For The Welfare, Happiness, Peace of All Sentient and Non-Sentient Beings and for them to Attain Eternal Peace as Final Goal.
at
KUSHINARA NIBBANA BHUMI PAGODA-is a 18 feet Dia All White Pagoda with a table or, but be sure to having above head level based on the usual use of the room.
inCircarama
At
WHITE HOME
668, 5A main Road, 8th Cross, HAL III Stage,
Prabuddha Bharat Puniya Bhumi Bengaluru
Magadhi Karnataka State
PRABUDDHA BHARAT
May you, your family members and all sentient and non sentient beings be ever happy, well and secure!
May all live for 150 years
with NAD pills to be available in 2020 at a price of a cup of coffee
according to research doctors at Sydney!
May all have calm, quiet, alert and attentive and have equanimity mind with a clear understanding that everything is changing!
RSS favours paper ballots, EVMs subjected to public scrutiny
Today
the very same fraud EVMs which was doubted by RSS on Saturday, Aug 28
2010 has been tampered in favor of 1% RSS’s Bevakoof Jhoothe Psychopaths
(BJP) for Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) who WERE HATERS,
who ARE HATERS and will CONTINUE TO BE HATERS.
Though the Supreme
Court had ordered to replace all the fraud EVMs with fool proof voting
system that is being followed by 120 democries of the world and the
tried and tested paper ballots used in the recent UK elections, the ex
CJI chitpavan brahminised Sathasivan committed a grave error of
judgement in allowing the fraud EVMs to be replaced in phases as
suggested by the ex CEC chitpavan brahminised Sampath because of the
cost of Rs 1600 crore involved in replacing the
fraud EVMs totally.
AND
Once
again the chitpavan brahminised Supreme Court has to be pursued by
99.9% Sarvajan Samaj i.e., All Societies literates to SCRAP all the
Central and Sate Elections conducted with these fraud EVMs and order for
fresh elections with FOOL PROOF VOTING SYSTEM. Since the MEDIA has
become DEADWOOD for the 99% and ALIVE just for 0.1% chitpavan brahmins
and Baniyas HIGHLIGHT this issue both ONLINE by creating WEBSITES,
BLOGS, Emails, SMSs etc., and OFFLINE by taking the message directly to
the people.
|
Here are hardcore vipassanā instructions dealing with the
perception of impermanence for advanced meditators who are looking
forward to attaining Nibbāna.
|
29) Classical English,Roman, |
nibbāna·sappāyaṃ vo, bhikkhave, paṭipadaṃ desessāmi. taṃ suṇātha, sādhukaṃ manasi karotha; bhāsissāmi. katamā ca sā, bhikkhave, nibbāna·sappāyā paṭipadā? |
|
idha, bhikkhave, bhikkhu ‘cakkhuṃ aniccan‘ti passati, ‘rūpā aniccā‘ti passati, ‘cakkhu·viññāṇaṃ aniccan‘ti passati, ‘cakkhu·samphasso anicco‘ti passati, yam·p·idaṃ cakkhu·samphassa·paccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkham·a·sukhaṃ vā tam·pi aniccan‘ti passati. |
Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu understands: ‘the eye is impermanent’, he |
|
He understands: ‘the ear is impermanent’, he understands: ’sounds are |
|
He understands: ‘the nose is impermanent’, he understands: ’smells are |
|
He understands: ‘the tongue is impermanent’, he understands: ‘tastes are |
|
He understands: ‘the body is impermanent’, he understands: ‘bodily |
|
He understands: ‘the mind is impermanent’, he understands: ‘mental |
|
>> Sutta Piṭaka >> Saṃyutta Nikāya >> Saḷāyatana Saṃyutta
SN 35.147 (S iv 133) Aniccanibbānasappāya Sutta — The [perception] of impermanence suitable for Nibbāna —
[anicca+nibbāna+sappāya]Here
are hardcore vipassanā instructions dealing with the perception of impermanence for advanced meditators who are looking forward to attaining Nibbāna. in 05) Classical Pāḷi,29) Classical English,Roman, 05) Classical Pāḷi
nibbāna·sappāyaṃ
