The Western canon is the body of books, music, and art that scholars generally accept as the most important and influential in shaping Western culture. It includes works of fiction, non-fiction, poetry, drama, music, art, sculpture, and architecture generally perceived as being of major artistic merit and representing the high culture of Europe and North America. University of California philosopher John Searle suggests that the Western canon can be roughly defined as “a certain Western intellectual tradition that goes from, say, Socrates to Wittgenstein in philosophy, and from Homer to James Joyce in literature”. The Bible, a product of Middle Eastern culture, has been a major force in shaping Western culture, and “has inspired some of the great monuments of human thought, literature, and art”.
The canon of books, including Western literature and Western philosophy, has been fairly stable, although it has expanded to include more women and racial minorities, while the canons of music and the visual arts have greatly expanded to cover the Middle Ages
and subsequent centuries once largely overlooked. Also during the
twentieth century there has been a growing interest in the cultures of
Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and South America. In particular the
former colonies of European countries began in the twentieth century to
produce major works, both in literature and in the other arts. This is
especially reflected in the Nobel prizes awarded in literature. But some
examples of newer media such as cinema have attained a precarious position in the canon.
has been an ongoing debate over the nature and status of the canon,
especially in America, since at least the 1960s, much of which is rooted
in critical theory, feminism, critical race theory, and Marxism. In particular, postmodern studies have argued that the body of scholarship is biased because the traditional main focus of academic studies of Western culture and history has only been on works produced by Western men.
In painting, the Mona Lisa
by Leonardo da Vinci
, c. 1503–1506, is the archetypal masterpiece, though it was not produced for admission to a guild or academy.
A classic is a book, or any other work of art, accepted as being exemplary or noteworthy, for example through an imprimatur such as being listed in a list of great books,
or through a reader’s personal opinion. Although the term is often
associated with the Western canon, it can be applied to works of
literature, music and art, etc. from all traditions, such as the Chinese classics or the Vedas. A related word is masterpiece
or chef d’œuvre, which in modern use refers to a creation that has been
given much critical praise, especially one that is considered the
greatest work of a person’s career or to a work of outstanding
creativity, skill, or workmanship. Historically, the word refers to a
work of a very high standard produced in order to obtain membership of a
Guild or Academy.
The first writer to use the term “classic” was Aulus Gellius, a 2nd-century Roman writer who, in the miscellany
Noctes Atticae (19, 8, 15), refers to a writer as a classicus scriptor,
non proletarius (”A distinguished, not a commonplace writer”). Such
classification began with the Greeks’ ranking their cultural works, with
the word canon (”carpenter’s rule”). Moreover, early Christian Church Fathers used canon to rank the authoritative texts of the New Testament, preserving them, given the expense of vellum and papyrus
and mechanical book reproduction, thus, being comprehended in a canon
ensured a book’s preservation as the best way to retain information
about a civilization. Contemporarily, the Western canon defines the best
of Western culture. In the ancient world, at the Alexandrian Library, scholars coined the Greek term Hoi enkrithentes (”the admitted”, “the included”) to identify the writers in the canon.
Literary canon (mainly)
With regard to books, what makes a book “classic” is a concern that has occurred to various authors ranging from Italo Calvino to Mark Twain
and the related questions of “Why Read the Classics?” and “What Is a
Classic?” have been essayed by authors from different genres and eras,
including Calvino, T. S. Eliot, Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve, Michael Dirda, and Ezra Pound.
terms “classic book” and Western canon are closely related concepts,
but they are not necessarily synonymous. A “canon” refers to a list of
books considered to be “essential” and is presented in a variety of
ways. It can be published as a collection (such as Great Books of the Western World, Modern Library, Everyman’s Library, or Penguin Classics), presented as a list with an academic’s imprimatur (such as Harold Bloom’s ) or be the official reading list of an institution of higher learning.
Some of the writers who are generally considered the most important in Western literature are Homer, Aeschylus, Euripides, Virgil, Horace, Geoffrey Chaucer, Dante Alighieri, William Shakespeare, François Rabelais, Jean Racine, Molière, Camões, Miguel de Cervantes, Michel de Montaigne, John Milton, Samuel Johnson, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, William Wordsworth, Jane Austen, Stendhal, Walt Whitman, Gustave Flaubert, Emily Dickinson, Honoré de Balzac, Charles Dickens, Herman Melville, George Eliot, Leo Tolstoy, Henrik Ibsen, Sigmund Freud, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Eça de Queirós, Marcel Proust, Thomas Mann, Robert Musil, James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, Franz Kafka, William Faulkner, Jorge Luis Borges, Pablo Neruda, Fernando Pessoa, Albert Camus and Samuel Beckett. 
Harold Bloom has divided the body of Western Literature into four ages :
- The Theocratic Age (2000 BC - 1321 AD), with five main traditions that influenced the West:
- The Aristocratic Age (1321 - 1832), with five major bodies of literature:
- The Democratic Age (1832 - 1900), when the strength of American and Russian literature begins
- The Chaotic Age (1900-today), which includes a multitude of countries and authors.
