99%
sarvajan samaj including the SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities/ poor upper castes
are the aboriginal people of Jambudivipa and 1% intolerant, violent,
militant, shooting, lynching cannibal psychopath chitpawan brahmin of
RSS (Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks) and all its avathars BJP (Bahuth Jiyadha
Psychopaths), VHP (Visha Hindutva Psychopaths), ABVP (All Brahmin
Venomous Psychopaths), Hindutva Masdur Sangh, Hindutva Kissan sangh,
Bajan Dal, terrorist sanathan sanstha and all other time to time
mushrooming avathars are anti-national and as they practice hatred,
anger, jealousy delusion which are difilement of mind are mad people who
keep heckling and giggling as though they are great achievers after
gobbling the Master Key by tampering the fraud EVMs (Evil Voting
Machines) dreaming that they can bury the Teachings of the Awaken One
with Awareness and Techno-Politico-Socio Transformation and Economic
Emancipation Movement of Bahujan Samaj party without realising that they
are seeds ever sprouting as Bodhi Trees.
Congress and the BJP remotely controlled by RSS are two sides of the
same coin. Both of brahminical parties controlled by just 1% chitpawan
brahmins.
For popularity many congress leaders in the past have
said that RSS killed gandhi. When RSS takes it seriously they backed
out.
in Classical English,આ આ Classical ગુજરાતી, शास्त्रीय हिन्दी,ಶಾಸ್ತ್ರೀಯ ಕನ್ನಡ,ക്ലാസ്സിക്കൽ മലയാളം,शास्त्रीय मराठी,ਕਲਾਸੀਕਲ ਦਾ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,பாரம்பரிய இசைத்தமிழ் செம்மொழி,ప్రాచీన తెలుగు, کلاسیکل اردو
Increasing threats to the democratic-secular Indian polity
from the Hindutva organizations - a concise document on the
anti-national game-plan of the RSS��The 20th century descriptions of
this 1% RSS chitpavan brahmins list inordinate frugality,
untrustworthiness, conspiratorialism, phlegmatism not only murder
democracy but also the real spirituality of this nation. �The true
cultural identity of this country is Jambudvipan that is Prabuddha
Bharath since all belong to the same race with Buddha Nature practicing
equality, fraternity and liberty as enshrined in the Constitution based
on Dhamma. ��From its inception, the RSS has been dominated by the
Brahminical elite, especially the Chitpawan Brahmins, who regard
themselves as a cut above the rest. Chitpawans’ domination in the
Sangh’s highest echelons has been almost total.
��http://www.bharatvani.org/books/ait/ch49.htm��Half
a century ago, Dr. Ambedkar surveyed the existing data on the physical
anthropology of the different castes in his book The Untouchables. He
found that the received wisdom of a racial basis of caste was not
supported by the data, e.g.: The table for Bengal shows that the Chandal
who stands sixth in the scheme of social precedence and whose touch
pollutes, is not much differentiated from the Brahmin () In Bombay the
Deshastha Brahmin bears a closer affinity to the Son-Koli, a fisherman
caste, than to his own compeer, the Chitpavan Brahmin.��http://defenceforumindia.com/…/51068-genetic-evidence-sugge…
brahmin demonstrates younger maternal component and substantial
paternal gene flow from West Asia, thus giving credence to their recent
Irano-Scythian ancestry from Mediterranean or Turkey, which correlated
well with European-looking features of this caste. This also explains
their untraceable ethno-history before 1000 years, brahminization event
and later amalgamation by Maratha.”��”… non-recombining uniparental
contributions in Chitpavan-brahmin Mediterranean or East European type
as shown by 20% (HV, U3) mtDNA lineages and highly frequent (R1a and L)
Y-haplogroups. The admixture and PC analyses (Figure 3a, b) reflected
genetic association of Chitpavan-brahmin with Iranian, Ashkenazi-Jews
(Turkey), Greeks (East Europe) and to some extent with Central Asian
Turkish populations elucidating their distinct Nordic, “Scytho-Iranian”
ancestry.��The Caucasian link of Chitpavan-brahmin has also been
inferred from biparental microsatellites variations (Figure 3c). The
observed genomic analyses asserted the ethnographical fact that
Chitpavan-brahmin share ancestry with conspicuously European-looking
Pagan or Alpine group, who under religious pressure had migrated from
Anatolian Turkey or East Europe to Gujarat coast probably via
sea-vessel. Besides, their documented history is untraceable beyond 1000
years, further indicating that they were not part of the original Vedic
migrations (early Indo-European) on the west coast. Therefore, the
present genome analyses provide conclusive evidence of their recent
migration, genesis, and expansion after they migrated from “Sopara”
(India’s western trade zone) to geographically isolated Konkan-region,
where they adopted “Konkani” language, and cultivated cash crop. Their
considerable genetic affinity with Maratha caste further corroborated
the prevalent norm that few of the dynamic and intelligent Chitpavans
were “Brahmanized” for performing religious rituals in King Shivaji’s
court (elite Maratha group) and some members were given the title of
“Peshwa” or Minister for managing the administration of Maratha kingdom,
which was extended farther north after King’s death under their rule.