vo, bhikkhave, paṭipadaṃ desessāmi. taṃ suṇātha, sādhukaṃ manasi karotha; bhāsissāmi. katamā ca sā, bhikkhave, nibbāna·sappāyā paṭipadā? idha, bhikkhave, bhikkhu ‘cakkhuṃ aniccan’ti passati, ‘rūpā aniccā’ti passati, ‘cakkhu·viññāṇaṃ aniccan’ti passati, ‘cakkhu·samphasso anicco’ti passati, yam·p·idaṃ cakkhu·samphassa·paccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkham·a·sukhaṃ vā tam·pi aniccan’ti passati. ’sotaṃ aniccā’ti passati, ’saddā aniccā’ti passati, ’sota·viññāṇaṃ aniccan’ti passati, ’sota·samphasso anicco’ti passati, ‘yam·p·idaṃ sota·samphassa·paccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkham·a·sukhaṃ vā tam·pi aniccan’ti passati. ‘ghāṇaṃ aniccā’ti passati, ‘gandhā aniccā’ti passati, ‘ghāṇa·viññāṇaṃ aniccan’ti passati, ‘ghāṇa·samphasso anicco’ti passati, ‘yam·p·idaṃ ghāṇa·samphassa·paccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkham·a·sukhaṃ vā tam·pi aniccan’ti passati. ‘jivhā aniccā’ti passati, ‘rasā aniccā’ti passati, ‘jivhā·viññāṇaṃ
aniccan’ti passati, ‘jivhā·samphasso anicco’ti passati, ‘yam·p·idaṃ jivhā·samphassa·paccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkham·a·sukhaṃ vā tam·pi aniccan’ti passati. ‘kāyo aniccā’ti passati, ‘phoṭṭhabbā aniccā’ti passati, ‘kāya·viññāṇaṃ aniccan’ti passati, ‘kāya·samphasso anicco’ti passati, ‘yam·p·idaṃ kāya·samphassa·paccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkham·a·sukhaṃ vā tam·pi aniccan’ti passati. ‘mano anicco’ti passati, ‘dhammā aniccā’ti passati, ‘mano·viññāṇaṃ aniccan’ti passati, ‘mano·samphasso anicco’ti passati, ‘yam·p·idaṃ mano·samphassa·paccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkham·a·sukhaṃ vā tam·pi aniccan’ti passati. ayaṃ kho sā, bhikkhave, nibbāna·sappāyā paṭipadā ti.
29) Classical English,Roman,
I
will show you, bhikkhus, the method which is suitable for Nibbāna. Listen to that and pay close attention, I will speak. And what, bhikkhus, is that method which is suitable for Nibbāna? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu understands: ‘the eye is impermanent’, he understands: ‘(visible) forms are impermanent’, he understands: ‘eye-consciousness is impermanent’, he understands: ‘eye-contact is impermanent’,{1} he understands: ‘whatever arises on account of eye-contact, whether it is felt as pleasant, unpleasant or neutral, that also is impermanent’. He understands: ‘the ear is impermanent’, he understands: ’sounds are impermanent’, he understands: ‘ear-consciousness is impermanent’, he understands: ‘ear-contact is impermanent’, he understands: ‘whatever arises on account of ear-contact, whether it is felt as pleasant, unpleasant or neutral, that also is impermanent’. He understands: ‘the nose is impermanent’, he understands: ’smells are impermanent’, he understands: ‘nose-consciousness is impermanent’, he understands: ‘nose-contact is impermanent’, he understands: ‘whatever arises on account of nose-contact, whether it is felt as pleasant, unpleasant or neutral, that also is impermanent’. He understands: ‘the tongue is impermanent’, he understands: ‘tastes are impermanent’, he understands: ‘tongue-consciousness is impermanent’, he understands: ‘tongue-contact is impermanent’, he understands: ‘whatever arises on account of tongue-contact, whether it is felt as pleasant, unpleasant or neutral, that also is impermanent’. He understands: ‘the body is impermanent’, he understands: ‘bodily phenomena are impermanent’, he understands: ‘body-consciousness is impermanent’, he understands: ‘body-contact is impermanent’, he understands: ‘whatever arises on account of body-contact, whether it is felt as pleasant, unpleasant or neutral, that also is impermanent’. He understands: ‘the mind is impermanent’, he understands: ‘mental phenomena are impermanent’, he understands: ‘mind-consciousness is impermanent’, he understands: ‘mind-contact is impermanent’, he understands: ‘whatever arises on account of mind-contact, whether it is felt as pleasant, unpleasant or neutral, that also is impermanent’. This, bhikkhus, is that method which is suitable for Nibbāna. Chandrashekhara Ashtakam | Damaru | Adiyogi Chants | Sounds of Isha