Great Books Program
A university or college Great Books Program is a program inspired by the Great Books movement begun in the United States in the 1920s by Prof. John Erskine of Columbia University, which proposed to improve the higher education system by returning it to the western liberal arts tradition of broad cross-disciplinary learning. These academics and educators included Robert Hutchins, Mortimer Adler, Stringfellow Barr, Scott Buchanan, Jacques Barzun, and Alexander Meiklejohn. The view among them was that the emphasis on narrow specialization in American colleges had harmed the quality of higher education by failing to expose students to the important products of Western civilization and thought.
essential component of such programs is a high degree of engagement
with primary texts, called the Great Books. The curricula of Great Books
programs often follow a canon of texts considered more or less
essential to a student’s education, such as Plato’s Republic, or Dante’s
Divine Comedy. Such programs often focus exclusively on Western
culture. Their employment of primary texts dictates an interdisciplinary
approach, as most of the Great Books do not fall neatly under the
prerogative of a single contemporary academic discipline. Great Books
programs often include designated discussion groups as well as lectures,
and have small class sizes. In general students in such programs
receive an abnormally high degree of attention from their professors, as
part of the overall aim of fostering a community of learning.
100 institutions of higher learning, mostly in the United States, offer
some version of a Great Books Program as an option for students.
There has been an ongoing debate, especially in the US, over the nature
and status of the canon since at least the 1960s, much of which is
rooted in critical theory, feminism, critical race theory, and Marxism. In particular postmodern
studies has argued that the body of scholarship is biased, because the
main focus traditionally of the academic studies of history and Western culture, has only been on Europe and men. American philosopher Jay Stevenson argues:
Classicist Bernard Knox made direct reference to this topic when he delivered his 1992 Jefferson Lecture (the U.S. federal government’s highest honor for achievement in the humanities). Knox used the intentionally “provocative” title “The Oldest Dead White European Males”,
as the title of his lecture and his subsequent book of the same name,
in both of which Knox defended the continuing relevance of classical culture to modern society. 
intellectuals have championed a “high conservative modernism” that
insists that universal truths exist, and have opposed approaches that
deny the existence of universal truths. Many argued that “natural law” was the repository of timeless truths. Allan Bloom,
in his highly influential Closing of the American Mind: How Higher
Education Has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today’s
Students (1987) argues that moral degradation results from ignorance of
the great classics
that shaped Western culture. Bloom further comments: “But one thing is
certain: wherever the Great Books make up a central part of the
curriculum, the students are excited and satisfied.”
His book was widely cited by some intellectuals for its argument that
the classics contained universal truths and timeless values which were
being ignored by cultural relativists.  Yale University Professor of Humanities and famous literary critic Harold Bloom (no relation) has also argued strongly in favor of the canon, in his 1995 book The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages, and in general the canon remains as a represented idea in many institutions, though its implications continue to be debated.
maintain that those who undermine the canon do so out of primarily
political interests, and that such criticisms are misguided and/or
disingenuous. As John Searle, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, has written:
is a certain irony in this [i.e., politicized objections to the canon]
in that earlier student generations, my own for example, found the
critical tradition that runs from Socrates through the Federalist Papers, through the writings of Mill and Marx,
down to the twentieth century, to be liberating from the stuffy
conventions of traditional American politics and pieties. Precisely by
inculcating a critical attitude, the “canon” served to demythologize the
conventional pieties of the American bourgeoisie and provided the
student with a perspective from which to critically analyze American
culture and institutions. Ironically, the same tradition is now regarded
as oppressive. The texts once served an unmasking function; now we are
told that it is the texts which must be unmasked.
of the main objections to a canon of literature is the question of
authority; who should have the power to determine what works are worth
reading? Searle’s rebuttal suggests that “one obvious difficulty with it
[i.e., arguments against hierarchical ranking of books] is that if it
were valid, it would argue against any set of required readings
whatever; indeed, any list you care to make about anything automatically
creates two categories, those that are on the list and those that are
Charles Altieri, of the University of California, Berkeley,
states that canons are “an institutional form for exposing people to a
range of idealized attitudes.” It is according to this notion that work
may be removed from the canon over time to reflect the contextual
relevance and thoughts of society. American historian Todd M. Compton
argues that canons are always communal in nature; that there are
limited canons for, say a literature survey class, or an English
department reading list, but there is no such thing as one absolute
canon of literature. Instead, there are many conflicting canons. He
regards Bloom’s “Western Canon” as a personal canon only.
The process of defining the boundaries of the canon is endless. The philosopher John Searle
has said, “In my experience there never was, in fact, a fixed ‘canon’;
there was rather a certain set of tentative judgments about what had
importance and quality. Such judgments are always subject to revision,
and in fact they were constantly being revised.” One of the notable attempts at compiling an authoritative canon for literature in the English-speaking world was the Great Books of the Western World program. This program, developed in the middle third of the 20th century, grew out of the curriculum at the University of Chicago. University president Robert Maynard Hutchins and his collaborator Mortimer Adler
developed a program that offered reading lists, books, and
organizational strategies for reading clubs to the general public. An
earlier attempt had been made in 1909 by Harvard University president Charles W. Eliot, with the Harvard Classics,
a 51-volume anthology of classic works from world literature. Eliot’s
view was the same as that of Scottish philosopher and historian Thomas Carlyle: “The true University of these days is a Collection of Books”. (”The Hero as Man of Letters”, 1840)
In the English-speaking world
British renaissance poetry
canon of Renaissance English poetry of the 16th and early 17th century
has always been in some form of flux and towards the end of the 20th
century the established canon was criticized, especially by those who
wished to expand it to include, for example, more women writers. However, the central figures of the British renaissance canon remain, Edmund Spenser, Sir Philip Sidney, Christopher Marlowe, William Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, and John Donne. Spenser, Donne, and Jonson were major influences on 17th-century poetry. However, poet John Dryden condemned aspects of the metaphysical poets in his criticism. In the 18th century Metaphysical poetry fell into further disrepute, while the interest in Elizabethan poetry was rekindled through the scholarship of Thomas Warton and others. However, the canon of Renaissance poetry was formed in the Victorian period with anthologies like Palgrave’s Golden Treasury.
