Caste system (Manusmritic Jati Pratha) promoters in the name of Hindu nationalist.

These
are some influential
peoples on media those spread ideology of Manusmritic Jati
Pratha/Vedism/Casteism (Rig Vedic purusha Sukta 10:90 i.e. fourfold
caste system) in India. They claim they are Hindu nationalist but not as
Secular Democratic Indian Nationalist. So in other ways they say they
are not a part of Democratic India so need Hindu Rashtra which implies
treason against India; means Rashstra Droh. They don’t accept they are
secular. They reject preamble of constitution “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA,
having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST
SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.”
It directly proofs they are anti nationalist with a so called slogan we
are nationalist as Hindu for their personal and organized benefits.
India is a Nation of multi linguistic, multi culture, multi religions,
multi races and a place for even non-believers. It is not belongs to
only caste followers of vedism. Claiming it belongs to only Caste
followers polytheists is just anti nationalism. Re-meaning to the word
“Hindu” as “an art of living for all root natives of Indian origin” is
just like making a new construct by present con vedic followers to
impose vedism to whole Indian root natives though they follow or not
follow any faiths but belongs to origin of Vedism.  Vedism is just a
stupid & most idiotic faith of this land that has been destroying
all good rational faith systems of Indian origin for which original
progressive Indian civilization has been devastated. Their ideology
declines and  hurts SECULARISM mentioned in preamble of India. They want
to replace  SECULARISM word from preamble making it HINDUSIM
in the process of making India as a Hindu Rastra or Nation of Hindus.
These stupids even don’t know  what is Hindu? They follow their stupid
master V.D Savarkar who had defined “Who is Hindu?” and they loved to be
brain raped by his ideology.  V. D. Savarkar  had defined Hindu,
Hindutva and Hinduism according to his won understanding of word Hindu
without the basic knowledge of its meaning and its origin and defined it
with fake and wrong claims. That stupid so called intellect imposed and
induced Brahmanism in the word Hindu to promote caste system and
polytheist idolism. Who advocates “Hindu glory is evident in the
preservation of the Vedas and Shastras, the protection of Cows and
Brahmins.”
Is he a secular? In his book he had said “Rape is religious duty.” RSS
and BJP i.e. Sangh Parivar and their paid media follow him as their God
father. Our Nation so far strong and under development country because
its root base is Secularism otherwise it might have the
position like Pakistan; even worsen than them. V.D. Savarkar had agreed
that Sindhu word is not from Sanskrit language. Sindhu word is from
Pali language and its meaning is river. India was a land of SAPTA SINDHU
meant it was land of seven major rivers that had flourished the
multicultural civilization of India. India is a land of rivers was its
original demographic entity not Brahmanism. Indus, Hindu, Hindustan,
Sindhusthan, Shindh, Sindhi, Al-Hind, Indoustan, India etc. all are
streams from this Pali language word Sindhu. Sindhu word got popularized
in the age of Buddhism in India due to propagation of Pali Buddhist
scriptures. BTW prime architecture of Indian constitution Bhimrao Ramji
Ambedkar was a Buddhism ideology follower not a Hindu. Why an
intelligent person who was prime architecture of the constitution
rejected the ideology of Hinduism? Was he a fool? He knew the cons of
India well; and had architect the constitution in that forms so that
future generations won’t face major problems due to ideological faith
contradiction based on God. RSS and BJP administration and their paid
media trying to change the core of its architecture which is nothing but
unconstitutional, anti nationalism and anti patriotic. When you meet
them ask to say Proudly say “I am secular and I love India” and See
their reaction.

Here is some Stupids those stagnate our Prabuddha Bharat to 5000 years back.

Mathadhiswaras (Background Players)

Mohan Madhukar Bhagawat

Bhaiyyaji Joshi

Lal Krishna Advani (Now Underground player)

Murli Manohar Joshi (Now Underground player)

Narendra Damodardas Modi

Amitbhai Anilchandra

Rajnath Singh

Ramdev

Devendra Fadnavis

Vinay Katiyar

Subramanian Swamy

Swami Chakrapani

Smriti Zubin Irani

Sadhvi Rithambara

Uma Bharti

Pravin Togadia (Master of hate speech)

Acharya Shri Dharmendra Ji (Master of Hate speech)

Mahanth Yogi Adityanath (Hate speaker)

Giriraj Singh

Shiv Sena

Ramdas Kadam

Sadhwi balika saraswati (Hate speaker)

Sadhvi Prachi (Hate speaker)

Sachchidanand Hari Sakshi (Hate speaker)

Ram Madhav

Prof. Rakesh Sinha

Vijay Shankar Tiwari

Ravi Shankar Prasad

Vinod Bansal VHP

Nalin S. Kohli

Sudhanshu Trivedi

Dr. Sambit Patra

Srikant Sharma

Prem Shukla

KK Sharma

Sangit Ragi

Nirmala Sitharaman

Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi

Syed Shahnawaz Hussain

Pseudo Secular Hinduism

Digvijay Singh

Rajiv Tyagi

Manish Tewari

Anand Sharma

Alok Sharma

Sanjay Jha

THEO-SOCIOPATHS

Detected Hindu (Polytheist & Casteism follower) promoters Media persons….