Click on the link above for lyrics and other information on the album
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more music
Chandrashekara
Ashtakam is said to have been written by Sage Markandeya, an ancient Hindu Rishi who was saved by Chandrashekara or Lord Shiva from Lord of Death (Kala or Yama) at the age of 16 and blessed him to be 16 forever. In these verses, the sage seeks refuge in Chandrashekara, who is the destroyer of the various illusions and who is the personification of the three qualities and worshipped as the Lord of the Lords. “When he is by my side, what can the Lord of Death (Yama) do to me?”, asks Sage Markandeya. Subscribe to Sounds of Isha for more!
https://goo.gl/EeA3nt Subscribe to official Sadhguru Channel.
Chandrashekhara Ashtakam | Damaru | Adiyogi Chants | Sounds of Isha
On a day of widespread protests by political parties, Bahujan Samaj Party chief Mayawati called for the removal of the ‘incapable’ chief minister, causing the chairperson of the SC Commission to retort that Mayawati should remember her own time.
On Thursday, a note issued by former chief minister Mayawati tore into Yogi Adityanath saying if he could not protect the honour of women, he must resign.
She also said the government had not allowed a party delegation to meet the family of the gang-rape and murder victim in Hathras, and had called the deceased’s brother to the police station. “This is a very painful situation. It seems as if the victim’s family is being harassed. Under Yogi Adityanath, this has become common practice with the administration and the police”.
The BSP chief also called upon the Central government to pay attention to what was happening in the state and “make a capable person the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh”.
“If there is too much pressure of the RSS (Rowdy Swayam Sevaks) who are foreigners kicked out from Bene israel, Tibet, Africa Etc., chitpavan brahmins , the Centre should at least impose President’s rule in the state. For how long will it test Adityanath”, she said. https://www.theweek.in/…/mayawati-acts-against-rebel… Mayawati acts against ‘rebel’ MLAs, Latest flare-up in SP-BSP tension comes as the parties prepare for Rajya Sabha polls A day after a group of BSP MLAs met Akhilesh Yadav at the Samajwadi Party headquarters in Lucknow, BSP chief Mayawati on Thursday lashed out at her erstwhile ally. Mayawati also suspended the MLAs who met Akhilesh.
Hindustan Times reported the suspended MLAs are Chaudhary Aslam Ali, Hakim Lal Bind, Mohammad Mujtaba Siddiqui, Aslam Raini, Sushma Patel, Hargovind Bhargava and Bandana Singh.
The move by the BSP MLAs had triggered speculation they could join the Samajwadi Party amid claims that Mayawati has been close to the BJP.
The BSP and SP sewed up an alliance for the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, which fell apart after the BJP swept back to power.
Speaking to mediapersons on Thursday, Mayawati was quoted by ANI as saying, “Our party had joined hands with SP to fight communal forces during Lok Sabha elections. Due to their family in-fighting, they couldn’t gain much from ‘Gathbandhan’ with BSP. They stopped responding to us post-elections and hence, we decided to part ways with them.”