We observed 15% similar HVS -1 sequence motif (M4 lineage) between
Chitpavan-brahmin and Bene-Israeli (or Indian Jews), probably suggesting
similar indigenous Paleolithic contribution. Compared to
Desasth-brahmin, Kokanasth-brahmin showed lowest biparental diversity,
younger age of population based upon Tau value, larger genetic affinity
with West Asians plus East Europeans suggesting their recent descent, in
absence of bottleneck effect.���Conclusions��Our comprehensive genomic
analyses showed divergent paternal and maternal ancestry of studied four
castes correlating well with their varied migration and exchequer
demographic histories. The distribution and admixture of
Western-Eurasian-specific mtDNA and Y-chromosomal haplogroups lend
support to the diverse genesis of western ranked castes. The
asymmetrical Proto-Asian component and Western-Eurasian admixture in two
brahmin castes explained the “Scytho-Dravidian” origin of elite,
ancient Desasth-brahmin and much recent “Irano-Scythian” ancestry (West
Asia, East Europe) of Chitpavan-brahmin. Maratha and Dhangar have
significant Pleistocene gene pool corroborating their “Proto-Asian”
origin.��Maratha warrior caste has experienced gene flow from Anatolian
agriculturist (J2) supporting the conglomeration of migrant agricultural
communities. The recombining STR loci did not reveal significant
difference in population structure attributing to hypergamy between
Brahmins and Maratha, and shared ancestry of Dhangar and Maratha. This
study interestingly surmises the synchronization of caste stratification
with West-Eurasians admixture in “Gangetic” plains, which spread in
western territory due to demographic and economic reasons.���On KoBras
(the Konkanastha Chitpavan Brahmin Community) of West India��The
Chitpavan or Chitpawan, are Brahmins native to the Konkan predominantly
Hindu, but with a sizeable Christian Protestant.Until �Until the 18th
century,the Chitpavans were not esteemed in social ranking, and were
indeed considered by other Brahmin tribes as being an �inferior caste of
Brahmins.It remains concentrated in Maharashtra but also has
populations all over India & d rest of the world.(USA &
UK.)��According to Bene Israeli legend, the Chitpavan and Bene Israel
are descendants from a group of 14 people shipwrecked off the Konkan
coast. �One group converted to Hinduism as Chitpavan Brahmins, the other
remained Jewish or Bene Israel.The Konkan region has been inhabited by�
several immigrant groups including the Parsis, the Bene Israelis, the
Kudaldeshkar Gaud Brahmins, and the Konkani Saraswat Brahmins, and �the
Chitpavan Brahmins were the last of these immigrant arrivals.The
Satavahanas were great sanskritisers. It is possibly at their time that
the �new group of Chitpavan Brahmins were formed.Also, a reference to
the Chitpavan surname Ghaisas, written in Prakrut Marathi can be seen on
�a tamra-pat (bronze plaque) of the Year 1060 A.D. belonging to the
King Mamruni of Shilahara Kingdom, found at Diveagar in Konkan.�With the
accession of Balaji Bhat and his family to the supreme authority of the
Maratha Confederacy, Chitpavan immigrants began arriving �en masse from
