Analytic Insight Net - FREE Online Tipiṭaka Research and Practice University and related NEWS through 
http://sarvajan.ambedkar.org 
in
 105 CLASSICAL LANGUAGES
Paṭisambhidā Jāla-Abaddha Paripanti Tipiṭaka Anvesanā ca Paricaya Nikhilavijjālaya ca ñātibhūta Pavatti Nissāya 
http://sarvajan.ambedkar.org anto 105 Seṭṭhaganthāyatta Bhāsā
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
April 2017
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
04/30/17
2214 Mon 01 May 2017 LESSON Online International E- Campaign -Seminar, Symposium and Debate on the following is the need of the hour: Please join with your views to be published in http://sarvajan.ambedkar.org Emails: ballotpapers4ever@gmail.com sarvajanow@yahoo.co.in jcs4ever@outlook.com Also publish your views in facebook, WhatsApp and Tweet, E-file in Supreme Courts of all Democracies, UNO, International Human Rights Commission.
Filed under: General
Posted by: @ 4:19 pm
2214 Mon 01 May 2017 LESSON

Online International  E- Campaign -Seminar, Symposium and Debate on the following is the need of the hour:

Please join with your views to be published in

http://sarvajan.ambedkar.org

Emails:

ballotpapers4ever@gmail.com

sarvajanow@yahoo.co.in

jcs4ever@outlook.com

Also
publish your views in facebook, WhatsApp and Tweet, E-file in Supreme
Courts of all Democracies, UNO, International Human Rights Commission.

Do
not rest till all the fraud EVMs are banned and all governments
selected by these EVMs are dissolved and go for fresh polls with Ballot
Papers.

Do not recognise any leader selected by these fraud EVMs.

See
that the Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) who is the enemy of
Universal Adult Franchise for tampering, distorting and rigging the
EVMs to win elections  is punished with punitive punishment such as the
entire budget of our country to leaders such as Ms Mayawati the leader
of the 99% sarvajan samaj i.e.,  all societies to enable to distribute
the wealth of the country equally among them.

The
CEC and the presstitute must be equally punished for murdering
democracy in favour
of just 1% intolerant, violent, militant, lunatic, mentally retarded
No.1 terrorist cannibal chitpawan brahmin psychopaths Rakshasa Swayam
Sevaks (RSS) for their stealth, shadowy, discriminatory hindutva cult
and for practicing untouchabilty against Scheduled Caste leader Ms
Mayawati preventing her to acquire the Master Key by tampering the EVMs.
They must be booked under Atrocities Act.

The CJI, CEC,and the media must have collegate system representing SC/STs/OBCs and Minorities for real justice.

Point

No. 11)


At times RSS admits the truth such as

http://news.webindia123.com/…/A…/India/20100828/1575461.html

RSS favours paper ballots, EVMs subjected to public scrutiny

RSS Adityanath says that the Evil Voting Machines (EVMs) are for Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)

Rigging was possible even at the counting stage.

What
made the ballot papers voter-friendly was that all aberrations were
taking place before the public eye and hence open for corrections
whereas the manipulations in the EVMs is entirely in the hands of powers
that be and the political appointees manning the sytem, the paper
commented. The EVM has only one advantage — ’speed’ but that advantage
has been undermined by the staggered polls at times spread over three to four months.

‘’This
has already killed the fun of the election process,’’ the paper noted.
Of the dozen General Elections held in the country, only two were
through the EVMs and instead of rationally addressing the doubts aired
by reputed institutions and experts the Government has resorted to
silence its critics by ‘intimidation and arrests on false charges’, the
paper observed, recalling the arrest of Hyederabad-based technocrat Hari
Prasad by the Mumbai Police.

Prasad’s research has proved that the EVMs were ‘vulnerable to fraud’.