In the twentieth century T. S. Eliot and Yvor Winters were two literary critics who were especially concerned with revising the canon of renaissance English literature. T. S. Eliot, for example, championed poet Sir John Davies in an article in The Times Literary Supplement in 1926. During the course of the 1920s, T.S. Eliot
did much to establish the importance of the metaphysical school, both
through his critical writing and by applying their method in his own
work. However, by 1961 A. Alvarez
was commenting that “it may perhaps be a little late in the day to be
writing about the Metaphysicals. The great vogue for Donne passed with
the passing of the Anglo-American experimental movement in modern
poetry.” Two decades
later, a hostile view was expressed that emphasis on their importance
had been an attempt by Eliot and his followers to impose a ‘high
Anglican and royalist literary history’ on 17th-century English poetry.
The American critic Yvor Winters suggested in 1939 an alternative canon of Elizabethan poetry, which would exclude the famous representatives of the Petrarchan school of poetry, represented by Sir Philip Sidney and Edmund Spenser. Winters claimed that the Native or Plain Style anti-Petrarchan movement had been undervalued and argued that George Gascoigne (1525–1577) “deserves to be ranked […] among the six or seven greatest lyric poets of the century, and perhaps higher”.
Towards the end of the 20th century the established canon was increasingly under fire.
Expansion of the literary canon in the 20th century
In the twentieth century there was a general reassessment of the literary canon, including women’s writing, post-colonial literatures, gay and lesbian literature,
writing by people of colour, working people’s writing, and the cultural
productions of historically marginalized groups. This reassessment has
resulted in a whole scale expansion of what is considered “literature”,
and genres hitherto not regarded as “literary”, such as children’s
writing, journals, letters, travel writing, and many others are now the
subjects of scholarly interest.  
The Western literary canon has also expanded to include the literature of Asia, Africa, the Middle East,
and South America. Writers from countries like Turkey, China, Egypt,
Peru, and Colombia, Japan, etc., have received Nobel prizes since the
late 1960s. Writers from Asia and Africa have also been nominated for,
and also won, the Booker prize in recent years.
Feminism and the literary canon
feminist movement produced both feminist fiction and non-fiction and
created new interest in women’s writing. It also prompted a general
reevaluation of women’s historical
and academic contributions in response to the belief that women’s lives
and contributions have been underrepresented as areas of scholarly
in Britain and America at least women achieved major literary success
from the late eighteenth century, and many major nineteenth century
British novelists were women, including Jane Austen, the Brontë family, Mrs Gaskell, and George Eliot. There were also two major female poets, Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Emily Dickinson.  In the twentieth century there were also many major female writers, including Katherine Mansfield, Dorothy Richardson, Virginia Woolf, Eudora Welty, and Marianne Moore. Notable female writers in France include Colette and Simone de Beauvoir; and in Russia, Anna Akhmatova.
of the early period of feminist literary scholarship was given over to
the rediscovery and reclamation of texts written by women. Virago Press
began to publish its large list of 19th and early 20th century novels
in 1975 and became one of the first commercial presses to join in the
project of reclamation.
In the twentieth century, the Western literary canon started to include black writers not only from black American writers, but also from the wider black diaspora
of writers in Britain, France, Latin America, and Africa. This is
largely due to the shift in social and political views during the civil rights movement in the United States. The first global recognition came in 1950 when Gwendolyn Brooks was the first black American to win a Pulitzer Prize for Literature. Chinua Achebe’s novel Things Fall Apart helped draw attention to African literature. Nigerian Wole Soyinka was the first African to win the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1986, and American Toni Morrison was the first black woman to win in 1993.
In the United States
Throughout American history, African Americans have been discriminated against, and this experience inspired some Black writers,
at least during the early years, to prove they were the equals of white
American authors. As Henry Louis Gates, Jr., has said, “it is fair to
describe the subtext of the history of black letters as this urge to
refute the claim that because blacks had no written traditions they were
bearers of an inferior culture.”
writers were also attempting to subvert the literary and power
traditions of the United States. Some scholars assert that writing has
traditionally been seen as “something defined by the dominant culture as
a white male activity.”
This means that, in American society, literary acceptance has
traditionally been intimately tied in with the very power dynamics which
perpetrated such evils as racial discrimination. By borrowing from and
incorporating the non-written oral traditions and folk life of the African diaspora, African-American literature broke “the mystique of connection between literary authority and patriarchal power.”
In producing their own literature, African Americans were able to
establish their own literary traditions devoid of the white intellectual
filter. This view of African-American literature as a tool in the
struggle for Black political and cultural liberation has been stated for
decades, most famously by W. E. B. Du Bois.
Asia, Africa, Middle East, and South America
the 1960s the Western literary canon has been expanded to include
writers from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and South America. This is
reflected in the Nobel prizes awarded in literature.
Yasunari Kawabata (1899 – 1972) was a Japanese novelist and short story writer whose spare, lyrical, subtly-shaded prose works won him the Nobel Prize for Literature
in 1968, the first Japanese author to receive the award. His works have
enjoyed broad international appeal and are still widely read.