the Konkan to Pune where the Peshwa offered all important offices his
fellow-castemen. The Chitpavan kin were rewarded with �tax relief and
grants of land. Historians cite nepotism and corruption as causes of the
fall of the Maratha Empire in 1818. Richard Maxwell Eaton�states that
this rise of the Chitpavans is a classic example of social rank rising
with political fortune. The alleged haughty behavior by the upstart
�Chitpvans caused conflicts with other communities which manifested
itself as late as in 1948 in the form of anti-Brahminism after the
killing of �Mahatama Gandhi by Nathuram Godse, a Chitpavan. Bal
Gangadhar Tilak After the fall of the Maratha Empire in 1818, the
Chitpavans lost �their political dominance to the British. The British
would not subsidize the Chitpavans on the same scale that their
caste-fellow, the Peshwas had�done in the past. Pay and power was now
significantly reduced. Poorer Chitpavan students adapted and started
learning English because of �better opportunities in the British
administration. Some of the strongest resistance to change also came
from the very same community. �Jealously guarding their Brahmin stature,
the orthodox among the Chitpavans were not eager to see the Shastras
challenged, nor the conduct of �the Brahmins becoming indistinguishable
from that of the Sudras. The vanguard and the old guard clashed many
times. The Chitpavan �community includes two major politicians in the
Gandhian tradition: Gopal Krishna Gokhale whom he acknowledged as a
preceptor, and �Vinoba Bhave, one of his outstanding disciples. Gandhi
describes Bhave as the Jewel of his disciples, and recognized Gokhale as
his political guru. �However, strong opposition to Gandhi also came
from within the Chitpavan community. V D Savarkar, the founder of the
Hindu nationalist �political ideology Hindutva, was a Chitpavan Brahmin.
Several members of the Chitpavan community were among the first to
embrace the �Hindutva ideology, which they thought was a logical
extension of the legacy of the Peshwas and caste-fellow Tilak. These
Chitpavans felt out of �place with the Indian social reform movement of
Mahatama Phule and the mass politics of Mahatama Gandhi. Large numbers
of the community �looked to Savarkar, the Hindu Mahasabha and finally
the RSS. Gandhi’s assassins Narayan Apte and Nathuram Godse, drew their
inspiration �from fringe groups in this reactionary trend. The
Chitpavans have considered themselves to be both warriors and
priests.The willingness of the �Chitpavans to enter military and other
services. The Hindu Chitpavan Brahmins celebrate several festivals
according to the Hindu Calendar.�Traditionally, the Chitpavan Brahmins
were a community of astrologers and priests who offer religious services
to other communities. �The 20th century descriptions of the Chitpavans
list inordinate frugality, untrustworthiness, conspiratorialism,
phlegmatism. Agriculture was the �second major occupation in the
community, practised by the those who possess arable land. Later,
Chitpavans became prominent in various white �collar jobs and business.
