Ex
CJI  SADHASIVAM, shirked his duty & committed a grave error of
judgment by allowing in phased manner the  Fraud Tamperable EVMs on the
request of ex CEC   SAMPATH because of the 1600 crore cost to replace
them and dealt a fatal blow to the Country’s democracy.

Ex CEC
SAMPATH is number one enemy of Democracy, Liberty, Equality and
fraternity as enshrined in our Constitution for the welfare, happiness
and peace of Sarvajan Samaj.

Coal Scam: Petition to be filed at SC against CEC Sampath & EC Brahma

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlA7B6mfWaY&hd=1

Published on Jun 2, 2014

Coal
Scam: Petition to be filed at SC against CEC Sampath & EC Brahma
2:25 mins

For more content go to
http://www.indiatvnews.com/video/
Follow us on facebook at
https://www.facebook.com/indiatvnews
Follow us on twitter at
https://twitter.com/indiatvnews

He must be punished for murdering
democracy instead of awarding doctorate to him. Otherwise the Rakshsa
Swayam Sewaks and all its Avathars will start building temples and
install Ex CEC Sampath’s statues through out the Country as they have
done to the deadliest murderer chitpawan brahmin nathuram godse.

As a result of undemocratic act of ex CEC Sampath the damage done is as follows:

For
proper implementation of Reservation and to save this country from
Murderers of democratic institutions (Modi) remotely controlled by 1%
chitpawan brahmin psychopath Rowdy Swayam sevaks the offices of CJI,
CEC, Media, must have collegiate system consisting
SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities. And all the psychopaths practicing hatred must
be treated in mental asylums with Insight Meditation as cure. The ex CJI
Sadasivam committed a grave error of judgement by allowing ex CEC 
Sampath to replace all the EVMs vulnerable to fraud in phases instead of
totally replacing them with paper ballots as followed in 80 democracies
of the world. Ms Mayawati who could not win a single seat in the last
Lok sabha elections won more that 80% seats in the last UP Panchayat
elections. With paper ballots she will be the next PM od Prabuddha
Bharath. To prevent this the Judiciary wanted to remove reservation
which is unconstitutional.The CJI with collegiate system must salvage
the Central as well as all the states selected through these fraud EVMs
and order for fresh elections with paper ballots to save democracy,
liberty, fraternity and equality as enshrined in our constitution or
else these manuvadis will have their hey days.

Practice Middle path !

Eat the cake and still have it is psychopathetic !

Bad
governance because of the MASTER KEY in the hands of Murderer of
democratic institutions (Modi) selected by Evil Voting Machines (EVMs)
which are vulnerable to fraud.
If we want this country to develop,
the first necessity is to change and overhaul its legal and judicial
system. We must get the final judgment within a year and it should not
take decades to get final order. For that the CJI and CEC must have
COLLIGIATE SYSTEM consisting of SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities.

The ex
CJI Sadasivam had committed a grave error of judgement by ordering as
suggested by ex CEC Samapth to replace the fraid EVMs in phases instead
of total replacement by paper ballots as followed by 80 democracies of
the world. Ms Mayawat could not win a single seat in the last Lok sabha
elections because of these fraud EVMs. But won 80 % seats in the the
last UP Panchayat Elections.And another Justice wanted the RESERVATION
to be removed which is unconstitutional.

The present CJI must
salvage Central and all the state governments selected by these fraud
EVMs and order for fresh elections with paper ballots.Then the next PM
of Prabuddha Bharath will be Ms Mayawati.

On Wednesday, 23 December 2015 9:45 AM, “‘Prof R K Gupta India’
cityju@rediffmail.com [Janshakti]”

wrote:
Biggest
problem in the judicial system is its laxity and slow process as it is
captive of corrupted legal profession which is accountable to no body,
very less number of police stations and judges in India. 15,000 police
stations for a population of 120 crores is laughable.

We have 1
judge on 1.5 lac population that is funny and absurd. Lawyers don’t
allow cases to be completed as they have no performance monitoring
system and removal form bar. They charge huge fees, cheat and misbehave
with clients, don’t appear in court, distort facts and behave
like
street hooligans on drop of a hat. Policemen are recruited on
bribe basis. Even if you manage to get a court order chain of appeals
start that are shameless and endless process with one judge reversing
previous judgement and  merry-go-round keeps going. No one follows court
order. Courts are helpless and don’t care. If any one does not obey
order in 30 days he should not only be fines 1 million rupees minimum
and put behind bar till he executes the order. Hence passing of juvenile
bill not going to change anything. First is can we catch the criminals ,
then investigate and then successfully prosecute?
Conviction rate  is
less than 15 % .

What government is doing about it?

All the
time he goes abroad and talks big and useless things and all his acts
are to benefit baniya. For example 2 % interest reduced for aam aadmi
and give it to baniyas . This means 2 lac crore gift annually. Modi and
Jaitley should feel ashamed and quit.


Eight Reasons Why Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) is Disliked

Murderer
of democratic institutions(Modi) has earned the displeasure of many
segments of the society. Here are eight
reasons why he is disliked.

1.       Modi
is a ‘usurper of power’. He is trying to replicate the reign of the
Slave Dynasty of the thirteenth century by seizing Delhi Sultanate, an
inheritance of the Gandhi-Nehru dynasty. How dare a petty Ganchi Caste
have the audacity to gatecrash into the hallowed portals of Lutyens’
Delhi? Howsoever ill-equipped, inept and unqualified the dynasty may be,
Delhi throne is its family heritage. In any case, no competence is
required to plunder this country . As in the past, the country can be
easily ruled through a network of psycophants, stooges and dummies. It
is just a question of fine-tuning the remote controls.The EVMs which are
vulnerable to fraud have been tampered for 1% chitpawan brahmin
psychopaths Rowdy Swayam Sevaks remotely controlling Bahuth Jiyadha
paapis (BJP). Once the very same RSS wanted the Paper Ballots to be
reverted back. Now after gobbling the MASTER KEY through the very sane
EVMs which they have opposed earlier are noe silent for the greed of
power to practice their hatred, intolerance, militancy, violence,
lunching, cannibals in the name of stealth hindutva cult manufactured by
a chitpawan brahmin vir savarkar like the murderer nathuram godse for
whom temple and statues are installed all these against 99% Sarvajans
including SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities/poor brahmins and baniyas.


The
ex CJI Sadasivam committed a grave error judgement by ordering that
these fraud EVMs to be replaced in phases as suggested by ex CEC Sampath
instead of total replacement. These psychopaths must be punished by the
CJI by salvaging the Central and all state governments selected by
these fraud EVMs and order for fresh elections through Paper Ballots to
save democracy, liberty, fraternity and equality as enshrined in our
Constitution and to prevent manusmiriti being practiced  at present.
 
2.       Modi
is a ‘sadist’. How dare he discard the long practiced tenet of ‘khao
aur khane do’? His mantra of ‘naa khaunga, naa khane dunga’ is
symptomatic of his aversion for the well-being of the ruling elite. It
smacks of jealousy for the privileged. No one interfered in Raja’s
spectrum loot or in Praful Patel’s aircraft purchases. Modi must not
forget that leaders and bureaucrats have families. They have to amass
enough to secure the future of their progeny.
 
3.       Modi’s
Introduction of biometric system to mark presence in government offices
has been terribly painful. Modi has ruined happiness of all government
employees.
 
4.    Modi is ‘anti-media’.

Modi is
deliberately asphyxiating it because it was through the fraud EVMs he
has snatched the Master Key. Media is now a dead wood.
 
5.    Modi is ‘anti-employment’.

All his promises of generating jobs through economic growth are phony rendering numerous people jobless.
 
6.       Modi
is a ‘pseudo-secularist’. Although he had been demonised by the
self-proclaimed secularists as a communal menace for decades, Modi
remains unscathed. Most worrisomely, even negative campaigns like phoney
anti-Christian allegations during Delhi elections and spiteful
intolerance crusade during Bihar elections
have not provoked him.
 
7.       Modi
is highly ‘pretentious’. He has made a mess of country’s foreign
policy. Instead of following the established diplomatic protocol, he has
started establishing personal rapport with the world leaders.
 
8.       Modi is ‘intolerant’.

 
The
whole world knows that the 1% chitpawan psychopath brahmins of Rowdy
Swayam Sevaks are used for tampering the EVMs that are vulnerable to
fraud for Murder of democratic institutions (Modi)’s Bahuth Jiyadha
Paapis (BJP). The ex CJI Sadasivam committed a grave error of judgement
by ordering the EVMs to be replaced in phases as suggested by the ex CEC
Sampath instead of replacing them totally. The present CJI must order
for salvaging  the Central and all the other state governments selected
through these fraud EVMs and order for fresh eections with paper ballots
in the larger interest to save democracy, liberty, fraternity and
equality as enshrined in the Constitution. The manusmiriti has already
being implemented at present.

