LESSON 107 Maha punnama Sutta The Great Full moon Night Discourse 10 12 2010 FREE ONLINE eNÄlandÄ Research and Practice UNIVERSITY
Awakeness Practices
|
Traditionally the are 84,000 Dharma Doors - 84,000 ways to get Awakeness. Maybe so; certainly the Buddha taught a large number of practices that lead to Awakeness. This web page attempts to catalogue those found in the Pali Suttas (DN, MN, SN, AN, Ud & Sn 1). There are 3 sections: |
The discourses of Buddha are divided into 84,000, as to separate addresses. The division includes all that was spoken by Buddha.āI received from Buddha,ā said Ananda, ā82,000 Khandas, and from the priests 2000; these are 84,000 Khandas maintained by me.ā They are divided into 275,250, as to the stanzas of the original text, and into 361,550, as to the stanzas of the commentary. All the discourses including both those of Buddha and those of the commentator, are divided into 2,547 banawaras, containing 737,000 stanzas, and 29,368,000 separate letters.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.109.than.html
MN 109
PTS: M iii 15
Maha-punnama Sutta: The Great Full-moon Night Discourse
translated from the Pali by
Thanissaro Bhikkhu
I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Savatthi in the Eastern Monastery, the palace of Migara’s mother. And on that occasion ā the uposatha of the fifteenth, the night of a very full moon ā he was sitting out in the open with the community of monks.
Then a certain monk, rising from his seat, arranging his robe over one shoulder, and placing his hands palm-to-palm over the heart, said to the Blessed One: “Lord, there is an area where, if the Blessed One would give me leave, I would like the answer to a question.”
“Very well, then, monk. Sit back down in your seat and ask whatever you want.”
Responding to the Blessed One, “Yes, lord,” the monk sat back down in his seat and said to the Blessed One, “Aren’t these the five clinging-aggregates, i.e., form as a clinging-aggregate, feeling… perception… fabrications… consciousness as a clinging-aggregate.”
“Monk, these are the five clinging-aggregates, i.e., form as a clinging-aggregate, feeling… perception… fabrications… consciousness as a clinging-aggregate.”
Saying, “Very good, lord,” the monk delighted & approved of the Blessed One’s words and then asked him a further question: “But in what, lord, are these five clinging-aggregates rooted?”
“Monk, these five clinging-aggregates are rooted in desire.”
Saying, “Very good, lord,” the monk… asked him a further question: “Is clinging the same thing as the five clinging-aggregates, or is clinging separate from the five clinging-aggregates?”
“Monk, clinging is neither the same thing as the five clinging-aggregates, nor is it separate from the five clinging-aggregates. Just that whatever passion & delight is there, that’s the clinging there.”
Saying, “Very good, lord,” the monk… asked him a further question: “Might there be diversity in the desire & passion for the five clinging-aggregates?”
“There might, monk. There is the case where the thought occurs to someone, ‘May I be one with such a form in the future. May I be one with such a feeling… perception… fabrications… such a consciousness in the future. This is how there would be diversity in the desire & passion for the five clinging-aggregates.”
Saying, “Very good, lord,” the monk… asked him a further question: “To what extent does the designation ‘aggregate’ apply to the aggregates?”
“Monk, whatever form is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: that is called the aggregate of form. Whatever feeling is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: that is called the aggregate of feeling. Whatever perception is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: that is called the aggregate of perception. Whatever fabrications are past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: those are called the aggregate of fabrication. Whatever consciousness is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: that is called the aggregate of consciousness.[1] This is the extent to which the term ‘aggregate’ applies to the aggregates.”
Saying, “Very good, lord,” the monk… asked him a further question: “Lord, what is the cause, what the condition, for the delineation[2] of the aggregate of form? What is the cause, what the condition, for the delineation of the aggregate of feeling… perception… fabrications… consciousness?”
“Monk, the four great existents (earth, water, fire, & wind) are the cause, the four great existents the condition, for the delineation of the aggregate of form. Contact is the cause, contact the condition, for the delineation of the aggregate of feeling. Contact is the cause, contact the condition, for the delineation of the aggregate of perception. Contact is the cause, contact the condition, for the delineation of the aggregate of fabrications. Name-&-form is the cause, name-&-form the condition, for the delineation of the aggregate of consciousness.”