Most of the Chitpavan Brahmins in Maharashtra have adopted Marathi as
their language. Till the 1940s, most of the �Chitpavans in Konkan spoke a
dialect called Chitpavani Konkani in their homes. Even at that time,
reports recorded Chitpavani as a fast �disappearing language. But in
Dakshina Kannada District and Udupi Districts of Karnataka, this
language is being spoken in places like Durga �and Maala of Karkala
taluk and also in places like Shishila and Mundaje of Belthangady
Taluk.There are no inherently nasalized vowels in �standard Marathi
whereas the Chitpavani dialect of Marathi does have nasalized
vowels.Earlier, the Deshastha Brahmins believed that they were �the
highest of all Brahmins, and looked down upon the Chitpavans as parvenus
(a relative newcomer to a socioeconomic class), barely equal to the
�noblest of dvijas. Even the Peshwa was denied the rights to use the
ghats reserved for Deshasth priests at Nashik on the Godavari.This
usurping �of power by Chitpavans from the Deshastha Brahmins resulted in
intense rivalry between the two Brahmin communities which continued in
late �Colonial British India times. The 19th century records also
mention Gramanyas or village-level debates between the Chitpavans, and
two other �communities, namely the Daivajnas, and the Chandraseniya
Kayastha Prabhus. This lasted for about ten years.Half a century
ago,Dr.Ambedkar �surveyed the existing data on the physical anthropology
of the different castes in his book The Untouchables.He found that the
received �wisdom of a racial basis of caste was not supported by the
data,e.g.:The table for Bengal shows that the Chandal who stands sixth
in the �scheme of social precedence and whose touch pollutes, is not
much differentiated from the Brahmin () In Bombay the Deshastha Brahmin
�bears a closer affinity to the Son-Koli, a fisherman caste, than to his
own compeer, the Chitpavan Brahmin. The Mahar, the Untouchable of �the
Maratha region, comes next together with the Kunbi, the peasant. They
follow in order the Shenvi Brahmin, the Nagar Brahmin and the
�high-caste Maratha. These results () mean that there is no
correspondence between social gradation and physical differentiation in
Bombay.�A remarkable case of differentiation in skull and nose indexes,
noted by Dr. Ambedkar, was found to exist between the Brahmin and the
�(untouchable) Chamar of Uttar Pradesh. But this does not prove that
Brahmins are foreigners, because the data for the U.P. Brahmin were
�found to be very close to those for the Khattri and the untouchable
Chuhra of Panjab. If the U.P. Brahmin is indeed foreign to U.P., he is
by �no means foreign to India, at least not more than the Panjab
untouchables. This confirms the scenario which we can derive from the
Vedic �and ItihAsa-PurANa literature:the Vedic tradition was brought
east from d Vedic heartland by Brahmins who were physically
indistinguishable� from the lower castes there, when the heartland in
Punjab-Haryana at its apogee exported its culture to the whole Aryavarta
(comparable to �the planned importation of Brahmins into Bengal and the
South around the turn of the Christian era). These were just two of
the numerous �intra-Indian migrations of caste groups.Recent research
has not refuted Ambedkars views. A press report on a recent
anthropological survey �led by Kumar Suresh Singh explains:English
anthropologists contended that the upper castes of India belonged to the
Caucasian race and the �rest drew their origin from Australoid
types.The survey has revealed this to be a myth. Biologically and
linguistically, we are very mixed, says �Suresh Singh () The report says
that the people of India have more genes in common, and also share a
large number of morphological traits. �There is much greater
homogenization in terms of morphological and genetic traits at the
regional level, says the report. For example, the �Brahmins of Tamil
Nadu (esp.Iyengars) share more traits with non-Brahmins in d state than
with fellow Brahmins in western or northern India. �The sons-of-the-soil
theory also stands demolished. The Anthropological Survey of India has
found no community in India that cant remember �having migrated from
some other part of the country.Internal migration accounts for much of
India’s complex ethnic landscape, while there is �no evidence of a
separate or foreign origin for the upper castes.Among other scientists
who reject the identification of caste (varNa) with �race on
physical-anthropological grounds, we may cite Kailash C.
Malhotra:Detailed anthropometric surveys carried out among the people
�of Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Bengal and Tamil Nadu revealed
significant regional differences within a caste and a closer
�resemblance between castes of different varnas within a region than
between sub-populations of the caste from different regions. On the
�basis of analysis of stature, cephalic and nasal index, H.K. Rakshit
(1966) concludes that the Brahmins of India are heterogeneous &
suggest� incorporation of more than one physical type involving more
than one migration of people.A more detailed study among 8 Brahmin
castes in �Maharashtra on whom 18 metric,16 scopic and 8 genetic markers
were studied, revealed not only a great heterogeneity in both
morphological �and genetic characteristics but also showed that 3
Brahmin castes were closer to non-Brahmin castes than [to the] other
Brahmin castes. �P.P. Majumdar and K.C. Malhotra (1974) observed a
great deal of heterogeneity with respect to OAB blood group system among
50 Brahmin �samples spread over 11 Indian states. The evidence thus
suggests that varna is a sociological and not a homogeneous biological
entity.