SOLUTION

The Intellectuals
and intellegent Advocated belonging to Social Transformation Movement of
Sarvajan Samaj must unitedly move the Supreme Court as the EVMs are
insecure, to Scrap them and Order for fresh Lok Sabha elections and all
the State Assembly elections conducted with these fraud EVMs. Propagate
through Internet by creating websites, creating facebook, tweet, and
sending bulk emails TV channels and media as the present media is a dead
wood forgetting what Napolean said: “I can face two battalions but not
two scribes”.Democratic Institutions such as CJI, CEC, and all other
pillars of democracy such as Presidents, Prime Minister, Chief
Ministers, Defence etc. must follow Collegiate system consisting
SC/ST/OBCs/Minorities to challenge the following judgement:


http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/9093.pdf

http://news.webindia123.com/…/A…/India/20100828/1575461.html

RSS favours paper ballots, EVMs subjected to public scrutiny
New Delhi | Saturday, Aug 28 2010 IST

Joining
the controversy regarding the reliablity of Electronic Voting Machines
(EVMs) which have been questioned by political parties, the RSS today
asked the Election Commission (EC) to revert back to tried and tested
paper ballots and subject EVMs to public scrutiny whether these gadgets
are tamper proof. In an editorial titled ‘Can we trust our EVMs?’, The
Organiser, the RSS mouthpiece, noted it was a fact that till date an
absolutely tamper-proof machine had not been invented and credibility of
any system depends on ‘transparency, verifiability and trustworthiness’
than on blind and atavistic faith in its infallibility. The issue is
not a ‘private affair’ and it involves the future of India. Even if the
EVMs were genuine, there was no reason for the EC to be touchy about it,
the paper commented. The Government and the EC can’t impose EVMs as a
fait accompli on Indian democracy as the only option before the voter.
There were flaws like booth capturing, rigging, bogus voting, tampering
and ballot paper snatching in the ballot paper system of polling leading
the country to switch over to the EVMs and all these problems were
relevant in EVMs too. Rigging was possible even at the counting stage.
What made the ballot papers voter-friendly was that all aberrations were
taking place before the public eye and hence open for corrections
whereas the manipulations in the EVMs is entirely in the hands of powers
that be and the political appointees manning the sytem, the paper
commented. The EVM has only one advantage — ’speed’ but that advantage
has been undermined by the staggered polls at times spread over three to
four months. ‘’This has already killed the fun of the election
process,'’ the paper noted. Of the dozen General Elections held in the
country, only two were through the EVMs and instead of rationally
addressing the doubts aired by reputed institutions and experts the
Government has resorted to silence its critics by ‘intimidation and
arrests on false charges’, the paper observed, recalling the arrest of
Hyederabad-based technocrat Hari Prasad by the Mumbai Police. Prasad’s
research has proved that the EVMs were ‘vulnerable to fraud’. The
authorities want to send a message that anybody who challenges the EC
runs the risk of persecution and harassment, the RSS observed. Most
countries around the world looked at the EVMs with suspicion and
countries like the Netherlands, Italy, Germany and Ireland had all
reverted back to paper ballots shunning EVMs because they were ‘easy to
falsify, risked eavesdropping and lacked transparency’. Democracy is too
precious to be handed over to whims or an opaque establishment and
network of unsafe gizmos. ‘’For the health of Indian democracy it is
better to return to tried and tested methods or else elections in future
can turn out to be a farce,'’ the editorial said.
– (UNI) –
28DI28.xml

Today the very same fraud EVMs which was doubted by
RSS on Saturday, Aug 28 2010 has been tampered in favor of 1% RSS’s
Bahuth Jiyadha Paapis (BJP) for Murderer of democratic institutions
(Modi) who WERE HATERS, who ARE HATERS and will CONTINUE TO BE HATERS.

Though
the Supreme Court had ordered to replace all the fraud EVMs with fool
proof voting system that is being followed by 80 democries of the world
and the tried and tested paper ballots used in the recent UK elections,
the ex CJI Sathasivan committed a grave error of judgement in allowing
the fraud EVMs to be replaced in phases as suggested by the ex CEC
Sampath because of the cost of Rs 1600 crore involved in replacing the
fraud EVMs totally.

Now the country is
OF the fraud EVMs favored
1% Horrorist, Militant, Violent, Intolerant, Heckling, Lynching Stealth
hindutva chitpawan brahmin RSS’s Bahuth Jiyadha Paapis (BJP) for
Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi)!
BY the fraud EVMs favored 1%
Terrorist, Militant, Violent, Intolerant, Heckling, Stealth hindutva
chitpawan brahmin RSS’s Bahuth Jiyadha Paapis (BJP) for Murderer of
democratic institutions (Modi)!!
FOR the fraud EVMs favored 1%
Terrorist, Militant, Violent, Intolerant, Heckling, Stealth hindutva
chitpawan brahmin RSS’s Bahuth Jiyadha Paapis (BJP) for Murderer of
democratic institutions (Modi)!!!
AND
OFF the 99% Sarvajan Samaj
i.e., all societies including LOYAL Arogya Rakshakas (Safai
Karmacharis)/SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities and Poor Upper Castes!
to
BUY the
99% Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies including LOYAL Arogya Rakshakas
(Safai Karmacharis)/SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities and Poor Upper Castes!

FAR
the 99% Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies including LOYAL Arogya
Rakshakas (Safai Karmacharis)/SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities and Poor Upper
Castes!

Once again the Supreme Court has to be pursued by 99%
Sarvajan Samaj i.e., All Societies literates to SCRAP all the Central
and Sate Elections conducted with these fraud EVMs and order for fresh
elections with FOOL PROOF VOTING SYSTEM. Since the MEDIA has become
DEADWOOD for the 99% and ALIVE just for 1% brahmins and Baniyas
HIGHLIGHT this issue both ONLINE by creating WEBSITES, BLOGS, Emails,
SMSs etc., and OFFLINE by taking the message directly to the people.

Amar Khade
suggests
The practical techniques of Protest !!!

1)
Protest using Motorcyles , have a good traffic jams .Mind that police
does not catch you up …..( Just like the Political Rally …..Nobody
will dare to catch you ..The Police are ill equipped to catch you )

2)
Protest using a Truck ….Leave the rented Truck in middle of road
….Create a Traffic Jam ..Let People and Government machinery suffer
for a while .Let the Traffic Police come and impound the truck …one
can always pay a Little Fine and get the Truck back on the
technicalities that “Truck got broke down ” ….
.


3)Do not waste your
energy by shouting in protest ..Play recorded protest messages loud in a
Good Public Address System ……

4)Just carry out seating protest
…it is the most practical approach for protest …Government officials
cannot use an kind of excessive FORCE on the seating protesters
…..Meanwhile play the protest message loudly via PA system and take
care to wear an ear plug or ear muffler ….The loud noise of PA system
really make People crazy ……Sometimes one have to make Loud Voice
when not heard ….

5)Play patriotic songs in middle of protest
messages …that gives a stamp of being Nationalist ..Nobody can book
you under any so called Anti-National activity ….

6) Different
states got different laws regarding “Offences on Public disruption
“…..study those State specific Laws and then conduct the Protests ….

7)
The aim of Protest is primarily Annoyance to the establishes elite
class and the causes of protest is Annoyance Due to the Public Policy or
any Govt actions of Elitist towards the other disadvantaged social
group …..It is just a game of Tit for Tat ….They annoy you ……You
annoy them …They exert power via Public policy , via their decisions
via their newly amended law …You exert power via Disruption
…….Take a note that Media will be never on your side ….It will
always take side of Elite class ….

8) Use your smart phone to
fullest extent …It got a Video Camera …A Still Camera and good
internet connection …….If any Excessive Force used by Govt Machinery
…just Record them …..Use it as a proof against the perpetrators of
Excessive Force …….

We live in Democracy …Protest is my right too …..
The EVMs have to be totally replaced by Paper ballots for the following reasons:

http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/9093.pdf

Page
1
REPORTABLE
IN
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL
NO.9093 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 13735 of 2012)
Dr.
Subramanian Swamy
…. Appellant(s)
Versus
Election Commission of
India
…. Respondent(s)
WITH
WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 406 OF 2012
J U D G M
E N T
P. Sathasivam, CJI.
1)
Leave granted.
Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No.
13735 of 2012
2)
This appeal is directed against the judgment and
order
dated 17.01.2012 passed by the Division Bench of the High
Court of
Delhi at New Delhi in W.P.(C) No. 11879 of 2009
whereby the High Court
disposed of the petition by
Page
2
disallowing the prayer made by the
appellant herein for
issuance of a writ of
mandamus
directing the
Election
Commission of India (ECI)-Respondent herein to incorporate
a
system of “paper trail/paper receipt” in the Electronic
Voting Machines
(EVMs) as a convincing proof that the EVM
has rightly registered the
vote cast by a voter in favour of a
particular candidate.
3)
Being
aggrieved of the above, the present appeal has
been filed by way of
special leave.
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 406 of 2012
4)
One Rajendra
Satyanarayan Gilda has filed this Writ
Petition, under Article 32 of the
Constitution of India, praying
for issuance of a writ
of
mandamus/
direction(s) directing the
Union of India, the Chief
Election Commissioner and the
Technical Experts Committee-Respondent
Nos. 1-3 herein
respectively to effect the necessary modifications in
the
EVMs so as to allow the voters to verify their respective votes
and
to attach the printers to the EVMs with a facility to print
the running
record of the votes for the purpose of verification
by the voters in the
process of voting. He also prayed for a
2
Page
3
direction to frame
guidelines and to effect necessary
amendments in the Conduct of Election
Rules, 1961.
5)
In view of the pendency of the appeal filed by
Dr.
Subramanian Swamy, this Court issued notice in the writ
petition and
tagged with the said appeal.
6)
Heard Dr. Subramanian Swamy,
appellant-in-person in
the appeal, Dr. R.R. Deshpande, learned counsel
for the writ
petitioner, Mr. Ashok Desai and Ms. Meenakshi Arora,
learned
senior counsel for the ECI.
Contentions:
7)
Dr. Subramanian
Swamy, the appellant herein
contended before this Court that the present
system of
EVMs, as utilized in the last few general elections in
India,
does not meet all the requirements of the international
standards
and though the ECI maintains that the EVMs
cannot be tampered with, but
the fact is that EVMs, like all
electronic equipments, are open to
hacking.
8)
The appellant has further highlighted that the
instant
matter arises out of the refusal of the ECI to incorporate
a
certain obvious safeguard in the EVMs called “paper
3
Page
4
backup”,
“paper receipt” or “paper trail”, presently in use
and mandated in some
countries like USA, which would easily
and cheaply meet the requirement
of proof that the EVM has
rightly registered the vote cast by a voter.
The appellant has
further highlighted that the “paper trail” system is
to
supplement the procedure of voting as in this procedure,
after
recording a vote in the EVM, a print out will come out
which will
appraise the voter that his vote has been rightly
registered and the
same will be deposited in a box which can
only be used by the ECI in
case of election dispute.
9)
It is the categorical stand of the
appellant that the
above said system will bring more accuracy in the
present
system and if a particular election is challenged on the
ground
that some particular identified voter’s voter or the
votes of a group of
voters have been suppressed/have not
been correctly assigned by the
EVMs, the accepted current
procedure is for a re-run of the same EVMs
for a re-count,
however, under the new procedure, a re-count will be of
the
receipts in the ballot box containing the printouts the EVMs
4
Page
5
had
issued to the voter thereby ensuring more transparency
in the
process.
10)
The writ petitioner has also raised similar contentions
as
those of Dr. Swamy. According to the petitioner, in the
present
system of voting through EVMs, there is no such
facility by which a
voter can verify and confirm his own
voting. At present, a voter presses
a button only but cannot
ascertain the actual voting. He is not sure
whether his vote
is recorded or not, if recorded, whether it is recorded
in
favour of the person to whom it was intended or not.
Whether it is
valid or invalid and whether it is counted or not.
It is submitted by
the petitioner that unless and until answers
to these questions are
personally seen by the voter, it cannot
be said that voting is made by
him because “pressing a
button of choice and getting flashed the
red-light” is not
actual voting in real sense unless the voter knows
well that
what has happened in consequence of pressing a button of
his
choice from the EVMs.
Stand of the Election Commission of India:
5
Page
6
11)
Mr.
Ashok Desai, learned senior counsel for the ECI
submitted that the
apprehension that EVMs could be
tampered with is baseless. It was also
informed to this Court
that the ECI has been exploring the possibility
of
incorporating a viable Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail
(VVPAT)
system as a part of the presently used EVMs to
make the election system
more transparent. Further, it was
brought to our notice that the ECI
conducted field trials for
VVPAT system earlier also but the same had
not been
successful and were discontinued. The ECI also filed a
counter
affidavit stating that the EVMs provided by the
Commission are of such a
high end technology that it cannot
be hacked.
12) Referring to Section
61A of the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, it is submitted that
the Statute itself
provides for recording of votes by EVMs and the ECI
has been
given the discretion to prescribe recording of votes by
such
EVMs as it may deem fit. This discretion has to be exercised
in a
manner to preserve the sanctity of the election process
and ensure that
the election is conducted in a free and fair
6
Page
7
manner. The ECI
has exercised due diligence to ensure that
EVMs so used are “tamper
proof” and it is also in the process
of exploring to incorporate VVPAT
system which is
compatible with the present EVMs used by it. It is
asserted
that there is no instance of tampering with EVMs so far
by
anyone.
13)
It is further submitted that the EVMs used in India
are
unique and unlike the ones used in the elections in USA and
other
countries, which are personal computer based. EVMs
deployed by the ECI
have been lauded not only in India but
also abroad. EVM’s Control Unit
retains in the memory each
vote recorded elector-wise. The information
stored in the
memory of the Control Unit can be retrieved by using
a
device called the “decoder” which, when attached to the
Control Unit
of EVM, can print out the statement of voting
data showing the order in
which each voter has voted and to
whom he has voted.
14)
Insofar as the
transparency of the election process as
well as the right of a voter to
know whether his vote has
actually been recorded for the candidate for
whom it was
7
Page
8
cast is concerned, it is submitted that as soon
as a vote is
recorded by a voter by pressing the “candidate’s” button
on
the Ballot Unit, a light glows against the name and symbol of
the
candidate, which the voter can see for himself/ herself.
This is a
visual (electronic) assurance to the voter that the
candidate for whom
he has cast his vote has actually got that
vote. Thereafter, the light
goes off to protect the secrecy of
voting.
15)
It is further submitted
that the feasibility of VVPAT
system was sought to be explored to by
various political
parties and they were explained the technical
and
administrative safeguards. The ECI also constituted a
Technical
Experts Committee to examine the viability of the
VVPAT system. On
27.05.2011, the Technical Experts
Committee, after discussion with
political parties and civil
society members and also after seeing the
demonstration of
the prototype VVPAT system developed by M/s.
Bharat
Electronics Ltd. (BEL) and M/s. Electronics Corporation of
India
Ltd. (ECIL), recommended that a field test of the
prototype VVPAT system
should be carried out in a simulated
8
Page
9
election under
different environmental conditions in
Jaisalmer, Thiruvananthapuram,
Delhi, Leh and Cherapunji.
The ECI also held further meetings with the
manufacturers of
EVMs on various dates to fine tune the system and
expedite
the follow up action required. Several meetings were also
held
with the Expert Committee on VVPAT system.
16)
In wider fulfillment of
the objectives of the field trial, the
ECI has requested the National
and State parties to extend
necessary cooperation by getting involved in
the trial process
actively and also witness the trial in order to have a
first
hand experience of the system. The ECI has also requested
the
individuals including the appellant – Dr. Subramanian
Swamy and the
groups, who have been engaged with the ECI
on the issue of EVM-VVPAT, to
witness the trial.
17) We have carefully perused the relevant materials
and
considered the rival contentions.
Discussion
18)
When the matter
was listed before this Court for
hearing on 27.09.2012, Mr. Ashok Desai
had brought to our
notice that the ECI is contemplating foolproof method
in
9
Page
10
EVMs for which they are taking various steps in
consultation
with the Technical Experts Committee and the views of
all
recognized political parties. Mr. Desai also promised to
appraise
this Court about the deliberations and the ultimate
decision to be taken
by them in this regard. Accordingly, this
Court granted sufficient time
to the ECI to file Status Report
regarding introduction of VVPAT system
in EVMs to be used
in the elections.
19)
Pursuant to the directions of
this Court, the ECI filed a
Status Report on the developments of VVPAT
system. In the
said report, the ECI, citing various technicalities,
prayed for
further time to make the system more robust for the
field
conditions.
20)
On 15.12.2012, M/s BEL, Bangalore filed a
report
showing the status of development of VVPAT system which
contains
changes that have been carried out in VVPAT from
September to December,
2012 and also furnished
chronological changes made in VVPAT system after
the field
trial of the VVPAT system held in July and August,
2012.
10
Page
11
21)
Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the
Secretary,
ECI, filed an affidavit highlighting the following
steps/
information:
“
(i)
That vide its Affidavit dated 14.01.2013,
the