“I want to disclose that when we decided to contest polls with SP for Lok Sabha elections in UP, we worked very hard for it but from day 1 of our coalition, SP chief kept telling S.C. Mishra that since BSP-SP had joined hands, I should take back my June 1995 case,” Mayawati said. Mayawati was referring to an incident on June 2, 1995, when SP workers allegedly threatened to manhandle her at the government guest house in Lucknow. The incident ended the first alliance between the BSP and SP, which was in power in Uttar Pradesh at the time.
Mayawati told the mediapersons “When we saw Samajwadi Party’s behaviour towards us after Lok Sabha election results, we realised that we have committed a big mistake by taking back our 2nd June 1995 case against them and we shouldn’t have joined hands with them. We should’ve thought bit deeply.”
Mayawati declared that in order to defeat the Samajwadi Party, which holds the majority in the 100-member state Legislative Council, the BSP would vote for the BJP or other parties in future MLC polls. “We have decided that to defeat SP candidate in future MLC elections in UP, we will put all our force and even if we have to give our vote to BJP candidate or any party candidate, we’ll do it,” she said.
The latest flare-up in SP-BSP tension comes as the two parties prepare to contest elections for 10 Rajya Sabha seats from Uttar Pradesh on November 9. The SP has 48 members in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly and BSP only 18.
Four of the BSP MLAs who met Akhilesh had been among a group of 10 BSP MLAs who proposed the name of Ramji Gautam as the BSP’s candidate to one Rajya Sabha seat. The ‘rebel’ MLAs demanded the disqualification of the candidature of Gautam, alleging the signatures of the four “proposers” had been forged.
The SP is supporting industrialist Prakash Bajaj for the Rajya Sabha seat against Gautam. The BJP, which has 304 members in the 403 member UP Assembly, is contesting eight seats and is expected to win all eight comfortably.
The Print reported on Wednesday the ‘rebel’ BSP MLAs “have decided to quit the party because they are upset with what they perceive to be the party’s ‘internal agreement’ with the BJP for a Rajya Sabha seat”.
http://news.webindia123.com/…/India/20100828/1575461.html
RSS favours paper ballots, EVMs subjected to public scrutiny
New Delhi | Saturday, Aug 28 2010 IST
Joining the controversy regarding the reliablity of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) which have been questioned by political parties, the RSS today asked the Election Commission (EC) to revert back to tried and tested paper ballots and subject EVMs to public scrutiny whether these gadgets are tamper proof. In an editorial titled ‘Can we trust our EVMs?’, The Organiser, the RSS mouthpiece, noted it was a fact that till date an absolutely tamper-proof machine had not been invented and credibility of any system depends on ‘transparency, verifiability and trustworthiness’ than on blind and atavistic faith in its infallibility. The issue is
not a ‘private affair’ and it involves the future of India. Even if the EVMs were genuine, there was no reason for the EC to be touchy about it, the paper commented.
The Government and the EC can’t impose EVMs as a fait accompli on Indian democracy as the only option before the voter.
There were flaws like booth capturing, rigging, bogus voting, tampering and ballot paper snatching in the ballot paper system of polling leading the country to switch over to the EVMs and all these problems were relevant in EVMs too. Rigging was possible even at the counting stage.
What made the ballot papers voter-friendly was that all aberrations were taking place before the public eye and hence open for corrections whereas the manipulations in the EVMs is entirely in the hands of powers that be and the political appointees manning the sytem, the paper commented. The EVM has only one advantage — ’speed’ but that advantage has been undermined by the staggered polls at times spread over three to four months. ‘’This has already killed the fun of the election process,’’ the paper noted. Of the dozen General Elections held in the country, only two were through the EVMs and instead of rationally addressing the doubts aired by reputed institutions and experts the Government has resorted to silence its critics by ‘intimidation and arrests on false charges’, the paper observed, recalling the arrest of Hyederabad-based technocrat Hari Prasad by the Mumbai Police. Prasad’s research has proved that the EVMs were ‘vulnerable to fraud’. The authorities want to send a message that anybody who challenges the EC runs the risk of persecution and harassment, the RSS observed. Most
countries around the world looked at the EVMs with suspicion and countries like the Netherlands, Italy, Germany and Ireland had all reverted back to paper ballots shunning EVMs because they were ‘easy to falsify, risked eavesdropping and lacked transparency’. Democracy is too precious to be handed over to whims or an opaque establishment and network of unsafe gizmos. ‘’For the health of Indian democracy it is better to return to tried and tested methods or else elections in future
can turn out to be a farce,’’ the editorial said.
