating Websites, blogs. Make the best use
of facebook, twitter etc., to propagate TPSTEEM thru FOA1TRPUVF.
Behenji ko aane do (Let Behenji come to power)
Nirdoshon ko na aansoon bahane do… Behenji ko aane do (To wipe thetears of innocent…let Behenji come to power)
Nahi roshni dikhane
ko…. Behenji ko aane do (To show new light ….let behenji come to
power)
Upeksahaaon ko jane do… Behenji ko aane do (Let ‘neglect’ bethe past…let behenji come to power).
‘.
All these video messages, the excerpts of which are already being shared
on facebook, Twitter, Youtube and WhatsApp by a team of social media
savvy supporters of the party, send a tell-tale sign of BSP’s changed
approach in the current state polls to woo the voters.
Rallies are still where Mayawati excels, but now her outfit has also
heavily invested its thought and energy into new media. Twitter handles
backing the party have opened a broadside against rivals – mainly BJP
– and professionally produced digital and video campaigns are
arresting people’s attention.
Apart
from the party’s officials handles, scores of BSP supporters,
mostly youth, have been running a concerted campaign in support of the
Sarvajan party through different twitter handles. These are being used
to
share information on programmes and public meetings for promoting BSP
ideology as well as countering each move of the rivals.
Behenji Mayawati’s birthday on January 15 (Sunday) has given the Bahujan Samaj
Party (BSP) the perfect opportunity to escalate its social media blitz.
Over the next
few days, the BSP will launch a string of videos and posters on Twitter,
Facebook and other online platforms with the catchphrase - ‘Behenji Ko
Aane Do (Return Mayawati to power).
Mayawati plans to address over 50 rallies in the coming weeks.
The
campaign on Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp and YouTube will be a new
add-on for the 60-year-old who has always preferred more traditional
ways of reaching out to her supporters.
The BSP, which contests under the “elephant” symbol, has active Twitter and Facebook accounts which are very popular.
While planning to target Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)
over Demonetisation and SP’s goonda raj and ongoing fierce family feud
during public
rallies, party’s over a dozen campaign videos will form the series with
themes such as
“Makevillages prosperous”,
“Dignity of all communities”, 
“New light forminorities”,
“Justice for the innocent”, 
“Fulfil youth dreams”, 
and “Empowerment of women
and
senior citizens”.
vehicles will telecast these films in rural areas
has forged ahead of her political opponents as far as preparations for
the Assembly elections are concerned. The BSP will also highlight the achievements of the Mayawati-led
government from 2007-2012 through short films.
campaign will be launched simultaneously on Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp,
YouTube and television channels.
BSP candidates have been given the permission to use the social media
for their individual campaigns as well but without deviating from the
party ideology.
Ms Mayawati will be addressing around 60 meetings in various districts
in the coming days.
“The
video campaign will be aired through screen-fitted campaign vehicles in
rural areas. Party has roped in an agency to the make these films and
videos, and draft the strategy for the party’s campaign,” said a senior
party leader.
With the notification of the first phase of UP
assembly elections on January 17, Mayawati is all set to launch her
party campaign addressing over 60 meetings in different districts across
the state.
Please watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6uFgwb50bI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Imzv3z23A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfbcER2N1v4ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLEgcnppt10
UP Elections 2017: Muslim Voters are Confused on Choosing SP or BSP
http://www.ambedkar.org/gifima
मुहीम से जुड़ें
Many more happy returns of day akka Mayawati
Nagesh Bodh Nagesh Bodh shared ಸಾಕ್ಯವಂಶಿ ಸಾಕ್ಯವಂಶಿ’s post.
ಬಹುಜನರ ಉದ್ಧಾರಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಅಪ್ಪನ ಸಿದ್ಧಾಂತವನ್ನು ಜಾರಿ ಮಾಡಲು ದಾದಾಸಾಹೇಬರೊಂದಿಗೆ ಹೆಜ್ಜೆಗೆ ಹೆಜ್ಜೆಯಾಗಿ ನಿಂತ ಅಕ್ಕನಿಗೆ ಜನುಮದಿನದ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು
Bhanu Prakash posted 2 updates.