Commission had filed the status report regarding
introduction of the
VVPAT system in the Electronic
Voting Machines (EVMs).
(ii)
That
subsequently, in the Technical Expert
Committee meeting held on
04.02.2013, the
Committee approved the design of the VVPAT and
decided
that software fine tuning will be done and
completed by the end of
February, 2013, and
modified design specifications will be submitted
to
the Technical Expert Committee for approval.
The Committee also
recommended that the
Commission may for using the VVPAT and that
the
VVPAT should be tried in a bye-election.
(iii)
That in the Technical
Expert Committee
meeting held on 19.02.2013, the Committee
finalized
the VVPAT design.
The manufacturers, namely, M/s. Bharat
Electronics
Limited and M/s. Electronics Corporation of India
Limited
have quoted Rs. 16,200/- (excluding duties,
taxes and transport charges)
per VVPAT system.
The Commission has decided to purchase
sufficient
units of VVPAT for trials in a Bye-election, at
an
approximate cost of Rs.72,90,000/- (Rupees seventy
two lakh ninety
thousand) approximately.
(iv)
It is submitted that the Commission
will
require approximately 13 lakh VVPAT units to be
manufactures for 13
lakh EVMs presently available
and roughly about Rs. 1690 crores (One
Thousand
Six Hundred Ninety Crores)(i.e. 13 lakh units x
Rs.13,000 per
unit) are required for the purpose of
implementation of the VVPAT system
taking into
account the possible reduction in the cost per unit
when
produced in bulk.
(v)
It is further submitted that in order to
implement
the new system the Conduct of Election
Rules, 1961 will require certain
amendments.
In this connection, vide letter No.
3/1/2013/Vol.II/SDR/86
dated 28.03.2013, the
11
Page
12
Commission has informed the
Legislative
Department of the Ministry of Law and Justice
inter
alia
the
various amendments required to the
relevant parts of Rules 49A to 49X,
66A, 55C, 56C,
57C and Form 17C of the Conduct of Elections Rules,
1961,
as well as introduction of Rules 49MA and 56D
in the said
Rules…
(vi)
That the Commission has called for a meeting
of all the
recognized National and State Parties on
10
th
May, 2013 for the purpose
of demonstration of
VVPAT unit to them and for discussion with them
for
eliciting their views regarding use of VVPAT system
in the
elections. The petitioner herein and others
interested in the matter
would also be invited at the
meeting.”
22)
It is seen from the records
that after various
deliberations with the experts and persons concerned
with
the technology, the Technical Experts Committee approved
the final
design of VVPAT units in its meeting held on
19.01.2013. In order to
meet the directions of this Court and
for proper execution of VVPAT
system, as noticed above, the
ECI in its letter dated 28.03.2013,
addressed to the Secretary
to the Government of India, Ministry of Law
and Justice stated
that necessary ground work for amendment to the
Conduct
of Election Rules, 1961 (in relevant parts in Rules 49A to
49X,
66A, 55C, 56C, 57C and Form 17C) may be made so that the
amendment
to the Rules can be notified immediately which
12
Page
13
will enable
the ECI to use the VVPAT system in bye-elections
in consultation with
the political parties. By placing all those
materials, the ECI requested
the Ministry of Law and Justice
for drafting and notifying amendment
Rules expeditiously.
23)
From the materials placed by the ECI, it is
noted that
the purchase order has been placed with M/s BEL and M/s
ECIL
for supplying 150 and 300 VVPAT units respectively at
Rs. 16,200/- per
unit excluding excise duty, sales tax and
transportation etc. costing
Rs. 72,90,000/- (approx.). The ECI
has also highlighted that if the
VVPAT systems are ultimately
to be used with all the 13 lakh EVMs
available, the total cost
in the purchase of VVPAT units may come to
about Rs. 1,690
crores, taking into account the possible reduction in
the cost
per unit due to bulk production the cost may come to
Rs.
13,000/- per unit approximately.
24)
The affidavit dated 21.08.2013,
filed on behalf of the
ECI, shows that the Ministry of Law and Justice,
on
24.07.2013, referred the draft notification to amend the
Conduct of
Election Rules, 1961 to provide for use of VVPAT
system of elections to
the ECI for its views and comments.
13
Page
14
The ECI suggested certain
minor modifications in the draft
notification and sent the same back to
the Ministry of Law
and Justice on 02.08.2013 with a request to notify
the
amendment Rules at the earliest. Accordingly, the Ministry
of Law
and Justice notified the amendments to the Conduct
of Election Rules,
1961 in the Gazette of India vide
notification No. S.O. 2470(E) dated
14.08.2013 to enable use
of VVPAT with EVMs.
25)
The aforesaid affidavit
of the ECI also shows that the
ECI had also convened a meeting of all
the recognized
National and State political parties on 10.05.2013
and
demonstrated before their representatives the working of
VVPAT
system. Separately, on the same day, the ECI also
held a meeting with
individuals including the appellant
herein who had been engaged with the
ECI over the past
several years regarding the functioning of EVMs.
VVPAT
system was demonstrated before them as well.
Representatives of
political parties and other individuals
expressed their satisfaction
over the VVPAT system.
Thereafter, the ECI had decided to use the VVPAT
system in
14
Page
15
the bye-election from 51-Noksen (ST) Assembly
Constituency
in the State of Nagaland. Instructions were issued to
hold
special meetings with the contesting candidates in
that
constituency to brief them about the use of VVPAT system.
The ECI
also organized special training sessions for poll
officers for the use
of VVPAT and steps were taken to
educate the electors for the
same.
26)
After various hearings, when the matter was heard
on
4.10.2013, an affidavit dated 01.10.2013 filed on behalf of
the ECI
was placed before this Court. The said affidavit was
filed to place on
record the performance/result of the
introduction of the VVPAT system in
the bye-election from
51-Noksen (ST) Assembly Constituency of Nagaland
for which
the poll was conducted on 04.09.2013 indicating the
future
course of action to be decided by the ECI on the basis of
said
performance. By this affidavit, it was brought to our notice
that
since VVPAT system was being used for the first time,
the ECI has
decided that intensive training shall be given to
the polling officers.
Members of the Technical Experts
Committee of the ECI also went to
supervise training and the
15
Page
16
actual use of VVPAT in the
bye-election. It is further stated
that the ECI also wrote letters to
all the recognized political
parties and other persons, including the
appellant herein,
engaged with the ECI on this subject inviting them to
witness
the use of VVPAT. It is also brought to our notice that
VVPAT
was successfully used in all the 21 polling stations of 51-
Noksen
(ST) Assembly Constituency of Nagaland. It was also
stated that as per
the Rules, the paper slips of VVPAT shall
not be counted normally except
in case the Returning Officer
decides to count them on an application
submitted by any of
the candidates. However, since VVPAT system was
being
used for the first time in any election, the ECI decided on
its
own to count paper slips of VVPAT in respect of all
polling
stations. According to the ECI, no discrepancy was found
between
the electronic and paper count.
27)
In the said affidavit, it is
finally stated that the ECI has
decided to increase the use of VVPAT
units in a phased
manner and for this purpose the ECI has already
written to
the Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice to
issue
administrative and financial sanction for procurement
of
16
Page
17
20,000 units of VVPAT (10,000 each from M/s BEL and
M/s
ECIL) costing about Rs. 38.01 crore.
28)
Though initially the ECI
was little reluctant in
introducing “paper trail” by use of VVPAT,
taking note of the
advantage in the system as demonstrated by
Dr.
Subramanian Swamy, we issued several directions to the
ECI .
Pursuant to the same, the ECI contacted several expert
bodies, technical
advisers, etc. They also had various
meetings with National and State
level political parties,
demonstrations were conducted at various places
and finally
after a thorough examination and full discussion, VVPAT
was
used successfully in all the 21 polling stations of 51-Noksen
(ST)
Assembly Constituency of Nagaland. The information
furnished by the ECI,
through the affidavit dated 01.10.2013,
clearly shows that VVPAT system
is a successful one. We
have already highlighted that VVPAT is a system
of printing
paper trail when the voter casts his vote, in addition to
the
electronic record of the ballot, for the purpose of verification
of
his choice of candidate and also for manual counting of
votes in case of
dispute.
17
Page
18
29)
From the materials placed by both the sides, we
are
satisfied that the “paper trail” is an indispensable
requirement of
free and fair elections. The confidence of the
voters in the EVMs can
be achieved only with the
introduction of the “paper trail”. EVMs with
VVPAT system
ensure the accuracy of the voting system. With an intent
to
have fullest transparency in the system and to restore the
confidence
of the voters, it is necessary to set up EVMs with
VVPAT system because
vote is nothing but an act of
expression which has immense importance
in democratic
system.
30)
In the light of the above discussion and
taking notice of
the pragmatic and reasonable approach of the ECI
and
considering the fact that in general elections all over India,
the
ECI has to handle one million (ten lakhs) polling booths,
we permit the
ECI to introduce the same in gradual stages or
geographical-wise in the
ensuing general elections. The
area, State or actual booth(s) are to be
decided by the ECI
and the ECI is free to implement the same in a
phased
18
Page
19
manner. We appreciate the efforts and good gesture
made
by the ECI in introducing the same.
31)
For implementation of such a
system (VVPAT) in a
phased manner, the Government of India is directed
to
provide required financial assistance for procurement of units
of
VVPAT.
32)
Before parting with the case, we record our appreciation
for
the efforts made by Dr. Subramanian Swamy as well as
the ECI, in
particular Mr. Ashok Desai and Ms. Meenakshi
Arora, learned senior
counsel for the ECI.
33)
With the above directions, the appeal and the
writ
petition are disposed of. No separate order is required in
the
applications for intervention. Both sides are permitted to
approach
this Court for further direction(s), if need
arises.
………………………………………….CJI
(P.
SATHASIVAM)
………………………………………..J.
(RANJAN
GOGOI)
19
Page
20
NEW DELHI;
OCTOBER 8, 2013.

