The Tipitaka (Pali ti, “three,” + pitaka, “baskets”), or Pali canon, is the collection of primary Pali language texts which form the doctrinal foundation of Theravada Buddhism. The Tipitaka and the
paracanonical Pali texts (commentaries, chronicles, etc.) together
constitute the complete body of classical Theravada texts.
The Pali canon is a vast body of literature: in English translation the texts add up to thousands of printed pages. Most (but not all) of the Canon has already been published in English over the years. Although only a small fraction of these texts are available on this website, this collection can be a good place to start.
The three divisions of the Tipitaka are:
Vinaya Pitaka
The collection of texts concerning the rules of conduct governing the
daily affairs within the Sangha — the community of bhikkhus (ordained
monks) and bhikkhunis (ordained nuns). Far more than merely a list of rules, the Vinaya Pitaka also includes the stories behind the origin of each rule, providing a detailed account of the Buddha’s solution to the question of how to maintain communal harmony within a large and diverse spiritual community. Sutta Pitaka The collection of suttas, or discourses, attributed to the Buddha and a few of his closest disciples, containing all the central teachings of Theravada Buddhism. (More than one thousand sutta translations are available on this website.) The suttas are divided among five nikayas (collections):
Digha Nikaya — the “long collection” Majjhima Nikaya — the “middle-length collection” Samyutta Nikaya — the “grouped collection” Anguttara Nikaya — the “further-factored collection” Khuddaka Nikaya — the “collection of little texts”: Khuddakapatha Dhammapada Udana Itivuttaka Sutta Nipata Vimanavatthu Petavatthu Theragatha Therigatha Jataka Niddesa Patisambhidamagga Apadana Buddhavamsa Cariyapitaka Nettippakarana (included only in the Burmese edition of the Tipitaka) Petakopadesa ( ” ” ) Milindapañha ( ” ” )
Abhidhamma Pitaka The collection of texts in which the underlying doctrinal principles presented in the Sutta Pitaka are reworked and reorganized into a systematic framework that can be applied to an investigation into the nature of mind and matter.
https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Buddhism_in_Scotland
The arrival of Buddhism in Scotland is relatively recent. In Scotland
Buddhists represent 0.13% of the population.[1] People were asked both
their current religion and that they were brought up in. 6,830 people
gave Buddhism as their current religion, and 4,704 said they were
brought up in it, with an overlap of 3,146.[2]
Contents
1 History of Buddhism in Scotland 2 Samyé Ling 3 Notable Scottish Buddhists 4 See also 5 External links 6 References
History of Buddhism in Scotland
The earliest Buddhist influence on Scotland came through its imperial
connections with South East Asia, and as a result the early connections
were with the Theravada traditions of Burma, Thailand, and Sri Lanka. To
begin with, 150 years ago, this response was primarily scholarly, and a
tradition of study grew up that eventually resulted in the foundation
of the Pali Text Society, which undertook the huge task of translating
the Pali Canon of Theravada Buddhist texts into English. The main stupa at Samyé Ling monastery in Scotland
The rate of growth was slow but steady through the century, and the
1950s saw the development of interest in Zen Buddhism. In 1967 Kagyu
Samyé Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre was founded by Tibetan lamas and
refugees Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche and Akong Rinpoche. It is in
Eskdalemuir, in south west Scotland and is the largest Tibetan Buddhist
centre in Western Europe, and part of the Karma Kagyu tradition.
As well there are other Buddhism-based new religious movements such as
the New Kadampa Tradition, Triratna Buddhist Community and Sōka Gakkai
International. The Triratna community maintains a retreat centre at
Balquhidder in the Trossachs. Samyé Ling
Kagyu Samyé Ling
Monastery and Tibetan Centre monastery—founded in 1967[3]—includes the
largest Buddhist temple in western Europe. There is an associated
community on Holy Isle which is owned by Samyé Ling who belong to the
Kagyu school of Tibetan Buddhism. The settlements on the island include
the Centre for World Peace and Health and a retreat centre for nuns.
Samyé Ling has also established centres in more than 20 countries,
including Belgium, Ireland, Poland, South Africa, Spain and
Switzerland.[4] Notable Scottish Buddhists
Stephen Batchelor Bodhipaksa Alex Ferns Rupert Gethin Ajahn Candasiri See also
Holy Isle, Firth of Clyde Buddhism in the United Kingdom Buddhism by country Demographics of Scotland British Asian Asian-Scots New Scots External links
Edinburgh Drikung Kagyu Sangha Edinburgh Buddhist Centre (FWBO) Scotland - List of Buddhist groups in Scotland Portobello Buddhist Priory (OBC) Edinburgh Theravadan Buddhists Scottish Wild Geese Sangha (COI) Diamond Way Buddhism References http://www.scotland.gov.uk/stats/bulletins/00398-02.asp
Scotland’s Census 2001: the Registrar-General’s Report to the Scottish
Parliament, General Register Office for Scotland, 2003, page 31 Kate Rew (2010-01-15). “Scotland’s Buddhist retreat”. The Guardian. Retrieved 2010-01-15. In the Scottish Lowlands, Europe’s first Buddhist monastery turns 40 Retrieved 24 June 2007.
A Vajrayana Buddhist group in Scotland following the Drikung Kagyu
lineage and the enlightened vision of His Eminence Garchen Triptrul
Rinpoche.
Welcome
final
Gar Trinley Yongkhyab Ling is a Vajrayana Buddhist group in Scotland,
following the Drikung Kagyu lineage and the enlightened vision of His
Eminence Garchen Rinpoche.
Under the spiritual direction of Venerable Dorzin Dhondrup Rinpoche, we are based in Edinburgh and we meet twice a month.
Tha
Tipitaka (Pali deich, “trì,” + Pitaka, “basgaidean”), no Pali Canan, ‘S
e cruinneachadh de bhun-Pali cànan theacsaichean, der teagasgail nam
bunait Theravada Buddhism. Tha na teacsaichean Tipitaka agus Paracanonical Pali (beachdan,
litrichean, msaa) còmhla mar bhuidheann iomlan de theacsaichean
clasaigeach Theravada.
Is
e buidheann mòr de litreachas a th’ann an canon Pali: ann an
eadar-theangachadh Beurla tha na teacsaichean a ‘cur suas ri mìltean de
dhuilleagan clò-bhuailte. Tha
a ‘chuid as motha (ach chan eil a h-uile h-uile) den Canon air
fhoillseachadh an-toiseach sa Bheurla thar nam bliadhnaichean. Selv om kun en lille del af disse tekster er tilgængelige på denne hjemmeside, kan denne samling være et godt sted at starte.
Is iad na trì roinnean anns an Tipitaka:
Vinaya Pitaka Cruinneachadh
de theacsaichean a thaobh riaghailtean giùlain a tha a ‘riaghladh
chùisean làitheil taobh a-staigh na Sangha - coimhearsnachd nam bikkhus
(manaich òrdaichte) agus bhikkhunis (beanntan-dubha òrdaichte). Fada a bharrachd na dìreach liosta de na riaghailtean, a ‘gabhail
a-steach Vinaya Pitaka også na sgeulachdan air cùl an tùs gach
riaghailt, a’ toirt cunntas mionaideach air a ‘Buddha a’ fuasgladh dà
spørgsmålet mar bevare coitcheann co-sheirm inom mòr spioradail agus
eadar-mheasgte a ‘choimhearsnachd. Sutta Pitaka An
cruinneachadh de suttas, no deasbadan, a chaidh a thoirt don Buddha
agus beagan de na deiscioblaidhean ab ‘fhaisge aige, anns a bheil prìomh
theagasg Theravada Buddhism. (Tha barrachd air mìle eadar-theangachadh ri fhaighinn air an
làrach-lìn seo.) Tha na h-eadar-theangachadh air an roinn am measg còig
nikayas (cruinneachaidhean):
Digha Nikaya - an “cruinneachadh fada” Majjhima Nikaya - an “cruinneachadh meadhanach fada” Samyutta Nikaya - an “cruinneachadh buidhne” Anguttara Nikaya - an “cruinneachadh nas fhasa” Khuddaka Nikaya - an “cruinneachadh de theacsaichean beaga”: Khuddakapatha Dhammapada Udana Itivuttaka Sutta Nipata Vimanavatthu Petavatthu Theragatha Therigatha jataka Niddesa Patisambhidamagga Apadana Buddhavamsa Cariyapitaka Nettakarana (a-mhàin ann an eagran Burmese an Tipitaka) Petakopadesa (”") Milindapañha (”")
Abhidhamma Pitaka Tha
an cruinneachadh de theacsaichean ann an Som prionnsabalan teagasgail a
thoirt seachad ann an Sutta Pitaka tha ath-obrachadh agus
ath-eagrachadh a-steach frèam-obrach eagarach Som Kan Gnìomhaichte til
en rannsachadh nàdar inntinn agus Matter.