Sudhir Chaudhary

Rajat Sharma (India TV)

Arnab Ranjan Goswami

Sweta Singh

Nishant Chaturvedi

  Kartikeya Sharma (India News)

Chitra Tripathi

Acharya shailesh tiwari

Acharya Vikramaditya

Amish Devgan

 Anjana Om Kashyap

Avnijesh-Awasthi

Deepak chaurasia

Gaurav Bhatia
 

Rohit Sardana

Swami Dipankar

Nazism
and Fascist Murderer of democratic institutions and Master of diluting
institution (Modi) by tampering the fraud EVMs/VVPATs to win elections

Nazism and Narendra Modi: The ideological influence on India’s next Prime Minister

Further to the previous detailed Loonwatch article about Narendra Modi and the rise of India’s neo-fascist Far-Right, some more facts have surfaced. Readers may be particularly interested in the following:

1. According to Outlook India and Forbes India, the colour photo at the top of this article was taken at a meeting of the paramilitary ultranationalist
“Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh” (“RSS”) near Ahmedabad in Gujarat, India
in September 2009. Narendra Modi has been an active member of the RSS
for the entirety of his political career, and can be seen openly
performing a modified Nazi salute alongside a number of his fellow RSS
members.

The nature of that salute and the
uniforms worn by the RSS members in the photo is not a coincidence. As
discussed in the main part of this article further below, the RSS’s core
ideology is explicitly and directly influenced by Hitler and Third
Reich-era Nazism.

2. Narendra Modi is currently predicted
to become 1.2 billion-population, nuclear-armed India’s next Prime
Minister. He is campaigning as a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (“BJP”), which is effectively the political wing of the RSS. In fact, a BJP spokesperson even recently described the RSS as the “ideological fountainhead” of the BJP.

3. A Caravan magazine article from 2012 comprehensively details
Narendra Modi’s career trajectory, from his early membership of the
RSS, to his eventual involvement with the BJP, to his current role as
Chief Minister of India’s Gujarat state. The article includes extensive
information on Modi’s specific political manouverings during the course
of his career; it is very revealing. As the article also mentions,
India’s then-Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vaypayee wanted to remove Modi
as Gujarat’s Chief Minister after the anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat in
2002. Vajpayee even publicly admonished Modi for his sectarian and
bigoted attitudes.

The article also mentions the following
fact: In late 2001, during the tenure of the previous BJP Chief Minister
of Gujarat, Modi complained to the senior BJP leadership in Delhi that
the CM was “interested only in development, but not advancing the stated
goals of Hindutva [Hindu Nationalism]”. This certainly adds weight to
suspicions that Modi’s current newfound public emphasis on his alleged
interest in “development” may actually be a Trojan Horse for a far more
dangerous agenda.

4. The New York Times have recently published an informative article summarising the timeline of the Gujarat 2002 riots and the subsequent sequence of events involving Narendra Modi.

5. The BJP’s recently-released 2014 election manifesto
includes a declaration that a Modi national government would reconsider
India’s “no first strike” nuclear weapons policy, which was originally
implemented by Atal Bihari Vajpayee during the previous BJP government. The Hindu have subsequently confirmed the following: In 1999, the RSS’s mouthpiece Organiser
actually tried to convince then-Prime Minister Vajpayee to launch a
nuclear attack on Pakistan. Addressing the following directly to
Vajpayee, the RSS stated: “Arise, Atal Behari! Who knows if fate has
destined you to be the author of the final chapter of this long story.
For what have we manufactured bombs? For what have we exercised the
nuclear option?“. Vajpayee obviously ignored the RSS’s belligerent statements.

The Hindu’s article also contains details
on India and Pakistan’s respective nuclear arsenals, including India’s
current plans to significantly increase its number of nuclear warheads.
The RSS leadership have publicly backed
Narendra Modi as their choice for India’s Prime Minister and
simultaneously reiterated that Modi is an RSS activist, and the RSS as a
whole have been heavily involved in supporting Modi’s election
campaign.

6. The Economist recently published a lead article
in which the magazine has formally refused to endorse Narendra Modi as a
suitable Prime Minister for India. Amol Rajan, the Indian-born editor
of the The Independent has also personally written an article condemning Modi. Furthermore, The Times has published an article
warning that Modi will cause huge problems both domestically and
internationally; the start of the article also notes Modi’s similarity
to Hitler.

7. The Guardian recently published an open letter
signed by very senior British lawyers, senior Indian-origin academics
at Harvard and the London School of Economics, and a number of famous
Indian-origin writers and artists condemning Narendra Modi and warning
about the dangers he poses for India. Multiple British Indian academics
have written similar letters to The Guardian.