SAMAPATH, EVM GOVERNMENT- NEED OF THE HOUR IS Electronic Virtual Movement 4 Replacing all EVMs (EVM4RAEVMs) to save Democracy.

October
2, 2006 Supreme Court started e-filing facility. It is a simple way of
filing any case via internet from his house. e-filing via internet does
not require the help of advocate.

This service can be utilized by any
common man as well as registered advocate. Anybody desiring to avail
this service may log on to www.sc-efiling.nic.in/sc-efiling/index.html
and sign up as a user.

For sign up procedure please follow up these
steps: First time users of Supreme Court’s E-filing have to register
him/her through the ‘Sign Up’ option.Through ‘e-FILING’ only Advocate-on
Record’ and petitioners-in-person can file cases in the Supreme Court
of India Advocate option is to be chosen if you are an
‘Advocate-on-Record’, otherwise choose ‘In-person’ option in case you
are petitioner-in-person.

For registering first time personal details
such as Address, contact details, E-mail Id etc., which are mandatory,
need to be entered.For Advocate-on-record, his/her code
(Advocate-on-record code) will be ‘Login-ID’, while ‘In-person’will
create his/her Login-Id through ‘Sign Up’ option. Password needs to be
entered thereafter. Login Id and password will be created once the
mandatory requirements are filled properly. After successful login the
‘Disclaimer screen’ appears on the screen.

Clicking of ‘I agree’
button on Disclaimer allows the user to proceed further, while ‘I
decline’ button sends the control back to the Login screen. After
successful login, the user can file the case electronically. ‘New Case’
option allows the user to file a new case ‘Modify’ option allows a user
to carryout changes to the already e-filed case, provided the court fee
payment option is not invoked. Defects associated with the e-filed case
will be e-mailed to the advocate/petitioner by the Supreme Court
Registry.For further assistance, ‘Help’ option is available.Click here
to file case online in Supreme Court of India
http://kohram.in/ten-reasons-for-banning-indian-evms/ - Reasons For
Banning Fradulent Tamperable EVMs Electronic voting machines (EVMs) were
introduced in a limited way in Indian elections in 1982, and they have
been in universal use since the general elections of 2004, when paper
ballots were phased out completely.

It is about time this country
reformed its voting system to ensure that the electoral verdicts reflect
the true will of the people of the country.
1. The Whole World has
Discarded Similar EVMs
2. Use of EVMs is Unconstitutional and Illegal
Too!
3. EVM Software Isn’t Safe
4. Nor is The Hardware
5. EVMs are
Sitting Ducks
6. “Insider” Fraud a Concern
7. Storage and Counting are
Concerns
8. Vote of No Confidence
9. EC is Clueless on Technology
10.
Trust Deficit1.

The Whole World has Discarded Similar EVMs.

The
electronic voting machines used in this country’s elections are
internationally known as Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting
machines which record votes directly in electronic memory.

Similar
voting machines have been banned in many countries such as Germany, the
Netherlands, Irelands etc. and such machines are allowed in most states
of the US only with a paper back up. Potential dangers of “vote fraud”
and more importantly, lack of transparency and verifiability associated
with them prompted ban or restrictions of their use. Developed nations
like the United Kingdom and France and advanced countries in our region
like Japan and Singapore have so far stuck to voting on paper ballots,
owing to their simplicity, verifiability and voter confidence in the
system. This country is an exception to this international trend and we
continue to use these voting machines long discarded by the world due to
lack of awareness and appreciation of the lay public of the concerns.

2.
Use of EVMs is Unconstitutional and Illegal Too! This country’s EVMs
may also be held unconstitutional because they infringe upon the
fundamental rights of the voters. In this country, Right to vote is a
legal right but how that vote should be exercised by a voter is his/ her
individual expression covered by Article 19 (1) (a) of the
Constitution, which guarantees fundamental rights to the citizens. In
the 2002 case pertaining to disclosure of assets and the criminal
background of candidates, the Supreme Court ruled that voters have a
right to know the antecedents of the contesting candidates and this is
fundamental and basic for survival of democracy. Accordingly, a voter
has the right to know that his vote which he exercised as a part of
freedom of expression has really gone in favour of the candidate whom
he/she has chosen. This right, fundamental in nature, is absent in the
electronic voting system.

In the traditional paper ballot system,
that fundamental right was preserve because a voter knew exactly how
his/ her vote was recorded and Universal use of EVMs in Indian elections
is illegal too! In 1984, the Supreme Court of India held that the use
of electronic voting machines in elections was “illegal” as the
Representation of People (RP) Act, 1951 did not permit use of voting
machines in elections. Later, the R.P. Act was amended in 1989
incorporating Section 61A. However, the amendment says voting machines
“may be adopted in such constituency or constituencies as the Election
Commission may, having regard to the circumstances of each case,
specify.” Violating the provisions of the R.P Act, the Election
Commission has conducted 2004 and 2009 nationwide general elections only
using electronic voting machines. Going by the 1984 judgment of the
Supreme Court, parliamentary elections of 2004 and 2009 may be held
illegal.

3. EVM Software Isn’t Safe.

The electronic voting machines are safe and secure only if the source code used in the EVMs is genuine.

Shockingly,
the EVM manufacturers, the BEL and ECIL, have shared the ‘top secret’
EVM software program with two foreign companies, Microchip (USA) and
Renesas (Japan) to copy it onto microcontrollers used in EVMs. This
process could have been done securely in-house by the Indian Worse, when
the foreign companies deliver microcontrollers fused with software code
to the EVM manufacturers, the EVM manufacturers cannot “read back”
their contents as they are either OTP-ROM or masked chips.

Amusingly,
the software given to foreign companies is not even made available with
the Election Commission, ostensibly for security reasons. With such
ridiculous decisions, the Election Commission and the public sector
manufacturers have rendered security of the EVMs a mockery. Adopting an
open standards policy by making the software public and allowing parties
to test the software installed in the EVMs would have offered better.

4. Nor is The Hardware. The danger for EVM manipulations is not just from its software.

Even
the hardware isn’t safe. Dr. Alex Halderman, professor of computer
science in the University of Michigan says, “EVMs used in the West
require software attacks as they are sophisticated voting machines and
their hardware cannot be replaced cheaply. In contrast, the Indian EVMs
can easily be replaced either in part or as wholesale units.” One
crucial part that can be faked is microcontrollers used in the EVMs in
which the software is copied. EVM manufacturers have greatly facilitated
fraud by using generic microcontrollers rather than more secure ASIC or
FPGA microcontrollers. Not just only microcontrollers, mother boards
(cards which contain microcontrollers) and entire EVMs can be replaced.
Neither the Election Commission nor the manufacturers have undertaken
any hardware or software audit till date. As a result, such manipulation
attempts would go undetected. To detect such fraud, the upgraded EVMs
have a provision to interface with an Authentication Unit that would
allow the manufacturers to verify whether the EVM being used in the
election is the same that they have supplied to the Election Commission.
The EVM manufacturers developed an “Authentication Unit” engaging the
services of Secure Spin, a Bangalore based software services firm.

The
Unit was developed and tested in 2006 but when the project was ready
for implementation, the project was mysteriously shelved at the instance
of the Election Commission. Several questions posed to the Election
Commission for taking this decision went unanswered. 5. EVMs are Sitting
Ducks. This country’s EVMs can be hacked both before and after
elections to alter election results. Apart from manipulating the EVM
software and replacing many hardware parts discussed above, discussions
with knowledgeable sources revealed that our country’s EVMs can be
hacked in many ways. I mention just two of them below. Each EVM contains
two EEPROMs inside the Control Unit in which the voting data is stored.

They
are completely unsecured and the data inside EEPROMs can be manipulated
from an external source. It is very easy to read (data from) the
EEPROMs and manipulate them. The second and the most deadly way to hack
our country’s EVMs is by inserting a chip with Trojan inside the display
section of the Control unit. This requires access to the EVM for just
two minutes and these replacement units can be made for a few hundred
rupees. Bypassing completely all inbuilt securities, this chip would
manipulate the results and give out “fixed” results on the EVM screen.
The Election Commission is completely oblivious to such possibilities. A
demonstration of these vulnerabilities is on the cards.

6.
“Insider” Fraud a Concern. Personal accounts from some well placed
political sources and experts say that there are some “insiders”
demanding vast sums (Rs. 5 Crore for each assembly constituency) to fix
election results. Who are these insiders? Unlike in the traditional
ballot system where only the election officials were the “insiders”,
electronic voting machine regime has spawned a long chain of insiders,
all of whom are outside the ambit and control of the Election Commission
of this country. There is every possibility that some of these
“insiders” are involved in murky activities in fixing elections. The
whole world—except us in this country–is alive to the dangers of insider
fraud in elections. The “insiders” include the public sector
manufacturers of this country’s electronic voting machines namely, the
Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and Electronics Corporation of India
(ECIL), the foreign companies supplying micro controllers, private
players (some of which are allegedly owned by some political leaders)
for carrying out checking and maintenance of electronic voting machines
during.