– (UNI) — 28DI28.xml
Today the very same fraud EVMs which was doubted by RSS on Saturday, Aug 28 2010 has been tampered in favor of 1% RSS’s Bevakoof Jhoothe Psychopaths (BJP) for Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) who WERE HATERS, who ARE HATERS and will CONTINUE TO BE HATERS.
Though the Supreme Court had ordered to replace all the fraud EVMs with fool proof voting system that is being followed by 120 democries of the world and the tried and tested paper ballots used in the recent UK elections, the ex CJI chitpavan brahminised Sathasivan committed a grave error of judgement in allowing the fraud EVMs to be replaced in phases as suggested by the ex CEC chitpavan brahminised Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 crore involved in replacing the
fraud EVMs totally.
Now the country is
OF
the fraud EVMs favored 1% Horrorist, Militant, Violent, Intolerant, Heckling, Lynching Stealth hindutva chitpawan brahmin RSS’s Bevakoof Jhoothe Psychopaths (BJP) for Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)!
BY
the fraud EVMs favored 0.1% Terrorist, Militant, Violent, Intolerant, Heckling, Stealth hindutva chitpawan brahmin RSS’s Bevakoof Jhoothe Psychopaths (BJP) for Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)!!
FOR
the fraud EVMs favored 1% Terrorist, Militant, Violent, Intolerant, Heckling, Stealth hindutva chitpawan brahmin RSS’s Bevakoof Jhoothe Psychopaths (BJP) for Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)!!!
AND
OFF
the 99% Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies including LOYAL Arogya Rakshakas (Safai Karmacharis)/SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities and Poor UpperCastes!
to
BUY
the 99% Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies including LOYAL Arogya Rakshakas (Safai Karmacharis)/SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities and Poor Upper Castes!
FAR
the 99% Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies including LOYAL Arogya Rakshakas (Safai Karmacharis)/SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities and Poor Upper
Castes!
Once again the chitpavan brahminised Supreme Court has to be pursued by 99.9% Sarvajan Samaj i.e., All Societies literates to SCRAP all the Central and Sate Elections conducted with these fraud EVMs and order for fresh elections with FOOL PROOF VOTING SYSTEM. Since the MEDIA has become DEADWOOD for the 99% and ALIVE just for 0.1% chitpavan brahmins and Baniyas HIGHLIGHT this issue both ONLINE by creating WEBSITES, BLOGS, Emails, SMSs etc., and OFFLINE by taking the message directly to the people.
Democracy at Risk ! Can we trust our Electronic Voting Machines?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saffron_terror Saffron terror or hindutva cult extremism is a neologism used to describe acts of violence motivated by hindutva cult or hindutvastan . Hindutva extremism is usually perpetrated by members, of hndutva cult organisations like Rowdy Swayam Sevak (RSS) or Abhinav Bharat. The term comes from the symbolic use of the saffron colour by many hndutva cult organisations. Term usage
The first known use of the term “Saffron Terror” is from a 2002 article in Frontline. However, it was in the aftermath of 29 September 2008 bomb blast in the predominantly Muslim town of Malegaon in Maharashtra that it came to be used widely.[9] In late 2008, Indian police arrested members of a Hindu cell allegedly involved in the Malegaon blasts. Former Home Minister of India P. Chidambaram urged Indians to beware of “Saffron terror” in August 2010 at a meeting of state police chiefs in New Delhi. Since making that remark, a Hindu swami in the Patan district has filed a defamation lawsuit against Chidambaram, saying that the saffron colour is a symbol of Hindu religion and that saints across the country wear attire of the same colour. The swami also said that saffron was a symbol of peace, sacrifice and God, and that Chidambaram has hurt the sentiments of Hindus by linking the symbol with terrorism. On 6 September 2010, a Gujarat court ordered a probe into the use of the term by Chidambaram. Chidambaram was also criticised by members of his own party (the Indian National Congress) for the use of the term, with Congress spokesman Janardhan Dwivedi claiming “terrorism does not have any colour other than black.”