8. The Independent recently published an open letter
signed by more than 70 academics (mostly British Indians) at multiple
universities in the UK, condemning Narendra Modi and warning about the
dangerous ramifications of Modi achieving power in India.

9. Approximately 60 leading figures from India’s Bollywood film industry have signed an open letter warning about the dangers of voting for Narendra Modi. Hundreds of Indian civil rights groups
have also mobilised at the grassroots level across India, with the aims
of opposing Modi and a possible “communal [sectarian] takeover” of the
country, providing a “strong and viable opposition to the forces of
fascism at the national level”, and “safeguarding [Indian] democracy and
the Indian Constitution”.

10. Referring to Narendra Modi’s role in
the Gujarat 2002 riots, many of his apologists and supporters are
claiming that he has been “given a clean chit” (ie. exonerated) by
India’s Supreme Court, based on the report of the Supreme
Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (“SIT”). However, this claim
is completely false. Not only has the Supreme Court accused Modi of
being a “modern-day Nero” at the very least, but the SIT’s report can be
read in full online here.
Amongst other things, the SIT report confirmed that Modi’s Gujarat
state government is guilty of destroying a huge amount of incriminating
evidence, including completely destroying the records of police
communications and government meetings during the riots. The SIT report
also confirmed multiple incidents where Modi’s conduct was divisive and
prejudiced against Gujarat’s Muslim population; as Gujarat’s Chief
Minister, Modi was therefore in violation of his constitutional duty to
protect the life and property of every citizen of Gujarat state.

Equally damningly, the SIT report
confirmed that Modi’s Gujarat state government assigned an unusual
number of public prosecutors involved with the RSS and VHP to cases
against people accused of perpetrating the anti-Muslim riots. There have
been relatively few convictions compared to the actual number of
rioters. Bear in mind that the RSS and VHP were among the main
ringleaders of the violence.

Also note that the SIT report confirmed
that (a) Modi claimed to have been unaware of the first massacre during
the riots (at the Gulbarg Society area of Ahmedabad) for as long as 5
hours after the atrocity; Modi specifically claimed that he only heard
about it during a meeting at his house that evening, (b) there were
numerous communications between police officers during the course of the
siege and subsequent massacre, and (c) Modi was praised for holding a
series of meetings with police officers throughout the day in order to
continuously monitor the violence. Readers will note the glaring
contradiction in this narrative and can draw their own conclusions about
the implications.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court also appointed an amicus curiae. Based on the SIT’s own findings, the
senior Supreme Court lawyer and former Additional Solicitor General
& Vice-President of the Supreme Court Bar Association has
recommended that Modi should be put on trial and has concluded that
there is indeed sufficient evidence to prosecute Modi on multiple
criminal charges, including: (a) Promoting enmity on grounds of
religion, (b) Making assertions prejudicial to national integration, (c)
Being a public servant disobeying the law, with intent to cause injury
to people, and (d) Making statements creating or promoting enmity and
hatred. Full details via the Times of India and Tehelka.
According to Indian law, guilty verdicts on all these charges would
result in Modi being sentenced to up to 10 years in prison.

A case can of course also be made for
prosecuting Modi via the International Criminal Court at The Hague and
putting him on trial there.

Readers here in the West may be interested to know that multiple British citizens of Indian origin were also murdered
by the rioters; a number of British Members of Parliament have
correspondingly confirmed their support for prosecuting Modi and
continuing to ban him from the UK “irrespective of the results of the
upcoming Indian elections until he has been brought to account for his
actions in fermenting racial and religious violence and bigotry”.

11. It is worth noting the following fact
regarding the attack against the train carrying Hindu pilgrims in 2002,
which ostensibly caused the anti-Muslim riots: The people responsible
for the attack have never actually been identified.
Despite the fact that there was absolutely no evidence of the
identities of the perpetrators, at the time Narendra Modi promptly
issued a press release declaring “This is not a mere communal event but a one-sided collective terrorist attack by one community [ie. the entire Muslim population]”.

Furthermore, in a foretaste of the depths
of barbarity to come, Modi also took the following actions: Instead of
treating the victims and their families with respect by handing over the
bodies to the grieving relatives, like some twisted medieval king Modi
decided to let the VHP publicly parade the burnt, mutilated corpses
through the streets of the city of Ahmedabad. Full details via the Indian Express and Kafila.

12. Anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat rapidly ensued. The previous Loonwatch article on Narendra Modi
included extensive details on a number of these massacres (readers are
strongly advised to familiarise themselves with that article if they
have not done so already), but it is worth summarising the following
incident too: The first location attacked was the Gulbarg Housing Society,
a residential area in Ahmedabad whose inhabitants were mostly
upper-middle-class Muslims. One of these properties was owned by Ehsan Jafri,
who also happened to be a former Member of Parliament for the Congress
party; many of Jafri’s neighbours along with Muslims from nearby areas
had gathered at his house too, since it was expected that Jafri’s status
as a veteran MP would give them safety. A huge baying mob had gathered
outside the housing society, armed with swords, petrol bombs and cycle
chains. After they broke into the complex, they proceeded to slaughter
69 of the inhabitants, at least 35 of whom were burned alive. Women were
also raped and then killed. Children were not spared either.