The
authorities want to send a message that anybody who challenges the EC
runs the risk of persecution and harassment, the RSS observed.

https://vickynanjappa.com/2010/08/27/eci-has-lied-to-people-that-evm-is-fool-proof/


‘ECI has lied to people that EVM is fool proof’






 
0
 
0
 
Rate This


Will Hariprasad go down in history as an EVM thief or has he just set a
precedent which could change the manner in which India votes in the
future? The arrest of Hariprasad who showed on TV how an EVM could be
hacked and also stolen out of a godown did not go down too well with the
Election Commission of India which filed a complaint and had him
arrested.


There has been an uproar over the arrest and several petitions demanding his release have been doing the rounds. G V L N Rao,
President of the Citizens for Verifiability, Transparency &
Accountability in Elections (VeTA) who is also the author of the book,
“Democracy at Risk: Can we trust Electronic Voting Machines,” says that
the action against Hariprasad has opened up the pandoras box. The
Election Commission of India has lied to the people that the EVM is fool
proof and no matter how they try and bully us, we will continue
fighting to prove our point in the interest of the Indian democracy. In
this interview with
rediff.com,
Rao says that he has gone umpteen number of times to the Election
Commission of India to debate this issue, but we have always been
denied. Let them chose a platform in public to debate the matter, we are
ready provided they agree.


Your immediate concern must be about Hariprsad and his release. What are you doing about it?


The battle is now a legal one. We have put forth the best legal team
to fight the matter and are exploring all other options to secure his
release. What we understand is that this is nothing but EC sponspored
police raj.


Has this arrest deterred all of you?


No it has not. In fact it has provoked us to prove that the machine
can be tampered with. They have lied to the people and this is what made
us challenge them in the first place. We have not started this fight
only to prove that EVMs can be tampered with. Our fight is to ensure
transparency in the democratic process.


You speak of paper documents when the world is trying to go paperless.


It is needed. This is an election and there has to be a fair process.
We are not against technology. It is a machine after all and can be
tampered with. Paper records are being used in other parts of the world
to ensure that the election process is fair and transparent. Why cant
the same be done in India?


What in your opinion has made the ECI react so sharply?
According to you, you want to bring about transparency then why should
the ECI have a problem?


The ECI has taken upon itself to prove to the world that this machine
is the best thing on earth. Some courts have termed it as a jewel of
India. Why is the ECI making this a prestige issue? It is not a machine
that has been developed by them. The makers of the machine, BEL
themselves have said that it is reliably fool proof. When the
manufacturers themselves have made such a claim why is the ECI acting in
this manner?


Have you made any attempt to meet someone from the ECI and debate the matter?


Several times. We have been denied any opportunity to make our point.
If they are so sure then let them debate with us on a public platform.
Let the media be present during such a debate. The fact is that the ECI
never wanted a dialogue with us. Their claim that the machine is fool
proof is bogus and that is why at every step to defend themselves they
have blocked us.


Some say that the EVMs were rigged during the previous
elections? Isn’t that a bogus claim. Why didn’t the Congress rig it to
attain a majority in Parliament What about Karnataka where they lost.
Also in the case of the recent by-polls even the TRS was proved wrong.


No body is alleging that the elections were rigged. We are just
saying it can be tampered with. It may have been rigged in one or two
places, but no one knows and we don’t want to make any such allegations
either. Since it is a machine and can be tampered with, the system needs
an overhaul. Remember an election can never be fought on trust, it is
always fought on proof.


What do you mean by fought on proof?


Let us face the fact that the ECI knows nothing about the EVMs. There
are so many loop holes in this machine and an awareness regarding this
is already existing. When matters are such, every losing candidate will
have a doubt about the result. As a losing candidate how do I verify the
result? The machine does not give any proof or allow me to detect a
fraud.


Are you making a political point?


Not at all and we are not interested in making any political point.
As I said our claim is not that the elections are rigged. We are saying
in future let there be transparency. Alright, there is technology, but
my point is why should it not evolve? Let us identify the flaws and
rectify it. The ECI must realize that the EVM is a primitive device and
should stop lying to the country that is is state of the art.


Do you think the ECI is on some ego trip?


