http://indiatoday.intoday.in/…/uttar-pradesh-…/1/891651.html

Only 20 constituencies in UP elections are replaced by VVPAT. So BJP
will distort EVM to win elections . EC must first tell the voters how it
is going to stop this.

The CEC said that only in 2019 entire EVMs will be replaced.

Ms Mayawati’s BSP won 80 % seats in UP Panchayat elections conducted
with Ballot papers while it lost all the seats in 2014 Lok Sabha
elections conducted with these EVMs.

I was because the ex CJI
Sathasivam had committed a grave error of judgement by ordering that the
EVMs to be replaced in a phased manner as suggested by the ex CEC
Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 crores involved in the entire
replacement of EVMs. Only 8 out of the 543 Lok sabha seats were replaced
helping the Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) to gobble the
Master Key while he had commissioned a statue of a anti-reservation
leader at a cost of Rs 3000 crores and RSSised Shivaji statue at a same
cost.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vjl3DrhoWa8&t=7s
खबरदार चुनाव जीतने के लिए भाजपा EVM से छेड़छाड़ कर सकती है | BJP may distort EMV to win election
now with just 20 constituencies out of 403 constituencies the EVMs have been replaced with VVPAT
Hence Modi, Venkaya Naidu and Amit Shaw say they are confident of winning as it happened in 2014 Lok sabha elections.

http://history.edri.org/edri-g…/number7.5/no-evoting-germany

Digital Civil Rights in Europe

No e-voting in Germany

Electronic voting

This article is also available in:
Deutsch: Keine E-Wahlen in Deutschland

Macedonian: Нема е-гласање во Германија

The German Federal Constitutional Court decided on 3 March 2009 that
electronic voting used for the last 10 years, including for the 2005 general
elections, was unconstitutional and therefore not to be used for the next
elections in September 2009.

The court ruled that the use of the electronic machines contradicts the
public nature of elections and the equipment used in 2005 had some
shortcomings. However, as there has been no evidence of errors in the
past, the results of the previous elections remain valid.

The use of e-voting was challenged by political scientist Joachim Wiesner
and his son, physicist Ulrich Wiesner who complained that the system was not
transparent because the voter could not check what actually happened to his
vote, being actually asked to blindly trust the technology. The voting
machines which are manufactured by the Dutch firm Nedap, do not print out
receipts. In the plaintiffs’ opinion, the results could be manipulated.

A petition signed by over 45 000 people in 2005, trying to ban e-voting, had
been rejected by the German Government. Now, the court ruled that the
Federal Voting Machines Ordinance having introduced e-voting was
unconstitutional because it did not “ensure that only such voting machines
are permitted and used which meet the constitutional requirements of the
principle of the public nature of elections.”

Also the court considered that, differently from the traditional voting
system where manipulations and frauds are much more difficult involving a
high degree of effort and a high risk of detection, “programming errors in
the software or deliberate electoral fraud committed by manipulating the
software of electronic voting machines can be recognised only with
difficulty.” Also, in the court’s opinion, the electors should be able to
verify how their vote is recorded without having to possess detailed
computer knowledge. “If the election result is determined through
computer-controlled processing of the votes stored in an electronic memory,
it is not sufficient if merely the result of the calculation process carried
out in the voting machine can be taken note of by means of a summarising
printout or an electronic display.”

A campaign against electronic voting has been initiated by EDRi member Chaos
Computer Club together with the Dutch foundation Wij vertrouwen
stemcomputers niet (We don’t trust voting computers) because of the risk of
electronic errors and the potential for abuse.

After a group of hackers had succeeded in tampering with similar machines in
the Netherlands in 2006, the Dutch Government imposed a moratorium on the
use of electronic voting machines and Ireland also has banned electronic
voting.

German Court Rules E-Voting Unconstitutional (3.03.2009)

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4069101,00.html

Federal Constitutional Court - Press release on Use of voting computers in
2005 Bundestag election unconstitutional (3.03.2009)

http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/…/p…/bvg09-019en.html

Voting machines unconstitutional in Germany (3.03.2009)

http://able2know.org/topic/129942-1

EDRi-gram: Electronic voting machines eliminated in the Netherlands
(24.10.2007)

http://www.edri.org/…/number5…/e-voting-machines-netherlands

‹ IRMA tries to block websitesupEP wants a better balance between Internet security and privacy rights ›

The CEC and CJI must dissolve the Central and stat governments selected
by these fraud EVMs and go for fresh elections with Ballot papers as
followerd by 80 democracies of the world until the entire EVMs were
replaced in 2019. And punish all involved in retaining these EVMs to
save democracy, liberty, equality and fraternity as enshrined in our
Modern Constitution of the Chief Architect Dr BR Ambedkar by
derecognising all the beneficiaries of these EVMs.

Otherwise
statements construing as mixing of religion and caste with their
election campaigns aggravating the differences between political parties
and classes of citizens on the grounds of religion, caste, creed,
community and language and such statements being made from a place which
is not in the state where MCC is in force and in today’s electronic
age a statement made in any corner of the country gets circulated
through various forms of media which undoubtedly has a pernicious effect
of influencing the minds of voters of the poll-bound state, disturbs
the level-playing field and “often adversely affect (s) the peace,
tranquillity and harmony of poll-bound states though Supreme Court’s
recent observation on mixing religion and caste with election campaign
in continuing and will continue.

On February 19, Modi, while
addressing a rally in Fatehpur, said: “If land is given for kabristan
(cemetary), it should be given for shamshaan (cremation ground) too”.
The Prime Minister accused the Akhilesh Yadav government of indulging in
discrimination.

While he commissioned RSSised shiva burst who is
the watch and ward of cremation ground and cemetary, he himself has
become shiva after he turned the whole country as cemetary and cremation
ground.