Ehsan Jafri himself made numerous phone
calls asking for help, contacting Gujarat’s Director-General of Police,
Ahmedabad’s Police Commissioner, Gujarat state’s Chief Secretary, and
dozens of others. No assistance ever came. Ultimately, Jafri even
directly phoned Modi. As confirmed by Caravan and The Telegraph,
far from offering assistance, Modi responded by verbally abusing Jafri,
and even taunted him by expressing surprise that Jafri was still alive.
It was at this point that Jafri turned to his family members and told
them that there was no hope of rescue. When the killers finally reached
Jafri, they stripped him of his clothes, took him outside, beat him to
the ground, and publicly paraded the 72-year-old man naked. They also
repeatedly tried to force Jafri to sing Hindu prayers; when he refused,
they beat him with swords and incrementally cut off his fingers, hands
and legs. The dying & dismembered Ehsan Jafri was then thrown onto a
burning wooden pyre and burned alive.

13. Investigative journalists conducted
an interview with one of Ehsan Jafri’s killers; an English-language
transcript of that interview is available here. Jafri’s horrific murder occurred in full sight of his now-75-year-old wife, who was watching from a balcony; she is still fighting for justice.

14. Referring to the Gujarat riots as a whole, The Guardian confirmed
that some of the murderers actually poured chemicals on the victims in
order to ensure that their flesh was completely burned off. Furthermore,
The Guardian’s own correspondent in India at the time personally witnessed
local policemen actively co-ordinating attacks against ordinary
Muslims, accompanying the perpetrators as they torched village fields
and shooting at the Muslim farmers who tried to stop them.

15. It is worth noting that Gujarat’s state police is under the jurisdiction of Amit Shah,
who is Gujarat’s Home Minister and Narendra Modi’s right-hand-man. Like
Modi, Shah also has an extensive history of involvement with the RSS.
India’s English-language NDTV news channel recently speculated that Shah
will be India’s Deputy Prime Minister in a Modi national government.
Shah is currently being prosecuted on multiple charges of murder, the
illegal surveillance of ordinary Indian citizens, and being the head of
an extortion syndicate.

16. Estimates of the number of people
killed during the anti-Muslim riots range from 1000-2000. Approximately
200,000 people were also displaced. Narendra Modi’s Gujarat state
government refused to relocate the Muslim victims of the riots; Modi
even disparagingly described their refugee camps as “baby-making
factories”. Furthermore, in an echo of Jewish ghettos in Nazi-occupied Europe,
areas of Gujarat with large Muslim populations are now increasingly
becoming isolated sites of poverty and deprivation; basic state
infrastructure such as water, roads and sewage systems are not being
extended to them; in some cases, large garbage dumps of rotting (and
potentially toxic & dangerous) waste material from multiple nearby
hospitals have been placed near these populations. The New York Times has confirmed this in a detailed article about Ahmedabad’s largest Muslim ghetto, containing 400,000 people.

17. The Indian filmmaker Rakesh Sharma has created an acclaimed documentary about the Gujarat riots and their aftermath, titled Final Solution. The full 2.5 hour film is available online via Youtube here.
It specifically draws accurate parallels with political developments in
Nazi Germany in the early/mid-1930s. Sharma is currently involved in a high-profile argument
with the Bollywood actor Anupam Kher, as the latter was a member of the
censor board committee that previously banned Sharma’s film in India;
it is worth noting that Kher’s wife [the actress Kirron Kher] is
currently campaigning as a BJP politician and is therefore allied to
Narendra Modi.

18. India’s total Muslim population is
170 million; the country’s total Christian population is approximately
30 million. It is not just Muslims who are the primary targets of “Hindu
Nationalist” extremists; as documented in the main part of this article
below, specifically the section discussing the RSS’s core ideology,
Christians are also at risk. In fact, as discussed in the previous Loonwatch article and in much more detail in Caravan
magazine, Narendra Modi is the main political patron of Swami
Aseemanand, a senior RSS leader who was responsible for anti-Christian
riots involving mass-murder, forced conversions to Hinduism, the
destruction of dozens of churches, and the rape of nuns. Aseemanand is
also on record
as admitting that the RSS leadership personally authorised a series of
terrorist attacks across India, deliberately targeting innocent Muslims
for mass-murder.

19. Readers are strongly advised to read this excellent article in The Hindu
by Dr Nissim Mannathukkaren, an Associate Professor at a Canadian
university. The article eloquently summarises the core moral issues of
the situation as a whole, including the spurious nature of the arguments
used by Narendra Modi’s apologists; as Dr Mannathukkaren writes in the
final paragraph of his article, “Fascism is in the making when economics
and development are amputated from ethics and an overarching conception
of human good, and violence against minorities becomes banal”.