Saying, “Very good, lord,” the monk… asked him a further question: “Lord, how does self-identity view come about?”
“There is the case, monk, where an uninstructed, run-of-the-mill person ā who has no regard for noble ones, is not well-versed or disciplined in their Dhamma; who has no regard for men of integrity, is not well-versed or disciplined in their Dhamma ā assumes form to be the self, or the self as possessing form, or form as in the self, or the self as in form.
“He assumes feeling to be the self, or the self as possessing feeling, or feeling as in the self, or the self as in feeling. He assumes perception to be the self, or the self as possessing perception, or perception as in the self, or the self as in perception. He assumes fabrications to be the self, or the self as possessing fabrications, or fabrications as in the self, or the self as in fabrications. He assumes consciousness to be the self, or the self as possessing consciousness, or consciousness as in the self, or the self as in consciousness.
“This, monk, is how self-identity view comes about.”
Saying, “Very good, lord,” the monk… asked him a further question: “Lord, how does self-identity view no longer come about?”
“There is the case, monk, where a well-instructed disciple of the noble ones ā who has regard for nobles ones, is well-versed & disciplined in their Dhamma; who has regard for men of integrity, is well-versed & disciplined in their Dhamma ā does not assume form to be the self, or the self as possessing form, or form as in the self, or the self as in form. He does not assume feeling to be the self… does not assume perception to be the self… does not assume fabrications to be the self… He does not assume consciousness to be the self, or the self as possessing consciousness, or consciousness as in the self, or the self as in consciousness.
“This, monk, is how self-identity view no longer comes about.”
Saying, “Very good, lord,” the monk… asked him a further question: “What, lord, is the allure of form? What is its drawback? What is the escape from it? What is the allure of feeling… perception… fabrications… consciousness? What is its drawback? What is the escape from it?”
“Monk, whatever pleasure & joy arises dependent on form: that is the allure of form. The fact that form is inconstant, stressful, subject to change: that is the drawback of form. The subduing of desire & passion, the abandoning of desire & passion for form: that is the escape from form.
“Whatever pleasure & joy arises dependent on feeling: that is the allure of feeling…
“Whatever pleasure & joy arises dependent on perception: that is the allure of perception…
“Whatever pleasure & joy arises dependent on fabrications: that is the allure of fabrications…
“Whatever pleasure & joy arises dependent on consciousness: that is the allure of consciousness. The fact that consciousness is inconstant, stressful, subject to change: that is the drawback of consciousness. The subduing of desire & passion, the abandoning of desire & passion for consciousness: that is the escape from consciousness.”
Saying, “Very good, lord,” the monk… asked him a further question: “Knowing in what way, seeing in what way, is there ā with regard to this body endowed with consciousness, and with regard to all external signs ā no longer any I-making, or my-making, or obsession with conceit?”
“Monk, one sees any form whatsoever ā past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near ā every form, as it actually is with right discernment: ‘This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am.’
“One sees any feeling whatsoever… any perception whatsoever… any fabrications whatsoever…
“One sees any consciousness whatsoever ā past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near ā every consciousness ā as it actually is with right discernment: ‘This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am.’”
“Monk, knowing in this way, seeing in this way, there is ā with regard to this body endowed with consciousness, and with regard to all external signs ā no longer any I-making, or my-making, or obsession with conceit.”
Now at that moment this line of thinking appeared in the awareness of a certain monk: “So ā form is not-self, feeling is not-self, perception is not-self, fabrications are not-self, consciousness is not-self. Then what self will be touched by the actions done by what is not-self?”
Then the Blessed One, realizing with his awareness the line of thinking in that monk’s awareness, addressed the monks: “It’s possible that a senseless person ā immersed in ignorance, overcome with craving ā might think that he could outsmart the Teacher’s message in this way: ‘So ā form is not-self, feeling is not-self, perception is not-self, fabrications are not-self, consciousness is not-self. Then what self will be touched by the actions done by what is not-self?’ Now, monks, haven’t I trained you in counter-questioning with regard to this & that topic here & there? What do you think ā Is form constant or inconstant?” “Inconstant, lord.” “And is that which is inconstant easeful or stressful?” “Stressful, lord.” “And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful, subject to change as: ‘This is mine. This is my self. This is what I am’?”
“No, lord.”