Naguib Mahfouz (1911 – 2006) was an Egyptian writer who won the 1988 Nobel Prize for Literature. He is regarded as one of the first contemporary writers of Arabic literature, along with Tawfiq el-Hakim, to explore themes of existentialism.
He published 34 novels, over 350 short stories, dozens of movie
scripts, and five plays over a 70-year career. Many of his works have
been made into Egyptian and foreign films.
Kenzaburō Ōe (b. 1935) is a Japanese writer and a major figure in contemporary Japanese literature. His novels, short stories, and essays, strongly influenced by French and American literature and literary theory, deal with political, social, and philosophical issues, including nuclear weapons, nuclear power, social non-conformism, and existentialism. Ōe was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1994 for creating “an imagined world, where life and myth condense to form a disconcerting picture of the human predicament today”.
(b. 1955), better known by the pen name “Mo Yan”, is a Chinese novelist
and short story writer. Donald Morrison of the U.S. news magazine TIME referred to him as “one of the most famous, oft-banned and widely pirated of all Chinese writers“, and Jim Leach called him the Chinese answer to Franz Kafka or Joseph Heller. He is best known to Western readers for his 1987 novel Red Sorghum Clan, of which the Red Sorghum and Sorghum Wine volumes were later adapted for the film Red Sorghum. In 2012, Mo was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature for his work as a writer “who with hallucinatory realism merges folk tales, history and the contemporary”. 
Octavio Paz Lozano (1914 – 1998) was a Mexican poet and diplomat. For his body of work, he was awarded the 1981 Miguel de Cervantes Prize, the 1982 Neustadt International Prize for Literature, and the 1990 Nobel Prize in Literature.
Orhan Pamuk (b. 1952) is a Turkish novelist, screenwriter, academic, and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in Literature. One of Turkey’s most prominent novelists, his work has sold over thirteen million books in sixty-three languages, making him the country’s best-selling writer. Pamuk is the author of novels including The White Castle, The Black Book, The New Life, My Name Is Red, Snow, The Museum of Innocence, and A Strangeness in My Mind. He is the Robert Yik-Fong Tam Professor in the Humanities at Columbia University, where he teaches writing and comparative literature. Born in Istanbul,
Pamuk is the first Turkish Nobel laureate. He is also the recipient of
numerous other literary awards. My Name Is Red won the 2002 Prix du Meilleur Livre Étranger, 2002 Premio Grinzane Cavour, and 2003 International Dublin Literary Award.
Gabriel García Márquez (1927 – 2014) was a Colombian
novelist, short-story writer, screenwriter, and journalist. Considered
one of the most significant authors of the 20th century and one of the
best in the Spanish language, he was awarded the 1972 Neustadt International Prize for Literature and the 1982 Nobel Prize in Literature.
Márquez started as a journalist, and wrote many acclaimed non-fiction
works and short stories, but is best known for his novels, such as One Hundred Years of Solitude (1967), The Autumn of the Patriarch (1975), and Love in the Time of Cholera
(1985). His works have achieved significant critical acclaim and
widespread commercial success, most notably for popularizing a literary
style labeled as magic realism,
which uses magical elements and events in otherwise ordinary and
realistic situations. Some of his works are set in a fictional village
called Macondo (the town mainly inspired by his birthplace Aracataca), and most of them explore the theme of solitude. On his death in April 2014, Juan Manuel Santos, the President of Colombia, described him as “the greatest Colombian who ever lived.”
Mario Vargas Llosa, (b. 1936) is a Peruvian writer, politician, journalist, essayist, college professor, and recipient of the 2010 Nobel Prize in Literature.
Vargas Llosa is one of Latin America’s most significant novelists and
essayists, and one of the leading writers of his generation. Some
critics consider him to have had a larger international impact and
worldwide audience than any other writer of the Latin American Boom. Upon announcing the 2010 Nobel Prize in Literature, the Swedish Academy
said it had been given to Vargas Llosa “for his cartography of
structures of power and his trenchant images of the individual’s
resistance, revolt, and defeat”.
Canon of Western philosophers
discussion of the literary canon above, especially with regard to
“Great Book” and the “debate” over the canon, is also relevant.
Ancient Greek philosophy
has consistently held a prominent place in the canon. Only a relatively
small number of works of Greek philosophy have survived, essentially
those thought most worth copying in the Middle Ages. Plato, Aristotle and, indirectly, Socrates are the primary figures. Roman philosophy is included, but regarded as less significant (as it tended to be even by the Romans themselves). The ancient philosophy of other cultures now receives more attention than before the 20th century. The vast body of Christian philosophy is typically represented on reading lists mainly by Saints Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas, and the 12th-century Jewish scholar Maimonides is now usually represented, mostly by The Guide for the Perplexed. The academic canon of early modern philosophy generally includes Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, and Kant, though influential contributions to philosophy were made by many thinkers in this period.
Women have engaged in philosophy throughout the field’s history. There were female philosophers since ancient times, notably Hipparchia of Maroneia (active c. 325 BC) and Arete of Cyrene (active 5th–4th century BC), and some were accepted as philosophers during the ancient, medieval, modern and contemporary eras, but almost no female philosophers have entered the philosophical Western canon.  In the early 1990s, the Canadian Philosophical Association claimed that there is gender imbalance and gender bias in the academic field of philosophy.