Furthermore, Cambridge University’s Dr Priyamvada Gopal has written a very good article in The Guardian which succinctly discusses many of the facts that the previous Loonwatch article on Modi also highlighted.

20. Referring to his role in the Gujarat riots, Narendra Modi recently declared
“If I am guilty, hang me in the street”. Ironically, this was indeed
what eventually happened to one of Modi and the RSS’s ideological
predecessors, the Italian fascist dictator Mussolini. Furthermore, Modi
also recently declared
in a speech that “A government that cannot protect its own people
should not stay in power even for a minute”; considering what happened
in Gujarat in 2002 under Modi’s own state government, readers will note
the hypocrisy.

At the end of the Guardian article
mentioned in #19, Dr Priyamvada Gopal proposed that Western governments
should terminate relations with a Modi national government if he wins
the election in India. There are of course arguments both for and
against the feasibility and practicality of such measures; it is also
possible that realpolitik will force Modi to moderate his stance one he
is Prime Minister (due to foreign trade/diplomatic ties, or if the BJP
has to form a coalition with other Indian parties). Nevertheless,
Western governments, intelligence agencies and business leaders should
certainly be apprised of the true ideology of a Modi regime. For the
international public record, these facts will therefore be reiterated
and expanded below.

******************************************************************

”HINDUTVA”/“HINDU NATIONALISM”, NAZISM, NARENDRA MODI AND THE RSS

Via The Independent:

Hindu fundamentalism, also called Hindutva, is driven
by a trio of organisations in India called the Sangh Parivar – the
family. The RSS is an ultra-conservative group that demands unflinching
patriotism and preservation of Hindu culture; the VHP is their religious
arm; the BJP is the political arm and India’s main opposition party.
There are smaller offshoots too including a violent paramilitary wing
called the Bajrang Dal and the hardline Shiv Sena party in Mumbai whose
founder adored Hitler.

“Hindu nationalism is built on the idea that India is a Hindu
majoritarian nation, with Muslims and Christians cast as the minority,
‘other’,” Rahul Verma, a journalist and researcher on the subject, says.
He says Hindu nationalism in recent years has fed off the Islamophobic,
post-9/11 “Muslim terrorist” narrative.

Chetan Bhatt, the director at the Centre for the Study of Human
Rights at the London School of Economics, has also spent years studying
this movement. “Narendra Modi has been an activist for the Hindu
far-right paramilitary RSS and its affiliates for the entirety of his
political life. He remains committed to the supremacist ideology of
Hindutva which says that India should be an exclusive Hindu nation
state in which minorities are treated as second-class citizens or
worse.”

1. V.D. SAVARKAR AND “HINDUTVA”

Savarkar
(1883-1966) coined the term “Hinduvta”, ie. Hindu Nationalism. Narendra
Modi openly describes himself as a “Hindu Nationalist”. Savakar wrote
numerous propaganda texts promoting this ideology and has been one of
its most influential figures. Savarkar was an atheist, which possibly
explains why Hindutva is stripped of Hinduism’s admirable pluralistic
religious ideals and ethical principles.

Savarkar was also one of the leaders of the Hindu Mahasabha,
a Far-Right Indian political party that multiple senior RSS founders
were also heavily involved with. The party’s core ideology is
essentially the same as that of the RSS.

The Hindu Mahasabha did not actively
support agitations against British rule in India. Under the leadership
of Mahatma Gandhi, the mainstream Indian independence movement led
several nationwide campaigns of non-violent civil disobedience; the
Hindu Mahasabha refused to endorse any of these campaigns and
participated in the legislative councils established by the British,
which were otherwise boycotted by Gandhi’s movement and most of the
Indian population.

Many readers will be aware of the following fact: In 1948, a year after India’s independence, a former member of the RSS
murdered Gandhi, primarily due to the latter’s desire for Hindu-Muslim
unity and his opposition to anti-Muslim bigotry. (Gandhi was also
staunchly opposed to Nazism and fascism). Furthermore, during the 1960s,
a formal judicial investigation in India (known as the Kapur
Commission) concluded
that Savarkar had been part of the conspiracy to kill Gandhi; the
assassins had even personally visited Savarkar shortly beforehand, who
blessed them “Be successful and return”. All of the assassins were prominent members of the Hindu Mahasabha.

Savarkar is on record as repeatedly
endorsing Hitler, the Nazis, and their treatment of religious
minorities. Examples of Savarkar’s statements are listed below.