Bahujan
Students’ Front-UoH wishes happy 61st birthday to Behenji Kumari
Mayawati and also takes this opportunity to send our best wishes for a
Bahujan victory over Manuwadi forces in the upcoming U.P. Assembly
elections, 2017.
#Jai_Bheem
#Bahujan_Victory_Long_Live
Nagaraj Nagaraj was live.
https://www.facebook.com/
Behalf
of mis mayawathi ji birth day , All family troops of Indian becoming
together to rule this country by symbol of elephant 
🐘.
Behenji’s Birthday celebrations at head office , Bangalore, Karnataka
Bahujan
Students’ Front-UoH wishes happy 61st birthday to Behenji Kumari
Mayawati and also takes this opportunity to send our best wishes for a
Bahujan victory over Manuwadi forces in the upcoming U.P. Assembly
elections, 2017.
#Jai_Bheem
#Bahujan_Victory_Long_Live
Khalid Khan Dms shared A J Khan Dms’s post — with ಹುಲಿಹೈದರಕನಕಾಚಲ ಚಿತ್ರಕಲಾವಿದರು and 21 others.
ಬಹಜನರ
ಭಾಗ್ಯದೇವತೆ , ಭೀಮನ ಮಗಳು ಅಕ್ಕ ಮಾಯಾವತಿ ಅವರಿಗೆ 61ನೇ ಜನ್ಮದಿನದ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು
ಹಾಗೂ ಭಾರತೀಯರೆಲ್ಲರಿಗೂ 68 ನೇ ಸಂವಿಧಾನ ದಿನಾಚರಣೆಯ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು..
Bhanu Prakash posted 2 updates.
C
C
http://www.assam123.com/america-enlisted-rss-one-biggest-t…/
http://indianexpress.com/…/rss-cadres-start-massive-campai…/
Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) cadres start massive campaign for BJP in Uttar Pradesh
Now they want only RSS men to be in power as the fraud EVMs are being
tampered in favour of BJP since Murderer of democratic institutions
(Modi) is a looser after his DEMONitisation and has become unpopular.
The RSS is use-ing him as a use and throw curry leaves.
http://www.advocatekhoj.com/lib…/judgments/announcement.php…
The ex CJI Sathasivam had committed grave error of judgement by
ordering that the EVMs will be replaced in a phased manner as suggested
by ex CEC Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 involved in entire
replacement of the fraud EVMs. Only 8 out of 543 2014 Lok Sabha seats
were replaced that enabled Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) to
gobble the Master Key.
http://zeenews.india.com/…/2019-general-elections-to-have-p…
The present CEC said that entire EVMs will only be replaced in 2019.
But none of them ever said that paper ballots followed in 80 democracies
of the world will be used in all the elections till the entire EVMs
were replaced.
http://indianexpress.com/…/up-panchayat-polls-bsp-back-to-…/
Ms Mayawati’s BSP won majority of UP Panchayat elections because of the
paper ballots while it last in Lok Sabha elections because of the fraud
EVMs.
At all cost the RSS controlling both Congress and BJP and
their allies hate BSP acquire the Master Key because of their casteist
mentality.
When the BJP was in opposition the RSS favoured paper
ballots. Now since BJP is in power the want these EVMs to keep tampering
in their favour.
http://news.webindia123.com/…/A…/India/20100828/1575461.html
RSS favours paper ballots, EVMs subjected to public scrutinyNew Delhi | Saturday, Aug 28 2010 IST
Joining
the controversy regarding the reliablity of Electronic Voting Machines
(EVMs) which have been questioned by political parties, the RSS today
asked the Election Commission (EC) to revert back to tried and tested
paper ballots and subject EVMs to public scrutiny whether these gadgets
are tamper proof. In an editorial titled ‘Can we trust our EVMs?’, The
Organiser, the RSS mouthpiece, noted it was a fact that till date an
absolutely tamper-proof machine had not been invented and credibility of
any system depends on ‘transparency, verifiability and trustworthiness’
than on blind and atavistic faith in its infallibility. The issue is
not a ‘private affair’ and it involves the future of India. Even if the
EVMs were genuine, there was no reason for the EC to be touchy about it,
the paper commented. The Government and the EC can’t impose EVMs as a
fait accompli on Indian democracy as the only option before the voter.