Gautama Buddha (c. 563 BCE/480 BCE – c. 483 BCE/400 BCE), also known as Siddhārtha Gautama , Shakyamuni Buddha ,[4] or simply the Buddha, after the title of Buddha, was an ascetic (śramaṇa) and sage,[4] on whose teachings Buddhism was founded.[5] He is believed to have lived and taught mostly in the eastern part of ancient India sometime between the sixth and fourth centuries BCE.[6] [note 3]
Gautama taught a Middle Way between sensual indulgence and the severe asceticism found in the śramaṇa movement[7] common in his region. He later taught throughout other regions of eastern India such as Magadha and Kosala.[6] [8]
Gautama is the primary figure in Buddhism. He is recognized by Buddhists as an enlightened teacher who attained full Buddhahood, and shared his insights to help sentient beings end rebirth and suffering. Accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic
rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death
and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings
attributed to him were passed down by oral tradition and first committed to writing about 400 years later.
Historical Siddhārtha Gautama
Ancient kingdoms and cities of India during the time of the Buddha.
Scholars
are hesitant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of
the Buddha’s life. Most accept that he lived, taught and founded a
monastic order during the Mahajanapada era during the reign of Bimbisara (c. 558 – c. 491 BCE, or c. 400 BCE),[9] [10] [11] the ruler of the Magadha empire, and died during the early years of the reign of Ajatasatru, who was the successor of Bimbisara, thus making him a younger contemporary of Mahavira, the Jain tirthankara.[12] [13] Apart from the VedicBrahmins, the Buddha’s lifetime coincided with the flourishing of influential Śramaṇa schools of thought like Ājīvika, Cārvāka, Jainism, and Ajñana.[14] Brahmajala Sutta records sixty-two such schools of thought. It was also the age of influential thinkers like Mahavira (referred to as ‘Nigantha Nataputta’ in Pali Canon),[15] Pūraṇa Kassapa, Makkhali Gosāla, Ajita Kesakambalī, Pakudha Kaccāyana, and Sañjaya Belaṭṭhaputta, as recorded in Samaññaphala Sutta, whose viewpoints the Buddha most certainly must have been acquainted with.[16] [17] [note 4] Indeed, Sariputta and Moggallāna, two of the foremost disciples of the Buddha, were formerly the foremost disciples of Sañjaya Belaṭṭhaputta, the skeptic;[19]
and the Pali canon frequently depicts Buddha engaging in debate with
the adherents of rival schools of thought. There is also philological
evidence to suggest that the two masters, Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta, were indeed historical figures and they most probably taught Buddha two different forms of meditative techniques.[20] Thus, Buddha was just one of the many śramaṇa philosophers of that time.[21] In an era where holiness of person was judged by their level of asceticism[22] , Buddha was a reformist within the śramaṇa movement, rather than a reactionary against Vedic Brahminism.[23]
While the general sequence of “birth, maturity, renunciation, search,
awakening and liberation, teaching, death” is widely accepted,[24] there is less consensus on the veracity of many details contained in traditional biographies.[25] [26]
The
times of Gautama’s birth and death are uncertain. Most historians in
the early 20th century dated his lifetime as circa 563 BCE to 483 BCE.[1] [27] More recently his death is dated later, between 411 and 400 BCE, while at a symposium on this question held in 1988,[28] [29] [30] the majority of those who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha’s death.[1] [31] [note 3] These alternative chronologies, however, have not yet been accepted by all historians.[36] [37] [note 5]
The evidence of the early texts suggests that Siddhārtha Gautama was born into the Shakya
clan, a community that was on the periphery, both geographically and
culturally, of the eastern Indian subcontinent in the 5th century BCE.[42] It was either a small republic, or an oligarchy, and his father was an elected chieftain, or oligarch.[42] According to the Buddhist tradition, Gautama was born in Lumbini, now in modern-day Nepal, and raised in the Shakya capital of Kapilvastu, which may have been either in what is present day Tilaurakot, Nepal or Piprahwa, India.[note 1] He obtained his enlightenment in Bodh Gaya, gave his first sermon in Sarnath, and died in Kushinagar.
No written records about Gautama were found from his lifetime or some centuries thereafter. One Edict of Asoka, who reigned from circa 269 BCE to 232 BCE, commemorates the Emperor’s pilgrimage to the Buddha’s birthplace in Lumbini. Another one of his edicts mentions the titles of several Dhamma texts, establishing the existence of a written Buddhist tradition at least by the time of the Maurya era. These texts may be the precursor of the Pāli Canon.[59] [60] [note 7] The oldest surviving Buddhist manuscripts are the Gandhāran Buddhist texts, reported to have been found in or around Haḍḍa near Jalalabad in eastern Afghanistan and now preserved in the British Library. They are written in the Gāndhārī language using the Kharosthi script on twenty-seven birch bark manuscripts and date from the first century BCE to the third century CE.[61]
The sources for the life of Siddhārtha Gautama are a variety
of different, and sometimes conflicting, traditional biographies. These
include the Buddhacarita, Lalitavistara Sūtra, Mahāvastu, and the Nidānakathā.[62] Of these, the Buddhacarita[63] [64] [65] is the earliest full biography, an epic poem written by the poet Aśvaghoṣa in the first century CE.[66] The Lalitavistara Sūtra is the next oldest biography, a Mahāyāna/Sarvāstivāda biography dating to the 3rd century CE.[67] The Mahāvastu from the MahāsāṃghikaLokottaravāda tradition is another major biography, composed incrementally until perhaps the 4th century CE.[67] The Dharmaguptaka biography of the Buddha is the most exhaustive, and is entitled the Abhiniṣkramaṇa Sūtra,[68] and various Chinese translations of this date between the 3rd and 6th century CE. The Nidānakathā is from the Theravada tradition in Sri Lanka and was composed in the 5th century by Buddhaghoṣa.[69]
From canonical sources come the Jataka tales,
the Mahapadana Sutta (DN 14), and the Achariyabhuta Sutta (MN 123),
which include selective accounts that may be older, but are not full
biographies. The Jātakas retell previous lives of Gautama as a bodhisattva, and the first collection of these can be dated among the earliest Buddhist texts.[70]
The Mahāpadāna Sutta and Achariyabhuta Sutta both recount miraculous
events surrounding Gautama’s birth, such as the bodhisattva’s descent
from the Tuṣita Heaven into his mother’s womb.
In the earliest Buddhist texts, the nikāyas and āgamas, the Buddha is not depicted as possessing omniscience (sabbaññu)[71] nor is he depicted as being an eternal transcendent (lokottara) being. According to Bhikkhu Analayo,
ideas of the Buddha’s omniscience (along with an increasing tendency to
deify him and his biography) are found only later, in the Mahayana sutras and later Pali commentaries or texts such as the Mahāvastu.[71]
In the Sandaka Sutta, the Buddha’s disciple Ananda outlines an argument
against the claims of teachers who say they are all knowing [72]
while in the Tevijjavacchagotta Sutta the Buddha himself states that he
has never made a claim to being omniscient, instead he claimed to have
the “higher knowledges” (abhijñā).[73] The earliest biographical material from the Pali Nikayas focuses on the Buddha’s life as a śramaṇa, his search for enlightenment under various teachers such as Alara Kalama and his forty-five-year career as a teacher.[74]
Traditional
biographies of Gautama generally include numerous miracles, omens, and
supernatural events. The character of the Buddha in these traditional
biographies is often that of a fully transcendent (Skt. lokottara) and
perfected being who is unencumbered by the mundane world. In the
Mahāvastu, over the course of many lives, Gautama is said to have
developed supramundane abilities including: a painless birth conceived
without intercourse; no need for sleep, food, medicine, or bathing,
although engaging in such “in conformity with the world”; omniscience,
and the ability to “suppress karma”.[75]
Nevertheless, some of the more ordinary details of his life have been
gathered from these traditional sources. In modern times there has been
an attempt to form a secular understanding of Siddhārtha Gautama’s life by omitting the traditional supernatural elements of his early biographies.
Andrew Skilton writes that the Buddha was never historically regarded by Buddhist traditions as being merely human:
It
is important to stress that, despite modern Theravada teachings to the
contrary (often a sop to skeptical Western pupils), he was never seen as
being merely human. For instance, he is often described as having the
thirty-two major and eighty minor marks or signs of a mahāpuruṣa,
“superman”; the Buddha himself denied that he was either a man or a god; and in the Mahāparinibbāna Sutta he states that he could live for an aeon were he asked to do so.[76]
The
ancient Indians were generally unconcerned with chronologies, being
more focused on philosophy. Buddhist texts reflect this tendency,
providing a clearer picture of what Gautama may have taught than of the
dates of the events in his life. These texts contain descriptions of the
culture and daily life of ancient India which can be corroborated from
the Jain scriptures, and make the Buddha’s time the earliest period in Indian history for which significant accounts exist.[77] British author Karen Armstrong
writes that although there is very little information that can be
considered historically sound, we can be reasonably confident that
Siddhārtha Gautama did exist as a historical figure.[78]
Michael Carrithers goes a bit further by stating that the most general
outline of “birth, maturity, renunciation, search, awakening and
liberation, teaching, death” must be true.[24]
Biography
Conception and birth
Maya’s dream of the Birth of Gautama Siddharta
Birthplace of Gautama Buddha in Lumbini, Nepal,[note 1] [79] a holy shrine also for many non-Buddhists.[note 8]
The Buddhist tradition regards Lumbini, in present-day Nepal to be the birthplace of the Buddha.[80] [note 1] He grew up in Kapilavastu.[note 1] The exact site of ancient Kapilavastu is unknown.[81] It may have been either Piprahwa, Uttar Pradesh, in present-day India,[54] or Tilaurakot, in present-day Nepal.[82] Both places belonged to the Sakya territory, and are located only 15 miles apart.[82]
Gautama was born as a Kshatriya,[83] [note 9] the son of Śuddhodana, “an elected chief of the Shakya clan“,[6] whose capital was Kapilavastu, and who were later annexed by the growing Kingdom of Kosala during the Buddha’s lifetime. Gautama was the family name. His mother, Maya (Māyādevī), Suddhodana’s wife, was a Koliyan princess. Legend has it that, on the night Siddhartha was conceived, Queen Maya dreamt that a white elephant with six white tusks entered her right side,[85] [86] and ten months later[87]
Siddhartha was born. As was the Shakya tradition, when his mother Queen
Maya became pregnant, she left Kapilavastu for her father’s kingdom to
give birth. However, her son is said to have been born on the way, at
Lumbini, in a garden beneath a sal tree.