https://in.news.yahoo.com/indians-are-descendants-of-hindut…
Indians are descendants of Hindutva culture: RSS chief
Mohan Bhagwat said if inhabitants of England are English, Germany are
Germans and USA are Americans then why all inhabitants of Hindustan are
not known as Hindus.
http://www.countercurrents.org/islam130815.htm
Printer Friendly Version
Equip Ideologically To Challenge The Anti-National RSS
By Shamsul Islam
13 August, 2015�Countercurrents.org
Photo Courtesy: The Hindu
Friends from India and abroad who are concerned about the increasing
threats to the democratic-secular Indian polity from the Hindutva
organizations have been writing to me for preparing a concise document
on the anti-national game-plan of the RSS and other like-minded
offshoots. The need of such a document is rightly felt for countering
the Hindutva propaganda at all levels. The following document is an
attempt to accomplish this objective. It is hoped that equipped with
this document all those who love India as a democratic-secular nation
would be able to challenge the fountain-head of the Hindutva politics.
This document is based solely on the documents drawn from the RSS
archives.
This document underlines the following cardinal principles of the RSS world view:
(1) RSS IDOLIZES FASCISM & NAZISM.
(2) RSS WANTS MANUSMRITI TO REPLACE DEMOCRATIC-SECULAR CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
(3) RSS HAS ETERNAL BELIEF IN CASTEISM.
(4) RSS DENIGRATES THE NATIONAL FLAG.
(5) RSS AGAINST DEMOCRAY AND FOR TOTALITARIANISM.
(6) RSS AGAINST FEDERALISM.
(7) RSS’ HATRED FOR MUSLIMS & CHRISTIANS.
(8) RSS AGAINST COMPOSITE INDIAN NATIONALISM.
(1) RSS IDOLIZES FASCISM& NAZISM
Doubtlessly Hitler is a great hero for RSS. The RSS as great champions
of Hindutva want to deprive minorities of their all civil and human
rights shamelessly and openly adhering to the totalitarian models of
Hitler. This fascist outlook towards minorities specially Muslims and
Christians was clearly elaborated by the senior ideologue of the RSS, MS
Golwalkar, in his book, We or Our Nationhood Defined. This book
published in the year 1939, gives an insight into the thinking of the
RSS leadership. We find Golwalkar in this book idealizing the Nazi
cultural nationalism of Hitler in the following words:
“German
Race pride has now become the topic of the day. To keep up the purity of
the Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the
country of the Semitic Races—the Jews. Race pride at its highest has
been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well-nigh impossible it
is for Races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be
assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindusthan to
learn and profit by.”
[MS Golwalkar, We Or Our Nationhood Defined, Bharat Publications, Nagpur, 1939, p. 35.]
Golwalkar unhesitatingly wanted to model his Hindu Rashtra or Nation on
Hitler’s totalitarian and fascist pattern as is clear from the
following words of his in the same book:
“It is worth bearing
well in mind how these old Nations solve their minorities [sic] problem.
They do not undertake to recognize any separate element in their
polity. Emigrants have to get themselves naturally assimilated in the
principal mass of the population, the National Race,by adopting its
culture and language and sharing in its aspirations, by losing all
consciousness of their separate existence, forgetting their foreign
origin. If they do not do so, they live merely as outsiders,bound by all
the codes and conventions of the Nation, at the sufferance of the
Nation and deserving no special protection, far less any privilege or
rights. There are only two courses open to the foreign elements, either
to merge themselves in the national race and adopt its culture, or to
live at its mercy so long as the national race may allow them to do so
and to quit the country at the sweet will of the national race. That is
the only sound view on the minorities [sic] problem. That is the only
logical and correct solution. That alone keeps the national life healthy
and undisturbed. That alone keeps the nation safe from the danger of a
cancer developing into its body politic of the creation of a state
within a state.”
[MS Golwalkar, We Or Our Nationhood Defined, Bharat Publications, Nagpur, 1939, p. 47.]