There were flaws like booth capturing, rigging, bogus voting, tampering
and ballot paper snatching in the ballot paper system of polling leading
the country to switch over to the EVMs and all these problems were
relevant in EVMs too. Rigging was possible even at the counting stage.
What made the ballot papers voter-friendly was that all aberrations were
taking place before the public eye and hence open for corrections
whereas the manipulations in the EVMs is entirely in the hands of powers
that be and the political appointees manning the sytem, the paper
commented. The EVM has only one advantage — ’speed’ but that advantage
has been undermined by the staggered polls at times spread over three to
four months. ‘’This has already killed the fun of the election
process,’’ the paper noted. Of the dozen General Elections held in the
country, only two were through the EVMs and instead of rationally
addressing the doubts aired by reputed institutions and experts the
Government has resorted to silence its critics by ‘intimidation and
arrests on false charges’, the paper observed, recalling the arrest of
Hyederabad-based technocrat Hari Prasad by the Mumbai Police. Prasad’s
research has proved that the EVMs were ‘vulnerable to fraud’. The
authorities want to send a message that anybody who challenges the EC
runs the risk of persecution and harassment, the RSS observed. Most
countries around the world looked at the EVMs with suspicion and
countries like the Netherlands, Italy, Germany and Ireland had all
reverted back to paper ballots shunning EVMs because they were ‘easy to
falsify, risked eavesdropping and lacked transparency’. Democracy is too
precious to be handed over to whims or an opaque establishment and
network of unsafe gizmos. ‘’For the health of Indian democracy it is
better to return to tried and tested methods or else elections in future
can turn out to be a farce,’’ the editorial said.– (UNI) — 28DI28.xml
RSS is a non entity unregistered party stealth,shadowy discriminating
1% of the brahmins intolerant, militant, shooting, lynching, lunatic,
mentally retarded chitpawan brahmin cannibal psychopaths attempting the
bring back manusmriti as our constitution for their hindutva cult.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chitpavan
Chitpavans were not esteemed in social ranking, and were indeed
considered by other older Brahmin castes as being an inferior caste of
Brahmins.They came in Country’s social mainstream in time somewhere
around Peshwas.
The community chitpavan brahmins remains
concentrated in Maharashtra but also has populations all over the
country and the rest of the world including the USA , UK and Canada.
After the fall of the Maratha Empire in 1818, the Chitpavans lost their
political dominance to the British. The British would not subsidize the
Chitpavans on the same scale that their caste-fellow, the Peshwas had
done in the past. Pay and power was now significantly reduced. Poorer
Chitpavan students adapted and started learning English because of
better opportunities in the British administration.
Some of the
prominent figures in the hindutva reform movements of the 19th and 20th
centuries came from the chitpavan brahmin community. These included
Dhondo Keshav Karve, Justice Mahadev Govind Ranade, Vinayak Damodar
Savarkar, Gopal Ganesh Agarkar, Vinoba Bhave, and Gopal Krishna Gokhale.
These reforms preached against the Hindu caste system establishment.
Yet, some of the strongest resistance to change also came from the very
same community. Jealously guarding their brahmin stature, the orthodox
among the chitpavans were not eager to see the Shastras challenged, nor
the conduct of the brahmins becoming indistinguishable from that of the
Sudras. The vanguard and the old guard clashed many times. Ranade and
other reformers were forced to offer penance for breaking purity rules.
D. K. Karve was ostracised. Even Tilak made a visit to Varanasi so that
he may not be excommunicated.
The Chitpavan community includes
two major politicians in the Gandhian tradition: Gopal Krishna Gokhale
whom Gandhi acknowledged as a preceptor, and Vinoba Bhave, one of his
outstanding disciples. Gandhi describes Bhave as the Jewel of his
disciples, and recognized Gokhale as his political guru. However, strong
opposition to Gandhi also came from within the chitpavan community. V D
Savarkar, the founder of the hindutva rashtra political ideology
hindutva, was a chitpavan brahmin. Several members of the chitpavan
community were among the first to embrace the hindutva ideology, which
they thought was a logical extension of the legacy of the Peshwas and
caste-fellow Tilak. These Chitpavans felt out of place with the Nation’s
social reform movement of Mahatama Phule . Large numbers of the
community looked to Savarkar, the Hindu Mahasabha and finally the RSS.