The day of the Buddha’s birth is widely celebrated in Theravada countries as Vesak.[88] Buddha’s Birthday is called Buddha Purnima
in Nepal, Bangladesh, and India as he is believed to have been born on a
full moon day. Various sources hold that the Buddha’s mother died at
his birth, a few days or seven days later. The infant was given the name
Siddhartha (Pāli: Siddhattha), meaning “he who achieves his aim”.
During the birth celebrations, the hermit seer Asita journeyed from his mountain abode and announced that the child would either become a great king (chakravartin) or a great sadhu.[89]
By traditional account, this occurred after Siddhartha placed his feet
in Asita’s hair and Asita examined the birthmarks. Suddhodana held a
naming ceremony on the fifth day, and invited eight Brahmin scholars to read the future. All gave a dual prediction that the baby would either become a great king or a great holy man.[89] Kondañña, the youngest, and later to be the first arhat other than the Buddha, was reputed to be the only one who unequivocally predicted that Siddhartha would become a Buddha.[90]
While later tradition and legend characterized Śuddhodana as a hereditary monarch, the descendant of the Suryavansha (Solar dynasty) of Ikṣvāku (Pāli: Okkāka), many scholars think that Śuddhodana was the elected chief of a tribal confederacy.
Early
texts suggest that Gautama was not familiar with the dominant religious
teachings of his time until he left on his religious quest, which is
said to have been motivated by existential concern for the human
condition.[91] The state of the Shakya clan was not a monarchy and seems to have been structured either as an oligarchy, or as a form of republic.[92]
The more egalitarian gana-sangha form of government, as a political
alternative to the strongly hierarchical kingdoms, may have influenced
the development of the śramanic Jain and Buddhist sanghas, where monarchies tended toward Vedic Brahmanism.[93]
Siddhartha was brought up by his mother’s younger sister, Maha Pajapati.[94]
By tradition, he is said to have been destined by birth to the life of a
prince and had three palaces (for seasonal occupation) built for him.
His father, said to be King Śuddhodana, wishing for his son to be a
great king, is said to have shielded him from religious teachings and
from knowledge of human suffering.
While Śuddhodana has traditionally been depicted as a king, and
Siddhartha as his prince, more recent scholarship suggests the Shakya were in-fact organized as a semi-republican oligarchy rather than a monarchy. [95]
When he reached the age of 16, his father reputedly arranged his marriage to a cousin of the same age named Yaśodharā (Pāli: Yasodharā). According to the traditional account, she gave birth to a son, named Rāhula. Siddhartha is said to have spent 29 years as a prince in Kapilavastu.
Although his father ensured that Siddhartha was provided with
everything he could want or need, Buddhist scriptures say that the
future Buddha felt that material wealth was not life’s ultimate goal.[94]
Renunciation and ascetic life
The Victory of Buddha
The “Great Departure” of Siddhartha Gautama, surrounded by a halo, he is accompanied by numerous guards, maithuna loving couples, and devata who have come to pay homage; Gandhara, Kushan period
Prince Siddhartha shaves his hair and becomes an ascetic. Borobudur, 8th century
At
the age of 29, Siddhartha left his palace to meet his subjects. Despite
his father’s efforts to hide from him the sick, aged and suffering,
Siddhartha was said to have seen an old man. When his charioteer Channa explained to him that all people grew old, the prince went on further trips beyond the palace. On these he encountered a diseased man, a decaying corpse, and an ascetic. These depressed him, and he initially strove to overcome ageing, sickness, and death by living the life of an ascetic.[96]
Accompanied by Channa and riding his horse Kanthaka, Gautama quit his palace for the life of a mendicant. It’s said that “the horse’s hooves were muffled by the gods”[97] to prevent guards from knowing of his departure.
Gautama initially went to Rajagaha
and began his ascetic life by begging for alms in the street. After
King Bimbisara’s men recognised Siddhartha and the king learned of his
quest, Bimbisara offered Siddhartha the throne. Siddhartha rejected the
offer but promised to visit his kingdom of Magadha first, upon attaining enlightenment.
He left Rajagaha and practised under two hermit teachers of yogic meditation.[98] [99] [100] After mastering the teachings of Alara Kalama
(Skr. Ārāḍa Kālāma), he was asked by Kalama to succeed him. However,
Gautama felt unsatisfied by the practice, and moved on to become a
student of yoga with Udaka Ramaputta (Skr. Udraka Rāmaputra).[101]
With him he achieved high levels of meditative consciousness and was
again asked to succeed his teacher. But, once more, he was not
satisfied, and again moved on.[102]
According to the early Buddhist texts,[103] after realizing that meditative dhyana was the right path to awakening, but that extreme asceticism didn’t work, Gautama discovered what Buddhists know as being, the Middle Way[103] —a path of moderation away from the extremes of self-indulgence and self-mortification, or the Noble Eightfold Path, as described in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, which is regarded as the first discourse of the Buddha.[103] In a famous incident, after becoming starved and weakened, he is said to have accepted milk and rice pudding from a village girl named Sujata.[104] Such was his emaciated appearance that she wrongly believed him to be a spirit that had granted her a wish.[104]
Following this incident, Gautama was famously seated under a pipal tree—now known as the Bodhi tree—in Bodh Gaya, India, when he vowed never to arise until he had found the truth.[105] Kaundinya
and four other companions, believing that he had abandoned his search
and become undisciplined, ceased to stay with him, and went to somewhere
else. After a reputed 49 days of meditation, at the age of 35, he is
said to have attained Enlightenment,[105] [106] and became known as the Buddha or “Awakened One” (”Buddha” is also sometimes translated as “The Enlightened One”).
According to some sutras of the Pali canon, at the time of his awakening he realized complete insight into the Four Noble Truths, thereby attaining liberation from samsara, the endless cycle of rebirth, suffering and dying again.[107] [108] [109]
According to scholars, this story of the awakening and the stress on
“liberating insight” is a later development in the Buddhist tradition,
where the Buddha may have regarded the practice of dhyana as leading to Nirvana and moksha.[110] [111] [107] [note 10]
Nirvana
is the extinguishing of the “fires” of desire, hatred, and ignorance,
that keep the cycle of suffering and rebirth going.[112]
Nirvana is also regarded as the “end of the world”, in that no personal
identity or boundaries of the mind remain. In such a state, a being is
said to possess the Ten Characteristics, belonging to every Buddha.
According to a story in the Āyācana Sutta (Samyutta Nikaya VI.1) — a scripture found in the Pāli and other canons — immediately after his awakening, the Buddha debated whether or not he should teach the Dharma
to others. He was concerned that humans were so overpowered by
ignorance, greed and hatred that they could never recognise the path,
which is subtle, deep and hard to grasp. However, in the story, Brahmā Sahampati convinced him, arguing that at least some will understand it. The Buddha relented, and agreed to teach.
Mulagandhakuti, Remains of Buddha’s hut in Jetavana Monastery, Shravasti, India, Where the Buddha delivered majority of his discourses[113]
After his awakening, the Buddha met Taphussa and Bhallika — two merchant brothers from the city of Balkh
in what is currently Afghanistan — who became his first lay disciples.
It is said that each was given hairs from his head, which are now
claimed to be enshrined as relics in the Shwe Dagon Temple in Rangoon, Burma. The Buddha intended to visit Asita, and his former teachers, Alara Kalama and Udaka Ramaputta, to explain his findings, but they had already died.
He then travelled to the Deer Park near Varanasi (Benares) in northern India, where he set in motion what Buddhists call the Wheel of Dharma
by delivering his first sermon to the five companions with whom he had
sought enlightenment. Together with him, they formed the first saṅgha: the company of Buddhist monks.
All five become arahants, and within the first two months, with the conversion of Yasa
and fifty-four of his friends, the number of such arahants is said to
have grown to 60. The conversion of three brothers named Kassapa
followed, with their reputed 200, 300 and 500 disciples, respectively.