The saffron colour appears in the party flags of various national parties of India like the Indian National Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). A saffron-coloured flag is commonly seen in most temples in India. Buddhist monks typically wear saffron robes as a symbol of wisdom.It has been claimed that the term “saffron terrorism” is a misnomer considering the historical descriptions of the saffron colour compared to the definitions of terrorism. Saffron is the colour of the upper band of the Indian national flag. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, who was India’s first Vice-President and second President, described the saffron colour as follows: “Bhagwa or the saffron colour denotes renunciation of disinterestedness. Our leaders must be indifferent to material gains and dedicate themselves to their work.” Criticism of the term
The term “saffron terror” has been called a “myth” by the journalist and BJP leader Balbir Punj, who claims that it is an invention of the Congress party to demonise their political opposition as “terrorists”.[20] Similar views have been expressed by other journalists in India.[21] Kanchan Gupta and Swapan Dasgupta have accused investigators of making statements using “saffron terror” to the media to promote the agenda of the Congress.Raman accused the media of measuring Muslim and Hindu suspects by different yardsticks.
The Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) president, Rajnath Singh, spoke of a “political conspiracy” aimed at the “vilification of Hindu saints and army officers in the name of Hindu terrorism”. The term “saffron terror” was prominently used by some Congress party members in this campaign, most prominently by Digvijaya Singh The BJP criticised these statements and filed a complaint with the Election Commission of India, citing it as a violation of the Model Code of Conduct for political parties. The Election Commission issued a show-cause notice to Digvijay Singh on this complaint.The Hindu spiritual leader Sri Sri Ravi Shankar has also criticised it, saying that it is a myth and insult to the Hindu religion, which he said is the most tolerant religion.
R.V.S Mani, a former officer in the Home Ministry, published a book Hindu Terror: Insider Account of Ministry of Home Affairs in 2018, alleging that the UPA government had forced Home Ministry officials to “manufacture” a false narrative about the presence of “Hindu terror”. Incidents
Hindutva cult extremist organisations have allegedly carried out terrorist attacks like 2006 Malegaon blasts, Mecca Masjid bombing (Hyderabad), Samjhauta Express bombings and the Ajmer sharif dargah blast. There are some links and connections with Islamist organisations with these blasts.
Arif Qasmani of Karachi has been specifically named by the notification on 1 July 2009, by the US Department of Treasury as involved in the Mumbai suburban train blasts of July 2006, and in the Samjhauta Express blast of February, 2007.
1999 killing of Graham Staines
The killing of Graham Staines has been cited as example of Saffron terror. Staines, a Christian missionary, and his two sons were burned to death in January 1999. In 2003, a Bajrang Dal activist, Dara Singh, was convicted of leading the gang that murdered Graham Staines and his sons, and was sentenced to life in prison.
2002 Gujarat riots
Main articles: 2002 Gujarat riots and Godhra train burning
The 2002 communal riots in Gujarat, where the majority of victims were Muslims, are attributed largely to “foot soldiers” of the hindutva cult movement. The riots are part of a recent rise of Hindu extremist movements in India that have been linked to Saffron terrorism.
2007 Samjhauta Express bombings
Main article: 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings
Twin blasts shook two coaches of the Samjhauta Express around midnight on 18 February 2007. Sixty-eight people were killed in the ensuing fire and dozens were injured. It has been allegedly linked to Abhinav Bharat, a Hindu fundamentalist group. In November 2008, it was reported that the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) suspected the attacks were linked to Prasad Shrikant Purohit, an Indian army officer and member of Abhinav Bharat. Purohit himself claimed that he had “infiltrated” the Abhinav Bharat. During an army’s Court of Inquiry, 59 witnesses stated to the court, along with Officers who testified, that Purohit was doing his job of gathering intelligence inputs by infiltrating extremist organisations. On 8 January 2011, Swami Aseemanand, a pracharak of the Rowdy Swayam Sevak (RSS), confessed that he was involved in the bombing of Samjhauta express, a statement he later claimed to have made under duress. Aseeman and claimed that he was tortured to give a false statement.
