2133 Thu 9 Feb 2017
LESSONS
Ms Mayawati’s BSP became eligible to become the PM of Prabuddha bharath
after her best Governance of UP as CM. This was not tolerated by the
rulers of this country because of their casteist and communal
tendencies. So the EVMs were used to defeat her. The SP benefited and
later Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) gobbled the Master Key.
Their only enemy was Ms Mayawati the leader of Sarvajan Samaj. They are
scared that once he gets the Master Key she will distribute the wealth
of the country equally among all societies of the country as enshrined
in our Modern Constitution for Sarvajan Hitay Sarvajan Sukhya i.e., for
welfare, happiness and peace for all societies.
There
is a provision of VVPAT, google it and see. It gives a paper trail of
the polled votes. This kind of playing with EVM will not be possible as
the paper trail is vetted by the voter.
the last 2014 Lok Sabha election only in 8 out of 543 seats were
replaced which helped the Mouderer of democratic institutions to gobble
the Master Key. After that all the state governments were selected by
these fraud EVMs.
CEC said that entire EVMs will be replaced only in 2019. Buthe never
said that Ballot Papers will be used until the entire fraud EVMs were
replaced.
the 80 democracies use Ballot papers. Even in UP panchayat election Ms
Mayawati’s BSP won 80% seats with Ballot papers while a few months back
it lost all the seats in 2014 Lok Sabha elections because of these fraud
EVMs.
ex CJI Sathasivam had committed a grave error of Judgement by ordering
that the EVMs will be replaced in a phased manner as suggested by the ex
CEC Sampath because of the cost of RS 1600 crores involved in total
replacement of the EVMs while Modi started commissioning statues of anti
reservation leader at a cost of Rs 3000 crores.
is the time for all the democracy liking people, the Present CJI and
CEC to see that the Central and state governments selected by these
fraud EVMs were dissolved and go for fresh elections with Ballot papers
until the entire EVMs were replaced and also punish all the people
including Modi, the ex CJI and ex CEC for their madness and send them to
mental asylums for treatment.
Mayawati says will form govt with majority
DEMONetisation
Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) appeared defensive by
saying there was a horizontal divide. “On one side are the people of the country and on the other side are a group of political
leaders.
Modi said 700 Maoists had surrendered after DEMONetisation
and this
number was increasing. He must publish the names of all terrorists who
surrendered to know if they have any links with Bahuth Jiyadha
Psychopaths’ Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks (RSS) 1% intolerant chitpawan
brahmins while remaining
silent on the prime objective of DEMONetisation
while announcing the
move on November 8, Modi had said it was aimed at flushing out black
money from the economic system and deposit Rs 15 lakhs in every citizens
bank account. However, this most important objective did not yield the
desired result as most of the cash,
black or white, has found its way bank in the banks.
saying there was a horizontal divide. “On one side are the people of the country and on the other side are a group of political
leaders.
Further,
though Modi had demanded 50 days’ time from the people for banking
system to normalise post-DEMONetisation, the people are still facing
immense hardships in withdrawing money and 175 people died in his QUEUE
INDIA MOVEMENT. The RSS claimed that all those who died were patriots
who sacrificed (Balidhan) their lives for their stealth, shadowy,
discriminatory hinutva cult rashtra. The impact is likely to be seen
in the ongoing Assembly elections in five states as the rural people
have been worst hit by DEMONetisation and there is anger against the BJP
in all these states, particularly the most populous state of Uttar
Pradesh.
system to normalise post-DEMONetisation, the people are still facing
immense hardships in withdrawing money and 175 people died in his QUEUE
INDIA MOVEMENT. The RSS claimed that all those who died were patriots
who sacrificed (Balidhan) their lives for their stealth, shadowy,
discriminatory hinutva cult rashtra. The impact is likely to be seen
in the ongoing Assembly elections in five states as the rural people
have been worst hit by DEMONetisation and there is anger against the BJP
in all these states, particularly the most populous state of Uttar
Pradesh.
Modi is wary of the mood of the
people and was seen offering explanation to them through Parliament
debate. He had made the same pitch on Tuesday during his reply to the
motion in the Lok Sabha.
Modi had launched Swachh Bharat Mission
with much fanfare, its results not much is visible on the streets and other
public places even though the project was launched more than two years
ago is perhaps aware of the questions which are
being raised over the cess imposed in the name of Swachh Bharat without
an account of the money spent.
The record of the Modi in
checking black money is not unquestionable. Despite BJP making tall
promises before the 2014 Lok Sabha elections of bringing back black
money stashed in foreign banks within 100 days of coming to power, it
has failed to fulfil them. And did not deposit Rs 15 lakhs as promised by him in all citizens bank accounts.
people and was seen offering explanation to them through Parliament
debate. He had made the same pitch on Tuesday during his reply to the
motion in the Lok Sabha.
with much fanfare, its results not much is visible on the streets and other
public places even though the project was launched more than two years
ago is perhaps aware of the questions which are
being raised over the cess imposed in the name of Swachh Bharat without
an account of the money spent.
checking black money is not unquestionable. Despite BJP making tall
promises before the 2014 Lok Sabha elections of bringing back black
money stashed in foreign banks within 100 days of coming to power, it
has failed to fulfil them. And did not deposit Rs 15 lakhs as promised by him in all citizens bank accounts.