This swelled the sangha to more than 1,000.
Travels and teaching
Buddha with his protector Vajrapani, Gandhāra, 2nd century CE, Ostasiatische Kunst Museum
For the remaining 45 years of his life, the Buddha is said to have traveled in the Gangetic Plain, in what is now Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and southern Nepal, teaching a diverse range of people: from nobles to servants, murderers such as Angulimala, and cannibals such as Alavaka.[114]
Although the Buddha’s language remains unknown, it’s likely that he
taught in one or more of a variety of closely related Middle Indo-Aryan
dialects, of which Pali may be a standardization.
The
sangha traveled through the subcontinent, expounding the dharma. This
continued throughout the year, except during the four months of the Vassa
rainy season when ascetics of all religions rarely traveled. One reason
was that it was more difficult to do so without causing harm to animal
life. At this time of year, the sangha would retreat to monasteries,
public parks or forests, where people would come to them.
The first vassana was spent at Varanasi when the sangha was formed. After this, the Buddha kept a promise to travel to Rajagaha, capital of Magadha, to visit King Bimbisara. During this visit, Sariputta and Maudgalyayana were converted by Assaji,
one of the first five disciples, after which they were to become the
Buddha’s two foremost followers. The Buddha spent the next three seasons
at Veluvana Bamboo Grove monastery in Rajagaha, the capital of Magadha.
Upon
hearing of his son’s awakening, Suddhodana sent, over a period, ten
delegations to ask him to return to Kapilavastu. On the first nine
occasions, the delegates failed to deliver the message and instead
joined the sangha to become arahants. The tenth delegation, led by
Kaludayi, a childhood friend of Gautama’s (who also became an arahant),
however, delivered the message.
Now two years after his
awakening, the Buddha agreed to return, and made a two-month journey by
foot to Kapilavastu, teaching the dharma as he went. At his return, the
royal palace prepared a midday meal, but the sangha was making an alms
round in Kapilavastu. Hearing this, Suddhodana approached his son, the
Buddha, saying:
“Ours is the warrior lineage of Mahamassata, and not a single warrior has gone seeking alms.”
The Buddha is said to have replied:
“That
is not the custom of your royal lineage. But it is the custom of my
Buddha lineage. Several thousands of Buddhas have gone by seeking alms.”
Buddhist
texts say that Suddhodana invited the sangha into the palace for the
meal, followed by a dharma talk. After this he is said to have become a sotapanna. During the visit, many members of the royal family joined the sangha. The Buddha’s cousins Ananda and Anuruddha became two of his five chief disciples. At the age of seven, his son Rahula also joined, and became one of his ten chief disciples. His half-brother Nanda also joined and became an arahant.
Of the Buddha’s disciples, Sariputta, Maudgalyayana, Mahakasyapa,
Ananda and Anuruddha are believed to have been the five closest to him.
His ten foremost disciples were reputedly completed by the quintet of Upali, Subhoti, Rahula, Mahakaccana and Punna.
In the fifth vassana, the Buddha was staying at Mahavana near Vesali
when he heard news of the impending death of his father. He is said to
have gone to Suddhodana and taught the dharma, after which his father
became an arahant.
The last days of buddha teachings
The
king’s death and cremation was to inspire the creation of an order of
nuns. Buddhist texts record that the Buddha was reluctant to ordain
women. His foster mother Maha Pajapati,
for example, approached him, asking to join the sangha, but he refused.
Maha Pajapati, however, was so intent on the path of awakening that she
led a group of royal Sakyan and Koliyan ladies, which followed the
sangha on a long journey to Rajagaha. In time, after Ananda championed
their cause, the Buddha is said to have reconsidered and, five years
after the formation of the sangha, agreed to the ordination of women as
nuns. He reasoned that males and females had an equal capacity for
awakening. But he gave women additional rules (Vinaya) to follow.
According to the Mahaparinibbana Sutta of the Pali canon, at the age of 80, the Buddha announced that he would soon reach Parinirvana,
or the final deathless state, and abandon his earthly body. After this,
the Buddha ate his last meal, which he had received as an offering from
a blacksmith named Cunda. Falling violently ill, Buddha instructed his attendant Ānanda
to convince Cunda that the meal eaten at his place had nothing to do
with his passing and that his meal would be a source of the greatest
merit as it provided the last meal for a Buddha.[115] Mettanando and von Hinüber argue that the Buddha died of mesentericinfarction, a symptom of old age, rather than food poisoning.[116] [117]
The
precise contents of the Buddha’s final meal are not clear, due to
variant scriptural traditions and ambiguity over the translation of
certain significant terms; the Theravada tradition generally believes that the Buddha was offered some kind of pork, while the Mahayana
tradition believes that the Buddha consumed some sort of truffle or
other mushroom. These may reflect the different traditional views on Buddhist vegetarianism and the precepts for monks and nuns.
Waley
suggests that Theravadins would take suukaramaddava (the contents of
the Buddha’s last meal), which can translate literally as pig-soft, to
mean “soft flesh of a pig” or “pig’s soft-food”, that is, after Neumann, a soft food favoured by pigs, assumed to be a truffle.
He argues (also after Neumann) that as “(p)lant names tend to be local
and dialectical”, as there are several plants known to have suukara-
(pig) as part of their names,[note 11]
and as Pali Buddhism developed in an area remote from the Buddha’s
death, suukaramaddava could easily have been a type of plant whose local
name was unknown to those in Pali regions. Specifically, local writers
writing soon after the Buddha’s death knew more about their flora than
Theravadin commentator Buddhaghosa
who lived hundreds of years and hundreds of kilometres remote in time
and space from the events described. Unaware that it may have been a
local plant name and with no Theravadin prohibition against eating
animal flesh, Theravadins would not have questioned the Buddha eating
meat and interpreted the term accordingly.[118]
According to Buddhist tradition, the Buddha died at Kuśināra (present-day Kushinagar, India), which became a pilgrimage center.[119] Ananda protested the Buddha’s decision to enter Parinirvana in the abandoned jungles of Kuśināra of the Malla
kingdom. The Buddha, however, is said to have reminded Ananda how
Kushinara was a land once ruled by a righteous wheel-turning king and
the appropriate place for him to die.[120]
The Buddha then asked all the attendant Bhikkhus
to clarify any doubts or questions they had and cleared them all in a
way which others could not do. They had none. According to Buddhist
scriptures, he then finally entered Parinirvana. The Buddha’s final
words are reported to have been: “All composite things (Saṅkhāra)
are perishable. Strive for your own liberation with diligence” (Pali:
‘vayadhammā saṅkhārā appamādena sampādethā’). His body was cremated and
the relics were placed in monuments or stupas, some of which are believed to have survived until the present. For example, the Temple of the Tooth or “Dalada Maligawa” in Sri Lanka is the place where what some believe to be the relic of the right tooth of Buddha is kept at present.
Life scenes of Buddha, sand stone: Birth, Enlightenment, Descent from Heaven, First Sermon, Passing Away, c. 2nd Century CE, Government Museum, Mathura.
According to the Pāli historical chronicles of Sri Lanka, the Dīpavaṃsa and Mahāvaṃsa, the coronation of Emperor Aśoka (Pāli: Asoka) is 218 years after the death of the Buddha. According to two textual records in Chinese (十八部論 and 部執異論),
the coronation of Emperor Aśoka is 116 years after the death of the
Buddha. Therefore, the time of Buddha’s passing is either 486 BCE
according to Theravāda record or 383 BCE according to Mahayana record.
However, the actual date traditionally accepted as the date of the
Buddha’s death in Theravāda countries is 544 or 545 BCE, because the
reign of Emperor Aśoka was traditionally reckoned to be about 60 years
earlier than current estimates. In Burmese Buddhist tradition, the date
of the Buddha’s death is 13 May 544 BCE.[121] whereas in Thai tradition it is 11 March 545 BCE.[122]
At his death, the Buddha is famously believed to have told his disciples to follow no leader. Mahakasyapa was chosen by the sangha to be the chairman of the First Buddhist Council, with the two chief disciples Maudgalyayana and Sariputta having died before the Buddha.
While
in the Buddha’s days he was addressed by the very respected titles
Buddha, Shākyamuni, Shākyasimha, Bhante and Bho, he was known after his
parinirvana nirvana as Arihant, Bhagavā/Bhagavat/Bhagwān, Mahāvira,[123] Jina/Jinendra, Sāstr, Sugata, and most popularly in scriptures as Tathāgata.
Relics
After his death, Buddha’s cremation relics were divided
amongst 8 royal families and his disciples; centuries later they would
be enshrined by King Ashoka into 84,000 stupas.[124] [125]
Many supernatural legends surround the history of alleged relics as
they accompanied the spread of Buddhism and gave legitimacy to rulers.
An extensive and colorful physical description of the Buddha has been laid down in scriptures. A kshatriya
by birth, he had military training in his upbringing, and by Shakyan
tradition was required to pass tests to demonstrate his worthiness as a
warrior in order to marry. He had a strong enough body to be noticed by
one of the kings and was asked to join his army as a general. He is also
believed by Buddhists to have “the 32 Signs of the Great Man”.