“… Is feeling constant or inconstant?” “Inconstant, lord.”…
“… Is perception constant or inconstant?” “Inconstant, lord.”…
“… Are fabrications constant or inconstant?” “Inconstant, lord.”…
“What do you think, monks ā Is consciousness constant or inconstant?” “Inconstant, lord.” “And is that which is inconstant easeful or stressful?” “Stressful, lord.” “And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful, subject to change as: ‘This is mine. This is my self. This is what I am’?”
“No, lord.”
“Thus, monks, any form whatsoever that is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: every form is to be seen as it actually is with right discernment as: ‘This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am.’
“Any feeling whatsoever…
“Any perception whatsoever…
“Any fabrications whatsoever…
“Any consciousness whatsoever that is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: every consciousness is to be seen as it actually is with right discernment as: ‘This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am.’
“Seeing thus, the instructed disciple of the noble ones grows disenchanted with form, disenchanted with feeling, disenchanted with perception, disenchanted with fabrications, disenchanted with consciousness. Disenchanted, he becomes dispassionate. Through dispassion, he is fully released. With full release, there is the knowledge, ‘Fully released.’ He discerns that ‘Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, the task done. There is nothing further for this world.’”
That is what the Blessed One said. Gratified, the monks delighted in the Blessed One’s words. And while this explanation was being given, the minds of sixty monks, through no clinging (not being sustained), were fully released from fermentations.
1.
One form of consciousness apparently does not come under the aggregate of consciousness. This is termed viƱƱanam anidassanam ā consciousness without a surface, or consciousness without feature. MN 49 says specifically that this consciousness does not partake of the “allness of the all,” the “all” being conterminous with the five aggregates. The standard definition of the aggregate of consciousness states that this aggregate includes all consciousness, “past, present, or future… near or far.” However, because viƱƱanam anidassanam stands outside of space and time it would not be covered by these terms. Similarly, whereSN 22.97 says that no consciousness is eternal, “eternal” is a concept that applies only within the dimension of time, and thus would not apply to this form of consciousness.
2.
Delineation (paƱƱapana) literally means, “making discernible.” This apparently refers to the intentional aspect of perception, which takes the objective side of experience and fabricates it into discernible objects. In the case of the aggregates, the four great existents, contact, and name-&-form provide the objective basis for discerning them, while the process of fabrication takes the raw material provided by the objective basis and turns it into discernible instances of the aggregates. This process is described in slightly different terms in SN 22.79.
BUDDHA (EDUCATE)! DHAMMA (MEDITATE)! SANGHA (ORGANISE)!
WISDOM IS POWER
Awakened One Shows the Path to Attain Ultimate Bliss
Using such an instrument
The Free ONLINE e-NÄlandÄ Research and Practice University has been re-organized to function through the following Schools of Learning :
Buddhaās Sangha Practiced His Dhamma Free of cost, hence the Free- e-NÄlandÄ Research and Practice University follows suit
As the Original NÄlandÄ University did not offer any Degree, so also the Free e-NÄlandÄ Research and Practice University.
The teachings of Buddha are eternal, but even then Buddha did not proclaim them to be infallible. The religion of Buddha has the capacity to change according to times, a quality which no other religion can claim to haveā¦Now what is the basis of Buddhism? If you study carefully, you will see that Buddhism is based on reason. There is an element of flexibility inherent in it, which is not found in any other religion.
Ā§ Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar , Indian scholar, philosopher and architect of Constitution of India, in his writing and speeches
I.
KAMMA
AWAKEN-NESS
II.
ARHAT
TWELVEFOLD CONDITIONED ARISING
III.
IV.
FOUR APPLICATIONS OF MINDFULNESS
V.
FIVE TYPES OF BUDDHIST STUDY AND PRACTICE
MAHAYANA AND HINAYANA COMPARED
VI.
with
Level I: Introduction to Buddhism
Level II: Buddhist Studies
TO ATTAIN
Level III: Stream-Enterer
Level IV: Once - Returner
Level V: Non-Returner
Level VI: Arhat
Jambudvipa, i.e, PraBuddha Bharath scientific thought in
mathematics,
astronomy,
alchemy,
and
anatomy
Philosophy and Comparative Religions;
Historical Studies;
International Relations and Peace Studies;
Business Management in relation to Public Policy and Development Studies;
Languages and Literature;
and Ecology and Environmental Studies
Welcome to the Free Online e-NÄlandÄ Research and Practice University
GOOD GOVERNANCE
Press Information Bureau
(C.M. Information Campus)
Information & Public Relations Department, U.P.