Gandhi’s assassins Narayan Apte and Nathuram Godse, drew their
inspiration from fringe groups in this reactionary trend.
America enlisted RSS in one of the Biggest Terrorist Organisation in the World
A US-based risk management and consulting company has put the
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in its category of ‘Threat Group’ and
called it “a stealth, shadowy, discriminatory group that seeks to
establish a hindutva rashtra, a Hindu Nation.”
Terrorism Watch
& Warning provides intelligence, research, analysis, watch and
warning on international terrorism and domestic terrorism related
issues; and is operated by OODA Group LLC that helps clients identify,
manage, and respond to global risks and uncertainties while exploring
emerging opportunities and developing robust and adaptive strategies for
the future.
The websites describes: “The RSS is a stealth,
shadowy, discriminatory group that seeks to establish a hindutva
rashtra, a . The group is considered the radical ideological parent
group of Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths (BJP).”
“The RSS is a non
entity unregistered movement, a group that was founded in 1925. Their
philosophy, called hindutva and their main demand of Murderer of
democratic institutions (Modi) was that it stop appeasing Muslims,” the
description continues, adding, “hindutva has been translated to mean
variously: hindutva pride, patriotism, fundamentalism, revivalism,
chauvinism, or fascism. The group self-justifies by ‘asserting the
natural rights’.”
In its ‘Intel analysis,’ it further adds, “The
RSS was banned in 1948 following the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi by
an ex-RSS member, Nathuram Godse. ”
terrorist-hindutva
Describing violence as ‘Group Activities’ for the RSS, the site further
says, “Violence has been a strategy for the Sangh movement. It is often
couched as a method of self-defense against minority groups. hindutva
has been clear about the need for violence, particularly communal riots.
The Sangh has incited rioting to cause further chasms between
religions, and thus a further separation of religions, and to rally the
hindutva community around the philosophy of hindutva.”
The
Terrorism Watch & Warning database contains over 1,00,000 Open
source intelligence (OSINT) excerpts from 1999 to present on terrorism
and security related issues, attack database of over 10,000 attacks,
original terrorism analysis, terrorism document repository, Homeland
Security Fact Sheets and profiles over 500 Terrorist/Threat Groups.
enlisted RSS in one of the Biggest Terrorist Organisation in the World
in National 12 Comments A US-based risk management and consulting
company…
ARUN JAITLEY IS IN HURRY TO ANNOUCE – EXTENTION OF ILLEGAL CONCESSIONS
& TAX DODGES TO CORPORATE & SELECT SECTORS THAN ARE ALL CORRUPT
PRACTICES.
It is Scandalous to present budget based on Rough
Estimates TWO MONTHS in advance – ‘Presumable Running Out of Tax Money
due to Demonetization’.
GOI get
financial reports on Daily and Weekly basis about state of economy but
releases incorrect and misleading data. Even when Business & Trade
reports 50% SLOW DOWN GoI reports 7% Plus GDP Growth?
Arun
Jaitley unlike Manmohan Singh who admitted to Rise and Fall of GDP – is
determined to report 7%+ GDP growth even as 20 Cr Unorganized Work Force
is rendered jobless, business reported by 90% shops and traders and
businesses is down by 20% to 80%. Even auto drivers are reporting 30%
less income.
Instead of Charging ‘Commercial Rate of Interest’ on
Companies not paying back Project & Commercial Loans on time – Arun
Jaitley is REDUCING LENDING RATES at the cost of 100 Cr Depositor
Indians getting Just 6% interest against 10.75% at peak under UPA.
Housing crisis in India was due to BANKING SCAM – Financing At Three
Levels – Builders, Property Dealers & Buyers say 200% of Retail
Price or 300% Builder Cost. RIL taking Low Interest Loans for REFINERY
but diverting FUNDS to COMMERCIAL SECTOR like Trading where Competition
get Loans from Moneylenders at 36% to 120% rate of Interest.
These kinds of BANKING SCAMS are not being addressed by Arun Jaitley.
