Maharashtra’s former
inspector general of police SM Mushrif on Tuesday accused the
Intelligence Bureau (IB) of being hand-in-glove with right-wing
extremists, and called for a ban on the RSS describing it as India’s
No.1 terror organisation.

At the launch of the Bengali
version of his book “RSS - Country’s Greatest Terror Organisation”,
Mushrif also termed the ongoing JNU controversy as a manifestation of
the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’s (RSS) attempt to turn India into a
Hindu nation.

“The IB has been and
continues to be the most powerful organisation in the country and
irrespective of which political party is in power at the centre, it
continues to operate the way it wants.

“Whatever the IB says or does
is considered the truth and its claims or acts are never questioned or
verified,” said Mushrif, indicting the agency for colluding with the RSS
and its subsidiaries for the killing of anti-terror squad chief Hemant
Karkare, who was probing the involvement of Hindu radicals in terror
acts.

Karkare was killed during the 2008 Mumbai terror attack.

“No other terror organisation
has used RDX like the RSS has. At least 18 chargesheets have been filed
against the RSS and its subsidiaries like Abhinav Bharat and Bajrang
Dal in terror cases.

“The RSS should be immediately banned for being the country’s No.1 terror organisation,” said Mushrif.

Condemning the Jawaharlal Nehru University row, Mushrif expressed alarm over rising right-wing extremism.

“This is only a manifestation
of the RSS’s bid to establish the Aryavart Hindu Rashtra based on the
tenets of Smritis and Vedas. Its time the entire country stood up
against this rise of extremism,” said the author of “Who Killed Karkare?
: The Real Face of Terrorism in India”.

Referring to BJP and RSS,
Ms mayawati said they are only interested in “communal issues like
‘ghar wapsi’ and ‘love jehad’ but atrocities on SC/STs and backwards
never perturb them.” Bhagwat had remarked that as reservation has been
used as a political tool, there was a need to review the reservation
policy. Bhagwat’s remarks came amid the continuing Patel quota stir in
Gujarat. He said though “interest groups” do get formed in democracy,
aspirations
of one section should not be met at the cost of others. In an interview
to Sangh organs ‘Organiser’ and ‘Panchjanya’, the RSS chief had pitched
for constitution of a committee with representatives from the civil
society to go into the issue.

Mohan Bagawat is a dropout
and not a Constitutional expert. He wants all the top administrative
posts in service sector under brahmins to continue. Reservation in
promotions dilutes this system where SC/ST/OBCs also occupy these
posts.Infact there must be a collegate system in the top administrative
posts such as CJI, CEC etc., representing SC/STs/OBCs/Minorities and
poor upper castes for protecting justice for sarvajan Samaj. Not only in
service
sector even in trade, business and all other sectors there must be
reservation for equal distribution of wealth as enshrined in our modern
constitution for Sarvajan Hitay Sarvajan Sukhaya i.e., for the welfare,
happiness and peace of all societies.

This is the main step towards their revival of mausmriti which they wanted to rewrite to their taste.

The Modi (Murderer of democratic institutions) came under bitter
criticism following the 2002 Gujarat riots that betrayed the prevailing
communal harmony within the state. Investigations were ordered into
alleged abatement of crime. Modi’s image suffered a quake as a common
consensus was established that pointed fingers at the chief minister for
allowing communal violence in the state. Some demanded his prosecution
for promoting enmity among
different communities during the riots. His way of functioning has also
been the topic of much debate in the political arena with commentators
and subject-matter experts lambasting him for carrying the DNA of
fascist leadership. His critics call him a self-centered autocrat who
doesn’t care a hoot about the BJP. The Gujarat chief minister
findshimself in the bad books of analysts as he is also accused of
twisting facts to suit political motives on more than one occasion.

Modi belonged to the caste of
Gandhi. But he claims that he is a backward caste and availed
reservation benefits. He never mentioned that he was married while he
contested in Gujarat. The EC did not take any action on this.