Honāble C.M. ji orders officers to strengthen security arrangement of the State
Arrest culprits of Varanasi incident immediately
C.M. reviews progress of investigation of Varanasi blast incident
Lucknow : 09 December 2010
The Honāble Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh Ms. Mayawati ji, in the
light of Varanasi incident, has directed the officers to strengthen the security
arrangement of the State and asked them to remain vigilant against such
incidents. She directed the officers to formulate a new security arrangement
for very sensitive and important religious and tourist places and said that it
should be implemented immediately. She said that her government would
not compromise on the issue of law and order.
The Honāble Chief Minister ji was reviewing the progress of the
investigation of the December 07 Varanasi blast incident by the security
agencies at a high level meeting held at her official residence here today.
She said that the culprits of the Varanasi blast should be arrested
immediately.
The Honāble Chief Minister ji directed the DGP to conduct review of law
and order of all the districts of the State today itself through video
conferencing and asked him to ensure that all the Divisional Commissioners,
IG Range, DIG, DM and SSP/SP were present during the meeting. She said
that all the officers should be informed in clear terms that any laxity in law
and order of the State would not be tolerated (by the Honāble Chief Minister
ji) and stringent action would be initiated against the guilty.
The Honāble Chief Minister ji said that the officers of the administration
and the police should ensure that the criminal elements could not disturb the
law and order of the State at any cost. Expressing her concern over the
various incidents which occurred in Varanasi during past few years, she said
that blasts at Dashashwmedh Ghat (2005), Sankat Mochan Mandir and
railway station (2006) and in court premises (2007) occurred in the past.
She said that the security of Varanasi and other important cities should be
focused specially, so that the criminal elements did not succeed in their
nefarious designs. She directed the officers to deal strictly with mischievous
elements and rumour mongers.
During the meeting, the officers updated the Honāble Chief Minister ji
about the progress of the investigation of the Varanasi incident. The Cabinet
Secretary Mr. Shashank Shekhar Singh, Additional Cabinet Secretary Mr. Net
Ram, DGP Mr. Karam Veer Singh and other senior officers were present at
the meeting.
*********
State Government committed to provide stern punishment to all persons involved in food-grain scam
āHonāble Chief Minister jiState Government will comply with orders of Honāble High Court
Decision for CBI inquiry into food-grain scam was taken on 1st December 2007 by our governmentLucknow : 09 December 2010
The Honāble Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh Ms. Mayawati ji, has
said that the State Government was committed to providing stringent
punishment to all persons involved in food-grain scam. She said that the
State Government would fully comply with the orders passed by Honāble
High Court on 3
rd December 2010 in this regard. She directed to theagencies investigating the food-grain scam to complete the inquiry in
scheduled time, so that stern punishment could be given to the guilty
persons.
The Honāble Chief Minister ji said that after the formation of her
government in 2007, she had taken the decision for inquiry into the
biggest food-grain scam between March 2004 and October 2005. She said
that she was deeply shocked with this anti-human criminal act, which
deprived poor from their food. Therefore, she directed the officers to get
all inquiries done by special investigation team (SIT) with a view to
providing stringent punishment to those persons who sold the food-grains
of Sampoorn Gramin Rozgar Yojana, Public distribution system and midday
meal scheme and filled their pockets.
The Honāble Chief Minister ji said with the formation of her
government she had given warning that her government would not spare
the guilty persons involved in any scam. This food-grain scam took place
during the regime of earlier SP Government and she had made the
apprehension that the prominent SP Government office bearers, officers
and persons belonging to Central Government were involved in this scam.
She said that punishment would be compulsorily given to contractor,
transporter, exporter, officer, employee and anybody found guilty in this
scam. She had directed the agencies making inquiry into food-grain scam
that according to the orders of Honāble High Court, if any person was
found involved in the scam even after the year of 2007, then such
persons should not be spared at any cost and stringent action should be
taken against them also.
The Honāble Chief Minister ji said that one month after coming in
power, she had directed the officers to get food-grain scam inquiry done
by SIT, which took place in Gonda, Ballia and Lakhimpur districts.