In June 2013, a US sociology professor stated that “out of all recent
citations in four prestigious philosophy journals, female authors
comprise just 3.6 percent of the total. While other areas of the
humanities are at or near gender parity, philosophy is actually more
overwhelmingly male than even mathematics.”
Many philosophers today agree that Greek philosophy has influenced much of Western culture since its inception. Alfred North Whitehead once noted: “The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.” Clear, unbroken lines of influence lead from ancient Greek and Hellenistic philosophers to Early Islamic philosophy, the European Renaissance, and the Age of Enlightenment. Some claim that Greek philosophy, in turn, was influenced by the older wisdom literature and mythological cosmogonies of the ancient Near East, but philosophy as we understand it is a Greek creation.”
Plato was a philosopher in Classical Greece and the founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. He is widely considered the most pivotal figure in the development of philosophy, especially the Western tradition, unlike nearly all of his philosophical contemporaries. 
Aristotle was an ancient Greek philosopher and scientist. His writings cover many subjects – including physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics, poetry, theater, music, rhetoric, linguistics, politics and government—and constitute the first comprehensive system of Western philosophy.
Aristotle’s views on physical science had a profound influence on medieval scholarship. Their influence extended from Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages into the Renaissance, and his views were not replaced systematically until the Enlightenment and theories such as classical mechanics. In metaphysics, Aristotelianism profoundly influenced Judeo-Islamic philosophical and theological thought during the Middle Ages and continues to influence Christian theology, especially the Neoplatonism of the Early Church and the scholastic tradition of the Roman Catholic Church. Aristotle was well known among medieval Muslim intellectuals and revered as “The First Teacher” (Arabic: المعلم الأول). His ethics, though always influential, gained renewed interest with the modern advent of virtue ethics. All aspects of Aristotle’s philosophy continue to be the object of active academic study today.
Major Western writers and philosophers have been influenced by Eastern philosophy. American modernist poet T S Eliot wrote that the great philosophers of India “make most of the great European philosophers look like schoolboys”.  Arthur Schopenhauer, in the preface to his book The World As Will And Representation,
writes that one who “has also received and assimilated the sacred
primitive Indian wisdom, then he is the best of all prepared to hear
what I have to say to him” The 19th century American philosophical movement Transcendentalism was also influenced by Indian thought. 
The seventeenth century was important for philosophy, and the major figures were Francis Bacon (1561–1626), Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), René Descartes (1596–1650), Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677), John Locke (1632–1704), Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716), and Isaac Newton (1642– c.1726).
Major philosophers of the eighteenth century include George Berkeley (1685–1753), David Hume (1711–1776), Adam Smith (1723–1790), Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832), Voltaire (1694–1778), Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778), and Edmund Burke (1729–1797).
Important nineteenth century philosophers include Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831), Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855), Karl Marx (1818–1883) and Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900).
Major twentieth century figures are Henri Bergson (1859–1941), Edmund Husserl (1859-1938), Bertrand Russell (1872-1970), Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) and Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951). A porous distinction between analytic and continental approaches emerged during this period. The term “continental” is misleading, as many prominent British philosophers such as R. G. Collingwood and Michael Oakeshott were non-analytic, and many non-British European philosophers like Wittgenstein
were analytic. Moreover, analytic approaches are dominant in the
Netherlands, Scandinavia, Germany, and parts of east-central Europe
today. Some argue in English-speaking countries, it is better to
distinguish between the dominant approaches of university departments,
where Modern Language departments tend to favor continental methods and
philosophy department tends to favor analytic ones. However, the
humanities/social sciences departments in general such as history,
sociology, anthropology, and political science departments in
English-speaking countries tend to favor continental methods such as
those by Michel Foucault (1926-1984), Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002) and Jürgen Habermas (1929- ). 
philosophers have begun to gain prominence in the last hundred years.
Notable female philosophers from the contemporary period include Susanne Langer (1895–1985), Simone de Beauvoir (1908–1986), and Martha Nussbaum (1947– ).
The term “classical music” did not appear until the early 19th century, in an attempt to distinctly canonize the period from Johann Sebastian Bach to Ludwig van Beethoven as a golden age. In addition to Bach and Beethoven, the other major figures from this period were Joseph Haydn and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. The earliest reference to “classical music” recorded by the Oxford English Dictionary is from about 1836.
In classical music,
during the nineteenth century a “canon” developed which focused on what
was felt to be the most important works written since 1600, with a
great concentration on the later part of this period, termed the Classical period, which is generally taken to begin around 1730. After Beethoven, the major nineteenth century composers include Robert Schumann, Frédéric Chopin, Hector Berlioz, Franz Liszt, Richard Wagner, Johannes Brahms, Anton Bruckner, Giuseppe Verdi, Giacomo Puccini, and Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky.
the 2000s, the standard concert repertoire of professional orchestras,
chamber music groups, and choirs tends to focus on works by a relatively
small number of mainly 18th and 19th century male composers. Many of
the works deemed to be part of the musical canon are from genres
regarded as the most serious, such as the symphony, concerto, string quartet, and opera. Folk music was already giving art music melodies, and from the late 19th century, in an atmosphere of increasing nationalism,
folk music began to influence composers in formal and other ways,
before being admitted to some sort of status in the canon itself.
Since the early twentieth century non-Western music has begun to influence Western composers. In particular, direct homages to Javanese gamelan music are found in works for western instruments by Claude Debussy, Béla Bartók, Francis Poulenc, Olivier Messiaen, Pierre Boulez, Benjamin Britten, John Cage, Steve Reich, and Philip Glass.