It looks like. They are unable to accept that someone has finally
proved them wrong. They have invested too much of their faith in this
machine. The ECI has done a commendable job in other areas and let them
take credit for that. Why are they clinging on to this? It is funny, but
they appear to be acting like the vendors of the machine. The
Hariprasad case has only shown their scientific intolerance.



Ethical hacking is one part of the issue and stealing an EVM is a whole other ball game. Do you approve of this?


We have proved how vulnerable the system is. The ECI themselves have
claimed in the past that 80 machines have gone missing. Have they
initiated an inquiry or harassed those people. Here we have shown to
them in the open. They are harassing us. All they are interested in
knowing is who has provided us with the machine. They claim to have
their checks and balances in place. If that is so then why was it so
easy to get a machine out? It has happened in Mumbai, a metropolitan
city. Can you imagine what must be the case in smaller areas? They keep
asking us for the name of the person who handed over the machine to us.
Don’t they know who is in charge of the godown? Let us face it, all EVMs
are insecure and the ECI does not want to accept it.



So, what is the next course of action?


The action by the ECI has increased our resolve to fight. All we were
trying to do is to enter into a dialogue with them and make the
election process fair. But they chose to go ahead and arm twist us. This
is just not done.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/EVM-controversy-takes-a-political-turn/articleshow/6438841.cms


http://www.indiaresists.com/bjps-fight-evm-started-working-favour/

BJP’s long fight against EVM: until it started working in favour?

Mayawati, supremo of the Bahujan Samaj Party, has, after her party’s
sub-par seat wins in the recently concluded elections to the UP state
assembly, publicly voiced her suspicion of India’s electronic voting
machines.


So has the Aam Aadmi Party, which was given a decent probability to
notch its first win to a “proper” state assembly in Punjab. They have
been warning about the possibility of EVM-tempering for a few months
now.


With almost no exception, the mainstream news media, has condemned
these suspicions as the habitual rants of sore losers. Even “neutral”
commentators and those seen to be critical of Narendra Modi have made it
a point to question the timing of the suspicions.


“Why now, why not in all these years when other parties were winning
elections through votes counted by the same EVMs?”, it’s being asked,


It’s good to be not let prejudice overcome objectivity. Being
forgotten, however is the is the cold fact that no party has been so
vociferous in its condemnation of India’s voting machines as the BJP.


In the late 2000s, a BJP-sponsored campaign, using local and foreign
experts, custom-built NGOs and ‘think-tanks’ such as the Vivekananda
Foundation. had highlighted the vulnerability of India’s EVMs to
tampering, fraud and manipulation.


Part of the campaign was the book, “ Democracy At Risk! Can We Trust Our Electronic Voting Machines?”,  authored
by GVL Narasimha Rao with a foreword by LK Advani, and appreciative
messages by Chandra Babu Naidu and voting systems expert Prof David Dill
of Stanford University


The book is available here for download:  http://www.indianevm.com/book_democracy_at_risk_2010.pdf


The book is centred around a research paper by Hari Prasad, Rop Gonggrijp and J. Alex Halderman


Wikipedia lists Rop Gonggrijp as a hacker and founder of XS4ALL, a
Dutch internet services provider that sponsors and hosts the sites of
many free software projects, like PythonSquirrelmail and Debian.


Alex Halderman is Professor of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Michigan, specialising in computer privacy and security,


And Hari Prasad? He is founder of NetIndia. a Hyderabad-based  “IP
Surveillance & Streaming Systems & Solutions” company .


Hari Prasad was arrested in August 2010 for allegedly stealing an EVM
from the Mumbai Collector’s office..Hari Prasad said that the EVM was
given to him by an anonymous source to test for security
vulnerabilities. It was accepted by one and all, including the EC,  that
the EVM he and the other experts took apart was 100% genuine.


Among his vocal and ferocious defenders was Subramanian Swamy.