Besides, she had directed the officers for the inquiry about the role of
Food Department in 30 districts and Essential Commodities Corporation in
24 districts. Decision had been also taken for the inquiry by SIT into the
food-grain scam under Sampoorn Gramin Rozgar Yojana in Sant Kabir
Nagar district on 26
th April 2008.The Honāble Chief Minister ji has directed that stringent punishment
should be given to the persons involved in food-grain scam in accordance
with law after completion of inquiry soon. Keeping this in view, the State
Government is providing full cooperation to CBI and all necessary
facilities and additional human resource have been made available to CBI
in connection of inquiry.
It may be recalled that after the inquiry of SIT, facts came to light
that food-grains of different government schemes were sold in open
markets under a well planned conspiracy through forged documents,
owing to which State and Central Government ex-chequer suffered a
huge loss. This large scale food-grain scam had National and
International dimensions, because food-grain were sent to other States
and Countries also. Besides, prominent persons and officers on high-level
posts were involved in this criminal act. Keeping in view, the role of public
servants in this criminal act, SIT made the recommendation to hold the
inquiry into the entire case by CBI, because CBI has enough resources for
making investigation into such criminal acts.
The State Government, in this light, decided to recommend CBI
inquiry into the food-grain scam on 01 December 2007 and sent a letter
requesting the Ministry of Personnel, Government of India to conduct CBI
inquiry in the entire scam. On 28 March 2008, the Union Personnel
Ministry, informed the State Government that the ambit of this
investigation was very wide and owing to it the CBI could not investigate
this case. Therefore, the State Government should conduct an inquiry into
the case on its own. Again CBI, after having discussions with the State
Investigating Agency, took over 09 major food-grain scams of Ballia and
Lakhimpur Kheri districts on 03 November 2008.
The Honāble High Court, in its 19 November 2007 order, has
mentioned that the food-grain irregularities committed in 2002-03 and
2003-04 were minor issues. During these years, any case of transporting
food-grain from railway wagons to other parts of the State or the country
was not detected. On this basis, the State Government decided to
conduct CBI inquiry of serious food-grain scams that took place during
March 2004 and October 2005. The Honāble Court, considering the wide
scope of the issue, involvement of senior officers of Central and State
Governments and its inter-state and international dimensions, concluded
that the recommendation of the State Government for conducting CBI
inquiry of the scams was correct and proper.
Following the orders of the Honāble High Court, a coordination
committee headed by Joint Director CBI had been set up to monitor the
progress of investigation of the food-grain scam. The heads of all the
investigating agencies and the Food Commissioner were members of this
committee. The S.I.T. conducted inquiry of the food-grain scams
committed in Shahjahanpur, Lalitpur, Sant Ravidas Nagar, Basti, Ramabai
Nagar, Hardoi and Allahabad districts, while the E.O.W. investigated
scams committed in Sant Kabir Nagar, Hamirpur, Mahoba, Mathura and
Jaunpur districts, the food cell conducted inquiry into the scams
committed in Bahraich, Shravasti and Balrampur districts and CBI
conducted inquiry into the scams committed in Ballia, Lakhimpur Kheri
and Sitapur districts.
In compliance with the 03 December 2010 orders of the Honāble
High Court, the State Government has handed over the inquiry of the
food-grain scams committed in Gonda, Varanasi and Lucknow districts to
the CBI The Honāble High Court, in its order, said that if any agency
discovered that the food-grain had been transported out of country/state,
then the CBI would investigate that case and the culprit would not be
spared at any cost. Besides, the Honāble High Court has further ordered
that after the filing of the charge-sheet, the trial court would complete
proceedings within a year on priority basis.
*********
Provide similar facilities to U.P. as provided to Maharashtra Government after Mumbai blast
Honāble C.M. ji requests Centre to provide 125 companies of Central Security Forces to protect religious and tourist places
Honāble C.M. ji writes letter to Prime Minister
Lucknow : 08 December, 2010
Honāble Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh Ms. Mayawati ji has
requested the Government of India to provide 125 companies of
Central Security Forces, besides other resources, to protect important
religious and tourist places of the State. She said that the issues
related with development and national security should not be viewed
through political angle. She had visited the site of incident late
yesterday night and directed the authorities to provide adequate
medical facilities to the injured persons. She announced an ex-gratia
of Rs. 1 lakh to the family members of the deceased girl, Rs. 50,000
assistance for seriously injured persons and Rs. 25,000 assistance for
those suffering minor injuries.