There have also been allegations that Lashkar-e-Taiba was responsible for the bombings.[45] The United States declared Arif Qasmani, a Pakistani national and alleged ‘LeT financier’, to be the chief coordinator of the 2006 train bombing in Mumbai as well as the 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings, and labelled him an international terrorist via the United Nations.
2007 Ajmer Dargah attack
Main article: Ajmer Dargah attack
The Ajmer Dargah blast occurred on 11 October 2007, outside the Dargah (shrine) of Sufi saint Moinuddin Chishti in Ajmer, Rajasthan, allegedly by the hindutva cultorganisation Roowdy Swayam Sevak (RSS) and its groups. On 22 October 2010, five accused perpetrators, of which four said to belong to the RSS, were arrested in connection with the blast. Swami Aseemanand, in his confession, implicated the then General Secretary Mohan Bhagwat for ordering the terrorist strike. Bhavesh Patel, another accused in the bombings, has corroborated these statements but later claimed that the Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde and some other Congress leaders forced him to implicate the RSS leaders.
2008 Malegaon blasts
Main article: 29 September 2008 western India bombings
On 29 September 2008, three bombs exploded in the States of Gujarat and Maharashtra killing 8 persons and injuring 80. During the investigation in Maharashtra, a Hindu group was alleged to have been involved in the blasts. Three of the arrested persons were identified as Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, Shiv Narayan Gopal Singh Kalsanghra and Shyam Bhawarlal Sahu. All three were produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s court in Nashik, which remanded them to custody till 3 November. On 28 October, the Shiv Sena, came out in support of the accused saying that the arrests were merely political in nature. Lending credence to this, the party chief, Uddhav Thackeray, pointed out a potential conflict of interest in political rivalry as the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) controlled the relevant ministry NIA, National Investigation Agency, has found no evidence against Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and it has recommended the court to drop all charges against her. following which Bombay High Court granted bail to Pragya Thakur on 22 April 2017.
The Army officer Prasad Shrikant Purohit was also accused of being involved in the blast. His counsel alleged that he was being falsely framed for political reasons because he has intelligence data of a sensitive nature pertaining to the operations of Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, which could embarrass some quarters.
2007 Mecca Masjid bombing
Main article: Mecca Masjid bombing
The Mecca Masjid bombing occurred on 18 May 2007 inside the Mecca Masjid, a mosque in Hyderabad. Fourteen people were reported dead in the immediate aftermath.[66] The National Investigation Agency,[67] Central Bureau of Investigation and Anti Terrorist Squad (India questioned former members of the RSS On 19 November 2010, the Central Bureau of Investigation produced Swami Aseemanand before the court in connection with the Blast. But later he has retracted the confession citing the mental and physical pressure to provide that confession. The Special investigation Team (SIT) of Hyderabad Police arrested ’south India commander’ of the LeT, identified as Shaik Abdul Khaja alias Amjad, from Afzalgunj area of the city. Police said that the arrestee was linked to Mohammed Abdul Shahid Bilal, key suspect in the bombing. In 2013, Yasin Bhatkal confessed that Indian Mujahideen had bombed two other places in Hyderabad later in August 2007 to avenge Mecca Masjid blast which was then allegedly attributed to Hindu fundamental groups.
The South Asia Terrorism Portal, the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, the National Counter Terrorism Centre the United States, and the United Nations reported that Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami was actually behind the attacks while excluding involvement by any Hindu group. Noting this, security analyst Bahukutumbi Raman has questioned “the two different versions that have emerged from Indian and American investigators.” The South Asia Terrorism Portal cited Vikar Ahmed as a main suspect in the blast. Mohammed Abdul Shahid Bilal, former chief of HuJI’s Indian operations, is also regarded as a key suspect in the Mecca Masjid bombing. Later he was shot by unknown gunmen in Karachi on 30 August 2007.