Hari Prasad’s mug shot is also present on the home page of VeTA,


The home page of VeTA, www.indianevm.com.
 describes VeTA as “an independent national level Citizens’ Forum for
promoting Verifiability, Transparency and Accountability in Indian
Elections. The Forum is a civil society initiative involving some of the
best known computer experts, political scientists, public activists,
administrators, academicians, legal professionals etc.”


Hari Prasad is listed  on the site as the Technical Coordinator of VeTA.


VeTA is headed by GVL Narasimha Rao, a current BJP spokesperson.


Bottomline: If there is one party in India that has a first hand
understanding of the vulnerability of our EVMs, it is the BJP, because
senior members of the party have been closely involved with the ‘expert’
who managed to steal, according to the EC, an original EVM.


To be fair to the BJP, they took their job of being India’s main
opposition party in Parliament seriously. They went to town with their
findings. Subsequently, the Supreme Court, in 2012, directed the EC to
upgrade the EVMs to include a paper trail.


The Court’s exact words: “From the materials placed by both the
sides, we are satisfied that the “paper trail” is an indispensable
requirement of free and fair elections. The confidence of the voters in
the EVMs can be achieved only with the introduction of the “paper
trail”. EVMs with VVPAT system ensure the accuracy of the voting system.
With an intent to have fullest transparency in the system and to
restore the confidence of the voters, it is necessary to set up EVMs
with VVPAT system because vote is nothing but an act of expression which
has immense importance in democratic system.”


https://indiankanoon.org/doc/113840870/


GVL Naramsimha Rao had stated in his book that “the distrust among
political leaders of all hues in voting machines is so high that most
losers are wondering if they had been unfairly defeated in polls. It is
about time India shunned paperless voting to make its election outcomes
verifiable and auditable.”


In LS2104, VVPATs were piloted in 8 of 543 constituencies. No
complaints were reported. In one of them, Mizoram, an independent won


The recently held Punjab assembly elections saw VVPATs used in 33 of
the 117 constituencies. Reports were that 35% paper-trail machines
encounter technical snags


VVPATs were reported to have been used in all of Goa’s assembly constituencies. .No gripes reported there.


It is being hoped that, at the very least, VVPATs will be used in the coming Delhi municipal elections.


Will the VVPATs make our election outcomes more verifiable and
auditable? If one goes by the concerns originally raised by the BJP in
2010, no.


According to Wikipedia,


  • The introduction of malicious software into a VVPAT system can cause
    it to intentionally misrecord the voter’s selections. This attack could
    minimize detection by manipulating only a small percentage of the votes
    or for only lesser known races.
  • Another security concern is that a VVPAT could print while no voter is observing the paper trail, a form of ballot stuffing. Even
    if additional votes were discovered through matching to the voters
    list, it would be impossible to identify legitimate ballots from
    fraudulent ballots.
  • Alternatively the printer could invalidate the printed record after
    the voter leaves and print a new fraudulent ballot. These ballots would
    be undetectable as invalidated ballots are quite common during
    elections.]Also,
    VVPAT systems that are technically able to reverse the paper feed could
    be open to manipulated software overwriting or altering the VVPAT after
    the voter checks it.

Most important, while VVPAT is designed to serve as a check on DRE
(Direct Recording Electronic) vote recorders, it relies on the same
proprietary programming and electronics to produce the audit trail.


With the EC refusing to move from its old position of getting the
manufacturers ECIL and BEL to self-certify the old EVMs as well the
recently introduced VVPATs, it seems that the only way to get India’s
voting system to be audited and tested is through the courts and public
demonstrations.


Now that the BJP is comfortably in government, it has no incentive to
restart old fights. Its control over a none-secure system, the
vulnerabilities of which it knows too well, gives it a competitive
advantage. The Congress and the other major parties, especially the
regional parties, either do not have the stomach for a fight or have
made peace with whatever crumbs are thrown their way.


That leaves the AAP, the TMC, the communist parties to speak up. If
they don’t, it up to us citizens. Our democratic freedoms, which our
founding fathers fought so hard to win and establish, cannot be held
hostage to any party, ideology, or “constitutional authority”


comments (0)