The
Brahmin Sonadanda described him as “handsome, good-looking, and
pleasing to the eye, with a most beautiful complexion. He has a godlike
form and countenance, he is by no means unattractive.” (D, I:115)
“It
is wonderful, truly marvellous, how serene is the good Gotama’s
appearance, how clear and radiant his complexion, just as the golden
jujube in autumn is clear and radiant, just as a palm-tree fruit just
loosened from the stalk is clear and radiant, just as an adornment of
red gold wrought in a crucible by a skilled goldsmith, deftly beaten and
laid on a yellow-cloth shines, blazes and glitters, even so, the good
Gotama’s senses are calmed, his complexion is clear and radiant.” (A,
I:181)
A disciple named Vakkali, who later became an arahant, was
so obsessed by the Buddha’s physical presence that the Buddha is said
to have felt impelled to tell him to desist, and to have reminded him
that he should know the Buddha through the Dhamma and not through
physical appearances.
Although there are no extant representations of the Buddha in human form until around the 1st century CE (see Buddhist art), descriptions of the physical characteristics of fully enlightened buddhas are attributed to the Buddha in the Digha Nikaya’s Lakkhaṇa Sutta (D, I:142).[127] In addition, the Buddha’s physical appearance is described by Yasodhara to their son Rahula
upon the Buddha’s first post-Enlightenment return to his former
princely palace in the non-canonical Pali devotional hymn, Narasīha
Gāthā (”The Lion of Men”).[128]
Among the 32 main characteristics it is mentioned that Buddha has blue eyes.[129]
Nine virtues
Recollection of nine virtues attributed to the Buddha is a common Buddhist meditation and devotional practice called Buddhānusmṛti. The nine virtues are also among the 40 Buddhist meditation subjects. The nine virtues of the Buddha appear throughout the Tipitaka,[130] and include:
Araham – Worthy of homage. An Arahant
is “one with taints destroyed, who has lived the holy life, done what
had to be done, laid down the burden, reached the true goal, destroyed
the fetters of being, and is completely liberated through final
knowledge.”
Sacrifices have the Agnihotra as foremost; of meter, the foremost is the Sāvitrī.[131]
Tracing the oldest teachings
Information of the oldest teachings may be obtained by
analysis of the oldest texts. One method to obtain information on the
oldest core of Buddhism is to compare the oldest extant versions of the
Theravadin Pali Canon and other texts.[note 12] The reliability of these sources, and the possibility of drawing out a core of oldest teachings, is a matter of dispute.[134] [135] [136] [137] According to Vetter, inconsistencies remain, and other methods must be applied to resolve those inconsistencies.[132] [note 13]
According to Schmithausen, three positions held by scholars of Buddhism can be distinguished:[140]
“Stress on the fundamental homogeneity and substantial authenticity of at least a considerable part of the Nikayic materials;”[note 14] [note 15] , from the oldest extant texts a common kernel can be drawn out.[141]
According to Warder, c.q. his publisher: “This kernel of doctrine is
presumably common Buddhism of the period before the great schisms of the
fourth and third centuries BC. It may be substantially the Buddhism of
the Buddha himself, although this cannot be proved: at any rate it is a
Buddhism presupposed by the schools as existing about a hundred years
after the parinirvana of the Buddha, and there is no evidence to suggest
that it was formulated by anyone else than the Buddha and his immediate
followers”.[141] and Richard Gombrich. [142]
Richard Gombrich: “I have the greatest difficulty in accepting that the
main edifice is not the work of a single genius. By “the main edifice” I
mean the collections of the main body of sermons, the four Nikāyas, and
of the main body of monastic rules.”[137]
“Scepticism with regard to the possibility of retrieving the doctrine of earliest Buddhism;”[note 16] [note 17]
A core problem in the study of early Buddhism is the relation between dhyana and insight.[135] [134] [137]
Schmithausen notes that the mention of the four noble truths as
constituting “liberating insight”, which is attained after mastering the
Rupa Jhanas, is a later addition to texts such as Majjhima Nikaya 36.[138] [134] [135]
Earliest Buddhism
According to Tilmann Vetter, the core of earliest Buddhism is the practice of dhyāna,[146] as a workable alternative to painful ascetic practices.[147] [note 19] Bronkhorst agrees that Dhyāna was a Buddhist invention,[134] whereas Norman notes that “the Buddha’s way to release […] was by means of meditative practices.”[149] Discriminating insight into transiency as a separate path to liberation was a later development.[150] [151]
According to the Mahāsaccakasutta,[note 20] from the fourth jhana the Buddha gained bodhi. Yet, it is not clear what he was awakened to.[149] [134]
According to Schmithausen and Bronkhorst, “liberating insight” is a
later addition to this text, and reflects a later development and
understanding in early Buddhism.[138] [134]
The mentioning of the four truths as constituting “liberating insight”
introduces a logical problem, since the four truths depict a linear path
of practice, the knowledge of which is in itself not depicted as being
liberating:[152]
[T]hey
do not teach that one is released by knowing the four noble truths, but
by practicing the fourth noble truth, the eightfold path, which
culminates in right samadhi.[152]
Although “Nibbāna”
(Sanskrit: Nirvāna) is the common term for the desired goal of this
practice, many other terms can be found throughout the Nikayas, which
are not specified.[153] [note 21]
According to Vetter, the description of the Buddhist path may initially have been as simple as the term “the middle way”.[154] In time, this short description was elaborated, resulting in the description of the eightfold path.[154]
According to both Bronkhorst and Anderson, the four truths became a substitution for prajna, or “liberating insight”, in the suttas[111] [107] in those texts where “liberating insight” was preceded by the four jhanas.[155]
According to Bronkhorst, the four truths may not have been formulated
in earliest Buddhism, and did not serve in earliest Buddhism as a
description of “liberating insight”.[156] Gotama’s teachings may have been personal, “adjusted to the need of each person.”[155]
The three marks of existence[note 22]
may reflect Upanishadic or other influences. K.R. Norman supposes that
these terms were already in use at the Buddha’s time, and were familiar
to his listeners.[157]
The Brahma-vihara was in origin probably a brahmanic term;[158] but its usage may have been common to the Sramana traditions.[134]
Later developments
In time, “liberating insight” became an essential feature of
the Buddhist tradition. The following teachings, which are commonly seen
as essential to Buddhism, are later formulations which form part of the
explanatory framework of this “liberating insight”:[135] [134]
The Four Noble Truths:
that suffering is an ingrained part of existence; that the origin of
suffering is craving for sensuality, acquisition of identity, and fear
of annihilation; that suffering can be ended; and that following the Noble Eightfold Path is the means to accomplish this;
The
Noble Eightfold Path: right view, right intention, right speech, right
action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right
concentration;
Dependent origination: the mind creates suffering as a natural product of a complex process.
Other religions
Buddha depicted as the 9th avatar of god Vishnu in a traditional Hindu representation
Some Hindus regard Gautama as the 9th avatar of Vishnu.[note 8] [159] However, Buddha’s teachings deny the authority of the Vedas and the concepts of Brahman-Atman.[160] [161] [162] Consequently Buddhism is generally classified as a nāstika school (heterodox, literally “It is not so”[note 23] ) in contrast to the six orthodox schools of Hinduism.[165] [166] [167]
The Buddha is regarded as a prophet by the minority Ahmadiyya[168] sect of Muslims – a sect considered a deviant and rejected as apostate by mainstream Islam.[169] [170] Some early Chinese Taoist-Buddhists thought the Buddha to be a reincarnation of Laozi.[171]
Disciples of the Cao Đài religion worship the Buddha as a major religious teacher.[172]
His image can be found in both their Holy See and on the home altar. He
is revealed during communication with Divine Beings as son of their
Supreme Being (God the Father) together with other major religious
teachers and founders like Jesus, Laozi, and Confucius.[173]
The Christian Saint Josaphat is based on the Buddha. The name comes from the Sanskrit Bodhisattva via Arabic Būdhasaf and Georgian Iodasaph.[174] The only story in which St. Josaphat appears, Barlaam and Josaphat, is based on the life of the Buddha.[175]
Josaphat was included in earlier editions of the Roman Martyrology
(feast day 27 November) — though not in the Roman Missal — and in the
Eastern Orthodox Church liturgical calendar (26 August).