(a) Praises Hitler, Nazism and Fascism:

[‘Speech on India’s Foreign Policy’, Poona, 3.11.1938,
quoted in “Veer Savarkar’s Whirlwind Propaganda”, A.S. Bhinde, Bombay,
1941, page 51-52] “Hitler knows better than Pandit [Jawaharlal] Nehru
does what suits Germany best. The very fact that Germany or Italy has so
wonderfully recovered and grown as powerful as never before at the
touch of the Nazi or Fascist magical wand is enough to prove that those
political ‘isms’ were the most congenial tonics their health
demanded…Pandit Nehru went out of his way when he took sides in the name
of all Indians against Germany and Italy. Pandit Nehru might claim to
express the Congress section in India at the most. But it should be made
clear to the German, Italian or Japanese public that [tens of millions]
of Hindu Sanghatanists in India who neither Pandit Nehru nor Congress
represents cherish no ill-will towards Germany or Italy or Japan or any
other country in the world simply because they had chosen a form of
Government or constitutional policy why they thought suited best and
contributed most to their national solidarity and strength.”

[Savarkar, speech in 1940]:
“There is no reason to suppose that Hitler must be a human monster
because he passes off as a Nazi…..Nazism proved undeniably the savior of
Germany under the set of circumstances Germany was placed in.”

(b) Praises expansionist Nazi Germany and multiple aspects of Nazi ideology:

After Nazi Germany’s invasion of
Czechoslovakia in March 1939, Savarkar’s Hindu Mahasabha (1) explicitly
adopted a pro-Nazi stance and (2) explicitly drew parallels between
Hindutva and Nazism’s “Aryan” cult.

[‘Speech on India’s Foreign Policy’, Poona, 1938, quoted
in “Veer Savarkar’s Whirlwind Propaganda”, A.S. Bhinde, Bombay, 1941,
page 53] ”Germany was perfectly justified in uniting the Austrian and
Sudeten Germans under the German flag…The fact is that when Germany was
weak, they [the British] partitioned [her] piecemeal. Now that Germany
is strong, why should she not strike to unite all Germans and
consolidate them into a pan-German State and realise the political dream
which millions of German people have cherished.”

[Via M. Casolari, Hindutva’s foreign tie-up in the 1930s: archival evidence]
In 1939, Savarkar’s Hindu Mahasabha celebrated Germany’s ‘solemn
revival of Aryan culture, the glorification of the Swastika, her
patronage of Vedic learning, and the ardent championship of the
tradition of Indo-Germanic civilisation’.

[Direct quote from the Hindu Mahasabha spokesman’s speech
in 1939] “Germany’s solemn idea of the revival of the Aryan culture,
the glorification of the Swastika, her patronage of Vedic learning and
the ardent championship of the tradition of Indo-Germanic civilization
are welcomed by the religious and sensible Hindus of India with a
jubilant hope. Only a few Socialists headed by Pundit J. Nehru have
created a bubble of resentment against the present government of
Germany, but their activities are far from having any significance in
India. The vain imprecations of Mahatma Gandhi against Germany’s
indispensable vigour in matters of internal policy obtain but little
regard in so far as they are uttered by a man who has always betrayed
and confused the country with affected mysticism. Germany’s crusade
against the enemies of Aryan culture will bring all the Aryan nations of
the world to their senses and awaken the Indian Hindus for the
restoration of their lost glory.”

[Via C. Jaffrelot, “The Hindu Nationalist Movement in
Indian Politics”, Hurst, London, 1996, pages 51-52] The Nazi newspaper
“Vokischer Beobachter” reported on Savarkar’s speeches in exchange for
the promotion of Germany’s anti-semitic policies in India.

[Via M. Casolari, ‘Hindutva’s foreign tie-up in the
1930s: archival evidence’] This resulted in Savarkar receiving a copy of
[Hitler’s autobiography] Mein Kampf from Germany.

(c) Duplicates Nazi concept of a “Fatherland”:

[From Savarkar’s propaganda book Hindutva or Who is a Hindu]
“The Aryans who settled in India at the dawn of history already formed a
nation, now embodied in the Hindus…..Hindus are bound together not only
by the love they bear to a common Fatherland and by the common blood
that courses through their veins and keeps our hearts throbbing and our
affection warm but also by the of the common homage we pay to our great
civilization, our Hindu culture.”

(d) Explicitly compares Indian Hindus and Muslims to Germans and Jews:

[Savarkar speaking at the 20th session of the Hindu
Mahasabha, held in Nagpur in 1938] “If you call it an Indian Nation it
is merely an English synonym for the Hindu Nation. To us Hindus,
Hindustan and India mean one and the same thing. We are Indians because
we are Hindus and vice versa…It is absurd to call us a community in
India. The Germans are the nation in Germany and the Jews a
community…..Even so the Hindus are the nation in India – in Hindustan,
and the Muslim minority a community”

[Savarkar speaking at the 21st session of the Hindu
Mahasabha, held in Calcutta in 1939] “Today we Hindus from Kashmir to
Madras and Sindh to Assam will be a nation by ourselves – while the
Indian Muslims are on the whole more inclined to identify themselves and
their interests with Muslims outside India than Hindus who live next
door, like Jews in Germany.”