2018 Court Verdict
The NIA began the probe in April 2011 after the initial investigations by the local police and the chargesheet filed by the CBI. 226 witnesses were examined during the trial and about 411 documents exhibited. The verdict was pronounced by a special NIA court acquitting all the accused due to lack of evidence.
Other allegations
Members of Abhinav Bharat have been alleged to have been involved in a plot to kill Rowdy Swayam Sevak President Mohan Bhagwat, with the help of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence. Headlines Today released a recorded video tested by the Central Forensic Science Laboratory which indicated the uncovering of an alleged plot to assassinate the Vice-President of India Hamid Ansari. Tehelka also released alleged audio tape transcripts of main conspirators of Abhinav Bharat, which indicated involvement of Military intelligence officers with the Abhinav Bharat group, in their January 2011 edition.
The Indian Home Secretary Raj Kumar Singh said that at least 10 people having close links with the Rowdy Swayam Sevak (RSS) and its affiliated organisations were named accused in various acts of terror across India.
According to released documents by WikiLeaks, Congress(I) party’s general secretary Rahul Gandhi remarked to US Ambassador Timothy Roemer, at a luncheon hosted by Prime Minister of India at his residence in July 2009, that the RSS was a “bigger threat” to India than the Lashkar-e-Tayiba. At The Annual Conference of Director Generals of Police held in New Delhi on 16 September 2011, a special director of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) reportedly informed the state police chiefs that hindutva cult activists have either been suspected or are under investigation in 16 incidents of bomb blasts in the country. Now the RSS chief says that he has no faith in god as the COVID-19 virus is not helping any believers in god:
BSP
chief Mayawati makes ugly personal attack at PM Modi, says ‘wives of
BJP leaders are wary he’ll make their husbands leave them’
Friends
https://indianexpress.com/…/farm-bills-anti-farmer…/
Farm bills anti-farmer, will help rich: Mayawati and Akhilesh
The
Lok Sabha on Thursday passed The Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce
(Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020 and The Farmers (Empowerment and
Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020
Bahujan
Samaj Party (BSP) chief Mayawati and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh
Yadav on Friday slammed the BJP government at the Centre for the farm
Bills, calling them “anti-farmer” and “pro-rich”.
The Lok Sabha on
Thursday passed The Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and
Facilitation) Bill, 2020 and The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection)
Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020.
Questioning
the manner in which the Bills were passed in the Lok Sabha, Mayawati
said, “Sansad mein kisanon se jure do Bill, unki sabhi shankaon ko door
kiye bina hi, kal paas kar diye gaye hain. Ush se BSP katai sehmat nahi
hai. (Two Bills related to farmers were passed in Parliament yesterday
without clearing doubts related to them. The BSP does not approve of it
at all.” She further said, “What does farmer of the entire country want?
It would be better if the Central government pays attention in this
direction.”
Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav termed the two farm
Bills “pro-rich and anti-farming”, and said that once they come into
effect, they would reduce the farmers as mere labourers on their own
fields and would take away their right of getting appropriate price for
their crop.
“BJP sarkar kheti ko ameeron ke hathon girwi rakhne ke
liye shoshankari vidheyak layi hai.” (The BJP government has brought
these Bills, which would mortgage the farms in the hands of rich and
will exploit them).”
Akhilesh further said that these Bills were
being passed “to end the protection given to the farmers and slowly
finish the mandis where farmers sell their crop at minimum support price
(MSP). He said that in the future, the minimum support price to farmers
would be done away with and farmers will just work as labourers in
their own fields (“Woh apni hi jameen par majdoor ban jayenge”).
In Parliament too, members of the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party have joined the Opposition ranks to oppose the Bills.
Farm bills anti-farmer, will help rich: Mayawati and Akhilesh
0:00 / 46:20
|