Debussy was immensely interested in non-Western music and its
approaches to composition. Specifically, he was drawn to the Javanese Gamelan,
which he first heard at the 1889 Paris Exposition. He was not
interested in directly quoting his non-Western influences, but instead
allowed this non-Western aesthetic to generally influence his own
musical work, for example, by frequently using quiet, unresolved
dissonances, coupled with the damper pedal, to emulate the “shimmering”
effect created by a gamelan ensemble. American composer Philip Glass was not only influenced by the eminent French composition teacher Nadia Boulanger, but also by the Indian musicians Ravi Shankar and Alla Rakha,
His distinctive style arose from his work with Shankar and Rakha and
their perception of rhythm in Indian music as being entirely additive.
In the latter half of the 20th century the canon expanded to cover the so-called Early music of the pre-classical period, and Baroque music by composers other than Bach and George Frideric Handel. including Antonio Vivaldi, Claudio Monteverdi, Domenico Scarlatti, Alessandro Scarlatti, Henry Purcell, Georg Philipp Telemann, Jean-Baptiste Lully, Jean-Philippe Rameau, Marc-Antoine Charpentier, Arcangelo Corelli, François Couperin, Heinrich Schütz, and Dieterich Buxtehude. Earlier composers, such as Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina, Orlande de Lassus and William Byrd, have also received more attention in the last hundred years.
The absence of female composers from the canon has been debated in the twentieth century, even though there have been female composers
throughout the classical music period. Marcia J Citron, for example,
has examined “the practices and attitudes that have led to the exclusion
of women [sic] composers from the received ‘canon’ of performed musical
works.” More recently the music of Hildegard von Bingen (1098–1179), a German Benedictine abbess, has been rediscovered, and both the Russian Sofia Gubaidulina (1931– ) and Finnish Kaija Saariaho (1952– ) have achieved international reputations. Saariaho’s opera L’amour de loin has been staged in some of the world’s major opera houses, including The English National Opera (2009) and in 2016 the Metropolitan Opera in New York.
The backbone of traditional Western art history is a celebratory chronology of artworks,
mostly of a luxury nature, commissioned by elite groups in western
Europe for private or public enjoyment, as well as works in drawing and printmaking. Much of this was religious, mostly Roman Catholic, art. The classical art
of Greece and Rome has been regarded since the Renaissance as the fount
of the Western tradition, and has been long regarded as superior to
modern creations in the equivalent fields, in particular sculpture.
Giorgio Vasari (1511–1574) is the great originator of the artistic canon and the originator of many of the concepts it embodies. His Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects covers only artists working in Italy,
with a strong pro-Florentine prejudice, and has cast a long shadow over
succeeding centuries. Northern European art has arguably never quite
caught up to Italy in terms of prestige, and Vasari’s placing of Giotto as the founding father of “modern” painting has largely been retained. In painting, the rather vague term of Old master covers painters up to about the time of Goya.
a “canon” remains prominent, as indicated by the selection of objects
present in art history textbooks, as well as the prices obtained in the art trade. But there have been considerable swings of fortune in what is valued. In the 19th century the Baroque fell into great disfavour, to be revived from about the 1920s, by which time the Academic art of the 18th and 19th century was largely disregarded, and Victorian painting generally, with its equivalents in other countries. The High Renaissance Vasari regarded as the greatest period has always retained its prestige, including works by Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Raphael, but the succeeding period of Mannerism has fallen in and out of favour.
the 19th century the beginnings of academic art history, led by German
universities, led to much better understanding and appreciation of medieval art,
and a more nuanced understanding of classical art, including the
realization that many if not most treasured masterpieces of sculpture
were late Roman copies rather than Greek originals. The European
tradition of art was expanded to include Byzantine art and the new discoveries of archaeology, notably Etruscan art, Celtic art and Upper Paleolithic art.
the 20th century there has been an effort to re-define the discipline
to be more inclusive of art made by women; vernacular creativity,
especially in printed media; and an expansion to include works in the
Western tradition produced outside Europe. At the same time there has
been a much greater appreciation of non-Western traditions, including
their place with Western art in wider global or Eurasian traditions. The decorative arts have traditionally had a much lower critical status than fine art,
although often highly valued by collectors, and still tend to be given
little prominence in undergraduate studies or popular coverage on
television and in print.
Women and the artistic canon
were discriminated against in terms of obtaining the training necessary
to be an artist in the mainstream Western traditions. In addition,
since the Renaissance the nude, more often than not female, has had a special position as subject matter. In her 1971 essay, “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?“, Linda Nochlin
analyzes what she sees as the embedded privilege in the predominantly
male Western art world and argues that women’s outsider status allowed
them a unique viewpoint to not only critique women’s position in art,
but to additionally examine the discipline’s underlying assumptions
about gender and ability.
Nochlin’s essay develops the argument that both formal and social
education restricted artistic development to men, preventing women (with
rare exception) from honing their talents and gaining entry into the
the 1970s, feminist art criticism continued this critique of the
institutionalized sexism of art history, art museums, and galleries, and
questioned which genres of art were deemed museum-worthy. This position is articulated by artist Judy Chicago:
“[I]t is crucial to understand that one of the ways in which the
importance of male experience is conveyed is through the art objects
that are exhibited and preserved in our museums. Whereas men experience
presence in our art institutions, women experience primarily absence,
except in images that do not necessarily reflect women’s own sense of
English artist and sculptor Barbara Hepworth DBE (1903 – 1975), whose work exemplifies Modernism, and in particular modern sculpture, is one of the few female artists to achieve international prominence. In 2016 the art of American modernist Georgia O’Keefe has been staged at the Tate Modern, in London, and is then moving in December 2016 to Vienna, Austria, before visiting the Art Gallery of Ontario, Canada in 2017.