(e) Explicitly states that Indian Muslims should be treated the way Nazis treated German Jews:

[Via V.D. Savarkar, “Hindu Rashtra Darshan”, G. Khare,
Bombay, 1949, page 65] “If they [Indian Muslims] grow stronger they can
play the part of Sudeten Germans alright. But if we Hindus in India grow
stronger in time these Muslim friends of the League type will have to
play the part of German-Jews instead. We Hindus have taught the Shakas
and the Huns already to play that part pretty well. So it is no use
bandying words till the test comes. The taste of the pudding is in its
eating.”

(f) Explicitly advocates the “Two Nation Theory”, reiterates parallels with Germany and Jews:

[Savarkar presiding over the 19th Hindu Mahasabha in
1937] “I warn the Hindus that the Mohammedans are likely to prove
dangerous to our Hindu Nation… India cannot be assumed today to be a
Unitarian and homogenous nation, but on the contrary there are two
nations in the main: the Hindus and the Muslims in India.”

[Savarkar, 15 August 1943, confirmed by the “Indian
Annual Register” 1943 vol.2 page 10] “I have no quarrel with Mr Jinnah’s
two-nation theory. We, Hindus, are a nation by ourselves and it is a
historical fact that Hindus and Muslims are two nations.”

[Savarkar presiding over the 20th Hindu Mahasabha in
1938] “The original political sin, which our Hindu
Congressites…committed at the beginning of the Indian National Congress
movement and are persistently committing still of running after the
mirage of a territorial Indian Nation and of seeking to kill as an
impediment in that fruitless pursuit the lifegrowth of an organic Hindu
Nation.….We Hindus are a Nation by ourselves because religious, racial,
cultural and historical affinities bind us intimately into a homogenous
nation.”

[Savarkar, October 1938] “A nation is formed by a
majority living therein. What did the Jews do in Germany? They being in
minority were driven out from Germany.”

[Savarkar, July 1939] “Nationality did not depend so much
on a common geographical area as on unity of thought, religion,
language and culture. For this reason the Germans and the Jews could not
be regarded as a nation.”

(g) Denigrates historical Hindu
warrior codes of chivalry towards women and explicitly states that Hindu
men should rape Muslim women:

[From Savarkar’s propaganda book The Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History,
specifically the chapter “Hindu Chivalry Towards Enemy Women”] “The
Muslim women never feared retribution or punishment at the hands of any
Hindu for their heinous crime. They [Hindus] had a perverted idea of
woman-chivalry…..Muslim women were sure that even in the thick of
battles and in the confusion wrought just after then neither the victor
Hindu Chiefs, nor any of their common soldiers, nor would any civilian
ever touch their hair. For ‘albeit enemies and atrocious, they were
women’ ! Hence, even when they were taken prisoner in battles the Muslim
women — royal ladies as also the commonest slaves — were invariably
sent back safe and sound to their respective families ! Such incidents
were common enough in those times. And this act was glorified by the
Hindus as their chivalry towards the enemy women and the generosity of
their religion !

…..The souls of…..millions of aggrieved [Hindu] women might have
perhaps said, ‘Do not forget, O, Your Majesty, Chhatrapati Shivaji
Maharaj [the 17th Century Maratha leader]…the unutterable atrocities and
oppression and outrage and committed on us by the Sultans and Muslim
noblemen and thousands of others, big and small. Let those Sultans
and their peers take a fright that in the event of a Hindu victory our
molestation and detestable lot shall be avenged on the Muslim women.
Once they are haunted with this dreadful apprehension that Muslim
women, too, stand in the same predicament in case the Hindus win, the
future Muslim conquerors will never dare think of such molestation of
Hindu women…..It was the suicidal Hindu idea of chivalry to women
which saved the Muslim women…..Their womanhood became their shield…..But
because of the then prevalent perverted religious ideas about chivalry
to women, which ultimately proved highly detrimental to the Hindu
community, neither Shivaji Maharaj nor Chimaji Appa could do such wrongs
to the Muslim women.

(h) Continues denigrating historical
Hindu chivalry towards Muslim women, explicitly states that Muslim women
should be forcibly converted to Hinduism:

[From Savarkar’s propaganda book “The Six Glorious Epochs
of Indian History”, specifically the chapter “Hindu Chivalry Towards
Enemy Women”] “Still worse was the ridiculous idea, which the Hindus of
those times entertained, that it was a sin to convert a Muslim woman to
Hinduism…..Naturally, even in the midst of a Hindu community and the
Hindu state they were secure against any attempt by the Hindus at
abducting them or their forcible conversion to Hinduism. Exceptions
however were very rare.

Under these circumstances, the Muslim feminine class was left
seraphically free from any chastisement or penalty for their share of
the crimes perpetrated against the Hindu woman-world…..”