(2) RSS WANTS MANUSMRITI TO REPLACE DEMOCRATIC-SECULAR CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
RSS and its fraternal organization, Hindu Mahasabha were very angry
when Indian Constituent Assembly adopted a democratic-Secular
Constitution under the supervision of Dr. BR Ambedkar. VD Savarkar as
leader of Hindutva believed:
“Manusmriti is that scripture which
is most worship-able afterVedas for our Hindu Nation and which from
ancient times has become the basis of our culture-customs, thought
andpractice. This book for centuries has codified the spiritualand
divine march of our nation. Even today the rules which are followed by
crores of Hindus in their lives and practiceare based on Manusmriti.
Today Manusmriti is Hindu Law”.
[VD Savarkar, ‘Women in Manusmriti’
in Savarkar Samagar (collection of Savarkar’s writings in Hindi), vol.
4, Prabhat, Delhi, p. 416.]
The democratic-secular Indian
Constitution was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on November 26,
1949, RSSEnglish organ, Organizer in an editorial on November 30, 1949,
complained:
“But in our constitution there is no mention of the
unique constitutional development in ancient Bharat. Manu’s Laws were
written long before Lycurgus of Sparta or Solon of Persia. To this day
his laws as enunciated in the Manusmriti excite the admiration of the
world and elicit spontaneous obedience and conformity. But to our
constitutional pundits that means nothing”.
How loyal the RSS is to the Constitution of India can be known by the following statement of Golwalkar:
“Our Constitution too is just a cumbersome and heterogeneous piecing
together of various articles from various Constitutions of the Western
countries. It has absolutely nothing which can be called our own. Is
there a single word of reference in its guiding principles as to what
our national mission is and what our keynote in life is? No!”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 238.]
(3) RSS HAS ETERNAL BELIEF IN CASTEISM
Golwalkar, the most prominent ideologue of the RSS like Savarkar,
believed that Casteism was a natural integral part of Hinduism. In fact,
Golwalkar went to the extent of declaring that Casteism was synonymous
with the Hindu nation. According to him, the Hindu people are none else
but, “the Virat Purusha, the Almighty manifesting himself… [according to
purusha sukta] sun and moon are his eyes, the stars and the skies are
created from his nabhi [navel] and Brahmin is the head, Kshatriya the
hands, Vaishya the thighs and Shudra the feet. This means that the
people who have this fourfold arrangement, i.e., the Hindu People, is
[sic] our God. This supreme vision of Godhead is the very core of our
concept of ‘nation’ and has permeated our thinking and given rise to
various unique concepts of our cultural heritage.[Italics as in the
original]
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, pp. 36-37.]
(4) RSS DENIGRATESTHE NATIONAL FLAG
The English organ of the RSS,Organizer (dated August 14, 1947) carried
afeature titled ‘mystery behind the bhagwa dhawaj’ (saffronflag) which
while demanding hoisting of saffron flag at theramparts of Red Fort in
Delhi, openly denigrated the choice of the Tri-colour as the National
Flag in the following words:
“The people who have come to power by
the kick of fate may give in our hands the Tricolour but it never be
respected and owned by Hindus. The word three is in itself an evil, and a
flag having three colours will certainly produce a very bad
psychological effect and is injurious to a country.”
Thus the National Flag was declared to be inauspicious and injurious for India!
(5) RSS AGAINST DEMOCRAY AND FOR TOTALITARIANISM
The RSS since its inception loves absolute power. Golwalkar while
addressing the 1350 top level cadres of the RSS at its headquarters at
Nagpur in 1940 declared:
“The RSS inspired by one flag, one leader
and one ideologyis lighting the flame of Hindutva in each and every
corner ofthis great land.”
[MS Golwalkar, Shri Guruji Samagar
Darshan (collected works of Golwalkar in Hindi), Bhartiya Vichar Sadhna,
Nagpur, nd, vol. I, p. 11.]
This slogan of one flag, one leader and
one ideology was directly borrowed from the programmes of the Nazi and
Fascist Parties of Europe.