Sources containing canonical lists
Top row: Homer
, William Shakespeare
, John Milton
, James Joyce
Second row: Miguel de Cervantes
, Fernando Pessoa
, Victor Hugo
, Marcel Proust
Third row: Leo Tolstoy
, Fyodor Dostoyevsky
, Dante Alighieri
, Alessandro Manzoni
Bottom row: Mark Twain
, Ernest Hemingway
, Friedrich Schiller
, Thomas Mann
A montage of composers, all of whom have notable pieces in the canon of classical music
. From left to right: Top row: Antonio Vivaldi
, Johann Sebastian Bach
, George Frideric Handel
, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
, Ludwig van Beethoven
second row: Gioachino Rossini
, Felix Mendelssohn
, Frédéric Chopin
, Richard Wagner
, Giuseppe Verdi
third row: Johann Strauss II
, Johannes Brahms
, Georges Bizet
, Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky
, Antonín Dvořák
bottom row: Edvard Grieg
, Edward Elgar
, Sergei Rachmaninoff
, George Gershwin
, Aram Khachaturian
University reading lists
Contemporary anthologies of renaissance literature
The preface to the Blackwell
anthology of Renaissance Literature from 2003 acknowledges the
importance of online access to literary texts on the selection of what
to include, meaning that the selection can be made on basis of
functionality rather than representativity”.
This anthology has made its selection based on three principles. One is
“unabashedly canonical”, meaning that Sidney, Spenser, Marlowe,
Shakespeare, and Jonson have been given the space prospective users
would expect. A second principle is “non-canonical”, giving female
writers such as Anne Askew, Elizabeth Cary, Emilia Lanier, Martha Moulsworth, and Lady Mary Wroth
a representative selection. It also includes texts that may not be
representative of the qualitatively best efforts of Renaissance
literature, but of the quantitatively most numerous texts, such as
homilies and erotica. A third principle has been thematic, so that the
anthology aims to include texts that shed light on issues of special
interest to contemporary scholars.
The Blackwell anthology is
still firmly organised around authors, however. A different strategy has
been observed by The Penguin Book of Renaissance Verse from 1992.
Here the texts are organised according to topic, under the headings The
Public World, Images of Love, Topographies, Friends, Patrons and the
Good Life, Church, State and Belief, Elegy and Epitaph, Translation,
Writer, Language and Public. It is arguable that such an approach is
more suitable for the interested reader than for the student. While the
two anthologies are not directly comparable, since the Blackwell
anthology also includes prose and the Penguin anthology goes up to 1659,
it is telling that while the larger Blackwell anthology contains work
by 48 poets, seven of which are women, the Penguin anthology contains
374 poems by 109 poets, including 13 women and one poet each in Welsh, Siôn Phylip, and Irish, Eochaidh Ó Heóghusa.
Best German Novels of the Twentieth Century
The Best German Novels of the Twentieth Century is a list of books compiled in 1999 by Literaturhaus München and Bertelsmann, in which 99 prominent German authors, literary critics, and scholars of German ranked the most significant German-language novels of the twentieth century. The group brought together 33 experts from each of the three categories.
Each was allowed to name three books as having been the most important
of the century. Cited by the group were five titles by both Franz Kafka and Arno Schmidt, four by Robert Walser, and three by Thomas Mann, Hermann Broch, Anna Seghers, and Joseph Roth.
Der Kanon or more precisely “Marcel-Reich-Ranickis Kanon” is a large anthology of exemplary works of German literature.
See Key texts of French literature
Canon of Dutch Literature
The Canon of Dutch Literature comprises a list of 1000 works of Dutch Literature important to the cultural heritage of the Low Countries, and is published on the DBNL.
Several of these works are lists themselves; such as early
dictionaries, lists of songs, recipes, biographies, or encyclopedic
compilations of information such as mathematical, scientific, medical,
or plant reference books. Other items include early translations of
literature from other countries, history books, first-hand diaries, and
published correspondence. Notable original works can be found by author
Danish Culture Canon
The Danish Culture Canon consists of 108 works of cultural excellence in eight categories: architecture, visual arts, design and crafts, film, literature, music, performing arts, and children’s culture. An initiative of Brian Mikkelsen in 2004, it was developed by a series of committees under the auspices of the Danish Ministry of Culture
in 2006–2007 as “a collection and presentation of the greatest, most
important works of Denmark’s cultural heritage.” Each category contains
12 works, although music contains 12 works of score music and 12 of
popular music, and the literature section’s 12th item is an anthology of
24 works. 
Världsbiblioteket (The World Library) was a Swedish list of the 100 best books in the world, created in 1991 by the Swedish literary magazine Tidningen Boken. The list was compiled through votes from members of the Svenska Akademien, Swedish Crime Writers’ Academy, librarians, authors, and others. Approximately 30 of the books were Swedish.
Notes and references
- Searle, John. (1990) “The Storm Over the University”, The New York Review of Books, December 6, 1990.