In the ancient Gnostic sect of Manichaeism, the Buddha is listed among the prophets who preached the word of God before Mani.[176]
According to the Buddhist tradition, following the Nidanakatha,[43] the introductory to the Jataka tales, the stories of the former lives of the Buddha, Gautama was born in Lumbini, present-day Nepal.[44] [45] In the mid-3rd century BCE the Emperor Ashoka
determined that Lumbini was Gautama’s birthplace and thus installed a
pillar there with the inscription: “…this is where the Buddha, sage of
the Śākyas (Śākyamuni), was born.”[46] Based on stone inscriptions, there is also speculation that Lumbei, Kapileswar village, Odisha, at the east coast of India, was the site of ancient Lumbini.[47] [48] [49] Hartmann discusses the hypothesis and states, “The inscription has generally been considered spurious (…)”[50]
He quotes Sircar: “There can hardly be any doubt that the people
responsible for the Kapilesvara inscription copied it from the said
facsimile not much earlier than 1928.” Kapilavastu was the place where
he grew up:[51] [note 6]
Warder:
“The Buddha […] was born in the Sakya Republic, which was the city
state of Kapilavastu, a very small state just inside the modern state
boundary of Nepal against the Northern Indian frontier.[6]
Walsh:
“He belonged to the Sakya clan dwelling on the edge of the Himalayas,
his actual birthplace being a few miles north of the present-day
Northern Indian border, in Nepal. His father was, in fact, an elected
chief of the clan rather than the king he was later made out to be,
though his title was raja – a term which only partly corresponds to our
word ‘king’. Some of the states of North India at that time were
kingdoms and others republics, and the Sakyan republic was subject to
the powerful king of neighbouring Kosala, which lay to the south”.[53]
The exact location of ancient Kapilavastu is unknown.[51] It may have been either Piprahwa in Uttar Pradesh, northern India,[54] [55] [56] or Tilaurakot,[57] present-day Nepal.[58] [51] The two cities are located only fifteen miles from each other.[58]
411–400: Dundas 2002,
p. 24: “…as is now almost universally accepted by informed
Indological scholarship, a re-examination of early Buddhist historical
material, […], necessitates a redating of the Buddha’s death to
between 411 and 400 BCE…”
405: Richard Gombrich[32] [33] [34] [35]
Around 400: See the consensus in the essays by leading scholars in Narain, Awadh Kishore, ed. (2003), The Date of the Historical Śākyamuni Buddha, New Delhi: BR Publishing, ISBN 81-7646-353-1.
According to Pali scholar K. R. Norman,
a life span for the Buddha of c. 480 to 400 BCE (and his teaching
period roughly from c. 445 to 400 BCE) “fits the archaeological evidence
better”.[2] See also Notes on the Dates of the Buddha Íåkyamuni.
According
to Alexander Berzin, “Buddhism developed as a shramana school that
accepted rebirth under the force of karma, while rejecting the existence
of the type of soul that other schools asserted. In addition, the
Buddha accepted as parts of the path to liberation the use of logic and
reasoning, as well as ethical behavior, but not to the degree of Jain
asceticism. In this way, Buddhism avoided the extremes of the previous
four shramana schools.”[18]
In 2013, archaeologist Robert Coningham found the remains of a Bodhigara, a tree shrine, dated to 550 BCE at the Maya Devi Temple, Lumbini, speculating that it may possible be a Buddhist shrine. If so, this may push back the Buddha’s birth date.[38] Archaeologists caution that the shrine may represent pre-Buddhist tree worship, and that further research is needed.[38]
Richard Gombrich has dismissed Coningham’s speculations as “a fantasy”,
noting that Coningham lacks the necessary expertise on the history of
early Buddhism.[39] Geoffrey Samuels notes that several locations of both early Buddhism and Jainism are closely related to Yaksha-worship, that several Yakshas were “converted” to Buddhism, a well-known example being Vajrapani,[40] and that several Yaksha-shrines, where trees were worshipped, were converted into Buddhist holy places.[41]
Some
sources mention Kapilavastu as the birthplace of the Buddha. Gethin
states: “The earliest Buddhist sources state that the future Buddha was
born Siddhārtha Gautama (Pali Siddhattha Gotama), the son of a local
chieftain — a rājan — in Kapilavastu (Pali Kapilavatthu) what is now the
Indian–Nepalese border.”[52] Gethin does not give references for this statement.
Minor
Rock Edict Nb3: “These Dhamma texts – Extracts from the Discipline, the
Noble Way of Life, the Fears to Come, the Poem on the Silent Sage, the
Discourse on the Pure Life, Upatisa’s Questions, and the Advice to
Rahula which was spoken by the Buddha concerning false speech – these
Dhamma texts, reverend sirs, I desire that all the monks and nuns may
constantly listen to and remember. Likewise the laymen and laywomen.”[59]
Dhammika:”There is disagreement amongst scholars concerning which Pali
suttas correspond to some of the text. Vinaya samukose: probably the
Atthavasa Vagga, Anguttara Nikaya, 1:98-100. Aliya vasani: either the
Ariyavasa Sutta, Anguttara Nikaya, V:29, or the Ariyavamsa Sutta,
Anguttara Nikaya, II: 27-28. Anagata bhayani: probably the Anagata
Sutta, Anguttara Nikaya, III:100. Muni gatha: Muni Sutta, Sutta Nipata
207-221. Upatisa pasine: Sariputta Sutta, Sutta Nipata 955-975.
Laghulavade: Rahulavada Sutta, Majjhima Nikaya, I:421.”[59]
Kumar Singh, Nagendra (1997). “Buddha as depicted in the Purāṇas”. Encyclopaedia of Hinduism. 7. Anmol Publications. pp. 260–75. ISBN 978-81-7488-168-7. Retrieved 16 April 2012.
According to Geoffrey Samuel, the Buddha was born as a Kshatriya,[83]
in a moderate Vedic culture at the central Ganges Plain area, where the
shramana-traditions developed. This area had a moderate Vedic culture,
where the Kshatriyas were the highest varna, in contrast to the Brahmanic ideology of Kuru-Panchala, where the Brahmins had become the highest varna.[83] Both the Vedic culture and the shramana tradition contributed to the emergence of the so-called “Hindu-synthesis” around the start of the Common Era.[84] [83]
Scholars
have noted inconsistencies in the presentations of the Buddha’s
enlightenment, and the Buddhist path to liberation, in the oldest
sutras. These inconsistencies show that the Buddhist teachings evolved,
either during the lifetime of the Buddha, or thereafter. See: * Andre
Bareau (1963), Recherches sur la biographie du Buddha dans les
Sutrapitaka et les Vinayapitaka anciens, Ecole Francaise
d’Extreme-Orient * Schmithausen, On some Aspects of Descriptions or
Theories of ‘Liberating Insight’ and ‘Enlightenment’ in Early Buddhism *
K. R. Norman, Four Noble Truths * Tilman Vetter, The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism * Richard F. Gombrich (2006). How Buddhism Began: The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-19639-5., chapter four * Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993), The Two Traditions Of Meditation In Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, chapter 7 * Anderson, Carol (1999), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravada Buddhist Canon, Routledge
Waley
notes: suukara-kanda, “pig-bulb”; suukara-paadika, “pig’s foot” and
sukaresh.ta “sought-out by pigs”. He cites Neumann’s suggestion that if a
plant called “sought-out by pigs” exists then suukaramaddava can mean
“pig’s delight”.
Exemplary studies are the study on descriptions of “liberating insight” by Lambert Schmithausen,[138] the overview of early Buddhism by Tilmann Vetter,[135] the philological work on the four truths by K.R. Norman,[139] the textual studies by Richard Gombrich,[137] and the research on early meditation methods by Johannes Bronkhorst.[134]
A well-known proponent of the first position is A.K. Warder
According to A.K. Warder, in his 1970 publication “Indian Buddhism”
A proponent of the second position is Ronald Davidson.
Ronald
Davidson: “While most scholars agree that there was a rough body of
sacred literature (disputed)(sic) that a relatively early community
(disputed)(sic) maintained and transmitted, we have little confidence
that much, if any, of surviving Buddhist scripture is actually the word
of the historic Buddha.”[143]
Well-known
proponents of the third position are: * J.W. de Jong: “It would be
hypocritical to assert that nothing can be said about the doctrine of
earliest Buddhism […] the basic ideas of Buddhism found in the
canonical writings could very well have been proclaimed by him [the
Buddha], transmitted and developed by his disciples and, finally,
codified in fixed formulas.”[144]
* Johannes Bronkhorst: “This position is to be preferred to (ii) for
purely methodological reasons: only those who seek may find, even if no
success is guaranteed.”[140]
* Donald Lopez: “The original teachings of the historical Buddha are
extremely difficult, if not impossible, to recover or reconstruct.”[145]
Vetter:
“However, if we look at the last, and in my opinion the most important,
component of this list [the noble eightfold path], we are still dealing
with what according to me is the real content of the middle way,
dhyana-meditation, at least the stages two to four, which are said to be
free of contemplation and reflection. Everything preceding the eighth
part, i.e. right samadhi, apparently has the function of preparing for
the right samadhi.”[148]
Majjhima Nikaya 36
Vetter:
“I am especially thinking here of MN 26 (I p.163,32; 165,15;166,35)
kimkusalagavesi anuttaram santivarapadam pariyesamano (searching for
that which is beneficial, seeking the unsurpassable, best place of
peace) and again MN 26 (passim), anuttaramyagakkhemam nibbiinam
pariyesati (he seeks the unsurpassable safe place, the nirvana).