CASHLESS ECONOMY
However, talking about cashless economy in
itself indicates Modi’s defensive attitude. While launching DEMONetisation, loving towards cashless economy was not a prime
objective. The Modi started talking about it when DEMONtisation failed to yield the desired result - of
ensuring that black money and counterfeit currency were rejected by the
system. But most of the currency has been deposited in the banks, thus,
defeating the very purpose of the DEMONtisation move.
CHECKING CORRUPTION
The people expected Modi to take
action on these scams. However, despite the lapse of more than
two-and-a-half years,he does not seem to have taken any
concrete action against those who were accused of indulging in these
corruption cases.
While it is the job of the Opposition to raise
allegations of corruption against the ruling party, the reverse is
taking place under the Modi government. The Centre has still been
raising the old scams without having taken a tangible action against
them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
UP चुनाव में पाकिस्तान मीडिया ने मायावती का सपोर्ट किया, Pakistan media on UP election
UP Election 2017: Why hasn’t Mayawati’s BSP tapped on the winnable Dalit-plus-Muslim votebank?
The Dalit-plus-Muslim votebank is easily the most winnable formula in Uttar Pradesh.
Together, these two groups form well over 40 percent of the population
in the state. In a state where Samajwadi Party could sweep the polls
with less than 30 percent vote share in the last Assembly election, a
Dalit-Muslim votebank is the simplest route to power.
Bahujan
Samaj Party (BSP) chief Mayawati has the single biggest block — majority
of Dalits behind her. If Muslim electorate gets enthusiastic towards
BSP, Dalit-plus-Muslim votebank could be a unbeatable. This is simple
arithmetic. And, Mayawati is surely aware of it. Yet, it remains a
mystery why the BSP never goes aggressively for the Muslim votes.
It is commonly said that Muslims go with the party that is most likely
to defeat BJP. If that’s true then why don’t we see Muslims voting
enthusiastically for a BSP? SP gets lion’s share of the Muslim votes but
BSP is far behind.
There are several reasons for that but first a
recent example when BSP had the opportunity to grab Muslim votes and
she missed it. After the Muzaffarnagar riots, or for that matter the
murder of Mohammad Akhlaq in Dadri, has turned the popular mood in the
state against SP. How can an astute politician like Mayawati be unaware
of this minority anger? There were other grievances too, apart of the
anti-incumbency factor against SP, yet the BSP failed to tap this
feeling of discontent among Muslims.
Failure to take stand on Muslim issues
The feeling among Muslims that Mayawati does not care much for the
Muslims, gained strength when Muslim youths were routinely picked up
from Azamgarh and other towns of Uttar Pradesh during BSP regime.
Azamgarh was branded as hub of terror during her tenure as the chief
minister.
Muslims hoped BSP leadership would take a strong stand
against it or at least speak out over the indiscriminate arrests —
something that could have boosted the morale of Muslims. But this didn’t
happen. Muslims felt that there pain wasn’t understood by the BSP. And
the trust deficit between Muslims and the BSP kept growing.
While
SP’s core Yadav vote is much less than BSP’s Dalit vote, SP managed to
create the image that it was a party that looked after interests of
Muslims and thus emerged the Muslim-Yadav combination. Muslims do vote
for BSP, often as second choice, but the Dalit-plus-Muslim combination
that would have been invincible, could never emerge in Uttar Pradesh.
No serious effort to reach out to Muslims
After the SP formed the government in 2012, there was little effort on
part of BSP leadership to reach out to Muslims. Many Muslims complained
that the BSP doesn’t even seem to acknowledge that ‘we had supported the
party election after election, but just expects our vote’. In the wake
of riots, Muslims were in need for someone who would stand by their
side. Perhaps, the expectation was that BSP leaders would visit homes of
victims of communal riots and those who suffered at the hands of cow
vigilantes.
There was bound to be a feeling of dejection. It was
the time one started hearing more and more about Mayawati being soft on
BJP and about BSP chief’s purported statement in the past that put blame
on Muslims for party’s loss. We have had examples of ’secular’ parties
allying with BJP, but BSP joining hands with the saffron party is
something that we have heard more often.
However, the fact
remains that the BSP has never had a serious outreach strategy towards
the Muslims — neither in terms of launching new schemes for artisans
(that could have helped the community), nor major developmental projects
in Muslim dominated cities or towns.
No symbolism: Rare to find Muslim icons on BSP’s banners, hoardings
During BSP events, conventions and political campaigns, it is rare to
see any Muslim personality’s photograph along Dalit icons of yore. The
banners and posters are seldom in Urdu. Symbolic representation goes a
long way in bringing a community with the party. But the BSP doesn’t
seem to think about it. Even promises are not such that would make
Muslims rush towards the party.
When new districts were carved
during BSP rule, none of them was named after any Muslim icon of the
past. Major schemes or projects weren’t named after Muslims freedom
fighters (unlike Dalit heroes).
No one except Nasimuddin: BSP’s sole Muslim face