7. Storage and Counting are Concerns. The EVMs are stored
at the district headquarters or in a decentralized manner in different
locations. Election Commission’s concern for EVM safety becomes apparent
only during elections, where as security experts say that voting
machines must remain in a secure environment throughout their life
cycle. There could be many malpractices associated with electronic
counting. “Everybody watches polling closely. Nobody watches counting as
closely),” says Bev Harris, an American activist. Our Election
Commission takes three months to conduct parliamentary elections but
wants counting to be over in just three hours! In the rush to declare
results and the winners, several serious lapses go unnoticed in the
counting process. As a result, parties cannot give it the kind of
attention that this activity deserves.

Massive discrepancies
between votes polled and counted in a large number of polling stations
across the country raise serious concerns in this regard.

8. Vote
of No Confidence.The political class cutting across all sides of the
divide has just one verdict: “we don’t trust the EVMs”. This vote of “no
confidence” stems from the personal experiences of parties and leaders
as well as the nature of results thrown up by the EVMs. Parties are
looking at EVMs with great suspicion and dread the prospect of EVMs
“defeating” them.This mistrust in EVMs is not confined to any single
party and is all pervasive. Almost all mainstream political parties,
including the BJP, Congress, left parties, regional parties like the
Telugu Desam party (TDP), AIADMK, Samajwadi party, Rastriya Lok Dal
(RLD), Janata Dal (United) etc. have all expressed reservation about
EVMs in the aftermath of 2009 Lok Sabha polls. Even the Congress party
that decisively won the 2009 general elections alleged that the EVMs
have been manipulated in Orissa. Today, it is difficult to find parties
that vouch for the continued use of EVMs in Indian elections. On the
contrary, there is a flood of opposition to the EVMs from the political
class.

9. EC is Clueless on Technology.The Election Commission
has adopted the EVM technology about which it has practically no
knowledge.

As a result, it has little control over many aspects
of the election process. None of the election commissioners, neither the
present commissioners nor their predecessors, have proper understanding
of the EVM technology. The only source of technical understanding for
the Election Commission is a Committee of experts led by its chairman,
Prof. P.V.Indiresan. Even the Expert Committee seems very weak in its
capacities and understanding. Alex Halderman, professor of computer
science at the University of Michigan and an expert on the security of
voting systems who was present in New Delhi for the launch of the book,
Democracy at Risk, Can We Trust our EVMS? commented, “When I read the
2006 technical report prepared by the Expert Committee of the Election
Commission. I scribbled on it that there was a cause for alarm and
quickly decided to agree to come here.” That speaks volumes for the
quality and rigor of security testing done on the Country’s EVMs.

10.
Trust Deficit. Election Commission’s conduct in the wake of the serious
reservations expressed by people has been unbecoming of a
constitutional body. It has uttered many lies – our EVMs are “tamper
proof”, they are “different” etc. etc. It has refused to provide any
clarifications sought to the petitioners in the Supreme Court, despite a
reference from the Supreme Court of India. It has taken several
questionable decisions for which it has refused to offer any
explanations. For instance, it does not explain why old EVMs were used
in Lok Sabha elections despite the recommendations of its own Expert
Committee.

It does not explain why as many as 4.48 Lakh new EVMs
(which are more secure as per the Expert Committee) were not used in any
Congress party or UPA ruled states? Why and where it had allowed use of
state government owned EVMs? The non-transparent conduct of Election
Commission in the use of EVMs and the farce of an “enquiry” it has
conducted following serious reservations on EVMs does not inspire
confidence in its unbiased functioning.

How EVM Works and how can changed it’s functionality Watch this video [youtube id=”ZlCOj1dElDY” width=”620″ height=”360″]

-
See more at: http://kohram.in/ten-reasons-for-banning-indian-evms/…
youtube id=”ZlCOj1dElDY” width=”620″ height=”360″ -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlCOj1dElDY

This country’s EVMs are
Vulnerable to Fraud-Contrary to claims by our country,s election
authorities, the paperless electronic voting systems used in India
suffer from significant vulnerabilities. Even brief access to the
machines could allow criminals to alter election results.

In this
video, we demonstrate two kinds of attacks against a real Indian EVM.
One attack involves replacing a small part of the machine with a
look-alike component that can be silently instructed to steal a
percentage of the votes in favor of a chosen candidate. These
instructions can be sent wirelessly from a mobile phone. Another attack
uses a pocket-sized device to change the votes stored in the EVM between
the election and the public counting session, which in India can be
weeks later.These attacks are neither complicated nor difficult to
perform, but they would be hard to detect or defend against. The best
way to prevent them is to count votes using paper ballots that voters
can see. indiaEVM.org

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br2Mjt1BecI
- EVMs Can Be Tampered - Says Net India - Net India company says that
the Electronic Voting Machines EVMs which are used in polling stations
can be tampered in favor of the candidates. Watch this to find out
more…..To watch live news, videos subscribe to CVR News @
https://www.youtube.com/user/CVRNewsO…-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1xov8mrLZc -

EVM in INDIA REALITY EXPOSED by Dr Subramanian Swamy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3THfIvvxPY -

EVMs
can be tampered, experts say - Electronic voting machines could be
easily tampered to manipulate elections results, a group of foreign
experts said at a seminar in Dhaka on Tuesday. A standing committee
member of the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party, Abdul Moyeen
Khan, in the seminar said that the party would make some prototypes of
the EVMs the Election Commission made to show the people how the device
could be tampered.

Non-governmental organisation Centre for
Sustainable Development organised the seminar, ‘Electronic voting
machines: use and abuse,’ at the Lake Shore hotel in the city. The
organisation’s secretary general Mahfuzullah conducted the seminar and
its president Anwar Hashim, also a former ambassador, presided over the
programme. Computer science professor in the University of California
Mathew Allen Bishop, senior software architect of Yahoo in India
Shashank Shekhar and research and development director of Hewlett
Packard of the United States Shawn Islam made presentation in the
seminar highlighting how EVMs could be tampered. All the three experts
said the EVMs could be tampered in several ways in a short span of time
to manipulate the elections results in favour of a certain candidate if
the manipulators would get physical access to EVMs. Citing an example of
the flaws of the EVM used in the United States and in other parts of
the world, Bishop said the EVMs, electronic devices which need software
to function, could be easily tampered. Bishop, however, asked the
authorities concerned to look into certain issues before using EVMs.
‘When votes are counted, how do you know that the button pushed to vote
for scales on the ballot unit is in fact counted as a vote for scales?’
he said. Bishop also said, ‘How do you know that the software is
correct? There are no bugs that affect the vote counting?

How do you know that the software on the EPROM chip is the version that is supposed to be used? There was no malware?’

He
said the security of the software running the EVM must be part of the
inbuilt design of the device. Earlier, Shawn Islam,m a
Bangladeshi-American, demonstrated how a vote cast for a candidate could
be stored for the candidate the voter did not vote for through software
manipulation effected beforehand. Both of the experts said that there
be a system of paper trail of the votes cast so that the voters could
see that their votes were stored for the candidate they voted for.’But,’
Shawn Islam added, ‘the EVMs developed by Bangladesh do not have any
option to add the paper trail system.’ He claimed that the EVM developed
in Bangladesh have plenty of problems. Shashank said that there was no
electronic device in the world which could not be tampered. All of the
experts said that the device must be tested by a third party before its
use.

In reply to a question whether the EVM can be manipulated
with remote control devise without physical intervention once EVMs are
tested and certified by the experts of the political parties just before
the elections, Shawn said, ‘You must have physical interventions to
manipulate it if the EVM does not belong to any wireless network.’

When
a reporter asked Abdul Moyeen Khan whether the BNP would accept it if
EVMs were tested by their experts, the BNP leader parried the answer
saying that the party would develop some EVM prototypes to show how they
could be tampered.

Representatives from the Bangladesh
Nationalist Party, including its acting secretary general Mirza Fakhrul
Islam Alamgir, the chairperson’s advisers Iqbal Hasan Mahmud, Sabiuddin
Ahmed, Ruhal Alam and opposition chief whip Zainul Abdin Farroque,
attended. Speaking on the occasion, former Dhaka University
vice-chancellor Moniruzzaman Mia, BRAC University professor Piash Karim
and Sushaner Janya Nagarik secretary Badiul Alam Majumder stressed the
need for building trust among political parties before introducing any
new device in the elections process.The country’s two major political
camps are now at loggerheads over the introduction of EVMs in the next
polls. The ruling Awami League-led alliance said that it would extend
all cooperation to the E C in using EVMs in the next general elections
while the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party-led alliance vowed to
resist the move.Attachments area- Preview YouTube video India’s EVMs are
Vulnerable to Fraud
-Preview YouTube video EVMs Can Be Tampered - Says
Net India Preview YouTube video EVM in INDIA REALITY EXPOSED by Dr
Subramanian Swamy.

http://www.firstpost.com/politics/time-to-show-bjp-cong-a-mirror-two-thirds-of-india-doesnt-like-them-2820624.html?ref=yfp

It
is Time to show BJP, Cong a mirror: 99% of this Country doesn’t like
them-RSS and BJP were instrumental in the rise of all the newly elected
state governments who are just scape goats and their own mother’s flesh
eaters who emerged on the political firmament with BJP and RSS support
without which they would not remain strong for long. The country was
already on course to become ‘Congress mukt’ (free from Congress) and
that the party’s dipping fortunes could be attributed to it having
remained “captive to a family”which  had trashed the possibility of
Sonia Gandhi becoming the Prime Minister in 2004. AIADMK in Tamil Nadu
Trinamool Congress in West Bengal and Bihar’s alliance emerged due to
hard work of Sangh workers.They all will gradually become ineffective
& will not win next time. They together used to wipe out Congress.
Communists and socialist parties do this drama that they were  communal.
All of them have fought alongside them. In 1977, they came together. In
1966, they came together. They  came together in 1989. When was the
taboo. When did we not come together. This is all drama and hypocrisy of
socialists and communists.While CPI had supported Congress during
Emergency, CPM was opposed to it.”They think people’s memory is short.
All of them had come with them when they fought against Congress.