Anuppatta-sadattho (one who has reached the right goal) is also a vague
positive expression in the Arhatformula in MN 35 (I p, 235), see chapter
2, footnote 3, Furthermore, satthi (welfare) is important in e.g. SN
2.12 or 2.17 or Sn 269; and sukha and rati (happiness), in contrast to
other places, as used in Sn 439 and 956. The oldest term was perhaps
amata (immortal, immortality) […] but one could say here that it is a
negative term.”[153]
Understanding of these marks helps in the development of detachment:
Anicca (Sanskrit: anitya): That all things that come to have an end;
Dukkha (Sanskrit: duḥkha): That nothing which comes to be is ultimately satisfying;
Anattā (Sanskrit: anātman): That nothing in the realm of experience can really be said to be “I” or “mine”.
“in
Sanskrit philosophical literature, ‘āstika’ means ‘one who believes in
the authority of the Vedas’, ’soul’, ‘Brahman’. (’nāstika’ means the
opposite of these).[163] [164]
Rawlinson, Hugh George. (1950) A Concise History of the Indian People, Oxford University Press. p. 46.
Muller, F. Max. (2001) The Dhammapada And Sutta-nipata, Routledge (UK). p. xlvii. ISBN 0-7007-1548-7.
India: A History. Revised and Updated,
by John Keay: “The date [of Buddha’s meeting with Bimbisara] (given the
Buddhist ’short chronology’) must have been around 400 BCE.”
Типитака (Пали ти, “три”, питака, “корпе”), или Пали канон, је колекција примарних текстова Пали језика који су формирају доктринарну основу Тхеравадског будизма. Типитака и паракононски пали текстови (коментари, хронике, итд.) заједно чине комплетно тело класичних текстова Тхеравада.
Тхе Пали канон је огромно тело књижевности: у преводу на енглески језик текстови додају хиљаде штампаних страница. Већина (али не и све) Цанон је већ објављен на енглеском преко година. Иако само мали део ових текстова је доступан на овој веб страници, ово колекција може бити добро место за почетак.
Три одјела Типитаке су:
Винаиа Питака Збирка текстова који се тичу правила понашања која се односе на
дневне послове унутар Сангхе - заједница бхиккхуса (ордаинед монкс) и
бхиккхунис (ордаинед монахиње). Далеко више од само правила, Винаиа Питака такође укључује приче иза извора сваког правила, а детаљан приказ Будиног рјешења за питање како одржавају заједничку хармонију унутар великог и разноликог духовног заједница. Сутта Питака Тхе збирка сутата или дискурса, приписаних Буди и неколико његових најближих ученика, који садрже сва централна учења Тхеравада будизам. (Више од хиљаду превода сутте су доступне на овој веб страници.) Сутате су подељене међу пет никаиас (колекције):
Абхидхамма Питака Тхе збирка текстова у којима су основни принципи доктрине представљени у Сутта Питаки су преобликовани и реорганизовани у а систематски оквир који се може применити на истрагу о природа ума и материје.
“Savitribai Phule (1831-97), struggled and suffered with her
revolutionary husband in an equal measure, but remains obscured due to
casteist and sexist negligence. Apart from her identity as Jotirao
Phule’s wife, she is little known even in academia. Modern India’s first
woman teacher, a radical exponent of mass and female education, a
champion of women’s liberation, a pioneer of engaged poetry, a
courageous mass leader who took on the forces of caste and patriarchy
certainly had her independent identity and contribution. It is indeed a
measure of the ruthlessness of elite-controlled knowledge-production
that a figure as important as Savitribai Phule fails to find any mention
in the history of modern India. Her life and struggle deserves to be
appreciated by a wider spectrum, and made known to non-Marathi people as
well,” writes Braj Ranjan Mani.
Here we present life-sketch of Savitribai Phule. In case we have
missed any important event from the life of Savitribai Phule or have
made any mistake while recording any event, let us know in the comments
section and we will try to update the timeline. Alternatively, you can
submit further information here. If you like this timeline, share it with your friends!
Savitribai
Jyotirao Phule was born on January 3, 1831 at Naigaon, about 50 km from
Pune. She was the eldest daughter of mother Lakshmi and father Khandoji
Neveshe Patil.
As
was the practice then, at the age of nine, she was married to
twelve-year-old Jyotirao Phule in 1840. Savitribai and Jyotirao had no
children of their own but they adopted Yashavantrao, a son born to a
widowed Brahmin.
Shortly
after the marriage to Jyotiba Phule, education of Savitribai Phule
started. Impressed by her thirst for learning, Savitribai’s husband,
Jyotirao Phule, taught her to read and write. Becoming fond of teaching,
Savitribai trained at Ms Farar’s Institution in Ahmednagar.
Savitribai
Phule along with Sagunabai started school in Maharwada on 1st may 1847,
initially 8-9 girls were enrolled but within year strength reached to
40-45.
Country’s
first school for girls was started at Bhide Wada in Pune. On 1st Jan.
1848, India’s first school for girls was started at Bhide Wada in Pune
by Mahatma Jotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule. The present condition of
that first school for girls is miserable because of the lack of interest
from subsequent governments in preserving the Dalit-Bahujan heritage.
India’s
first school was started at Bhide Wada in Pune by Phule couple,
Savitribai Phule became not only the first woman teacher but Savitribai
was nominated as India’s first lady headmistress in 1st Jan 1848.
Life
of Savitribai Phule as a teacher in the school at the time when upper
caste orthodox people used to look down wasn’t easy and many times they
used to pelt stones and throw dung on her. The young couple faced severe
opposition from almost all sections. Savitribai was subject to intense
harassment every day as she walked to the school. Stones, mud and dirt
were flung at her as she passed but Savitribai Phule faced everything
courageously.
Savitribai
Phule and Jotiba Phule’s work of educating downtrodden and girls
infuriated many Brahmins of that time and because of the fears of
attacks from orthodox Brahmins, Jyotiba Phule’s father was afraid. In
1849, both Savitribai Phule and Jotiba Phule were thrown out of their
home.
After
being thrown out of their home, Savitribai Phule and Jotiba Phule
started school for adults at Usman Sheikh’s Wada in Pune for educating
Shudra and Ati-Shudra community. Savitribai taught at this school along
with the first Muslim woman teacher of India, Fatima Sheikh.
Savitribai
Phule is also said to have inspired a young student to ask for a
library for the school at an award ceremony instead of gifts for
herself. She inspired the young girls to take up painting, writing, and
other activities. An essay written by a young girl, Mukta Salve, at that
time became the face of Dalit literature and Dalit Feminism.
Parent-teacher meeting was conducted at regular intervals to aware the
parents about the importance of education and to encourage their
children to attend the schools regularly.
You
might wonder the Right to Education Act, midday meal schemes are a
modern-day concept but Savitribai Phule and Jotiba Phule set the stage
for it almost 170 years back by giving stipends to children to reduce
the dropout rate in schools. They took initiatives to reduce
malnutrition in children by taking care of the health of each and every
child in school.
By
1851, Savitribai Phule along with her husband was running three schools
with around 150 female students. For her, education was not simply
alphabetical learning, but rather, an evolution of the mind itself. Her
innovative methods of teaching slowly attracted the common people, as
the number of girls increased.
On
16th Nov. 1852, Phule family was honoured by the British government for
their works in the field of education and Savtribai was declared as the
best teacher.
Savitribai
Phule started Mahila Seva Mandal in 1852, which worked for raising
women’s consciousness about their human rights, the dignity of life and
other social issues. She went on to organise a successful barbers strike
in Mumbai and Pune against the prevailing practice of shaving of
widows’ heads.
On
28 January 1853, the first-ever infanticide prohibition home of India
was started by Savitribai Phule. Due to the Brahminical Social Order,
those were the days when women irrespective of their caste and class
were very much oppressed in all fields of life. There were many
patriarchal and Brahminical traditions, values and rituals which were
against women. There were a large number of widows in the Pune City and
the nearby villages during days. Adolescents and young girls happened
to more among in the widows. These widows were boycotted publicly and
with the meagre financial support, they were clandestine subjects to
sexual exploitation.
Savitribai
Phule wrote many poems against discrimination and advised people to get
educated. Savitribai Phule was the first Dalit women, in fact, the
first Indian woman whose poems got noticed in the British empire.
Savitribai Phule was the mother of modern poetry stressing the necessity
of English and education through her poems. “Kavya Phule”- the first
collection of poems was published in 1854. Read a few of her poems from
“Kavyaphule” from here.
In
1855, a night school for agriculturist and labourers was started by
Phule couple. There were many downtrodden people who had no option to go
to regular schools but could themselves available only at night so to
cater their needs Phule couple started the night school.
Phule
couple started orphanage home for the pregnant widows in 1863 so that
they can give birth to their children and live without the fear of
society.
At
a time when even the shadow of untouchables was considered impure when
the people were unwilling to offer water to thirsty untouchables,
Savitribai Phule and Mahatma Jotiba Phule opened the well in their house
for the use of untouchables. It was a challenge thrown at the Brahmins
to change their mindset towards untouchables (But unfortunately, the
sick mindset of so-called upper castes have not changed even after
almost 200 years, Dalit (untouchables) still strive for water rights).
When
Jotiba Phule established the Satya Shodhak Samaj, Savitribai became the
head of the women’s section which included ninety female members.