- Riches, John (2000). The Bible: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-19-285343-1.
- Hicks, Stephen. (2004). Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Scholargy Press, p. 18.
- Bloom, Harold (1994). The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
- Harold Bloom, The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages, 1994, p. 2
- Tucker, Ken (21 October 1994). “Book Review: ‘The Western Canon: The Books and the School of the Ages’; Books”. EW.com. Retrieved 2011-05-01.
- “radicalacademy.com”. radicalacademy.com. Retrieved 2013-11-09.
- Casement, William. “College Great Books Programs”. The Association for Core Texts and Courses (ACTC). Retrieved May 29, 2012.
- Jay Stevenson (2007). The Complete Idiot’s Guide to English Literature. Alpha Books. pp. 9–10.
- Jefferson Lecturers at NEH Website (retrieved May 25, 2009).
- Nadine Drozan, “Chronicle”, The New York Times, May 6, 1992.
Knox, The Oldest Dead White European Males and Other Reflections on the
Classics (1993) (reprint, W. W. Norton & Company, 1994), ISBN 978-0-393-31233-1.
- Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, “Books of The Times; Putting In a Word for Homer, Herodotus, Plato, Etc.”, The New York Times, April 29, 1993.
- Gerald J. Russello, The Postmodern Imagination of Russell Kirk (2007) p. 14
- Hyrum S. Lewis (2007). Sacralizing
the Right: William F. Buckley Jr., Whittaker Chambers, Will Herberg and
the Transformation of Intellectual Conservatism, 1945–1964. ProQuest. p. 122.
- Allan Bloom (2008), p. 344.
- M. Keith Booker (2005). Encyclopedia of Literature and Politics: A–G. Greenwood. pp. 180–81.
- Jeffrey Williams, ed. PC wars: Politics and theory in the academy (Routledge, 2013)
- Compton, “Infinite Canons: A Few Axioms and Questions, and in Addition, a Proposed Definition. A response to Harold Bloom”
- Waller, Gary F. (2013). English Poetry of the Sixteenth Century. London: Routledge. pp. 263–70. ISBN 0582090962. Retrieved 30 March 2016.
- “English Poetry” James P. Bednarz. Oxford Bibliographies 
- “Life of Cowley,” in Samuel Johnson’s Lives of the Poets
- Gary F. Waller, (2013). English Poetry of the Sixteenth Century. London: Routledge. p. 262
- Alvarez, p.11
- Brown & Taylor (2004), ODNB
LII (1939, pp. 258-72, excerpted in Paul. J. Alpers (ed): Elizabethan
Poetry. Modern Essays in Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
LII (1939, pp. 258–72, excerpted in Paul. J. Alpers (ed): Elizabethan
Poetry. Modern Essays in Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
- Waller, Gary F. (2013). English Poetry of the Sixteenth Century. London: Routledge. pp. 263–70. ISBN 0582090962. Retrieved 30 March 2016.
Virginia; Clements, Patricia; Grundy, Isobel (1990). The feminist
companion to literature in English: women writers from the Middle Ages
to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press. pp. vii–x. ISBN 0-300-04854-8.
- Buck, Claire, ed. (1992). The Bloomsbury Guide to Women’s Literature. Prentice Hall. p. vix.
- Salzman, Paul (2000). “Introduction”. Early Modern Women’s Writing. Oxford UP. pp. ix–x.
- Angela Leighton (1986). Elizabeth Barrett Browning. Indiana University Press. pp. 8–18. ISBN 978-0-253-25451-1. Retrieved 22 October 2011.
- Bloom (1999), 9
- Ford (1966), 122
Other Ghost in Beloved: The Specter of the Scarlet Letter” by Jan Stryz
from The New Romanticism: a collection of critical essays by Eberhard
Alsen, p. 140, ISBN 0-8153-3547-4.
from Marjorie Pryse in “The Other Ghost in Beloved: The Specter of the
Scarlet Letter” by Jan Stryz, from The New Romanticism: a collection of
critical essays by Eberhard Alsen, p. 140, ISBN 0-8153-3547-4.
- Mason, “African-American Theory and Criticism” (accessed July 6, 2005).
- “Yasunari Kawabata - Facts”. Retrieved June 11, 2014.
- Haim Gordon. “Naguib Mahfouz’s Egypt: Existential Themes in His Writings”. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-04-26.
- “Oe, Pamuk: World needs imagination”, Yomiuri.co.jp; May 18, 2008.
- Morrison, Donald (2005-02-14). “Holding Up Half the Sky”. Time. Retrieved 2017-08-30.
- “Archived copy”. Archived from the original on 2015-11-18. Retrieved 2015-11-03.
- “García Márquez”. Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary.
- “The Nobel Prize in Literature 1982″. Retrieved 18 April 2014.
- “Vargas Llosa” Archived December 31, 2014, at the Wayback Machine.. Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary.
- “Peru’s Mario Vargas Llosa wins Nobel Literature Prize”. London: The Independent. October 7, 2010.
- Boland & Harvey 1988, p. 7 and Cevallos 1991, p. 272
- “The Nobel Prize in Literature 2010″. Nobelprize. October 7, 2010. Retrieved October 7, 2010.
Martinich, Fritz Allhoff, Anand Vaidya, Early modern philosophy:
essential readings with commentary. Oxford : Blackwell, 2007
- Duran, Jane. Eight women philosophers: theory, politics, and feminism. University of Illinois Press, 2005.