(6) RSS AGAINST FEDERALISM
On federalism Golwalkar sent the following message to the first session of the National Integration Council in 1961. It read:
“Today’s federal form of government not only gives birth butalso
nourishes the feelings of separatism, in a way refuses torecognize the
fact of one nation and destroys it. It must be completely uprooted,
constitution purified and unitary form of government be established.”
[MS Golwalkar, Shri Guruji Samagar Darshan (collected works of
Golwalkar in Hindi), Bhartiya Vichar Sadhna, Nagpur, nd, vol. III, p.
128.]
These have not been some stray ideas of the RSS ideologue on the Indian
Federalism. The Bible of the RSS, Bunch of Thoughts, has an exclusive
chapter titled, ‘Wanted a unitary state’ in which Golwalkar presenting
his remedy to the federal set-upof India wrote:
“The most important
and effective step will be to bury deep for good all talk of a federal
structure of our country’s Constitution, to sweepaway the existence of
all ‘autonomous’ or semi-autonomous ‘states’within the one state viz.,
Bharat and proclaim ‘One Country, OneState, One Legislature, One
Executive’ with no trace offragmentational[sic], regional, sectarian,
linguistic or other types of pridebeing given a scope for playing havoc
with our integrated harmony.Let the Constitution be re-examined and
re-drafted, so as to establishthis Unitary form of Government…”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 227.]
(7) RSS’ HATRED FOR MUSLIMS& CHRISTIANS
Organizations like the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), Hindu Jagran Manch
(HJM) and Bajrang Dal (BD), and other affiliates of the RSS after using
Gujarat as a laboratory for religious cleansing of minorities specially
Christians and Muslims for last so many years are spreading their
tentacle throughout India. The leaflets containing highly provocative
statements like, “‘Muslims are filth of the gutter, don’t let them enter
in your houses’,or ‘Wherever Christian priests have gone in the world,
they loot thepeople. Lies and deceit are their religion. The Christian
priests teachpeople to tell lies, to steal in the name of religion…They
curse Hindus,and decry the Hindu religion. Awaken Hindus and struggle
againstthese thieves who lie, who rob you of your rights, and bring
thesepeople to their senses and put their pride in place’, or ‘One
additionin the population of Christians or Muslims is not only the
addition ofanti-Hindu but anti-national person.’”
[Leaflets circulated by the RSS offsprings like VHP, Hindu Jagaran Manch, and Bajrang Dal]
The ‘Holy’ book for the RSS cadres Bunch of Thoughts, has a long
chaptertitled as ‘Internal Threats’ in which Muslims and Christians are
described as threatnumber one and two respectively. This chapter opens
with the following statement:
“It has been the tragic lesson of the
history of many a country in theworld that the hostile elements within
the country pose a far greatermenace to national security then
aggressors from outside.”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 177.]
While treating Muslims as hostile element number one he goes on to
elaborate, “Even to this day there are so many who say, ‘now there is no
Muslimproblem at all. All those riotous elements who supported Pakistan
have gone away once for all. The remaining Muslims are devoted toour
country. After all, they have no other place to go and they arebound to
remain loyal’….It would be suicidal to delude ourselves intobelieving
that they have turned patriots overnight after the creation ofPakistan.
On the contrary, the Muslim menace has increased ahundredfold by the
creation of Pakistan which has become aspringboard for all their future
aggressive designs on our country.”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, pp. 177-78.]
He goes on to spit venom against common Muslims in the following words:
“…within the country there are so many Muslim pockets, i.e., so many
‘miniature Pakistans’… The conclusion is that, in practically every
place, there are Muslims who are in constant touch with Pakistan over
the transmitter…”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 185.]
While deliberating on the ‘Internal Threat’ number two, he says, “such
is the role of Christian gentlemen residing in our land today, out to
demolish not only the religious and social fabric of our life but also
to establish political domination in various pockets and if possible all
over the land.”
[MS Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1996, p. 193.]