Moreover, she worked tirelessly as a school teacher for girls. After
Jotiba Phule’s death, she was the chairperson of Satya Shodhak Samaj and
carried his work ahead. Savitribai Phule acted as a Chairperson of
Satya Shodhak Samaj Conference at Saswad in 1893. Its purpose was to
liberate the Shudra and Untouchable castes from exploitation and
oppression.
In
1874, Phule couple adopted the son of Kashibai, a Brahmin widow. When
Infanticide Prohibition Home started by Savitribai Phule working as a
hospital, Savitribai did not remain as one who served to widows but she
went further in this regard. She adopted a child from a Brahmin widow
(Kashibai) and thereby gave a message to the progressive people of the
society. This adopted child was named Yashwant Rao, who later became a
doctor.
During
the 1876 to 1898 famines, Savitribai Phule worked courageously with her
husband and suggested many new ways to overcome the difficult time.
They started distributing free food at many locations. Phule couple
started 52 free food hostels in Maharashtra.
In
July 1889, when Jyotiba Phule suffered a stroke and right side of the
body was paralyzed, Savitribai nursed him night and day hence he managed
to recover and write again.
Savitribai
and her adopted son, Yashwant, opened a clinic to treat those affected
by the bubonic plague when it appeared in the area around Nallasopara in
1897. Savitribai Phule personally took patients to the clinic where her
son served them. While caring for the patients, she contracted the
disease herself. She died from it on 10 March 1897 while serving a
plague patient.
“Savitribai Phule (1831-97), struggled and suffered with her
revolutionary husband in an equal measure, but remains obscured due to
casteist and sexist negligence. Apart from her identity as Jotirao
Phule’s wife, she is little known even in academia. Modern India’s first
woman teacher, a radical exponent of mass and female education, a
champion of women’s liberation, a pioneer of engaged poetry, a
courageous mass leader who took on the forces of caste and patriarchy
certainly had her independent identity and contribution. It is indeed a
measure of the ruthlessness of elite-controlled knowledge-production
that a figure as important as Savitribai Phule fails to find any mention
in the history of modern India. Her life and struggle deserves to be
appreciated by a wider spectrum, and made known to non-Marathi people as
well,” writes Braj Ranjan Mani.
Here we present life-sketch of Savitribai Phule. In case we have
missed any important event from the life of Savitribai Phule or have
made any mistake while recording any event, let us know in the comments
section and we will try to update the timeline. Alternatively, you can
submit further information here. If you like this timeline, share it with your friends!
Savitribai
Jyotirao Phule was born on January 3, 1831 at Naigaon, about 50 km from
Pune. She was the eldest daughter of mother Lakshmi and father Khandoji
Neveshe Patil.
As
was the practice then, at the age of nine, she was married to
twelve-year-old Jyotirao Phule in 1840. Savitribai and Jyotirao had no
children of their own but they adopted Yashavantrao, a son born to a
widowed Brahmin.
Shortly
after the marriage to Jyotiba Phule, education of Savitribai Phule
started. Impressed by her thirst for learning, Savitribai’s husband,
Jyotirao Phule, taught her to read and write. Becoming fond of teaching,
Savitribai trained at Ms Farar’s Institution in Ahmednagar.
Savitribai
Phule along with Sagunabai started school in Maharwada on 1st may 1847,
initially 8-9 girls were enrolled but within year strength reached to
40-45.
Country’s
first school for girls was started at Bhide Wada in Pune. On 1st Jan.
1848, India’s first school for girls was started at Bhide Wada in Pune
by Mahatma Jotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule. The present condition of
that first school for girls is miserable because of the lack of interest
from subsequent governments in preserving the Dalit-Bahujan heritage.
India’s
first school was started at Bhide Wada in Pune by Phule couple,
Savitribai Phule became not only the first woman teacher but Savitribai
was nominated as India’s first lady headmistress in 1st Jan 1848.
Life
of Savitribai Phule as a teacher in the school at the time when upper
caste orthodox people used to look down wasn’t easy and many times they
used to pelt stones and throw dung on her. The young couple faced severe
opposition from almost all sections. Savitribai was subject to intense
harassment every day as she walked to the school. Stones, mud and dirt
were flung at her as she passed but Savitribai Phule faced everything
courageously.
Savitribai
Phule and Jotiba Phule’s work of educating downtrodden and girls
infuriated many Brahmins of that time and because of the fears of
attacks from orthodox Brahmins, Jyotiba Phule’s father was afraid. In
1849, both Savitribai Phule and Jotiba Phule were thrown out of their
home.
After
being thrown out of their home, Savitribai Phule and Jotiba Phule
started school for adults at Usman Sheikh’s Wada in Pune for educating
Shudra and Ati-Shudra community. Savitribai taught at this school along
with the first Muslim woman teacher of India, Fatima Sheikh.
Savitribai
Phule is also said to have inspired a young student to ask for a
library for the school at an award ceremony instead of gifts for
herself. She inspired the young girls to take up painting, writing, and
other activities. An essay written by a young girl, Mukta Salve, at that
time became the face of Dalit literature and Dalit Feminism.
Parent-teacher meeting was conducted at regular intervals to aware the
parents about the importance of education and to encourage their
children to attend the schools regularly.
You
might wonder the Right to Education Act, midday meal schemes are a
modern-day concept but Savitribai Phule and Jotiba Phule set the stage
for it almost 170 years back by giving stipends to children to reduce
the dropout rate in schools. They took initiatives to reduce
malnutrition in children by taking care of the health of each and every
child in school.
By
1851, Savitribai Phule along with her husband was running three schools
with around 150 female students. For her, education was not simply
alphabetical learning, but rather, an evolution of the mind itself. Her
innovative methods of teaching slowly attracted the common people, as
the number of girls increased.
On
16th Nov. 1852, Phule family was honoured by the British government for
their works in the field of education and Savtribai was declared as the
best teacher.
Savitribai
Phule started Mahila Seva Mandal in 1852, which worked for raising
women’s consciousness about their human rights, the dignity of life and
other social issues. She went on to organise a successful barbers strike
in Mumbai and Pune against the prevailing practice of shaving of
widows’ heads.
On
28 January 1853, the first-ever infanticide prohibition home of India
was started by Savitribai Phule. Due to the Brahminical Social Order,
those were the days when women irrespective of their caste and class
were very much oppressed in all fields of life. There were many
patriarchal and Brahminical traditions, values and rituals which were
against women. There were a large number of widows in the Pune City and
the nearby villages during days. Adolescents and young girls happened
to more among in the widows. These widows were boycotted publicly and
with the meagre financial support, they were clandestine subjects to
sexual exploitation.
Savitribai
Phule wrote many poems against discrimination and advised people to get
educated. Savitribai Phule was the first Dalit women, in fact, the
first Indian woman whose poems got noticed in the British empire.
Savitribai Phule was the mother of modern poetry stressing the necessity
of English and education through her poems. “Kavya Phule”- the first
collection of poems was published in 1854. Read a few of her poems from
“Kavyaphule” from here.
In
1855, a night school for agriculturist and labourers was started by
Phule couple. There were many downtrodden people who had no option to go
to regular schools but could themselves available only at night so to
cater their needs Phule couple started the night school.
Phule
couple started orphanage home for the pregnant widows in 1863 so that
they can give birth to their children and live without the fear of
society.
At
a time when even the shadow of untouchables was considered impure when
the people were unwilling to offer water to thirsty untouchables,
Savitribai Phule and Mahatma Jotiba Phule opened the well in their house
for the use of untouchables. It was a challenge thrown at the Brahmins
to change their mindset towards untouchables (But unfortunately, the
sick mindset of so-called upper castes have not changed even after
almost 200 years, Dalit (untouchables) still strive for water rights).
When
Jotiba Phule established the Satya Shodhak Samaj, Savitribai became the
head of the women’s section which included ninety female members.
Moreover, she worked tirelessly as a school teacher for girls. After
Jotiba Phule’s death, she was the chairperson of Satya Shodhak Samaj and
carried his work ahead. Savitribai Phule acted as a Chairperson of
Satya Shodhak Samaj Conference at Saswad in 1893. Its purpose was to
liberate the Shudra and Untouchable castes from exploitation and
oppression.
In
1874, Phule couple adopted the son of Kashibai, a Brahmin widow. When
Infanticide Prohibition Home started by Savitribai Phule working as a
hospital, Savitribai did not remain as one who served to widows but she
went further in this regard. She adopted a child from a Brahmin widow
(Kashibai) and thereby gave a message to the progressive people of the
society. This adopted child was named Yashwant Rao, who later became a
doctor.
During
the 1876 to 1898 famines, Savitribai Phule worked courageously with her
husband and suggested many new ways to overcome the difficult time.
They started distributing free food at many locations. Phule couple
started 52 free food hostels in Maharashtra.
In
July 1889, when Jyotiba Phule suffered a stroke and right side of the
body was paralyzed, Savitribai nursed him night and day hence he managed
to recover and write again.
Savitribai
and her adopted son, Yashwant, opened a clinic to treat those affected
by the bubonic plague when it appeared in the area around Nallasopara in
1897. Savitribai Phule personally took patients to the clinic where her
son served them. While caring for the patients, she contracted the
disease herself. She died from it on 10 March 1897 while serving a
plague patient.