(i) Denigrates Buddhism’s principle of universal brotherhood:

[From Savarkar’s propaganda book Essentials of Hindutva,
specifically the chapter “Buddhism – a universal religion”] “Buddhism
had made the first and yet the greatest attempt to propagate a universal
religion…..As long as the whole world was red in tooth and claw and the
national and racial distinction so strong as to make men brutal, so
long if India had to live at all a life whether spiritual or political
according to the right of her soul, she must not lose the strength born
of national and racial cohesion. So the [Hindu] leaders of thought and
action grew sick of repeating the [Buddhist] mumbos and jumbos of
universal brotherhood…..”

In the previous chapter, Savarkar had
already disparagingly referred to what he called “the mealy-mouthed
formulas of Ahimsa [non-violence] and universal brotherhood”.

(j) Promotes collaboration with British colonial authorities, refuses to support mainstream Indian independence movement:

Savarkar was originally involved in
activities opposing the British colonial rule of India; he primarily
advocated violent revolution and assassinations. After a member of
Savarkar’s revolutionary group killed a British official, British
authorities arrested and jailed Savarkar, sentencing him to life
imprisonment in the Andaman Islands. It was during his incarceration
that Savarkar wrote his “Hindutva” treatise (in the early 1920s), which
unequivocally depicted Muslims as the primary enemy.

Within a year of his imprisonment,
Savarkar also repeatedly contacted British authorities, appealing for
clemency; for example, in a sycophantic letter dated November 1913,
Savarkar wrote the following:

[Savarkar] “If the government in their manifold
beneficence and mercy release me, I for one cannot be but the staunchest
advocate of constitutional progress and loyalty to the English
government which is the foremost condition of that progress…..Moreover,
my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those
misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as
their guide…..The Mighty alone can afford to be merciful and therefore
where else can the prodigal son return but to the parental doors of the
government?”

From his incarceration onwards, the
primary targets of Savarkar’s hostility were Indian Muslims, not the
British colonial authorities who had actually imprisoned him and who
were continuing to rule India. After Savarkar’s early release in 1924,
he never participated again in any aspect of the Indian independence
movement.

In fact, in October 1939, as a leader of
the Hindu Mahasabha, Savarkar personally met the British Viceroy Lord
Linlithgow and explicitly offered to collaborate with the British
colonial authorities. Linlithgow spoke positively about the matter:

[Linlithgow] “The situation, [Savarkar] said, was that
His Majesty’s Government must now turn to the Hindus and work with their
support…..Our interests were now the same and we must work together.
Even though now the most moderate of men, he had himself been in the
past the adherent of a revolutionary party … But now that our interests
were so closely bound together the essential thing was for Hinduism and
Great Britain to be friends, and the old antagonism was no longer
necessary. The Hindu Mahasabha, he went on to say, favoured an
unambiguous undertaking of Dominion Status at the end of the war [as
opposed to India’s full independence]”

The mainstream “Quit India” movement was
launched in 1942; its leaders included Gandhi, Nehru and Sardar Patel.
At the time, when Gandhi asked Indians to resign from government jobs
with the British colonial authorities as part of the independence
movement’s campaign of non-violent non-cooperation, Savarkar ordered his followers to continue collaborating with the British:

[Savarkar] “I issue this definite instruction to all
Hindu Sanghatanists in general holding any post or position of vantage
in the government services, should stick to them and continue to perform
their regular duties.”

To quote this article in Frontline (part of The Hindu
media group): To summarise, Savarkar started out as a revolutionary,
abjectly renounced his principles in the Andamans, refused to join his
fellow prisoners in their struggle there, stayed away from all
anti-British activities after his release from prison, and, with his
virulent anti-Muslim campaign, ended up helping the British in their
policy of “divide and rule”.

And, of course, Savarkar was also one of the ringleaders of the cabal that murdered Mahatma Gandhi.

(k) Savarkar and betrayal:

In a speech directed at India’s royalty, Savarkar made the following statement:

[Via “Savarkar Commemoration Volume, page 82] “But anyone
who might have actively betrayed the trust of the people, disowned his
fathers, and debased his blood, by arraying himself against the Mother –
he shall be crushed to dust and ashes, and shall be looked upon as a
helot, a bastard, and a renegade.”

Considering the information
comprehensively documented above, readers can draw their own conclusions
about the extent to which Savarkar’s diatribe inadvertently applies to
himself.

(l) Narendra Modi repeatedly praises Savarkar:

As of 29 May 2013, Narendra Modi’s official website has displayed an article praising Savarkar,
which quotes Modi describing Savarkar as a “heroic man”, a “worshipper
of weapons” and a “worshipper of sacred texts”. Along with some
imaginative claims about Savarkar’s alleged contribution to India’s
freedom struggle against British imperialism, the article highlights the
fact that Modi “paid tributes” to Savarkar on the latter’s “130th birth
anniversary on 28th May 2013” at the Gujarat Vibhan Sabha [Gujarat
Legislative Assembly] at the state capital of Gandhinagar (Modi’s
website has publicised photos here).
The article also includes audio footage of a speech of Modi “going back
almost two decades, where he talks about the phenomenon Veer Savarkar
was”.

Leave a Reply