Golwalkar, finally, following into the footsteps of Hitler had the followingsolution of the minority problem in India:
“From this stand point, sanctioned by the experience of shrewd
oldnations, the foreign races in Hindusthan must either adopt the
Hinduculture and language, must learn to respect and hold in
reverenceHindu religion, must entertain no idea but those of the
glorification ofthe Hindu race and culture, i.e., of the Hindu nation
and must losetheir separate existence to merge in the Hindu race, or may
stay in thecountry, wholly subordinated to the Hindu Nation, claiming
nothing,deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment not
evencitizen’s rights. There is, at least should be, no other course for
themto adopt. We are an old nation: let us deal, as old nations ought
toand do deal, with the foreign races who have chosen to live in our
country.”
[MS Golwalkar, We Or Our Nationhood Defined, Bharat Publications, Nagpur, 1939, pp. 47-48.]
The RSS hatred for Muslims and Christians does not mean that it accords
equality to other religious Indian minorities like Sikhs, Buddhist and
Jains. It does not accord the status of independent religions to
Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism and treats them as part of Hinduism.
(8) RSS AGAINST COMPOSITE INDIAN NATIONALISM
Importantly, the RSS organ Organizer in its issue on the very eve of
Independence, dated 14 August, 1947, rejected the whole concept of a
composite nation (under the editorial title ‘Whither’): ”Let us no
longer allow ourselves to be influenced by false notions of nationhood.
Much of the mental confusion and the present and future troubles can be
removed by the ready recognition of the simple fact that in Hindusthan
only the Hindus form the nation and the national structure must be built
on that safe and sound foundation […] the nation itself must be built
up of Hindus, on Hindu traditions, culture, ideas and aspirations”.
Shamsul Islam is a former professor of Delhi University�Email: notoinjustice@gmail.com
LINKS FOR MORE MATERIAL ON RSS/HINDUTVA
https://www.academia.edu/676529/Know_the_RSS
https://www.academia.edu/…/RSS_Ko_Pehchane_Hindi_version_of…
https://www.academia.edu/…/RSS_Marketing_Fascism_as_Hindutva
https://www.academia.edu/…/Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh_and_…
https://www.academia.edu/…/RSS_Ideologue_Nana_�Deshmukh_Con…
https://www.academia.edu/…/The_Freedom_Movement_and_�the_RS…
https://www.academia.edu/…/RSS_Primer_Based_on_RSS_Document…
https://www.academia.edu/…/RSS_s_Tryst_with_Terrorism_Past_…
https://www.academia.edu/…/AAB_BARI_AMBEDKAR_KEE_Now_is_the…
https://www.academia.edu/…/Appropriation_of_Dr._Ambedkar_by…
https://www.academia.edu/14838603/Return_of_Manu
http://www.academia.edu/…/Open_letter_to_Hindu_Nationalist_…
http://www.academia.edu/…/Hindu_Nationalist_Narendra_Modi_k…
https://www.academia.edu/11939263/The_Hijacking_of_Babasaheb
https://www.academia.edu/…/GANDHIJI_S_MARTYRDOM_ANNIVERSARY…
https://www.academia.edu/…/Not_the_First_Controversy_Over_V…
https://www.academia.edu/…/Tiranga_For_Muslims_And_Saffron_…
http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam
http://www.academia.edu/…/KNOW_THE_RASHTRIYA_SWAYAMSEVAK_SA…
https://www.academia.edu/…/Madhok_Makes_Stunning_Revelations
https://www.academia.edu/…/DOES_VD_SAVARKAR_S_PORTRAIT_DESE…
https://www.academia.edu/…/Text_of_Savarkars_Mercy_�Petitio…
https://www.academia.edu/…/Need_to_Indianise_the_RSS_By_Sha…
https://www.academia.edu/…/THE_DALIT_AGENDA_OF_HINDUTVA–Sh…
https://www.academia.edu/…/WHO_IS_HELPING_THE_ISI_�OF_PAKIS…
https://www.academia.edu/…/CROSS-BREEDING_HUMAN_TIPS_FROM_G…
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/rahul-gandhis-u-turn-in-supreme-court-never-blamed-rss-for-gandhis-killing/1/747655.html