A
“Good Governance” situation had prevailed in UP after Mayawati’s BSP
formed its government in 2007. Hence  in 2012 the BJP wanted to remove
Mayawati and, since they believed BJP would not be able to form its
government, they used the temperable EVMs for Samajwadi Party back to
power.Today, the situation is not like that. With the fraud EVMs BJP has
72 MPs and the fraud EVMs will not have BSP now. Now they are ready.
They have proved to the world  that they are ready with the fraud
EVMs.The electorate was now convinced that  with Paper ballots Ms
Mayawati’s BSP will not only become the CM of UP but also the new PM of
Prabuddha Bharath as it was proved in the UP Panchayath Elections.Ms
Mayawati  empowered the people.Ms Mayawati will not be merely a Prime
Minister but will become a Iron lady . As CM she was  different. She was
a great  administrator as she started implementing the Modern
Constitution distributing the wealth of the state equally among the
Sarvajan Samaj. People felt she solved all their problems. So the scene
had changed.

Time to show BJP, Cong a mirror: 99% of Sarvajan Samaj doesn’t like them

With
the nation getting fed up of the perennial — perhaps mutual — exchange
of jibes and accusations between the Congress and the BJP,  it’s high
time that BSP showed these two prima donna entities a mirror, reflecting
their true worth in the overall political space in this country.

The
picture that emerges in the mirror makes it clear that both these
parties, which think too big of themselves, are living in a fools’
paradise. Even if they were to join hands at the current juncture, they
wouldn’t even occupy 1% in the country! Like it or not, that is a fact.

Let’s
examine their strength in the Rajya Sabha first. The Congress continues
to be the largest single party with 64 members. The strength of the BJP
stands at 49 currently. If you add the numbers of the two top national
parties, they would account for less than half of the total strength of
this House of 245. It’s the “others” who are in majority.

Those
who refuse to view things from this angle might argue that things are
vastly different in the Lok Sabha, which truly represents this country.
No, it doesn’t in spite of the fact that the BJP, with its 282 members,
enjoys absolute majority in this august House.

Dig a little
deeper beneath the surface and you would find that the ruling party had
swept to power by bagging just 31.34 percent of the total valid votes
polled at the height of the Modi wave in 2014.

And if you
consider their vote share in relation to the total number of voters –
not just those who preferred to exercise their franchise – the figure
drastically comes down to 20.58 percent. Yes, that is a fact. The BJP
now lords over India by getting support of just one fifth of the total
voters.

The performance of the Congress was even worse. This
grand-old party of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty could manage to bag only
19.52 percent of the total valid votes polled in during the Modi wave.
Their vote share, in relation to the overall number of voters in
country, had shrunk to 12.82 percent.

Can you believe that the
Congress doesn’t enjoy the support of even one eighth of the Country’s
voters? And together, the BJP and the Congress haven’t been been getting
the support of even one percent of Country’s population on the whole as
the intolerant, violent, militant, lunatic, mentally retarded
horrorists shooting, lynching cannibal psychopaths are just 1% chitpawan
brahmin Rakshasa Swayam Seevaks controlling both Congress and BJP
(Bahuth Jiyadha Psychopaths) and its avatars VHP (Visha Hindutva
Psychopaths), ABVP (All Brahmin Venomous Psychopaths) Bajan Dal etc.,for
the sake of stealth, shadowy, discriminative of hindutva cult full of
hatred towards 99% Sarvajan Samaj i.e., all societies includeng
SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities and poor upper castes!

But the perception
that these two parties are ‘be-all’ and ‘end-all’ of politics in the
country persists, thanks to the heat and dust generated by their mutual,
never-ending attacks and counter attacks.

Obviously, both the
parties have, over the years, developed expertise in keeping camera
arc-lights focused on them, through an endless series of allegations and
counter-allegations.  And they have succeeded massively.

The
nation listens to their otherwise explosive statements attentively.
Don’t you remember some of these catch-phrases that were used by
Murderer of democratic institutions (Modi) and Sonia Gandhi to settle
scores – maut ka saudagar (merchant of death), zahar ki kheti (sowing
seeds of poison), khooni panja and zalim haath (bloody claws and cruel
hand)?

Let’s play back some of their more recent jibes at each other:

-
At a party rally in the Capital on 6 May, Sonia said: “Do not frighten
us. Life has taught me to fight on. They are murdering democracy. The
achche din of the BJP are over.”

- In retaliation, Modi raked up the
issue of the “Italian Connection” to target Sonia over the
AgustaWestland deal, in the election rallies in Kerala and Tamil Nadu
three days later.

- Targeting Modi for its rather loud celebrations
on the completion of two years in office, Sonia said: “Modi ji acts more
like a Shahenshah than a democratically elected Prime Minister”.

-
Hitting back, Union agriculture minister, Radha Mohan Singh, thundered:
“The daughter-in-law of a big family is not a Maharani.”

The ranting
and raving of the two players apart, the fact regarding their worth
remains unchanged: 99% of the Country’s voters don’t like them! They
either stay away from the polling booths or vote against them actively.
They are weak collectively and even weaker separately as they are aware
both have used the fraud EVMs to gobble the Master Key.

Chances are
that they would never shake hands, not even when the nation calls for a
unity between forces espousing the cause of Congress-mukt Bharat and
Sangh-mukt Bharat. But just visualise for a minute: What happens if all
the non-Congress, non-BJP people unite in this country?

http://twocircles.net/2016jun05/1465136405.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Twocirclesnet-IndianMuslim+%28TwoCircles.net+-+Indian+Muslim+News%29#.V1f2TNeaS2x

Racial prejudice runs deep in the land of casteism

Sushma
Swaraj and General V K Singh are habitual in putting foot in their
mouths saying that this was a ‘minor’ incident blown out of proportion
by the media.

While most of the upper caste middle class will reject
this suggesting that SC/STs have got ‘everything’ after the government
provided them ‘reservation’ in its services and hence things are
‘resolved’. This segment of the upper caste Hindus is highly avers to
the idea of affirmative action and always claim those who get into it
lack ‘merit’. The fact is the word ‘merit’ itself has become the biggest
racist terminology of the powerful to defend and ensure their control
on the levers of powers in the country. The brahmanical in general and
the 1% chitpawan brahmin in particular system in the country work
through various ways and the biggest is controlling the popular
discourse and cultural practices and the discrimination and prejudices
are visible in not only humors but also in pains.

The Brahmanical in general and the 1% chitpawan brahminical in particular  idea of national ‘treasures’

We
all heard how the upper castes reacted to the so-called humor on Sachin
Tendulkar and Lata Mangeshkar by some Tanmay Bhat, evidently a brahmin
himself. The entire cinema fraternity came up to rescue Lata Mangeshkar.
The argument was that we must not make fun of ‘Icons’ of India
otherwise it would be too dangerous.  Another important point that we
must understand is whether we really have a sense of humor or we are
habitual of joking at people on the basis of their color, ability,
physique and caste? Can mocking at someone with racial, caste and gender
prejudices be called humor? Now, we have seen these entire ‘humorist’
mocking at Gandhi and Nehru with latter targeted with malicious videos
and character assassination as if he was the worst person that the
country could have. How we treat our iconic leaders of the freedom
movement is reflected in these ‘humors’ but then none ever bother to
question under the pretext of ‘freedom of expression’ but with Lata and
Sachin targeted all of us are seeking their ‘protection’ in the garb of
‘national treasure’ ? Is Nehru not ‘national treasure’? But then Nehru
is the biggest villain today for this government and Amitabh, Sachin and
Lata are the epitome of chitpawan brahmanical ‘morality’ today. Even
when we know Nehru was a brahmin but suddenly the chitpawan brahmins are
realizing that he was not and ‘researchers’ and ‘humorists’ found that
he came from a Muslim ancestry. The Bollywood never came for the
‘rescue’ of our national icons but it look that the only national icons
that we have are either from the corrupt world of cricket or orthodox
and conservative Bollywood fraternity which has become the
‘conscious-keeper’ of the country. Why is that people get agitated for
Sachin and Lata when any one try to imitate them or joke on them
particularly when we have mocked at all our icons of freedom movement
who were unambiguously against RSS ( Rakshasa Swayam Sevaks) brand of
nationalism ? The reason lies in the mindset and the targeted group of
the upper castes feeling offended these days if you remind them of their
‘sins’ or any historical wrongs. They are the torch bearer of the
chitpawan brahmanical ‘success’ stories and ‘morality’ of our times
hence any ‘humor’ in their name is questionable, though since the humor
was done by another brahmin so there are numeryous supporting fraternity
too otherwise if he were a Muslim or a Christian we would have been in a
very difficult situation.