Honāble Chief Minister ji, in her letter, sent to the Prime Minister
Dr. Manmohan Singh, has written that the State Government took
yesterdayās blast at the Sheetla Ghat Varanasi very seriously and sent
two senior ministers, chief secretary and DGP immediately to the site
of accident. She directed these officers to ensure that the injured
persons got proper medical attention and also to ensure other
necessary arrangements. She said that to investigate the matter
seriously, special teams of ATS and BDDS were rushed to Varanasi in
the night itself, besides the forensic team from Agra. All these teams
were seriously investigating this accident.
Honāble Chief Minister ji, in her letter, said that for almost one
decade the terrorist incidents had been taking place in the State and
to effectively control these incidents, the State needed additional
companies of Central Security Forces. She said that the religious and
tourist places would have to be protected for a long time. She said
that the Central intelligence agencies did not give any specific
information to the State Government.
Ms. Mayawati ji said that the Indian Mujahideen, in the light of
this incident, had sent an e-mail to all the newspapers and electronic
media saying that the Babari Masjid demolition would be avenged in
this way continuously. She said that after the Honāble High Courtās
verdict on Ayodhya issue, her government had taken effective steps to
maintain the law and order and peace in the State through its limited
resources. She said that owing to these steps the State remained calm
and no untoward incident occurred and law and order and communal
harmony of the State remained intact.
Honāble Chief Minister ji said that U.P. was the most populous
State of the country having a population of more than 20 crores. The
State had several religious places like Ayodhya and Varanasi, which
had special importance for the followers of various religions and sects
coming from country and abroad. She said that 18 big terrorist
incidents had occurred in U.P. since year 2000 and 80 persons lost
their lives in these incidents. These incidents included blasts at
Dashashwmedh Ghat (2005), Sankat Mochan Mandir and railway
station (2006) and 3 blasts in court premises (2007). All of them
occurred in Varanasi itself. The terrorist attack at the CRPF group
centre Rampur is also included in it.
Honāble Chief Minister ji said that the terrorist elements were
constantly targeting U.P.ās religious and tourist places of various
communities to disturb the peace and order of the State. She said that
extensive security arrangements at these important places were
required for future, so that the criminals and disruptive elements did
not succeed in disturbing the peace and order of the State as well as
the country.
Besides, Honāble Chief Minister ji said that terrorism was a
national problem and until the Central Government did not make solid
arrangements to protect the international borders of the country, it
would not be possible to stop such incidents. She said that the
problem of terrorism should not be left for the States as it is not
correct in the interest of the country.
The Honāble Chief Minister said that Central Government had to
take stern steps to root-out terrorism. She said that terrorists take
entry through international borders and perform terroristsā activities.
She said that the State Government understands its responsibility.
After the verdict of high court in Ayodhya controversy, peaceful
atmosphere remained in the State, owing to which peace was
maintained in the whole country. Similarly, no terrorist incident took
place in the State on 06 December, she added.
The Honāble Chief Minister said that terrorist incident of Varanasi,
or Mumbai or Ahmedabad or Delhi could not be prevented by all these
State Governments, unless the Central Government rises above the
party politics and equip every state with modern weapons available to
terrorists. She said that the Central Government should provide all
necessary facilities to the State Government like the Maharashtra
Government after the Mumbai Blast.
The Honāble Chief Minister said that as far as the question of
Varanasi Blast is concerned, it has to be made clear that Central
Intelligence Agencies had not given any confirmed intelligence
information in this regard. Therefore, it is far from the fact to say that
State Government had been alerted several times regarding this
incident. She said that no state government should be held fully
responsible for such terrorist incidents. Whether, the State
Governments could be held solely responsible for the serial blasts in
Gujarat in 26 July, 2008 in which 53 persons died and Mumbai blast
held two years earlier in which hundreds of persons died or terrorist
incidents held in Delhi, she asked.
Against the backdrop of former Union Minister and Senior BJP MP
Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi who held the State Government responsible,
the Honāble Chief Minister asked that when the blast took place in
Gujarat, what the Honāble Chief Minister of Gujarat was doing. On the
statement of Union Home Minister Mr. P. Chidambaram, she remarked
that the State Government had not received and confirmed āActionable
Specific Intelligence Inputā from the Central Government.
*********