INDUSTRY Also get FINANCING like TATA MOTORS at Three or Five Levels –
Ancillary Units, Assembly Plants and Dealerships and Service Centers in
age of Just in Time supply of Components and Advance Booking of
Products.
Arun Jaitley is not CLOSING SHELL Companies converting
BLACK MONEY in to White, Not Closing Illegal Subsidiaries To Enrich
PROMOTERS and EVADE Taxes & PROFITS and Seeking GOOD MINIMUM Return
of 10% on $600b Invested in Foreign Countries.
Arun Jaitley is
Not REPLACING MONEYLENDERS & MIDDLEMEN TRADERS and Directly
Financing MSMEs and Producers including On Farm Food Processing &
Retailers.
Attack On BLACK MONEY GENERATION [BLACK ECONOMY] is ABSENT – Arun Jaitley has no Plans to MONETIZE WHITE ECONOMY.
Insight Meditation in all postures of the body - Sitting, standing,
lying, walking, jogging, cycling, swimming, martial arts etc., for
health mind in a healthy body.
http://www.ntd.tv/2017/01/10/cutest-tahitian-dancer-youve-ever-seen/
The Cutest Tahitian Dancer You’ve Ever Seen
Something you can not miss in the video
is almost at the end, so you can see how this little girl decides to
finish her dance routine in a very unusual way seen in the shows !
Adorably talented kid chefs 
😍😍😍
2108 Sun 15 Jan 2017
LESSONS
Rector
JC
an expert who identifies experts influenced by Expert and Infulencer Sashikanth Chandrasekharan
Religions for Kidshttps://drambedkarbooks.co
(A1wAM)
as Final Goal through Electronic Visual Communication Course on
Political Science -Techno-Politico-Socio Transformation and Economic
Emancipation Movement (TPSTEEM).
Struggle hard to see that all fraud EVMs are replaced by paper ballots by
Start
using Internet of things by creating Websites, blogs. Make the best use
of facebook, twitter etc., to propagate TPSTEEM thru FOA1TRPUVF.
The video of
the campaign will be launched simultaneously on Twitter, Facebook,
WhatsApp, YouTube and television channels.
http://www.asianage.com/…/bsp-
BSP to launch first online campaign on Mayawati’s birthday
http://www.ambedkar.org/gifima
BJP Spreading ‘Religious Fundamentalism’, Says Mayawati
Achievements of “Bahujan Samaj Party” – 100s Reason to Vote for BSP
http://xboxonezone.com/…/bsp-to-launch-first-online-campai…/
BSP to launch first online campaign on Mayawati’s birthday on 15-1-2017
The BSP campaign that is ready to be launched on Ms Mayawati’s 61st
birthday on Sunday is titled “Behenji ko aane do”. A dozen campaign
videos will form the series with themes such as
“Let daughters smile”,
“Make villages prosperous”,
“Dignity of all communities”,
“New light for minorities”,
“Justice for the innocent”,
“Fulfil youth dreams”, and
“Empowerment of women and senior citizens”.
screen-fitted campaign vehicles will telecast these films in rural
areas. With less than a month for the first phase of polling in Uttar
Pradesh, BSP supremo Mayawati has forged ahead of her political
opponents as far as preparations for the Assembly elections are
concerned.The BSP will also highlight the achievements of the
Mayawati-led government from 2007-2012 through short films. The video of
the campaign will be launched simultaneously on Twitter, Facebook,
WhatsApp, YouTube and television channels. BSP candidates have been
given the permission to use the social media for their individual
campaigns as well but without deviating from the party ideology. Ms
Mayawati will be addressing around 60 meetings in various districts in
the coming days. A BSP member said the cadres have also been directed
not to celebrate the day as “Jankalyankari Diwas” by distributing
candies, fruits and quilt to the poor. The EC has allowed the party “to
hold celebrations within the ambit of model code in three constituencies
-Agra south, Bah and Kheragarh”. The reason behind scaling down is the
imposition of the model code of conduct before the upcoming Assembly
polls, as well as DEMONetisation.
dozen campaign videos will form the series with themes such as “Let
daughters smile”, “Make villages prosperous”, “Dignity of all
communities”, “New light for…