Haven’t we seen the ‘humor’ of mocking
at a person on the basis of their color or physical appearance or his
disability in the Hindi cinema? That reflect the popular mindset and the
perception that it has. The Country is turning into an upper-caste
stealth, shadowy, discriminative hindutva cult country now with people
getting encouragement from those in power. It is difficult for certain
communities to get a house at a relatively ‘secular’ place in any part
of the country. ‘Secular’ space means un-ghettoized upper caste
dominated space with all the ‘modern amenities’ at your disposal but
unfortunately these spaces are now being converted into ‘upper caste’
‘ghettoes’ with more and more mobilization in the name of ‘festivals’
and ‘jaati’ to protect. So it is nearly difficult for a Muslim to get a
house on rent in these places. Similarly the SC/STs too face this
discrimination based on their caste once they inform about their castes
then it becomes difficult for them to survive in that locality. Friends
from North East will not get house on cheaper rate at any good locality
and definitely our African friends would find it difficult to get a
house that easily as the ‘mainstream’ Indians get and here lies the
prejudiced mind that we have allowed to happen. ‘People call us names
like ‘blacky’, ‘blackberry’ and even ‘monkey’. It happens on the road
while driving, at public places and even at the locality we live in,”
says Faisal Dermane, President of the Africans Students Association in
Telangana. The student from Togo in West Africa, however, notes that
most students are good to Africans but it’s the few who use racial slurs
that make them live in fear. Abdoul Gueye, a Senegalese student in
Osmania University, says it’s difficult to be African and black in
India. “There are lots of stereotypes about Africans. People think that
we live in the jungle. They think Africa is a country. They say Africa
is so hot that’s why we are black,” he says as quoted by ‘The News
Minute’.

It is a well-known fact that Indians are highly color
conscious. My father was dark in complexion and he faced a lot of
comments due to that when he was a teacher. I was a child but I could
understand senior students doing that. Most of the ‘humor’ that we have
in our country comes from mocking at people’s color, physical appearance
like disability, caste and religion. Many times you are mocked due to
your accent of the language.

Our External Affairs minister Ms
Sushma Swaraj felt that people must ensure that we shake hand with
Africans telling them that they are welcome. Obviously, it is an
important issue but do not try to suggest that we love ‘vasudhaiv
Kutumbakam’ and there are no issues in our society related to color and
caste when our entire newspaper columns, Sunday supplements are crowded
with caste based advertisement and the most of our boys and their
families irrespective of their caste, color, religion or region want
‘fair-skinned’ ‘fair and lovely’ wife.

Just when the government was
trying to ignore this issue, a new report by Walkfree Foundation in
Australia informed that India has World’s highest number of ‘modern
slaves’. Now, this issue is highly ‘controversial’ for many as they feel
that government of India has done everything as there are laws in our
statute books. Another official was questioning the statistics as how
did they arrive at a figure of 18.35 million ‘modern slaves’ in the
country which was about 1.4% of its total population.

The
interesting fact is that five biggest countries are China, this country,
Pakistan, Bangladesh and Uzbekistan where 58% of the total ‘modern
slaves’ of the world work under horrible conditions but still if you
compare the figures India’s record shames us. China (3.39 million),
Pakistan ( 2.13 million), Bangladesh ( 1.53 million) and Uzbekistan (
1.23 million) are nothing in comparison to 18.35 million Indian ‘modern
slaves’. A senior officer in the Ministry of labor was pointing out that
we have all the laws and constitutional provisions to protect people so
these reports are ‘questionable’ while another one in the TV studio
wanted to ‘know’ the methodology of the process. The fact is that if a
proper methodology is taken into account then we will find the number
much larger in India. Why should we only point out to ‘economic aspect’
of the ‘modern slavery’ and ‘satisfy’ ourselves with constitutional
provisions. There is a socio-cultural aspect of the ‘slavery’ and I
can’t call it just ‘modern slavery’ when the things are historically
proven that there was a caste system which ensured that certain people
would do the most inhuman kind of ‘work’ on the basis of the caste and
these ‘aajivaks’ were not allow to obtain ‘knowledge’ which was the sole
domain of the chitpawan brahminms. How can one not call an ‘occupation’
which compel people to clean the human excreta by another human being?
For so many years, despite best laws, we are unable to bring a full stop
this heinous and criminal traditional practice worse than slavery. The
fact is that people don’t even get money in lieu of it and they are
virtually made helpless under this work.

There is a need to
understand what exactly is ‘Modern slavery’ report suggests. this
country, Pakistan and Bangladesh have commonality in terms of caste
influence in our lives while China and Uzbekistan have remnants of
feudalism in their societies which influenced Pakistan too. The report
points out that China, Pakistan, North Korea, Iran, Bangladesh and
several other countries are worst as they have not done anything to
eradicate it. The reason why this country is still better lies in our
constitutional provisions while these countries mentioned as most
problematic have not yet done anything to remove ‘modern slavery’ as
most of states have not yet ratified many international covenants. There
are issues of trafficking prevalent in our societies and yes the
government is serious in handling them yet the biggest road-block is the
prevailing mindset of prejudices and discrimination.

Dr Baba
Saheb Ambedkar often talked of contradictions in our society between the
political and social lives and therefore pointed out that the best of
the constitution in the hands of ‘worst’ people might turn out to be a
nightmare which will force people to rebel against the same.
Unfortunately the countries which have been named as worst have not been
able to change their social system despite certain provisions made in
their constitution. Most of these societies are still dominated by
religious laws which are the biggest obstacles in creating a humane
society but as far as India is concern our struggle is between the
modern constitution and those status- quoists who have been benefitted
from the feudal Manuwadi social order. The constitution can only break
this order once it has fair representation at all level of the people
who have been denied human rights for centuries and that too is possible
if the people joining the government be made compulsorily to take oath
under the constitution to protect it as caste minds are failing the
republican constitution.

It is in these context one would be
surprised to hear from our external affairs minister making a point that
there is no racial discrimination in India and that Country’s must
‘shake hand’ with African people and say ‘we love them’. Now this
symbolizes the upper caste effort to ‘resolve’ the discriminatory Indian
system through ‘tokenism’ and that too in a very patronizing way like
the upper caste leaders ‘dining’ at the places of SC/STs as if doing a
great favor on them. The cruel reality is that upper caste Indians still
suffer from Superiority complex and have not taken it seriously that
the ‘others’ are now responding better. How interesting is the fact that
now Dalit young boys and girls are faring better than caste Hindus in a
very similar way as studies showing that black boys and girls are
growing better than the American whites in term of education despite the
fact that America is not really a better model for us in terms of
representation and development of the blacks there but as far as
arrogant and false pride is concern none can beat the caste Hindus and
the way they are justifying all acts of historic wrong. The problem is
not to even accept that there was a problem and we need to address it
with all seriousness and concern. If anything is questioned about the
‘golden past’ of the upper caste Indians they come out with vengeance
hurling abuses on the others.

There is no denial the fact that
our constitutional founding fathers were aware of the whole issue of
discrimination and they did their best but what we have failed in India
is to develop those understanding and not wait for law to guide us but
strengthen our own resolve to fight against all kinds of prejudices and
stereotypes. Our sports fraternity and cultural activist have no
parallel of legendary boxer Mohammad Ali who had the courage to stand up
and speak against racial discrimination in United States. We remained
confined to glorifying our past and justifying all the historical
wrongs.

Frankly the current government in India is encouraging
those old stereotypes against all the dissenters, minorities
particularly Muslims as well as SC/STs. It play multiple games while on
the massive propaganda machinery of paid media the government goes on
with ‘make in India’ and Dr Ambedkar’s vision and mission while the main
clientele of the ruling party are the orthodox upper caste Hindus
despise the very word of reservation and equality. Not only in India but
abroad too they are on distortion of history mission flatly denying any
wrong of the past with the Dalits. Examples from UK and USA clearly
reveal how Hindu Council there objected to Equity Law in UK and opposed
mentioning of the word Dalit as if the problem never existed. The Modi
government’s attempt to provide citizenship to Bangladeshi and Pakistani
Hindus is an attempt to play with the communal fire in the entire
subcontinent. It means that rather than believing in multiculturalism
the government and its ideological master, the Sangh Parivar, are ready
to deepen those stereotypes, which has created the whole crisis today.
One need to understand as how will a narrow minded leadership allow a
healthy relationships between diverse faiths and races in India. Sushma
Swaraj will have to seriously ponder over whether her government’s
policies are not responsible for encouraging such elements who believe
in their caste, colour and cultural superiority.